Clustering of the chemical properties of small‐scale farm soils to develop fertilizer blend ratios
Crop management through site‐specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato‐specific fertilizer has not been fully established in Kenya, and the current fertilizer recommendation has been in place for a long time. A study was designed through soil sampling...
Saved in:
Published in | Agrosystems, geosciences & environment Vol. 7; no. 1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.03.2024
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2639-6696 2639-6696 |
DOI | 10.1002/agg2.20468 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Crop management through site‐specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato‐specific fertilizer has not been fully established in Kenya, and the current fertilizer recommendation has been in place for a long time. A study was designed through soil sampling from small‐scale farms to make a soil‐based fertilizer recommendation for potato production. Inverse distance weighting interpolation was used to study spatial distribution of pH and major nutrients. Cluster analysis was used to group sampled farms into similar fertility clusters for easier fertilizer recommendations. Spatial distribution maps were identified for the project area. Three and four clusters were established in Meru and Nyandarua counties, respectively, among which three had adequate nutrients for potato production. At least 150 kg N ha
−1
is recommended in most of the farms and 160 kg P ha
−1
in Nyandarua, while 285 kg K ha
−1
was recommended in one of the clusters (nitrogen, phosporus, potassium [NPK] 1:1:1.5). Cluster analysis can be used to enhance fertilizer recommendations. The assumption that K is adequate in tropical soil should not be generalized. Fertilizers in the market with formulations close to the recommended ones should be evaluated for field performances and adjustment of the final potato fertilizer.
Inverse distance weighing interpolation clearly showed spatial distribution of pH and major soil chemical properties for better fertility management.
Cluster analysis of soil chemical properties was able to delineate farms that could have the same fertilizer recommendation.
There is a need for different fertilizer recommendations between Meru and Nyandarua. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Crop management through site-specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato-specific fertilizer has not been fully established in Kenya, and the current fertilizer recommendation has been in place for a long time. A study was designed through soil sampling from small-scale farms to make a soil-based fertilizer recommendation for potato production. Inverse distance weighting interpolation was used to study spatial distribution of pH and major nutrients. Cluster analysis was used to group sampled farms into similar fertility clusters for easier fertilizer recommendations. Spatial distribution maps were identified for the project area. Three and four clusters were established in Meru and Nyandarua counties, respectively, among which three had adequate nutrients for potato production. At least 150 kg N ha−1 is recommended in most of the farms and 160 kg P ha−1 in Nyandarua, while 285 kg K ha−1 was recommended in one of the clusters (nitrogen, phosporus, potassium [NPK] 1:1:1.5). Cluster analysis can be used to enhance fertilizer recommendations. The assumption that K is adequate in tropical soil should not be generalized. Fertilizers in the market with formulations close to the recommended ones should be evaluated for field performances and adjustment of the final potato fertilizer. Abstract Crop management through site‐specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato‐specific fertilizer has not been fully established in Kenya, and the current fertilizer recommendation has been in place for a long time. A study was designed through soil sampling from small‐scale farms to make a soil‐based