Contribution of Boll Mass and Boll Number to Irrigated Cotton Yield
The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Pr...
Saved in:
Published in | Agronomy journal Vol. 107; no. 5; pp. 1845 - 1853 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
The American Society of Agronomy, Inc
01.09.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d−1) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar‐specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity‐related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d−1) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar‐specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity‐related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield. The production of fruit on upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d −1 ) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar‐specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity‐related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield. The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield increase in response to irrigation is a combination of additional boll production on the plant and differences in the size of individual bolls. Previous research on this subject is incomplete. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of irrigation on boll distribution and boll size in four cotton cultivars in West Texas. Boll distribution and boll mass in response to 10 daily irrigation levels (0–6.5 mm d⁻¹) were compared among four cultivars with varying maturities [‘Deltapine 1212 B2RF’ (DP1212), ‘Deltapine 1219 B2RF’ (DP1219), ‘FiberMax 2484 B2F’ (FM2484), and ‘FiberMax 2011 GT’ (FM2011)] from 2011 to 2013 in Lubbock, TX. Boll production and retention followed cultivar-specific patterns in all 3 yr. Two cultivars (DP1212 and FM2011) produced fruit primarily at the bottom and middle of the plant, one had increased production high on the plant (DP1219), and one produced fruit almost exclusively in the middle of the plant (FM2484). Both boll number and boll mass contributed to lint yield, with boll number being the major determinant (on average, 90%) of lint yield, whereas boll mass accounted for 10% of lint yield on average. The contribution of boll number and boll size to yield varied among cultivars and did not appear to be wholly maturity-related. Research studies focused on boll number should be aware that boll distribution does not account for all of the variation in yield. |
Author | Sharma, Bablu Snowden, Chase Ritchie, Glen L. Mills, Cory I. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Bablu surname: Sharma fullname: Sharma, Bablu email: bablusharma.sharma@gmail.com organization: Texas Tech Univ – sequence: 2 givenname: Cory I. surname: Mills fullname: Mills, Cory I. organization: Bayer Crop Science – sequence: 3 givenname: Chase surname: Snowden fullname: Snowden, Chase organization: Utah State Univ – sequence: 4 givenname: Glen L. surname: Ritchie fullname: Ritchie, Glen L. organization: Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center |
BookMark | eNp9kM9LwzAYQIMouE2P3nv00plfbRc8zaJzY24gevAU0iQdGVkzkxTZf29n9SLoKXzhve-DNwSnjWs0AFcIjjEi9EZsvGu2KBtDiOkJGCBKshTmNDsFA9j9pYjl-BwMQ9hCiBCjaADK0jXRm6qNxjWJq5M7Z23yJEJIRKP6adXuKu2T6JK592YjolZJ6WLshDejrboAZ7WwQV9-vyPw-nD_Uj6my_VsXk6XqSQY07QqslrSWlQqLxiEqma1QCTDoiAaEYIKiKBWuSKMVhpLKqXWuRSYKUQFg5SMwHW_d-_de6tD5DsTpLZWNNq1geMMU0whnUw6NO1R6V0IXtd8781O-ANHkB9j8Z9Y_Bir48kvXpoojk2iF8b-ad321oex-vD_CT6dLfB09rxeLVD2ZX8CQrGCxQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2016_03_0168 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2018_05_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2020_107759 crossref_primary_10_1002_agg2_70010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2023_108969 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2025_110065 crossref_primary_10_1111_jac_12462 crossref_primary_10_3390_su131810070 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2021_108373 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2022_108633 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2023_109209 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indcrop_2024_119957 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_018_2206_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_00103624_2020_1744633 crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20516 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2018_12_011 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13101403 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20434 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_108912 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agwat_2019_105932 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20931 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isprsjprs_2019_12_011 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_21206 