Contribution of Boll Mass and Boll Number to Irrigated Cotton Yield

The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAgronomy journal Vol. 107; no. 5; pp. 1845 - 1853
Main Authors Sharma, Bablu, Mills, Cory I., Snowden, Chase, Ritchie, Glen L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The American Society of Agronomy, Inc 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d−1) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar‐specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity‐related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield.
AbstractList The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d−1) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar‐specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity‐related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield.
The production of fruit on upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d −1 ) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar‐specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity‐related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield.
The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d⁻¹) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar-specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity-related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield.
Author Sharma, Bablu
Snowden, Chase
Ritchie, Glen L.
Mills, Cory I.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Bablu
  surname: Sharma
  fullname: Sharma, Bablu
  email: bablusharma.sharma@gmail.com
  organization: Texas Tech Univ
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Cory I.
  surname: Mills
  fullname: Mills, Cory I.
  organization: Bayer Crop Science
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chase
  surname: Snowden
  fullname: Snowden, Chase
  organization: Utah State Univ
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Glen L.
  surname: Ritchie
  fullname: Ritchie, Glen L.
  organization: Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center
BookMark eNp9kM9LwzAYQIMouE2P3nv00plfbRc8zaJzY24gevAU0iQdGVkzkxTZf29n9SLoKXzhve-DNwSnjWs0AFcIjjEi9EZsvGu2KBtDiOkJGCBKshTmNDsFA9j9pYjl-BwMQ9hCiBCjaADK0jXRm6qNxjWJq5M7Z23yJEJIRKP6adXuKu2T6JK592YjolZJ6WLshDejrboAZ7WwQV9-vyPw-nD_Uj6my_VsXk6XqSQY07QqslrSWlQqLxiEqma1QCTDoiAaEYIKiKBWuSKMVhpLKqXWuRSYKUQFg5SMwHW_d-_de6tD5DsTpLZWNNq1geMMU0whnUw6NO1R6V0IXtd8781O-ANHkB9j8Z9Y_Bir48kvXpoojk2iF8b-ad321oex-vD_CT6dLfB09rxeLVD2ZX8CQrGCxQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2016_03_0168
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2018_05_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2020_107759
crossref_primary_10_1002_agg2_70010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2023_108969
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2025_110065
crossref_primary_10_1111_jac_12462
crossref_primary_10_3390_su131810070
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2021_108373
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2022_108633
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2023_109209
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indcrop_2024_119957
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_018_2206_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_00103624_2020_1744633
crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20516
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2018_12_011
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13101403
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20434
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_108912
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agwat_2019_105932
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20931
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isprsjprs_2019_12_011
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_21206
crossref_primary_10_1186_s42397_024_00190_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2019_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20126
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2019_04_0227
crossref_primary_10_1111_jac_12595
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00016
crossref_primary_10_1111_jac_12453
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_1001940
crossref_primary_10_25308_aduziraat_1406419
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_99472_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2023_109176
crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2017_06_0360
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00344_024_11562_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agwat_2019_105782
crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_21232
crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_05_0343
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00425_024_04601_0
Cites_doi 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040017x
10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600010008x
10.2135/cropsci2001.1800
10.2134/agronj2009.0075
10.2134/agronj2007.0271R
10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00116-7
10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020024x
10.2134/agronj2008.0041xs
10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00175-5
10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0625
10.2135/cropsci2004.0321
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:4(277)
10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.009
10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040018x
10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600010024x
10.2134/agronj2004.3770
10.2135/cropsci2003.1950
10.2134/jpa1999.0085
10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.007
10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0310
10.1002/ird.418
10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.005
10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010005x
10.2134/agronj2013.0084
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.2134/agronj15.0024
DatabaseName CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1435-0645
EndPage 1853
ExternalDocumentID 10_2134_agronj15_0024
AGJ2AGRONJ150024
Genre article
GeographicLocations Texas
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Texas
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Texas State Support Committee
GroupedDBID -~X
.86
.~0
0R~
186
1OB
1OC
23M
2WC
33P
3V.
5GY
6J9
6KN
7X2
7XC
88I
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FW
8G5
8R4
8R5
AABCJ
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAYCA
ABCQX
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABRSH
ABUWG
ACAWQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACQAM
ACXQS
ADFRT
ADKYN
ADMHG
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYN
AEUYR
AFFPM
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AHBTC
AI.