fertilizer recommendation for potato production. Inverse distance weighting interpolation was used to study spatial distribution of pH and major nutrients. Cluster analysis was used to group sampled farms into similar fertility clusters for easier fertilizer recommendations. Spatial distribution maps were identified for the project area. Three and four clusters were established in Meru and Nyandarua counties, respectively, among which three had adequate nutrients for potato production. At least 150 kg N ha−1 is recommended in most of the farms and 160 kg P ha−1 in Nyandarua, while 285 kg K ha−1 was recommended in one of the clusters (nitrogen, phosporus, potassium [NPK] 1:1:1.5). Cluster analysis can be used to enhance fertilizer recommendations. The assumption that K is adequate in tropical soil should not be generalized. Fertilizers in the market with formulations close to the recommended ones should be evaluated for field performances and adjustment of the final potato fertilizer. Crop management through site‐specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato‐specific fertilizer has not been fully established in Kenya, and the current fertilizer recommendation has been in place for a long time. A study was designed through soil sampling from small‐scale farms to make a soil‐based fertilizer recommendation for potato production. Inverse distance weighting interpolation was used to study spatial distribution of pH and major nutrients. Cluster analysis was used to group sampled farms into similar fertility clusters for easier fertilizer recommendations. Spatial distribution maps were identified for the project area. Three and four clusters were established in Meru and Nyandarua counties, respectively, among which three had adequate nutrients for potato production. At least 150 kg N ha −1 is recommended in most of the farms and 160 kg P ha −1 in Nyandarua, while 285 kg K ha −1 was recommended in one of the clusters (nitrogen, phosporus, potassium [NPK] 1:1:1.5). Cluster analysis can be used to enhance fertilizer recommendations. The assumption that K is adequate in tropical soil should not be generalized. Fertilizers in the market with formulations close to the recommended ones should be evaluated for field performances and adjustment of the final potato fertilizer. Inverse distance weighing interpolation clearly showed spatial distribution of pH and major soil chemical properties for better fertility management. Cluster analysis of soil chemical properties was able to delineate farms that could have the same fertilizer recommendation. There is a need for different fertilizer recommendations between Meru and Nyandarua. |
Author | Dittert, Klaus Karanja, Nancy N. Gachene, Charles K. Schulte‐Geldermann, Elmar Mugo, James N. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: James N. orcidid: 0000-0002-1653-2947 surname: Mugo fullname: Mugo, James N. organization: The CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), International Potato Center, Sub‐Saharan African Regional Office Nairobi Kenya, Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology University of Nairobi Nairobi Kenya – sequence: 2 givenname: Nancy N. surname: Karanja fullname: Karanja, Nancy N. organization: Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology University of Nairobi Nairobi Kenya – sequence: 3 givenname: Charles K. surname: Gachene fullname: Gachene, Charles K. organization: Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology University of Nairobi Nairobi Kenya – sequence: 4 givenname: Klaus surname: Dittert fullname: Dittert, Klaus organization: Department of Crop Sciences, Plant Nutrition and Yield Physiology University of Gottingen Göttingen Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: Elmar surname: Schulte‐Geldermann fullname: Schulte‐Geldermann, Elmar organization: The CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), International Potato Center, Sub‐Saharan African Regional Office Nairobi Kenya, School of Life Sciences University of Applied Sciences Bingen (TH Bingen) Bingen Germany |
BookMark | eNpNkctKQzEQhoNUsF42PkHAnVDN_SRLKV4KBTe6Dmkyp56SntTkVNCVj-Az-iSe04q4mmHm45-f-Y_RqE0tIHROyRUlhF275ZJdMSKUPkBjpriZKGXU6F9_hM5KWZEepkqrSo5RmMZt6SA37RKnGncvgP0LrBvvIt7ktIHcNVCGVVm7GL8_v0q_Aly7vMYlNbHgLuEAbxDTBtcDHpsPyHgRoQ04u65J5RQd1i4WOPutJ-j57vZp-jCZP97PpjfzieeMdJNaUCKE46JiNEhJZeU51bAITIP0WlHjF4RToFWgxghJDWdQCS99AFX38Ama7XVDciu7yc3a5XebXGN3g5SX1vUGfQSrqROSgAnaG8FBLCSAqDXzGoynbNC62Gv1X3jdQunsKm1z29u3nGjBDOHM9NTlnvI5lZKh_rtKiR1CsUModhcK_wHUw4Gq |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/s41598‐020‐64036‐x 10.3390/AGRONOMY9100582 10.1007/s00374‐019‐01381‐8 10.9734/JAERI/2016/22519 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.043 10.3390/su13010194 10.1186/S40066‐023‐00409‐5 10.1080/02571862.2023.2168077 10.5923/j.ijaf.20130307.06 10.2134/agronmonogr12.2ed.c9 10.1186/S40663‐021‐00341‐9/FIGURES/4 10.1007/S00267‐008‐9157‐8 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102790 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.03.004 10.2489/jswc.73.5.567 10.1002/AGG2.20033 10.1080/00103620009370514 10.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e00225 10.3390/agronomy10121854 10.1080/00103624.2015.1043442 10.1017/S0014479797000203 10.1080/00387010802375065 10.1080/10106049.2022.2063413 10.4141/CJSS07107 10.1002/agj2.20827 10.1111/sum.12270 10.5772/intechopen.89040 10.1016/J.ETI.2021.101892 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10190 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012 10.1007/BF02871960 10.14445/23942568/ijaes‐v7i4p101 10.1016/J.SCIAF.2021.E00951 10.1002/jpln.201200603 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114474 10.5539/jas.v5n5p182 10.1038/s41598‐019‐40367‐2 10.9734/IJPSS/2015/13037 10.1080/23311932.2021.1898762 10.1002/AGG2.20420 10.1081/CSS‐120003067 10.3390/su11247084 10.1016/0016‐7061(90)90021‐Z 10.3390/su12145809 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01315-4 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X2 8FE 8FH 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI BKSAR CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ M0K PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYCSY DOA |
DOI | 10.1002/agg2.20468 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Agricultural & Environmental Science & Pollution Managment ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Agriculture Science Database Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Environmental Science Collection DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | Agricultural Science Database CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 2639-6696 |
EndPage | n/a |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_81a450e9d8c943e4b5ee4f82c8e9c12c 10_1002_agg2_20468 |
GeographicLocations | Kenya |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Kenya |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 1OC 24P 7X2 AAHBH AAHHS AAYXX ACCFJ ACCMX ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUYN AFKRA AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ATCPS AVUZU BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BKSAR CCPQU CITATION EBS ECGQY EJD GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ IAO IEP ITC M0K M~E OK1 PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PYCSY 3V. 8FE 8FH 8FK AAMMB ABUWG AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS WIN PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-f41044a34721d55157c318ebd28e5c8619cb031e17d199451932e74c5cde6f7c3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2639-6696 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:05:25 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 10:51:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:05:52 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c320t-f41044a34721d55157c318ebd28e5c8619cb031e17d199451932e74c5cde6f7c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1653-2947 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/81a450e9d8c943e4b5ee4f82c8e9c12c |
PQID | 3084290329 |
PQPubID | 5066180 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_81a450e9d8c943e4b5ee4f82c8e9c12c proquest_journals_3084290329 crossref_primary_10_1002_agg2_20468 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-03-00 20240301 2024-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2024 text: 2024-03-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Agrosystems, geosciences & environment |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | Kenya Soil Survey (e_1_2_11_25_1) 2014 USAID‐KAVES (e_1_2_11_61_1) 2015 IFDC (e_1_2_11_18_1) 2022 e_1_2_11_32_1 e_1_2_11_55_1 e_1_2_11_30_1 FURP (e_1_2_11_12_1) 1994 e_1_2_11_36_1 e_1_2_11_51_1 e_1_2_11_13_1 Jaetzold R. (e_1_2_11_20_1) 2006 e_1_2_11_34_1 e_1_2_11_53_1 e_1_2_11_11_1 e_1_2_11_29_1 e_1_2_11_6_1 e_1_2_11_27_1 e_1_2_11_4_1 Erp P. J. (e_1_2_11_62_1) 2014 e_1_2_11_48_1 e_1_2_11_2_1 Tamene L. (e_1_2_11_59_1) 2017 IFDC (e_1_2_11_17_1) 2018 e_1_2_11_60_1 e_1_2_11_66_1 Boulanger P. (e_1_2_11_5_1) 2017 e_1_2_11_47_1 e_1_2_11_24_1 e_1_2_11_41_1 e_1_2_11_8_1 e_1_2_11_22_1 e_1_2_11_43_1 e_1_2_11_64_1 e_1_2_11_15_1 e_1_2_11_38_1 e_1_2_11_19_1 Sharma R. C. (e_1_2_11_57_1) 2001 Sommer R. (e_1_2_11_58_1) 2013 Muthoni J. (e_1_2_11_46_1) 2009; 1 Mulder I. (e_1_2_11_45_1) 2000 e_1_2_11_10_1 e_1_2_11_31_1 e_1_2_11_14_1 e_1_2_11_35_1 e_1_2_11_52_1 e_1_2_11_33_1 e_1_2_11_54_1 e_1_2_11_7_1 e_1_2_11_28_1 e_1_2_11_26_1 e_1_2_11_3_1 e_1_2_11_49_1 Sanabria J. (e_1_2_11_56_1) 2018 Mugo (e_1_2_11_39_1) 2013; 1 e_1_2_11_21_1 e_1_2_11_44_1 e_1_2_11_40_1 e_1_2_11_63_1 e_1_2_11_9_1 e_1_2_11_23_1 e_1_2_11_42_1 e_1_2_11_65_1 e_1_2_11_16_1 e_1_2_11_37_1 NPCK (e_1_2_11_50_1) 2018 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_2_11_42_1 doi: 10.1038/s41598‐020‐64036‐x – ident: e_1_2_11_16_1 doi: 10.3390/AGRONOMY9100582 – ident: e_1_2_11_23_1 doi: 10.1007/s00374‐019‐01381‐8 – ident: e_1_2_11_44_1 doi: 10.9734/JAERI/2016/22519 – volume-title: Potato value chain analysis year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_11_61_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_29_1 doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.043 – ident: e_1_2_11_2_1 doi: 10.3390/su13010194 – ident: e_1_2_11_53_1 doi: 10.1186/S40066‐023‐00409‐5 – ident: e_1_2_11_9_1 doi: 10.1080/02571862.2023.2168077 – ident: e_1_2_11_35_1 doi: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20130307.06 – volume-title: Potato production handbook: A guideline for farmers and trainers year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_11_50_1 – volume-title: Farm management handbook of Kenya year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_11_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_24_1 doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr12.2ed.c9 – volume: 1 start-page: 98 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_11_46_1 article-title: A review of constraints to ware Irish potatoes production in Kenya publication-title: Forestry – ident: e_1_2_11_8_1 doi: 10.1186/S40663‐021‐00341‐9/FIGURES/4 – ident: e_1_2_11_37_1 doi: 10.1007/S00267‐008‐9157‐8 – ident: e_1_2_11_38_1 – volume-title: Fertilizer Use Recommendation Project (FURP) Kirinyaga district year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_11_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_55_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102790 – ident: e_1_2_11_60_1 doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.03.004 – ident: e_1_2_11_51_1 doi: 10.2489/jswc.73.5.567 – ident: e_1_2_11_32_1 doi: 10.1002/AGG2.20033 – ident: e_1_2_11_15_1 doi: 10.1080/00103620009370514 – volume-title: Boosting the fertilizer production in Kenya: A CGE analysis year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_11_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_52_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e00225 – volume-title: Assessment of fertilizer distribution and opportunities for developing fertilizer blends year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_11_17_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_26_1 doi: 10.3390/agronomy10121854 – ident: e_1_2_11_30_1 doi: 10.1080/00103624.2015.1043442 – ident: e_1_2_11_54_1 doi: 10.1017/S0014479797000203 – ident: e_1_2_11_14_1 doi: 10.1080/00387010802375065 – ident: e_1_2_11_10_1 doi: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2063413 – ident: e_1_2_11_7_1 doi: 10.4141/CJSS07107 – volume-title: Soil fertility: QUEFTS and farmers’ perceptions year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_11_45_1 – volume-title: Soil fertility status and NPK blends at planting for maize growing in the western Kenyan Counties Uasin Gishu and Busia year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_11_62_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_40_1 doi: 10.1002/agj2.20827 – ident: e_1_2_11_22_1 – volume-title: Profitable and sustainable nutrient management systems for east and southern African smallholder farming systems—Challenges and opportunities: A synthesis of the Eastern and Southern Africa situation in terms of past experiences, present and future opportunities in promoting nutrients use in Africa year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_11_58_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_13_1 doi: 10.1111/sum.12270 – ident: e_1_2_11_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_64_1 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.89040 – ident: e_1_2_11_27_1 doi: 10.1016/J.ETI.2021.101892 – ident: e_1_2_11_48_1 doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10190 – volume: 1 start-page: 1 year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_11_39_1 article-title: Criticalshoot nitrogen content for potato varieties Asante and Tigoni in Kenya publication-title: JKUAT – volume-title: Fertilizer quality assessment in markets of Kenya year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_11_56_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012 – ident: e_1_2_11_63_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02871960 – ident: e_1_2_11_33_1 doi: 10.14445/23942568/ijaes‐v7i4p101 – ident: e_1_2_11_3_1 doi: 10.1016/J.SCIAF.2021.E00951 – start-page: 363 volume-title: Proceedings of the Intentional Symposium on the Role of Potassium in Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production in India year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_11_57_1 – volume-title: Fertili zer bulk blending guide—Harmonized guidelines of good practice for quality control across West Africa year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_11_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_11_1 doi: 10.1002/jpln.201200603 – ident: e_1_2_11_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114474 – ident: e_1_2_11_47_1 doi: 10.5539/jas.v5n5p182 – ident: e_1_2_11_65_1 doi: 10.1038/s41598‐019‐40367‐2 – ident: e_1_2_11_43_1 doi: 10.9734/IJPSS/2015/13037 – ident: e_1_2_11_41_1 doi: 10.1080/23311932.2021.1898762 – ident: e_1_2_11_4_1 doi: 10.1002/AGG2.20420 – ident: e_1_2_11_49_1 doi: 10.1081/CSS‐120003067 – ident: e_1_2_11_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_36_1 doi: 10.3390/su11247084 – volume-title: A review of soil fertility management and crop response to fertilizer application in Ethiopia: Towards development of site‐ and context‐specific fertilizer recommendation year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_11_59_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_21_1 doi: 10.1016/0016‐7061(90)90021‐Z – ident: e_1_2_11_66_1 doi: 10.3390/su12145809 – volume-title: Soil suitability evaluation for maize production in Kenya year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_11_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_31_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01315-4 |
SSID | ssj0002168675 |
Score | 2.2490616 |
