Early immune outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study

We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 62 patients with T(1)N(0)M(0) staged RCC were randomized to either retro-laparoscopic (n = 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian Urological Association journal Vol. 6; no. 6; p. E242
Main Authors Lu, Yang, Tianyong, Fan, Qiang, Wei, Xiaobo, Cui, Siyuan, Bu, Ping, Han
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada Canadian Urological Association 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 62 patients with T(1)N(0)M(0) staged RCC were randomized to either retro-laparoscopic (n = 31) or open (n = 31) radical nephrectomy. Plasma levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured separately by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 5. Levels of CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) as well as the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio were acquired by flow cytometry at the same time points. Levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α increased significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups (p < 0.05) on postoperative day 1, and all the parameters in the open group were significantly higher than those in the retro-laparoscopy group (p < 0.05). On postoperative day 1, the levels of CD3(+) and CD4(+) and the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio decreased markedly compared to preoperative values for both groups (p < 0.05). Elevations of the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group (p < 0.05) and the CD8(+) level in the open group (p < 0.05) were observed when compared with the other group. On postoperative day 5, the levels of CD3(+) and CD4(+) and the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group, as well as the level of CD8(+) in the open group, returned to about preoperative levels (p < 0.05). Follow-up ranged from 4 to 14 months postoperatively in all 62 patients with a 100% cancer-specific survival rate in both groups. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is associated with the milder cytokine responses caused by trauma and inflammation and the better preserved distribution of T-lymphocytes.
AbstractList Objectives: We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: A total of 62 patients with T.sub.1 N.sub.0 M.sub.0 staged RCC were randomized to either retro-laparoscopic (n = 31) or open (n = 31) radical nephrectomy. Plasma levels of interleukin-1[beta] (IL-1[beta]), IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-[alpha]) were measured separately by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 5. Levels of CD3.sup.+ , CD4.sup.+ and CD8.sup.+ as well as the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio were acquired by flow cytometry at the same time points. Results: Levels of IL-1[beta], IL-6 and TNF-[alpha] increased significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups (p [less than] 0.05) on postoperative day 1, and all the parameters in the open group were significantly higher than those in the retro-laparoscopy group (p [less than] 0.05). On postoperative day 1, the levels of CD3.sup.+ and CD4.sup.+ and the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio decreased markedly compared to preoperative values for both groups (p [less than] 0.05). Elevations of the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group (p [less than] 0.05) and the CD8.sup.+ level in the open group (p [less than] 0.05) were observed when compared with the other group. On postoperative day 5, the levels of CD3.sup.+ and CD4.sup.+ and the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group, as well as the level of CD8.sup.+ in the open group, returned to about preoperative levels (p [less than] 0.05). Follow-up ranged from 4 to 14 months postoperatively in all 62 patients with a 100% cancer-specific survival rate in both groups. Conclusions: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is associated with the milder cytokine responses caused by trauma and inflammation and the better preserved distribution of T-lymphocytes.
We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 62 patients with T.sub.1 N.sub.0 M.sub.0 staged RCC were randomized to either retro-laparoscopic (n = 31) or open (n = 31) radical nephrectomy. Plasma levels of interleukin-1[beta] (IL-1[beta]), IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-[alpha]) were measured separately by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 5. Levels of CD3.sup.+ , CD4.sup.+ and CD8.sup.+ as well as the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio were acquired by flow cytometry at the same time points. Levels of IL-1[beta], IL-6 and TNF-[alpha] increased significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups (p [less than] 0.05) on postoperative day 1, and all the parameters in the open group were significantly higher than those in the retro-laparoscopy group (p [less than] 0.05). On postoperative day 1, the levels of CD3.sup.+ and CD4.sup.+ and the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio decreased markedly compared to preoperative values for both groups (p [less than] 0.05). Elevations of the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group (p [less than] 0.05) and the CD8.sup.+ level in the open group (p [less than] 0.05) were observed when compared with the other group. On postoperative day 5, the levels of CD3.sup.+ and CD4.sup.+ and the CD4.sup.+ :CD8.sup.+ ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group, as well as the level of CD8.sup.+ in the open group, returned to about preoperative levels (p [less than] 0.05). Follow-up ranged from 4 to 14 months postoperatively in all 62 patients with a 100% cancer-specific survival rate in both groups. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is associated with the milder cytokine responses caused by trauma and inflammation and the better preserved distribution of T-lymphocytes.
