An ICU Ethics Consultation: A Second Look

[...]they concurred that the medical treatment alone could cause or contribute to his immediate death. The ethics consultants agreed and advocated continued ventilator treatment until the pentobarbital no longer produced significant respiratory depression. Because the patient’s neurological examinat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurocritical care Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 296 - 298
Main Authors Vertrees, Stephanie M., Bernat, James L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Humana Press Inc 01.10.2009
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[...]they concurred that the medical treatment alone could cause or contribute to his immediate death. The ethics consultants agreed and advocated continued ventilator treatment until the pentobarbital no longer produced significant respiratory depression. Because the patient’s neurological examination showed no evidence of brain function, the ethics consultants initially suspected that he might be brain dead. In this case, we believe that the patient’s profound brain damage caused by his markedly elevated ICP resulted in permanent damage to his medullary breathing centers. [...]apnea could be confidently attributed to his brain damage irrespective of a potential contribution by respiratory suppressant medications. According to this argument, if our patient’s family understood and agreed, it was reasonable for the ICU team to respect their wishes and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1541-6933
1556-0961
DOI:10.1007/s12028-009-9212-1