Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings

The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England) Vol. 14; no. 46; p. 237
Main Authors Killingley, B, Greatorex, J, Cauchemez, S, Enstone, JE, Curran, M, Read, RC, Lim, WS, Hayward, A, Nicholson, KG, Nguyen-Van-Tam, JS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.10.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.
AbstractList The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission.BACKGROUNDThe relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission.To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients).OBJECTIVESTo collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients).Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus.METHODSAdults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus.Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs.RESULTSForty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs.Small number of subjects recruited.LIMITATIONSmall number of subjects recruited.The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.CONCLUSIONSThe finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.
The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent transmission, remains poorly understood. Current evidence suggests that infectious virus is not typically released from adults after 5 days of illness, however, little is known about the extent to which virus is deposited by infected individuals into the environment and whether deposited virus has the ability to infect new hosts. Further information about the deposition of viable influenza virus in the immediate vicinity of patients with pandemic influenza is fundamental to our understanding of the routes and mechanisms of transmission. To collect data on patients infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (swine flu). Primary objectives were to correlate the amount of virus detected in a patient's nose with that recovered from his/her immediate environment, and with symptom duration and severity. Secondary objectives were to describe virus shedding and duration according to major patient characteristics: adults versus children, and those with mild illness (community patients) versus those with more severe disease (hospitalised patients). Adults and children, both in hospital and from the community, who had symptoms of pandemic H1N1 infection, were enrolled and visited every day during follow-up for a maximum of 12 days. Symptom data was collected and samples were taken, including nose swabs and swabs from surfaces and objects around patients. Samples of air were obtained using validated sampling equipment. The samples were tested for the presence of pandemic H1N1 virus, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect virus genome and an immunofluorescence technique to detect viable virus. Forty-three subjects were followed up, and 19 of them were subsequently proven to be infected with pandemic H1N1 virus. The median duration of virus shedding from the 19 infected cases was 6 days when detection was performed by PCR, and 3 days when detection was performed by a culture technique. Over 30% of cases remained potentially infectious for at least 5 days. Only 0.5% of all community and none of the hospital swabs taken revealed virus on surfaces. Five subjects had samples of the air around them collected and virus was detected by PCR from four; some of the air particles in which virus was detected were small enough to be inhaled and deposited deep in the lungs. Small number of subjects recruited. The finding that over 30% of infected individuals have infectious virus in their noses for 5 days or more has infection control implications. The data suggest that contact transmission of pandemic influenza via fomites may be less important than previously thought, but transmission via bioaerosols at short range may be possible, meaning that high-level personal protective equipment may be needed by health-care workers when attending patients with pandemic influenza. Further work is being undertaken to consolidate these findings, as they have important potential implications for the protection of health-care workers and the formulation of advice to households, nationally and internationally.
Author Curran, M
Nguyen-Van-Tam, JS
Nicholson, KG
Cauchemez, S
Hayward, A
Read, RC
Lim, WS
Greatorex, J
Enstone, JE
Killingley, B
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: B
  surname: Killingley
  fullname: Killingley, B
  organization: Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J
  surname: Greatorex
  fullname: Greatorex, J
– sequence: 3
  givenname: S
  surname: Cauchemez
  fullname: Cauchemez, S
– sequence: 4
  givenname: JE
  surname: Enstone
  fullname: Enstone, JE
– sequence: 5
  givenname: M
  surname: Curran
  fullname: Curran, M
– sequence: 6
  givenname: RC
  surname: Read
  fullname: Read, RC
– sequence: 7
  givenname: WS
  surname: Lim
  fullname: Lim, WS
– sequence: 8
  givenname: A
  surname: Hayward
  fullname: Hayward, A
– sequence: 9
  givenname: KG
  surname: Nicholson
  fullname: Nicholson, KG
– sequence: 10
  givenname: JS
  surname: Nguyen-Van-Tam
  fullname: Nguyen-Van-Tam, JS
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpt0M9LwzAUB_AgE_dDT94lNxWpJmmTNt7GUCcMvajXkjavLtImtWkH-tfbss2DeHrw-Lwvj-8UjayzgNApJddhSMnNulU0igQJSHSAJoxEIogki0ZoQkMhAs7iZIym3n8QElHB6REaMyJZKGg4Qes303Qe-zVobew7VlZjsBvTOFuBbVWJNdTOm9Y4i12BrdtAief4Ykmf6CWuew-VybGxRdmB_VZ4MwTe9osWGlPhwtgh2B-jw0KVHk52c4Ze7-9eFstg9fzwuJivgjxkvA2A6yKGkBGqiNJEZZkUJMkFz4SWkkORK5Ayj7NYyYwVSsSUAGjGhVCZECScofNtbt24zw58m1bG51CWyoLrfBpzkTAWx0kvz3ayyyrQad2_q5qvdF9OD662IG-c9w0Uv4SSdKg-3VefkqjX9I_OTauG3tpGmfLfmx8JZoeL