Objectives: We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic andconventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal cellcarcinoma (RCC).Methods: A total of 62 patients with T1N0M0 staged RCC were randomized to either retro-laparoscopic (n = 31) or open (n = 31) radical nephrectomy. Plasma levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, andtumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured separately by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 5. Levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ as well as the CD4+:CD8+ ratio were acquired by flow cytometry at the same time points.Results: Levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α increased significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups (p < 0.05) on postoperative day 1, and all the parameters in the open group were significantly higher than those in the retro-laparoscopy group (p < 0.05). On postoperative day 1, the levels of CD3+ and CD4+ and the CD4+:CD8+ ratio decreased markedly compared to preoperative values for both groups (p < 0.05). Elevations of the CD4+:CD8+ ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group (p < 0.05) and the CD8+ level in the open group (p < 0.05) were observed when compared with the other group. On postoperative day 5, the levels of CD3+ and CD4+ and the CD4+:CD8+ ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group, as well as the level of CD8+ in the open group, returned to about preoperative levels (p < 0.05). Follow-up ranged from 4 to14 months postoperatively in all 62 patients with a 100% cancer specific survival rate in both groups.Conclusions: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is associated with the milder cytokine responses caused by trauma and inflammation and the better preserved distribution ofT-lymphocytes.
We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 62 patients with T(1)N(0)M(0) staged RCC were randomized to either retro-laparoscopic (n = 31) or open (n = 31) radical nephrectomy. Plasma levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured separately by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 5. Levels of CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) as well as the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio were acquired by flow cytometry at the same time points. Levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α increased significantly compared to preoperative values in both groups (p < 0.05) on postoperative day 1, and all the parameters in the open group were significantly higher than those in the retro-laparoscopy group (p < 0.05). On postoperative day 1, the levels of CD3(+) and CD4(+) and the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio decreased markedly compared to preoperative values for both groups (p < 0.05). Elevations of the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group (p < 0.05) and the CD8(+) level in the open group (p < 0.05) were observed when compared with the other group. On postoperative day 5, the levels of CD3(+) and CD4(+) and the CD4(+):CD8(+) ratio in the retro-laparoscopy group, as well as the level of CD8(+) in the open group, returned to about preoperative levels (p < 0.05). Follow-up ranged from 4 to 14 months postoperatively in all 62 patients with a 100% cancer-specific survival rate in both groups. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is associated with the milder cytokine responses caused by trauma and inflammation and the better preserved distribution of T-lymphocytes.