AIDBO
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMYDB
ATCPS
AZQEC
BCR
BCU
BEC
BENPR
BES
BFHJK
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BLC
BPHCQ
C1A
CCPQU
D0L
DCZOG
DROCM
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
F5P
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H13
HCIFZ
HF~
HGLYW
L6V
L7B
LAS
LATKE
LEEKS
LPU
M0K
M2O
M2P
M7S
MEWTI
MV1
NEJ
NHAZY
NHB
O9-
P2P
PATMY
PEA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
QF4
QM4
QN7
ROL
RPX
RWL
S0X
SAMSI
SJFOW
SJN
SUPJJ
TAE
TR2
TWZ
U2A
VH1
VOH
WOQ
WXSBR
Y6R
YR5
YYP
ZCG
~02
~KM
AAYXX
AETEA
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGYGG
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
7S9
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3224-b75fc4fabd67900df9fa1352a73e13317010ed6d394be2c4ccee6ca29d14a9043
ISSN 0002-1962
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 11:43:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:17:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:29 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:36:07 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3224-b75fc4fabd67900df9fa1352a73e13317010ed6d394be2c4ccee6ca29d14a9043
Notes All rights reserved.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 2524240488
PQPubID 24069
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2524240488
crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj15_0024
crossref_citationtrail_10_2134_agronj15_0024
wiley_primary_10_2134_agronj15_0024_AGJ2AGRONJ150024
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September–October 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2015
  text: September–October 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Agronomy journal
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher The American Society of Agronomy, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc
References 2004; 87
1990; 30
2011
2000; 68
2013; 105
2015; 55
2002; 55
2013; 145
2006
2011; 15
1996; 36
2008; 95
2005; 45
2001; 41
1994; 86
2009; 58
2004; 96
1984; 76
2004; 130
1999; 39
2000; 30
1999; 12
2009; 101
1984
2015
1976; 16
2003; 43
e_1_2_7_6_1
Meredith W.R.J. (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1984
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
Ritchie G.L. (e_1_2_7_23_1) 2011; 15
Sorensen I. (e_1_2_7_28_1) 2000; 30
Sharma B. (e_1_2_7_26_1) 2015; 55
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
SAS Institute (e_1_2_7_24_1) 2011
Littell R.C. (e_1_2_7_18_1) 2006
References_xml – volume: 76
  start-page: 94
  year: 1984
  end-page: 98
  article-title: Fruiting of cotton. II. Effects of plant moisture status and active boll load on boll retention
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– year: 2011
– volume: 87
  start-page: 73
  year: 2004
  end-page: 87
  article-title: Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes
  publication-title: Field Crops Res.
– start-page: 131
  year: 1984
  end-page: 150
– volume: 30
  start-page: 63
  year: 2000
  end-page: 66
  article-title: Effect of sowing time on yield of a short anda long season maize hybrid
  publication-title: Agron. Soc. N.Z. Annu. Rep.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 30
  year: 1976
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Ontogenetic model of cotton yield
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 86
  start-page: 20
  year: 1994
  end-page: 26
  article-title: Boll weight and within‐plant yield distribution in field‐grown cotton given different levels of nitrogen
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 101
  start-page: 460
  year: 2009
  end-page: 468
  article-title: Modeling irrigation management strategies to maximize cotton lint yield and water use efficiency
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 55
  start-page: 958
  year: 2015
  end-page: 969
  article-title: High throughput phenotyping of cotton in multiple irrigation environments
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 15
  start-page: 224
  year: 2011
  end-page: 232
  article-title: Effect of sample size on cotton plant mapping analysis and results
  publication-title: J. Cotton Sci.
– volume: 58
  start-page: 257
  year: 2009
  end-page: 274
  article-title: Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: A brief history and potential reductions in demand
  publication-title: Irrig. Drain.
– volume: 105
  start-page: 1536
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1544
  article-title: Multiple irrigation levels affect boll distribution, yield, and fiber micronaire in cotton
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 55
  start-page: 217
  year: 2002
  end-page: 237
  article-title: Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation
  publication-title: Agric. Water Manage.
– volume: 130
  start-page: 277
  year: 2004
  end-page: 285
  article-title: Evapotranspiration of full‐, deficit‐irrigated, and dryland cotton on the Northern Texas High Plains
  publication-title: J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 85
  year: 1999
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Selecting optimum planting dates and plant populations for dryland corn in Kansas
  publication-title: J. Prod. Agric.
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1336
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1344
  article-title: Subsurface drip and overhead irrigation: A comparison of plant boll distribution in upland cotton
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 377
  year: 2004
  end-page: 383
  article-title: Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1065
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1069
  article-title: Photosynthate and dry matter partitioning in short‐and long‐season cotton cultivars
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 101
  start-page: 60
  year: 2009
  end-page: 66
  article-title: A survey of factors involved in crop maturity
  publication-title: Agron. J.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 914
  year: 1996
  end-page: 921
  article-title: Late season water stress in cotton: I. Plant growth, water use, and yield
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 365
  year: 1990
  end-page: 369
  article-title: Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton
  publication-title: Yield. Crop Sci.
– year: 2006
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1497
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1503
  article-title: Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 95
  start-page: 69
  year: 2008
  end-page: 76
  article-title: Yield and growth characteristics for cotton under various irrigation regimes on sandy soil
  publication-title: Agric. Water Manage.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 195
  year: 2003
  end-page: 201
  article-title: Boll retention and boll ssize among intrasympodial fruiting sites in cotton
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 68
  start-page: 143
  year: 2000
  end-page: 155
  article-title: Timing of crop maturity in cotton: Impact of dry matter production and partitioning
  publication-title: Field Crops Res.
– volume: 55
  year: 2015
  article-title: Near‐remote green: Red PVI ground cover fraction estimation in cotton
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1800
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1808
  article-title: Spatial yield distribution in cotton following early‐season floral bud removal
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
– year: 2015
– volume: 145
  start-page: 52
  year: 2013
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density
  publication-title: Field Crops Res.
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040017x
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600010008x
– volume: 15
  start-page: 224
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  article-title: Effect of sample size on cotton plant mapping analysis and results
  publication-title: J. Cotton Sci.
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.1800
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0075
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj2007.0271R
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00116-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020024x
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0041xs
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00175-5
– volume-title: SAS for mixed models
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
– volume: 55
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  article-title: Near‐remote green: Red PVI ground cover fraction estimation in cotton
  publication-title: Crop Sci.
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0625
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0321
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:4(277)
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.009
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040018x
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600010024x
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.3770
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2003.1950
– volume: 30
  start-page: 63
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  article-title: Effect of sowing time on yield of a short anda long season maize hybrid
  publication-title: Agron. Soc. N.Z. Annu. Rep.
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.2134/jpa1999.0085
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.007
– start-page: 131
  volume-title: Cotton.
  year: 1984
  ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0310
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1002/ird.418
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.005
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010005x
– volume-title: Base SAS 9.3 Utilities: Reference
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj2013.0084
SSID ssj0011941
Score 2.3321896
Snippet The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield...
The production of fruit on upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1845
SubjectTerms agronomy
cotton
cultivars
fruit growing
Gossypium hirsutum
irrigation scheduling
lint yield
Texas
Title Contribution of Boll Mass and Boll Number to Irrigated Cotton Yield
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2134%2Fagronj15.0024
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2524240488
Volume 107
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLdgu8AB8Sk6BjIS4lJS4sRp6mNXjW4VK6japHGKHNuBTVWCSqpJ_PW8ZyepiwoaXKLGcpwm75f34Wf_HiFvCq10GMc6GJmRDLjOZSDDRAWjyHCdRlKzHOc7zubDkws-u0wuN0uC7O6SOh-onzv3lfyPVKEN5Iq7ZP9Bst2g0AC_Qb5wBAnD8VYyRmqptmAVen1HINT-GbjDNiVgz-a24gd6mKerFdJp4IxuVSOZxhdcvOY7p-OvK7vFoe_f3NI34ry3y07ky3Uno6vl0hEUYJ7-dNB1L6ubRptNvnnJn8UVIMSlQ6Zg6_ofB_6UA0u6NVW-GoVP16lR4zQn-F0Bkt9tqVZX0bbBUOIpSggsE8_ootewS6Ej3xxaK3z-a2anv_jGcrXZ-t8MWrfMEAIcHCBrL8_w8rtkP4KQAnTi_tHx_POiyzkxwVkbLOHDOUZWHOD91v23PZhNWOIHN9Y7OX9IHjRhBR07jDwid0z5mNwHgTbUKuYJmfhooVVBER8U0UIBLe7MoYXWFe3QQh1aqEXLU3Lx4fh8chI0JTQCBZqaB3maFIoXMtfDVIShLkQhGfjcMo0Ni2Mk4w-NHupY8NxEiivwmYZKRkIzLkXI42dkr6xK85zQXKWCqZjLUYExayG0YqLQCbRiyQLRI-_a15Kphl8ey5wss51i6JG3XffvjljlTx1ft-84A9WH-SxZmmr9I4sS3NuEJqhHuH35fx8pG09n0Xi6-DSfQRgEDQe3_Q8vyL3Nd3BI9urV2rwEZ7TOXzUo-gWY54jU
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution+of+Boll+Mass+and+Boll+Number+to+Irrigated+Cotton+Yield&rft.jtitle=Agronomy+journal&rft.au=Sharma%2C+Bablu&rft.au=Mills%2C+Cory+I.&rft.au=Snowden%2C+Chase&rft.au=Ritchie%2C+Glen+L.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1845&rft.epage=1853&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134%2Fagronj15.0024&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2134_agronj15_0024
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-1962&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-1962&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-1962&client=summon