crossref_primary_10_1186_s42397_024_00190_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2019_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20126 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2019_04_0227 crossref_primary_10_1111_jac_12595 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00016 crossref_primary_10_1111_jac_12453 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_1001940 crossref_primary_10_25308_aduziraat_1406419 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_99472_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fcr_2023_109176 crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2017_06_0360 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00344_024_11562_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agwat_2019_105782 crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_21232 crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_05_0343 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00425_024_04601_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040017x 10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600010008x 10.2135/cropsci2001.1800 10.2134/agronj2009.0075 10.2134/agronj2007.0271R 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00116-7 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020024x 10.2134/agronj2008.0041xs 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00175-5 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0625 10.2135/cropsci2004.0321 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:4(277) 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.009 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040018x 10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600010024x 10.2134/agronj2004.3770 10.2135/cropsci2003.1950 10.2134/jpa1999.0085 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.007 10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0310 10.1002/ird.418 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.005 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010005x 10.2134/agronj2013.0084 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.2134/agronj15.0024 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef AGRICOLA |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1435-0645 |
EndPage | 1853 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_2134_agronj15_0024 AGJ2AGRONJ150024 |
Genre | article |
GeographicLocations | Texas |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Texas |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Texas State Support Committee |
GroupedDBID | -~X .86 .~0 0R~ 186 1OB 1OC 23M 2WC 33P 3V. 5GY 6J9 6KN 7X2 7XC 88I 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FW 8G5 8R4 8R5 AABCJ AAHBH AAHHS AAHQN AAMNL AANLZ AAYCA ABCQX ABCUV ABEFU ABJCF ABJNI ABRSH ABUWG ACAWQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGOD ACIWK ACPOU ACQAM ACXQS ADFRT ADKYN ADMHG ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYN AEUYR AFFPM AFKRA AFRAH AFWVQ AHBTC AI. AIDBO AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB ATCPS AZQEC BCR BCU BEC BENPR BES BFHJK BGLVJ BHPHI BLC BPHCQ C1A CCPQU D0L DCZOG DROCM DWQXO E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD F5P GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HCIFZ HF~ HGLYW L6V L7B LAS LATKE LEEKS LPU M0K M2O M2P M7S MEWTI MV1 NEJ NHAZY NHB O9- P2P PATMY PEA PQQKQ PROAC PTHSS PYCSY Q2X QF4 QM4 QN7 ROL RPX RWL S0X SAMSI SJFOW SJN SUPJJ TAE TR2 TWZ U2A VH1 VOH WOQ WXSBR Y6R YR5 YYP ZCG ~02 ~KM AAYXX AETEA AEYWJ AGHNM AGYGG CITATION PHGZM PHGZT 7S9 AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3224-b75fc4fabd67900df9fa1352a73e13317010ed6d394be2c4ccee6ca29d14a9043 |
ISSN | 0002-1962 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:43:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:17:03 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:29 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:36:07 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3224-b75fc4fabd67900df9fa1352a73e13317010ed6d394be2c4ccee6ca29d14a9043 |
Notes | All rights reserved. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 2524240488 |
PQPubID | 24069 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2524240488 crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj15_0024 crossref_citationtrail_10_2134_agronj15_0024 wiley_primary_10_2134_agronj15_0024_AGJ2AGRONJ150024 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | September–October 2015 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2015 text: September–October 2015 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Agronomy journal |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | The American Society of Agronomy, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc |
References | 2004; 87 1990; 30 2011 2000; 68 2013; 105 2015; 55 2002; 55 2013; 145 2006 2011; 15 1996; 36 2008; 95 2005; 45 2001; 41 1994; 86 2009; 58 2004; 96 1984; 76 2004; 130 1999; 39 2000; 30 1999; 12 2009; 101 1984 2015 1976; 16 2003; 43 e_1_2_7_6_1 Meredith W.R.J. (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1984 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Ritchie G.L. (e_1_2_7_23_1) 2011; 15 Sorensen I. (e_1_2_7_28_1) 2000; 30 Sharma B. (e_1_2_7_26_1) 2015; 55 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 SAS Institute (e_1_2_7_24_1) 2011 Littell R.C. (e_1_2_7_18_1) 2006 |
References_xml | – volume: 76 start-page: 94 year: 1984 end-page: 98 article-title: Fruiting of cotton. II. Effects of plant moisture status and active boll load on boll retention publication-title: Agron. J. – year: 2011 – volume: 87 start-page: 73 year: 2004 end-page: 87 article-title: Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes publication-title: Field Crops Res. – start-page: 131 year: 1984 end-page: 150 – volume: 30 start-page: 63 year: 2000 end-page: 66 article-title: Effect of sowing time on yield of a short anda long season maize hybrid publication-title: Agron. Soc. N.Z. Annu. Rep. – volume: 16 start-page: 30 year: 1976 end-page: 34 article-title: Ontogenetic model of cotton yield publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 86 start-page: 20 year: 1994 end-page: 26 article-title: Boll weight and within‐plant yield distribution in field‐grown cotton given different levels of nitrogen publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 101 start-page: 460 year: 2009 end-page: 468 article-title: Modeling irrigation management strategies to maximize cotton lint yield and water use efficiency publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 55 start-page: 958 year: 2015 end-page: 969 article-title: High throughput phenotyping of cotton in multiple irrigation environments publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 15 start-page: 224 year: 2011 end-page: 232 article-title: Effect of sample size on cotton plant mapping analysis and results publication-title: J. Cotton Sci. – volume: 58 start-page: 257 year: 2009 end-page: 274 article-title: Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: A brief history and potential reductions in demand publication-title: Irrig. Drain. – volume: 105 start-page: 1536 year: 2013 end-page: 1544 article-title: Multiple irrigation levels affect boll distribution, yield, and fiber micronaire in cotton publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 55 start-page: 217 year: 2002 end-page: 237 article-title: Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation publication-title: Agric. Water Manage. – volume: 130 start-page: 277 year: 2004 end-page: 285 article-title: Evapotranspiration of full‐, deficit‐irrigated, and dryland cotton on the Northern Texas High Plains publication-title: J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. – volume: 12 start-page: 85 year: 1999 end-page: 90 article-title: Selecting optimum planting dates and plant populations for dryland corn in Kansas publication-title: J. Prod. Agric. – volume: 101 start-page: 1336 year: 2009 end-page: 1344 article-title: Subsurface drip and overhead irrigation: A comparison of plant boll distribution in upland cotton publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 96 start-page: 377 year: 2004 end-page: 383 article-title: Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 39 start-page: 1065 year: 1999 end-page: 1069 article-title: Photosynthate and dry matter partitioning in short‐and long‐season cotton cultivars publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 101 start-page: 60 year: 2009 end-page: 66 article-title: A survey of factors involved in crop maturity publication-title: Agron. J. – volume: 36 start-page: 914 year: 1996 end-page: 921 article-title: Late season water stress in cotton: I. Plant growth, water use, and yield publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 30 start-page: 365 year: 1990 end-page: 369 article-title: Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton publication-title: Yield. Crop Sci. – year: 2006 – volume: 45 start-page: 1497 year: 2005 end-page: 1503 article-title: Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 95 start-page: 69 year: 2008 end-page: 76 article-title: Yield and growth characteristics for cotton under various irrigation regimes on sandy soil publication-title: Agric. Water Manage. – volume: 43 start-page: 195 year: 2003 end-page: 201 article-title: Boll retention and boll ssize among intrasympodial fruiting sites in cotton publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 68 start-page: 143 year: 2000 end-page: 155 article-title: Timing of crop maturity in cotton: Impact of dry matter production and partitioning publication-title: Field Crops Res. – volume: 55 year: 2015 article-title: Near‐remote green: Red PVI ground cover fraction estimation in cotton publication-title: Crop Sci. – volume: 41 start-page: 1800 year: 2001 end-page: 1808 article-title: Spatial yield distribution in cotton following early‐season floral bud removal publication-title: Crop Sci. – year: 2015 – volume: 145 start-page: 52 year: 2013 end-page: 59 article-title: Plant architecture influences growth and yield response of upland cotton to population density publication-title: Field Crops Res. – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040017x – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600010008x – volume: 15 start-page: 224 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 article-title: Effect of sample size on cotton plant mapping analysis and results publication-title: J. Cotton Sci. – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.1800 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0075 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj2007.0271R – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00116-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020024x – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0041xs – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00175-5 – volume-title: SAS for mixed models year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 – volume: 55 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 article-title: Near‐remote green: Red PVI ground cover fraction estimation in cotton publication-title: Crop Sci. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0625 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0321 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:4(277) – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040018x – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600010024x – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.3770 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2003.1950 – volume: 30 start-page: 63 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 article-title: Effect of sowing time on yield of a short anda long season maize hybrid publication-title: Agron. Soc. N.Z. Annu. Rep. – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.2134/jpa1999.0085 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.007 – start-page: 131 volume-title: Cotton. year: 1984 ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0310 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1002/ird.418 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.005 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010005x – volume-title: Base SAS 9.3 Utilities: Reference year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj2013.0084 |
SSID | ssj0011941 |
Score | 2.3321896 |
Snippet | The production of fruit on upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield... The production of fruit on upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) varies with environment, cultivar, and management practices, including irrigation. Yield... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1845 |
SubjectTerms | agronomy cotton cultivars fruit growing Gossypium hirsutum irrigation scheduling lint yield Texas |
Title | Contribution of Boll Mass and Boll Number to Irrigated Cotton Yield |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2134%2Fagronj15.0024 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2524240488 |
Volume | 107 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLdgu8AB8Sk6BjIS4lJS4sRp6mNXjW4VK6japHGKHNuBTVWCSqpJ_PW8ZyepiwoaXKLGcpwm75f34Wf_HiFvCq10GMc6GJmRDLjOZSDDRAWjyHCdRlKzHOc7zubDkws-u0wuN0uC7O6SOh-onzv3lfyPVKEN5Iq7ZP9Bst2g0AC_Qb5wBAnD8VYyRmqptmAVen1HINT-GbjDNiVgz-a24gd6mKerFdJp4IxuVSOZxhdcvOY7p-OvK7vFoe_f3NI34ry3y07ky3Uno6vl0hEUYJ7-dNB1L6ubRptNvnnJn8UVIMSlQ6Zg6_ofB_6UA0u6NVW-GoVP16lR4zQn-F0Bkt9tqVZX0bbBUOIpSggsE8_ootewS6Ej3xxaK3z-a2anv_jGcrXZ-t8MWrfMEAIcHCBrL8_w8rtkP4KQAnTi_tHx_POiyzkxwVkbLOHDOUZWHOD91v23PZhNWOIHN9Y7OX9IHjRhBR07jDwid0z5mNwHgTbUKuYJmfhooVVBER8U0UIBLe7MoYXWFe3QQh1aqEXLU3Lx4fh8chI0JTQCBZqaB3maFIoXMtfDVIShLkQhGfjcMo0Ni2Mk4w-NHupY8NxEiivwmYZKRkIzLkXI42dkr6xK85zQXKWCqZjLUYExayG0YqLQCbRiyQLRI-_a15Kphl8ey5wss51i6JG3XffvjljlTx1ft-84A9WH-SxZmmr9I4sS3NuEJqhHuH35fx8pG09n0Xi6-DSfQRgEDQe3_Q8vyL3Nd3BI9urV2rwEZ7TOXzUo-gWY54jU |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution+of+Boll+Mass+and+Boll+Number+to+Irrigated+Cotton+Yield&rft.jtitle=Agronomy+journal&rft.au=Sharma%2C+Bablu&rft.au=Mills%2C+Cory+I.&rft.au=Snowden%2C+Chase&rft.au=Ritchie%2C+Glen+L.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1845&rft.epage=1853&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134%2Fagronj15.0024&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2134_agronj15_0024 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-1962&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-1962&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-1962&client=summon |