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_vec_12179
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infpip_2020_100079
crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12390
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infpip_2020_100098
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0027932
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1473_3099_18_30786_2
crossref_primary_10_3310_hta19160
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2011_09_006
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_65774
crossref_primary_10_1097_INF_0b013e31825c7304
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_00210_19
crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12216
crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12095
crossref_primary_10_4094_jkachn_2011_17_1_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules25214878
crossref_primary_10_1128_JVI_03101_13
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0051653
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2015_02_025
crossref_primary_10_1128_JCM_00930_18
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268816001850
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_05709_11
crossref_primary_10_1017_ice_2025_11
crossref_primary_10_1111_irv_12080
crossref_primary_10_22207_JPAM_13_2_42
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2015_08_027
crossref_primary_10_1080_07448481_2012_724744
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2016_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1093_infdis_jir701
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0056278
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.3310/hta14460-04
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2046-4924
ExternalDocumentID 20923613
10_3310_hta14460_04
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: G0600719
– fundername: Department of Health
  grantid: 09/85/01
– fundername: Department of Health
  grantid: 09/85/99
– fundername: Department of Health
  grantid: HTA/09/85/01
– fundername: Medical Research Council
  grantid: G0800453
GroupedDBID ---
53G
5GY
AAYXX
ADBBV
ADDVE
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
CZQ
DIK
EBS
EJD
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
OK1
P2P
P6G
TR2
W2D
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603
ISSN 1366-5278
2046-4924
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:19:41 EDT 2025
Sat May 31 02:12:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:47:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:49 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 46
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c325t-e5df7e3201a0ad0abb9608c65b6d995efcae99c7b7a9b2fa6710eed2566ab6603
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2001960
PMID 20923613
PQID 756822778
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_756822778
pubmed_primary_20923613
crossref_primary_10_3310_hta14460_04
crossref_citationtrail_10_3310_hta14460_04
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
PublicationTitleAlternate Health Technol Assess
PublicationYear 2010
SSID ssj0041651
Score 2.1097755
Snippet The relative importance of different routes of influenza transmission, including the role of bioaerosols, and ability of masks and/or hand hygiene to prevent...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 237
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aerosols
Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
Child
Child, Preschool
Confidence Intervals
Data Collection
Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control
Environmental Microbiology
Female
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Fomites
Global Health
Humans
Infant
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype
Influenza, Human - epidemiology
Influenza, Human - prevention & control
Influenza, Human - transmission
Male
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Statistics as Topic
Time Factors
Viral Load
Virus Shedding
Young Adult
Title Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923613
https://www.proquest.com/docview/756822778
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1da9swFBWhg7GXse9lH0UPfdgW3Dm2JUd7K6Vb2Ghh0G5lL0ayZRJYnZLYZfRn7BfvXn3FKRl0ezHB2ErIOUjnHt17RcherWBdyXgS1ZOSRVkpdCQTCFx1ylSSVWi7Ye3w8QmfnmWfz9n5YPC7l7XUtWq_vN5aV_I_qMI9wBWrZP8B2TAo3IDPgC9cAWG43grjb_NltxqtZrqqfK1hr3ANt1-0T8oyCRuLKw2AoKicjk_GaAhcooeM6fFze1jJtRxd4aBoFGAnieX8YmS2tb2f7nSsq15qgzE_kqHFJ47_fd64k7jMZGtPCum5Dl_mphe4M8zDts8nawLoXxsbVoeyg8EurNcdxOtRg7q13y7UmReYCBJ788LOtynnEAvbU3z2tbmXQMgeZcKWVodJOuuR0ZqWNyf_FJQqIDZrJca4mLS6XuP8vv6NpS8kJEIohK8X_uUCW8zeSSD0MAkAP7761R30K3O1fPaH25pPfPl975s3Vc5fQhcjYU4fkPsu9qAHlkgPyUA3j8jdY5dd8ZjMDJ-o5xMFyOgGn-iaT3RRU8MnekDfIJveUs8lGrhEDZc-UMck6pn0hJx9PDo9nEbuJI6oTBPWRppVda5TQFDGsoqlUhD4TkrOFK-EYLoupRaizFUuhUpqyUG3gvgCOc2l4jxOn5KdBijxnFCtYE1JRFzrRGUTqSUv80qzOssyUY_zckje-X-uKF2bejwt5WexBaMh2QsPX9ruLNsfox6CAmZP3BKTjV50qyJnHBRynk-G5JmFJoyTxAIbE6UvbvcdL8m9NcFfkZ122enXoFdbtWsItGvcnj-DtphH
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virus+shedding+and+environmental+deposition+of+novel+A+%28H1N1%29+pandemic+influenza+virus%3A+interim+findings&rft.jtitle=Health+technology+assessment+%28Winchester%2C+England%29&rft.au=Killingley%2C+B&rft.au=Greatorex%2C+J&rft.au=Cauchemez%2C+S&rft.au=Enstone%2C+JE&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.issn=1366-5278&rft.eissn=2046-4924&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.3310%2Fhta14460-04&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3310_hta14460_04
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1366-5278&client=summon