Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings
The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of...
Saved in:
Published in | Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) Vol. 14; no. 46; p. 237 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.10.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission.
To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients).
Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus.
Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs.
Small number of subjects recruited.
The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission.BACKGROUNDThe relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission.To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients).OBJECTIVESTo collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients).Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus.METHODSAdults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus.Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs.RESULTSForty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs.Small number of subjects recruited.LIMITATIONSmall number of subjects recruited.The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.CONCLUSIONSThe finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally. The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally. |
Author | Curran, M Nguyen-Van-Tam, JS Nicholson, KG Cauchemez, S Hayward, A Read, RC Lim, WS Greatorex, J Enstone, JE Killingley, B |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: B surname: Killingley fullname: Killingley, B organization: Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: J surname: Greatorex fullname: Greatorex, J – sequence: 3 givenname: S surname: Cauchemez fullname: Cauchemez, S – sequence: 4 givenname: JE surname: Enstone fullname: Enstone, JE – sequence: 5 givenname: M surname: Curran fullname: Curran, M – sequence: 6 givenname: RC surname: Read fullname: Read, RC – sequence: 7 givenname: WS surname: Lim fullname: Lim, WS – sequence: 8 givenname: A surname: Hayward fullname: Hayward, A – sequence: 9 givenname: KG surname: Nicholson fullname: Nicholson, KG – sequence: 10 givenname: JS surname: Nguyen-Van-Tam fullname: Nguyen-Van-Tam, JS |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpt0M9LwzAUB_AgE_dDT94lNxWpJmmTNt7GUCcMvajXkjavLtImtWkH-tfbss2DeHrw-Lwvj-8UjayzgNApJddhSMnNulU0igQJSHSAJoxEIogki0ZoQkMhAs7iZIym3n8QElHB6REaMyJZKGg4Qes303Qe-zVobew7VlZjsBvTOFuBbVWJNdTOm9Y4i12BrdtAief4Ykmf6CWuew-VybGxRdmB_VZ4MwTe9osWGlPhwtgh2B-jw0KVHk52c4Ze7-9eFstg9fzwuJivgjxkvA2A6yKGkBGqiNJEZZkUJMkFz4SWkkORK5Ayj7NYyYwVSsSUAGjGhVCZECScofNtbt24zw58m1bG51CWyoLrfBpzkTAWx0kvz3ayyyrQad2_q5qvdF9OD662IG-c9w0Uv4SSdKg-3VefkqjX9I_OTauG3tpGmfLfmx8JZoeL |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_vec_12179 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infpip_2020_100079 crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12390 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infpip_2020_100098 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0027932 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1473_3099_18_30786_2 crossref_primary_10_3310_hta19160 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2011_09_006 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_65774 crossref_primary_10_1097_INF_0b013e31825c7304 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_00210_19 crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12216 crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12095 crossref_primary_10_4094_jkachn_2011_17_1_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules25214878 crossref_primary_10_1128_JVI_03101_13 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0051653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2015_02_025 crossref_primary_10_1128_JCM_00930_18 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268816001850 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_05709_11 crossref_primary_10_1017_ice_2025_11 crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12080 crossref_primary_10_22207_JPAM_13_2_42 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2015_08_027 crossref_primary_10_1080_07448481_2012_724744 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2016_12_003 crossref_primary_10_1093_infdis_jir701 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0056278 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.3310/hta14460-04 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2046-4924 |
ExternalDocumentID | 20923613 10_3310_hta14460_04 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: G0600719 – fundername: Department of Health grantid: 09/85/01 – fundername: Department of Health grantid: 09/85/99 – fundername: Department of Health grantid: HTA/09/85/01 – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: G0800453 |
GroupedDBID | --- 53G 5GY AAYXX ADBBV ADDVE AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION CZQ DIK EBS EJD F5P GROUPED_DOAJ OK1 P2P P6G TR2 W2D CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603 |
ISSN | 1366-5278 2046-4924 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:19:41 EDT 2025 Sat May 31 02:12:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:47:52 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:49 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 46 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2001960 |
PMID | 20923613 |
PQID | 756822778 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_756822778 pubmed_primary_20923613 crossref_primary_10_3310_hta14460_04 crossref_citationtrail_10_3310_hta14460_04 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2010-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2010 text: 2010-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Health Technol Assess |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
SSID | ssj0041651 |
Score | 2.1097755 |
Snippet | The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 237 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aerosols Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use Child Child, Preschool Confidence Intervals Data Collection Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control Environmental Microbiology Female Fluorescent Antibody Technique Fomites Global Health Humans Infant Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype Influenza, Human - epidemiology Influenza, Human - prevention & control Influenza, Human - transmission Male Polymerase Chain Reaction Prospective Studies Risk Assessment Statistics as Topic Time Factors Viral Load Virus Shedding Young Adult |
Title | Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923613 https://www.proquest.com/docview/756822778 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1da9swFBWhg7GXse9lH0UPfdgW3Dm2JUd7K6Vb2Ghh0G5lL0ayZRJYnZLYZfRn7BfvXn3FKRl0ezHB2ErIOUjnHt17RcherWBdyXgS1ZOSRVkpdCQTCFx1ylSSVWi7Ye3w8QmfnmWfz9n5YPC7l7XUtWq_vN5aV_I_qMI9wBWrZP8B2TAo3IDPgC9cAWG43grjb_NltxqtZrqqfK1hr3ANt1-0T8oyCRuLKw2AoKicjk_GaAhcooeM6fFze1jJtRxd4aBoFGAnieX8YmS2tb2f7nSsq15qgzE_kqHFJ47_fd64k7jMZGtPCum5Dl_mphe4M8zDts8nawLoXxsbVoeyg8EurNcdxOtRg7q13y7UmReYCBJ788LOtynnEAvbU3z2tbmXQMgeZcKWVodJOuuR0ZqWNyf_FJQqIDZrJca4mLS6XuP8vv6NpS8kJEIohK8X_uUCW8zeSSD0MAkAP7761R30K3O1fPaH25pPfPl975s3Vc5fQhcjYU4fkPsu9qAHlkgPyUA3j8jdY5dd8ZjMDJ-o5xMFyOgGn-iaT3RRU8MnekDfIJveUs8lGrhEDZc-UMck6pn0hJx9PDo9nEbuJI6oTBPWRppVda5TQFDGsoqlUhD4TkrOFK-EYLoupRaizFUuhUpqyUG3gvgCOc2l4jxOn5KdBijxnFCtYE1JRFzrRGUTqSUv80qzOssyUY_zckje-X-uKF2bejwt5WexBaMh2QsPX9ruLNsfox6CAmZP3BKTjV50qyJnHBRynk-G5JmFJoyTxAIbE6UvbvcdL8m9NcFfkZ122enXoFdbtWsItGvcnj-DtphH |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virus+shedding+and+environmental+deposition+of+novel+A+%28H1N1%29+pandemic+influenza+virus%3A+interim+findings&rft.jtitle=Health+technology+assessment+%28Winchester%2C+England%29&rft.au=Killingley%2C+B&rft.au=Greatorex%2C+J&rft.au=Cauchemez%2C+S&rft.au=Enstone%2C+JE&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.issn=1366-5278&rft.eissn=2046-4924&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.3310%2Fhta14460-04&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3310_hta14460_04 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon |