Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?" Discrete choice experiment. Single community hospital in Ontario. Nonrandom sampling of healthc...
Saved in:
Published in | Critical care explorations Vol. 1; no. 10; p. e0052 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wolters Kluwer Health
01.10.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?"
Discrete choice experiment.
Single community hospital in Ontario.
Nonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public.
Online survey.
Of the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care-related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative "Do you want everything done?" compared with "I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself" was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2-20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6-62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound.
Using a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?"To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?"Discrete choice experiment.DESIGNDiscrete choice experiment.Single community hospital in Ontario.SETTINGSingle community hospital in Ontario.Nonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public.SUBJECTSNonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public.Online survey.INTERVENTIONOnline survey.Of the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care-related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative "Do you want everything done?" compared with "I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself" was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2-20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6-62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTSOf the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care-related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative "Do you want everything done?" compared with "I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself" was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2-20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6-62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound.Using a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning.CONCLUSIONSUsing a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning. To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?" Discrete choice experiment. Single community hospital in Ontario. Nonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public. Online survey. Of the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care-related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative "Do you want everything done?" compared with "I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself" was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2-20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6-62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound. Using a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning. Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase “Do you want everything done?” |
Author | DiDiodato, Giulio |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Giulio surname: DiDiodato fullname: DiDiodato, Giulio organization: Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada., Centre for Education & Research, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9UctOHDEQtBBRIAt_gCIfc1nix_ixHBKhYZIgIYUDCOVkeTwe1tGsvbE9K-2NC3-R_BxfEm8gCDjgS1vqquruqndg2wdvATjA6BCjmfhY180hevYY2QK7hNPZVCIit5_8d8B-Sj8LhGCGmajegh1KMOeE0l1w26TsFjo7fw3z3MLTxVKbDEMPr0LsErxMtoPtGp7P18kZp32CzsPjbqW9sbDW0cLzQXu_4Z-4ZMaUXPDpCF4Usbub3ycB_ggjvNI-w2Zl4zrP_0HLOZ_vbv7Apu-tyXvgTa-HZPcf6gRcfmku6m_Ts-9fT-vjs6mhhJKp1JzPhMad1IxSIiTHxLSCacZ533ZGVIwjjTS3BpFeYtkyiSsrW26F1j2mE_DpXnc5tgvbGetz1INaxmJBXKugnXre8W6ursNKCcSpnNEi8OFBIIZfo01ZLcrRdigW2DAmRagQtBKsrDsB75_Oehzy3_sCqO4BJoaUou0fIRipTcqqpKxeplxoRy9oxuUSYNhs7IbXyX8BIjCtYQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12910_022_00796_7 crossref_primary_10_9778_cmajo_20200022 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5 10.7326/M18-2335 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008 10.1186/cc5016 10.1136/bmj.c1345 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z 10.1111/jgs.14858 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 10.1177/1049909117744554 10.1002/hec.3354 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5299 10.1073/pnas.1805327115 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000783 10.1001/jama.2019.3785 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.005 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.007 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420200049006 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.018 10.1186/s12904-018-0333-1 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0302 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176 10.1177/1757913918786524 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5280 10.1177/1049909117693578 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001675 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eacf2 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00010 10.1371/journal.pone.0116629 10.1186/s12913-019-4118-x 10.1177/0269216315601346 10.1186/s12871-017-0388-1 10.1177/1049909118760303 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0034 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000852 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.016 10.1371/journal.pone.0150671 10.1136/bmj.k4135 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001284 10.1136/bmj.i2230 10.1001/jama.2009.396 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. – notice: Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000052 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2639-8028 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC7063893 32166233 10_1097_CCE_0000000000000052 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 53G AAAAV AAHPQ AAIQE AASCR AAYXX ABASU ABDIG ABVCZ ABZZY ACILI ACXJB ADGGA ADHPY ADPDF AFBFQ AFDTB AHQNM AHVBC AINUH AJCLO AJNWD AJZMW AKCTQ ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC CITATION DIWNM EBS EEVPB FCALG GNXGY GQDEL GROUPED_DOAJ HLJTE IKREB M~E OK1 OPUJH OVD OVDNE RLZ RPM TEORI TSPGW NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3232-8a6697a1d8a533278612cb75a566fbdc74560a0a6ec02f818b5814e8b6e7aaf13 |
ISSN | 2639-8028 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:12:34 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:32:28 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:53:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:50:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:25 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Keywords | healthcare survey withdrawing care medical power of attorney advance care planning life support systems decision modeling |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3232-8a6697a1d8a533278612cb75a566fbdc74560a0a6ec02f818b5814e8b6e7aaf13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000052 |
PMID | 32166233 |
PQID | 2377347532 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7063893 proquest_miscellaneous_2377347532 pubmed_primary_32166233 crossref_primary_10_1097_CCE_0000000000000052 crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_CCE_0000000000000052 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-Oct |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2019 text: 2019-Oct |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Critical care explorations |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Crit Care Explor |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wolters Kluwer Health |
References | Myers (R13-20230728) 2018; 35 Lobo (R40-20230728) 2017; 152 Lancsar (R38-20230728) 2008; 26 Klingler (R10-20230728) 2016; 30 Riaz (R31-20230728) 2017 Oczkowski (R12-20230728) 2016; 11 Watson (R43-20230728) 2017; 26 de Bekker-Grob (R44-20230728) 2015; 8 Lund (R27-20230728) 2015; 10 Dixon (R24-20230728) 2018; 17 Fried (R2-20230728) 2017; 65 Jeong (R26-20230728) 2019; 19 Khandelwal (R9-20230728) 2015; 43 Klein (R45-20230728) 2018; 115 Fried (R3-20230728) 2019; 179 Thomas (R33-20230728) 2019; 179 Cardona-Morrell (R17-20230728) 2017; 100 Quill (R47-20230728) 2009; 151 Khandelwal (R8-20230728) 2016; 44 Cohen (R16-20230728) 2019; 57 Pieterse (R28-20230728) 2019; 322 Mark (R1-20230728) 2015; 41 Dillon (R23-20230728) 2017; 34 Gross (R25-20230728) 2018; 4135 Vanderhaeghen (R34-20230728) 2019; 139 Cox (R5-20230728) 2019; 170 Fried (R15-20230728) 2019; 179 Weathers (R11-20230728) 2016; 91 Pantilat (R36-20230728) 2009; 301 Reilly (R29-20230728) 1994; 154 Johansson (R46-20230728) 2016; 353 Fried (R21-20230728) 2019; 179 Green (R14-20230728) 2018; 35 Sudore (R4-20230728) 2019; 179 Scheunemann (R32-20230728) 2019; 179 Detering (R6-20230728) 2010; 340 Nesseler (R41-20230728) 2018; 35 Abdul-Razzak (R19-20230728) 2019; 9 Fried (R20-20230728) 2017; 65 Cicekci (R22-20230728) 2017; 17 Rhee (R30-20230728) 2019; 179 Quill (R37-20230728) 2009; 151 Frost (R39-20230728) 2011; 39 Doig (R35-20230728) 2006; 10 Houben (R7-20230728) 2014; 15 Bravo (R18-20230728) 2018; 101 |
References_xml | – volume: 41 start-page: 1572 year: 2015 ident: R1-20230728 article-title: Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: A systematic review. publication-title: Intensive Care Med doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5 – volume: 170 start-page: 285 year: 2019 ident: R5-20230728 article-title: Effects of a personalized web-based decision aid for surrogate decision makers of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: A randomized clinical trial. publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/M18-2335 – volume: 15 start-page: 477 year: 2014 ident: R7-20230728 article-title: Efficacy of advance care planning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. publication-title: J Am Med Dir Assoc doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008 – volume: 10 start-page: 231 year: 2006 ident: R35-20230728 article-title: Ethics roundtable debate: Patients and surrogates want ‘everything done'–what does ‘everything' mean? publication-title: Crit Care doi: 10.1186/cc5016 – volume: 340 start-page: c1345 year: 2010 ident: R6-20230728 article-title: The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: Randomised controlled trial. publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1345 – volume: 8 start-page: 373 year: 2015 ident: R44-20230728 article-title: Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: A practical guide. publication-title: Patient doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z – volume: 65 start-page: 1712 year: 2017 ident: R20-20230728 article-title: Engagement in advance care planning and surrogates' knowledge of patients' treatment goals. publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc doi: 10.1111/jgs.14858 – volume: 26 start-page: 661 year: 2008 ident: R38-20230728 article-title: Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. publication-title: Pharmacoeconomics doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 – volume: 35 start-page: 866 year: 2018 ident: R14-20230728 article-title: A Randomized controlled trial of strategies to improve family members' preparedness for surrogate decision-making. publication-title: Am J Hosp Palliat Med doi: 10.1177/1049909117744554 – volume: 26 start-page: 810 year: 2017 ident: R43-20230728 article-title: Discrete choice experiment response rates: A meta-analysis. publication-title: Health Econ doi: 10.1002/hec.3354 – volume: 179 start-page: 267 year: 2019 ident: R3-20230728 article-title: Assessment of surrogates' knowledge of patients' treatment goals and confidence in their ability to make surrogate treatment decisions. publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5299 – volume: 179 start-page: 676 year: 2019 ident: R30-20230728 article-title: Advance care planning for patients with advanced illnesses attending hospital outpatient clinics study: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. publication-title: BMJ Open – volume: 115 start-page: 13222 year: 2018 ident: R45-20230728 article-title: People use less information than they think to make up their minds. publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805327115 – volume: 35 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: R41-20230728 article-title: Patient factors and outcomes associated with the withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapies in mechanically ventilated brain-injured patients. publication-title: Eur J Anaesthesiol doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000783 – volume: 322 start-page: 25 year: 2019 ident: R28-20230728 article-title: Shared decision making and the importance of time. publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3785 – volume: 101 start-page: 1256 year: 2018 ident: R18-20230728 article-title: Effects of advance care planning on confidence in surrogates' ability to make healthcare decisions consistent with older adults' wishes: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. publication-title: Patient Educ Couns doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.005 – volume: 100 start-page: 425 year: 2017 ident: R17-20230728 article-title: A systematic review of effectiveness of decision aids to assist older patients at the end of life. publication-title: Patient Educ Couns doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.007 – volume: 154 start-page: 2299 year: 1994 ident: R29-20230728 article-title: Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience. publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420200049006 – volume: 179 start-page: 676 year: 2019 ident: R32-20230728 article-title: Clinician-family communication about patients' values and preferences in intensive care units. publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027 – volume: 65 start-page: 1712 year: 2017 ident: R2-20230728 article-title: Engagement in advance care planning and surrogates' knowledge of patients' treatment goals. publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc doi: 10.1111/jgs.14858 – volume: 57 start-page: 37 year: 2019 ident: R16-20230728 article-title: Concordance between proxy level of care preference and advance directives among nursing home residents with advanced dementia: A cluster randomized clinical trial. publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.018 – volume: 17 start-page: 78 year: 2018 ident: R24-20230728 article-title: Whose job? The staffing of advance care planning support in twelve international healthcare organizations: A qualitative interview study. publication-title: BMC Palliat Care doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0333-1 – volume: 179 start-page: 820 year: 2019 ident: R33-20230728 article-title: Prognosis reconsidered in light of ancient insights—from hippocrates to modern medicine. publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0302 – volume: 152 start-page: 321 year: 2017 ident: R40-20230728 article-title: Decision-making on withholding or withdrawing life support in the ICU. publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176 – volume: 139 start-page: 97 year: 2019 ident: R34-20230728 article-title: What do hospitalists experience as barriers and helpful factors for having ACP conversations? A systematic qualitative evidence synthesis. publication-title: Perspect Public Health doi: 10.1177/1757913918786524 – volume: 179 start-page: E1 year: 2019 ident: R4-20230728 article-title: Preparing surrogates for complex decision making. publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5280 – volume: 34 start-page: 918 year: 2017 ident: R23-20230728 article-title: Provider perspectives on advance care planning documentation in the electronic health record: the experience of primary care providers and specialists using advance health-care directives and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment. publication-title: Am J Hosp Palliat Care doi: 10.1177/1049909117693578 – volume: 44 start-page: 1474 year: 2016 ident: R8-20230728 article-title: Potential influence of advance care planning and palliative care consultation on ICU costs for patients with chronic and serious illness. publication-title: Crit Care Med doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001675 – volume: 39 start-page: 1174 year: 2011 ident: R39-20230728 article-title: Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: A systematic review. publication-title: Crit Care Med doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eacf2 – volume: 151 start-page: 345 year: 2009 ident: R47-20230728 article-title: Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want “everything”. publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00010 – volume: 10 start-page: e0116629 year: 2015 ident: R27-20230728 article-title: Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: An explanatory systematic review of implementation studies. publication-title: Plos One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116629 – volume: 179 start-page: 267 year: 2019 ident: R21-20230728 article-title: Assessment of surrogates' knowledge of patients' treatment goals and confidence in their ability to make surrogate treatment decisions. publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5299 – volume: 19 start-page: 286 year: 2019 ident: R26-20230728 article-title: Study protocol to investigate the efficacy of normalisation of advance care planning (ACP) for people with chronic diseases in acute and community settings: A quasi-experimental design. publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4118-x – volume: 30 start-page: 423 year: 2016 ident: R10-20230728 article-title: Does facilitated advance care planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations. publication-title: Palliat Med doi: 10.1177/0269216315601346 – volume: 17 start-page: 97 year: 2017 ident: R22-20230728 article-title: The communication between patient relatives and physicians in intensive care units. publication-title: BMC Anesthesiol doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0388-1 – volume: 35 start-page: 1123 year: 2018 ident: R13-20230728 article-title: Provider tools for advance care planning and goals of care discussions: A systematic review. publication-title: Am J Hosp Palliat Care doi: 10.1177/1049909118760303 – volume: 179 start-page: 684 year: 2019 ident: R15-20230728 article-title: Communication about treatment options and shared decision making in the intensive care unit. publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0034 – volume: 43 start-page: 1102 year: 2015 ident: R9-20230728 article-title: Estimating the effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU utilization: A systematic review. publication-title: Crit Care Med doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000852 – volume: 91 year: 2016 ident: R11-20230728 article-title: Advance care planning: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials conducted with older adults. publication-title: Maturitas doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.016 – volume: 11 start-page: e0150671 year: 2016 ident: R12-20230728 article-title: Communication tools for end-of-life decision-making in ambulatory care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. publication-title: Plos One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150671 – volume: 4135 start-page: k4135 year: 2018 ident: R25-20230728 article-title: Intensive care: Balancing risk and benefit to facilitate informed decisions. publication-title: Bmj doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4135 – volume: 151 start-page: 345 year: 2009 ident: R37-20230728 article-title: Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want “everything”. publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00010 – volume: 9 start-page: e20 year: 2019 ident: R19-20230728 article-title: Patient-family agreement on values and preferences for life-sustaining treatment: results of a multicentre observational study. publication-title: BMJ Support Palliat Care doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001284 – volume: 353 start-page: i2230 year: 2016 ident: R46-20230728 article-title: “Informed choice” in a time of too much medicine-no panacea for ethical difficulties. publication-title: Bmj doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2230 – start-page: 946 year: 2017 ident: R31-20230728 article-title: Advance care planning: Understanding clinical routines and experiences of interprofessional team members in diverse health care settings. publication-title: Am J Hosp Palliat Med – volume: 301 start-page: 1279 year: 2009 ident: R36-20230728 article-title: Communicating with seriously ill patients: Better words to say. publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.396 |
SSID | ssj0002151574 |
Score | 2.0903459 |
Snippet | To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the... Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e0052 |
SubjectTerms | Original Clinical Report |
Title | Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166233 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2377347532 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7063893 |
Volume | 1 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWIqFeEIjX8qiGip6iwMZO4oQLqrpbCgeERFftbRV7HTVSSSp2cyg3_jljO3ayZRGPPUSrZOJIni-ebyYzY0Je6QYpZUJFmKNxDNFCyDCPOQ8F2tK01AVQ0mRbfEpP5vHH8-R8NPoyyFpq1-K1_L61ruR_tIrnUK-6SvYfNOsHxRP4H_WLR9QwHv9KxzN8PzXj7CqePviKxzN0KVfBfGXp5WcXvTC5r4f2q7-pPPJ7FukunLLVGbH1yiViHFA6bQJcDoIznP5ghtNzvTYBq2lTqwN2jAKB7X48pLh-8wSTVKZMjt8gLKhJczWtmmVhNnAK3lftpc0Fc8GHKPdpbGg7zCJFkeGglesKvN2KOgTOZLA8Kh2F3rpwdw2Bj2a2oaT_bYrjBFx9NcpkNEqRubHejPnkQnfpFrlN0XeggxCONs-a4yQ8dmWUOX-z7am75I4bZ5Ox_OKG3MymHdCT03vkbudXwKEFyX0yUvUD8qMHCCBAwAIEmhIMQEADBMQ19ACBqoYOIKABAg4gMADIW0B4wP60AQQHaHBADw7Q4Hi3DxYYD8n8eHZ6dBJ2e26EkiG5DrMiTXNeRMusQEeA8gwZsBQ8KZD2l2IpORLuSTEpUiUntES2J5IsilUmUsWLoozYI7JT43OeEEhSIeOyTETKInz9MxTmpYqWTHCpaCzGhLl5XciuIb3eF-Vy4RIjUDGLm4oZk9DfdWUbsvxB_qVT2QJXTv05rKhV064WlHHOYnTXUeaxVaEf0el-TPiGcr2A7sq-eaWuLkx3dm6dgKe_HfMZ2e1fpedkZ_2tVS-Q2a7FnokI7Rm8_gRWa52O |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating+the+Impact+of+Words+Used+by+Physicians+in+Advance+Care+Planning+Discussions%3A+The+%22Do+You+Want+Everything+Done%3F%22+Effect&rft.jtitle=Critical+care+explorations&rft.au=DiDiodato%2C+Giulio&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.eissn=2639-8028&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FCCE.0000000000000052&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32166233&rft.externalDocID=32166233 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2639-8028&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2639-8028&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2639-8028&client=summon |