Testing and Social Studies in Capitalist Schooling

In a New York Times editorial on August 15, 2015, the editors, following the NAACP, cautioned that the movement for students to opt out of high-stakes standardized exams was detrimental to minority students and their communities. The rigorous accountability measures of high-stakes exams, it was clai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMonthly review (New York. 1949) Vol. 67; no. 10; p. 51
Main Authors Cole-Malott, Donna-Marie, Malott, Curry
Format Journal Article Magazine Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Monthly Review Foundation, Inc 01.03.2016
Monthly Review Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a New York Times editorial on August 15, 2015, the editors, following the NAACP, cautioned that the movement for students to opt out of high-stakes standardized exams was detrimental to minority students and their communities. The rigorous accountability measures of high-stakes exams, it was claimed, compelled teachers and schools to do a better job educating traditionally oppressed students... Such views ignore the history of high-stakes testing, which has served to perpetuate class inequality and advance white supremacy since intelligence testing was developed during the First World War. More than anything else, standardized testing measures students' access to resources and proximity to dominant cultures, rather than innate ability or quality of teaching. The accountability movement has successfully exploited the existing inequalities of a white-supremacist, capitalist society to argue that high-stakes testing, one of its primary tools, is helping to overcome those same inequalities. Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 24
SourceType-Magazines-1
ISSN:0027-0520
0027-0520
DOI:10.14452/MR-067-10-2016-03_5