Reconstruction in Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancers

• Published in: Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 211 - 221
• Main Authors: Noothanapati, Nageswara R., Akali, Nisha R., Buggaveeti, Rahul, Balasubramanian, Deepak, Mathew, Jimmy, Iyer, Subramania, Thankappan, Krishnakumar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.09.2023
• Subjects: Original; free flaps; salvage surgery; head and neck cancer; morbidity; oral cancer
• ISSN: 1943-3875; 1943-3883
• DOI: 10.1177/19433875221109248

Introduction Salvage surgery is the treatment option in recurrences and second primary tumors. This paper aimed to study the options and outcomes of reconstruction and the predictors of poor reconstructive outcomes in salvage surgery for head and neck cancers. Study Design This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent reconstructive flap surgery as part of salvage surgery for head and neck cancers between the years 2004 and 2017. Methods The initial treatment may be single modality radiotherapy or surgery or multimodality with combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Any pathology that required surgical salvage was included. Any procedures done purely as reconstructive surgery were excluded. Predictor variables included demographical, clinical, and treatment factors. The outcome parameter was the occurrence of any flap-related complication or not. The complications and morbidity related to the procedures are reported Results Ninety-three patients underwent loco-regional flaps (LRF group), and 100 had free flaps (FF group). Pectoralis major flap was the commonest flap used in 68 patients (73.1%). Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap was the commonest free flap and comprised 41% of the FF group. Any skin-related complication was seen in 35 patients (37.6%) and 41 (41%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Any flap-related complication was seen in 16 patients (17.2%) and 29 patients (29%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. A summary measure “any one of the complications” was seen in 46 (49.5%) and 57 (57%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Univariate and multivariate analysis for any flap-related complication identified no statistically significant predictor. Conclusions Soft tissue flaps were preferred in salvage reconstruction, though the defects had a bony component. In the microvascular free flap reconstruction era, pectoralis major flap has shifted its role from a “workhorse flap” to a “salvage flap.” About half of the patients develop some complications. Flap-related complications are also common. In salvage surgery, it is important that an appropriate flap is selected, suitable for the setting, according to the indications, neck, and patient conditions.