Audience Academic
Author Qiang, Wei
Xiaobo, Cui
Lu, Yang
Ping, Han
Tianyong, Fan
Siyuan, Bu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yang
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Yang
  organization: Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Fan
  surname: Tianyong
  fullname: Tianyong, Fan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Wei
  surname: Qiang
  fullname: Qiang, Wei
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Cui
  surname: Xiaobo
  fullname: Xiaobo, Cui
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Bu
  surname: Siyuan
  fullname: Siyuan, Bu
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Han
  surname: Ping
  fullname: Ping, Han
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22060731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkm9r1EAQxhep2D8KfgIJCkXBnPsnl1x8V0rVQtEX6uswmUx6W7LZdHcjXj-DH9o5T6UHZWF3eeY3z8LscywORj-SEM-VXCyLVf0OZ7hZKF08Ekeq1jJXWhUH27tSeVlU8lAcx3gjZclK9UQcai1LWRl1JH5dQBg2mXVuHinzc0Lv-OyzQCn4iYJN_BQM2QATBB_RTxazAJ1FFkea1oEwebfJeh-ywbNq76jj9pHrSANvENCO3sH7DLKJPSbusD_oLduMnXd_-JjmbvNUPO5hiPTs73kivn-4-Hb-Kb_68vHy_OwqR6OLlGu5Aiq7qizbTnbGqKqUWGssCRSX6p5aLNVqWWhY9i0sK-oloMIWCwKizpyIVzvfaxiosWPvUwB0NmJzZpSptDF1xdTLByic7G1zH1o8APHqyFnk0fWW9T3XN3sNzCT6ma5hjrG5_Pp5nz29x675G9I6-mFO1o9xH3y9A5HHGwP1zRSsg7BplGy2CWm2CWk4IYy-2KHT3Drq_oP_ImF-AzSYuTI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2015_09_084
crossref_primary_10_1186_1477_7819_12_179
crossref_primary_10_1177_2058739219863288
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2012 Canadian Urological Association
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2012 Canadian Urological Association
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
ISN
DOI 10.5489/cuaj.124
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
Gale In Context: Canada
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList




CrossRef
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1920-1214
ExternalDocumentID A313723397
10_5489_cuaj_124
22060731
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID 29B
2WC
53G
6PF
AAWTL
ABDBF
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EJD
ESX
F5P
HYE
IAO
ICQ
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ISN
ITC
KWQ
NPM
OK1
PV9
RPM
RZL
TR2
AAYXX
CITATION
ABPTK
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-208ae6d766bd0d331760c92c6ea108a9febc618542a5fba57ef0ac1cbc4eaeed3
ISSN 1911-6470
IngestDate Thu Feb 22 23:36:22 EST 2024
Tue Dec 12 21:19:07 EST 2023
Fri Feb 02 04:08:19 EST 2024
Thu Aug 01 20:28:22 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 20 22:12:19 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 02:40:41 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:50:25 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c324t-208ae6d766bd0d331760c92c6ea108a9febc618542a5fba57ef0ac1cbc4eaeed3
PMID 22060731
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs gale_infotracmisc_A313723397
gale_infotraccpiq_313723397
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A313723397
gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A313723397
gale_healthsolutions_A313723397
crossref_primary_10_5489_cuaj_124
pubmed_primary_22060731
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-Dec
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-Dec
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
PublicationTitle Canadian Urological Association journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Can Urol Assoc J
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Canadian Urological Association
Publisher_xml – name: Canadian Urological Association
References 17287172 - Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007 Feb;6(1):81-6
15791361 - Surg Endosc. 2004 Oct;18(10):1411-9
8916880 - Ann Surg. 1996 Nov;224(5):647-64
9240130 - Br J Surg. 1997 Jul;84(7):920-35
9678378 - Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jul;41(7):901-9
10566539 - Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Nov;42(11):1480-6
18265990 - World J Urol. 2008 Apr;26(2):127-33
19916010 - World J Urol. 2010 Jun;28(3):289-93
20922542 - Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jan;26(1):53-9
18811573 - J Endourol. 2008 Sep;22(9):2161-4
16364716 - Surgery. 2006 Jan;139(1):39-45
10805546 - Dig Surg. 1999;16(6):471-7
10064753 - Surg Endosc. 1999 Mar;13(3):233-5
18342166 - Urology. 2008 Mar;71(3):372-8
15532785 - Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Nov-Dec;51(60):1595-9
18392834 - World J Urol. 2008 Apr;26(2):115-25
15996197 - Clin Exp Immunol. 2005 Aug;141(2):326-32
16283854 - J Endourol. 2005 Nov;19(9):1140-5
17786453 - World J Urol. 2007 Dec;25(6):619-26
15136930 - Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1022-8
1830346 - J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2):278-82
15191862 - Am J Surg. 2004 Jun;187(6):705-12
10069630 - Eur J Surg. 1999 Jan;165(1):21-8
19020880 - World J Urol. 2009 Feb;27(1):81-8
10437613 - Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999 Jun;384(3):250-8
15608426 - Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;62:161-72
9527054 - Ann Surg. 1998 Mar;227(3):326-34
7726672 - Ann Surg. 1995 Apr;221(4):372-80
8661626 - World J Surg. 1996 Jun;20(5):528-33; discussion 533-4
15212338 - Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004 Sep;18(3):439-54
12103285 - Lancet. 2002 Jun 29;359(9325):2224-9
15017197 - J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1456-60
18639228 - Am J Surg. 2009 Feb;197(2):238-45
References_xml
SSID ssj0061917
Score 1.9468817
Snippet We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomies for...
Objectives: We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic andconventional open radical...
Objectives: We evaluated differences in cytokine responses and T-lymphocyte subsets following retroperitoneal laparoscopic and conventional open radical...
SourceID gale
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage E242
SubjectTerms Carcinoma, Renal cell
Care and treatment
Nephrectomy
Patient outcomes
Title Early immune outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22060731
Volume 6
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWIiEuiDfbFjAIiQMEEidxdrlV0KoFtRKiK_YWOY6DIrHJdptc-huQ-MvM2E7irEACLtEqduI483ke3pkvhLzAujyWK-HlseIQoIS-N2eB9GaFH-UyDn0_w0Lh0zN-vIg-LuPlZPLTyVpqm-yNvPptXcn_SBXOgVyxSvYfJNvfFE7Ab5AvHEHCcPwrGRt24hJLPCD0bxsYQ28BbFSDe-wQ99cVEgd_B4uIrJX1GgmbhflrplIoR9nUK5Ozqa1aeaWwnAVdVNzSR-JqWVb1SpiiaFC3XWkmygbsXF6v9DUDTe027cFi0-tXBwuv3AliQlCrjYGwhlQnBoOesgnDRwOGP5d2h_urKrtzy1LUmdnzbUt3HyNgTk6IUb2gdj0emc-IdLqZOxB09ewhM5xc2wYA4i_kT5WtABtgirMdHKxXGgiM-Rw0WzCYwD4xsWu6Rq6zZB5jNP_h5FNn2jkGtzpNwT6qYTPGQd92QyK7tL3JyNWxBn8Uu2gf5vw2uWWDD3pgkHSHTFR1l9w4tekV98gPDShqAEUtoGhd0C1AURdQ1AKKOoCiACjaA4pqQFEEFO0B9Y4K6sDpNR3ARDWY7pPF0eH5-2PPfq7Dk-CVN7AyZ0LxPOE8y_08BMeU-3LOJFcigKZ5oTLJwT2MmIiLTMSJKnwhA5nJSAlw1cIHZKeCWTwilIehyCI1i4SCkEOCF6t4kihfzmJQOXk0Jc-6N5uuDStLCtEsCiJFQaQgiCl5iq88NfXE_XJPD8IgTFgIfviUPNc9kAalwjyrb6K9vExPvpyNOr20nYq62QgpbNkKPCgyp4167o16ynV5kTqt-6NW0OJydPFDg4x-Ph2Kdv_YskduDgtpn-w0m1Y9Bhe5yZ5o2P4C9CXCbw
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27957,27958
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early+immune+outcome+of+retroperitoneal+laparoscopic+radical+nephrectomy+for+localized+renal+cell+carcinoma%3A+a+prospective%2C+randomized+study&rft.jtitle=Canadian+Urological+Association+journal&rft.au=Lu%2C+Yang&rft.au=Tianyong%2C+Fan&rft.au=Qiang%2C+Wei&rft.au=Xiaobo%2C+Cui&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.issn=1911-6470&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=E242&rft_id=info:doi/10.5489%2Fcuaj.124&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22060731&rft.externalDocID=22060731
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1911-6470&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1911-6470&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1911-6470&client=summon