Snippet | Crop management through site‐specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato‐specific fertilizer has not been fully... Crop management through site-specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato-specific fertilizer has not been fully... Abstract Crop management through site‐specific fertility methods is crucial for both economic and environmental benefits. Potato‐specific fertilizer has not... |
SourceID | doaj proquest crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database |
SubjectTerms | Agriculture Analytical chemistry Chemical properties Cluster analysis Clustering Clusters Crop management Environmental management Farmers Farms Fertilizers Formulations Nutrients Potatoes Ratios Small farms Small-scale farming Soil analysis Soil chemistry Soil fertility Soil properties Soil sampling Soil testing Spatial distribution Tropical environments Tropical soils Vegetables |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NS-wwEA9-XPTw8BPXpxLQa3A3Tbfp6aGiiKCIKHgr6WSyCHW7trsX__o3082ugiD0lOQ0mY_fTDO_EeIsJ9TtMclUhjkoY02irIFcofc-eCCM7bh3-P5hePti7l7T11hwa-OzyoVP7By1r4Fr5OdJ35Lr7Cc6_zf5UDw1iv-uxhEaq2KdXLCl5Gv98vrh8WlZZdGDoSVIvOQl1eduNOL-K8Pcqt8iUUfY_8Mfd0HmZkv8iehQXsyvc1us4HhHbF6MmsiQgbuivKpmTG5AIUfWQRJ-kxCb_uWEK-sNU6TyVvvuqkq1tIEyuOZdtvVb1cppLWOnlAx8uHr7xEaWFH287NSh3RMvN9fPV7cqDkpQkOj-VAVDSZVxiaF0zhMESjMgU8XSa4spWMqRoCTjxUHmmQq4A22YGUjB4zDQ4X2xNq7HeCAklKXjL7FoTerAMl-fszAENCYLoSdOF0IrJnM-jGLOfKwLFm3RibYnLlmeyxPMYd0t1M2oiCZR2IEzaR9zbyE3CZoyRTTBarCkNgMNPXG0uI0iGlZbfKnB4e_bf8WGJvwxfy52JNamzQyPCT9My5OoJP8Bj1zIaA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Clustering of the chemical properties of small‐scale farm soils to develop fertilizer blend ratios |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3084290329 https://doaj.org/article/81a450e9d8c943e4b5ee4f82c8e9c12c |
Volume | 7 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NS8NAEF1EL15EUbF-lAW9hiabTbM52tJSBIuIgrewmZ0VIbbS1Isnf4K_0V_iTJKWggcvQk7ZIQkzmX1vlp23QlxlxLodxmmQYgaBNjoOjIYsQOecd0Ac23Lv8O20P3nUN0_J08ZRX7wnrJEHbhzXM5HVSYiZM5DpGHWRIGpvFBh6eKSAZ1_CvI1iiudgFfUNUeG1Hqnq2edn7rvSrKm6gUC1UP-vebgGl_G-2GtZobxuvuZAbOHsULhh-c4yBgQucu4lMTUJbXu_fOM19AWLofJQ9WrL8vvzq6IhlN4uXmU1fykruZzLtitKejYvXz5wIQtCGifr0FdH4nE8ehhOgvZQhABiFS4Dr6mA0jbWVLo5ojtJCpSWWDhlMAFD9RAUlKgYpY5lf2uChqmGBBz2PRkfi-3ZfIYnQkJRWL5ig0YnFgxr81kDfUCtU-874nLlqPyt0b7IG5VjlbM789qdHTFgH64tWK-6vkFRzNso5n9FsSPOVxHI2ySq8jg0hJZhrLLT_3jHmdhVxEiaDWTnYnu5eMcLYhTLoit2BqPp3X23_ol-APrlztc |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2V7QE4ID7VhQKWgKPVXdvZOAeE2tJqS9sVQq3Um3Hs8apSulmSrRD8KH4j43wslSpxq5RTbOUwfp5543jeALzPiHV7lClPMXNcaSW5Vi7j6L0P3hHHtrF2-HQ2mZ6rLxfJxQb86Wth4rXK3ic2jtqXLp6R78iRJtc5kiL7tPzBY9eo-He1b6HRwuIYf_2klK3-ePSZ1veDEIcHZ_tT3nUV4E6K0YoHRRmIslJR7uOJLySpI1xj7oXGxGlKKFxOSMdx6qNubsNwMFUucR4ngSbTd-_BppKUygxgc-9g9vXb-lRHjCeaKPhaB1Xs2Pk81nupqOV6I_I1DQJu-f8mqB0-hkcdG2W7LXyewAYunsLD3XnVKXLgM8j3i-sopkAhjpWBEV9krhMZYMt4kl9FSdY4VF_ZouA1DSALtrpidXlZ1GxVsq4yi4U4ubj8jRXLKdp51sCvfg7nd2LCFzBYlAvcAuby3MZHatQqsU5HfUCr3cShUmkIQ3jXG80sW_0N0yotCxNNaxrTDmEv2nM9I2pmNy_Kam66LWj02KpkhJnXLlMSVZ4gqqCF0wTTsXBD2O5Xw3QbuTb_YPfy_8Nv4f707PTEnBzNjl_BA0Hcp72qtg2DVXWNr4m7rPI3HWAYfL9rjP4FrAkDkg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Na9wwEB3SDZT2ENIvukmaCtoezXpleS0fSsnXkjTtEkoDuamyNFoCznpjbyjtT-uv68iWt4VCbwGfLOHD6EnzRp55A_A2J9ZtMcmiDHMTCSmSSAqTR2itddYQx9a-dvjzbHJ6KT5epVcb8KuvhfFplf2Z2B7UtjL-jnyUxJKOzjjh-ciFtIiL4-mH5W3kO0j5P619O40OIuf44zuFb837s2Na63ecT0--Hp1GocNAZBIeryInKBoROhEUB1niDmlmCONYWC4xNZKCC1MQ6nGcWa-h27IdzIRJjcWJo8n03QewmVFUFA9g8_BkdvFlfcPDxxNJdHyticpHej73tV_C67r-5QXbZgH_-ILWwU23YSswU3bQQekJbODiKTw-mNdBnQOfQXFU3nlhBXJ3rHKMuCMzQXCALf2tfu3lWf1Qc6PLMmpoAJnT9Q1rquuyYauKhSot5vzk8von1qwgz2dZC8XmOVzeiwlfwGBRLfAlMFMU2j-JRClSbaTXCtTSTAwKkTk3hDe90dSy0-JQneoyV960qjXtEA69PdczvH52-6Kq5ypsRyXHWqQx5laaXCQoihRROMmNJMiOuRnCXr8aKmzqRv2B4M7_h1_DQ8Km-nQ2O9-FR5xoUJe1tgeDVX2Hr4jGrIr9gBcG3-4bor8Ba6wHxw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clustering+of+the+chemical+properties+of+small%E2%80%90scale+farm+soils+to+develop+fertilizer+blend+ratios&rft.jtitle=Agrosystems%2C+geosciences+%26+environment&rft.au=James+N.+Mugo&rft.au=Nancy+N.+Karanja&rft.au=Charles+K.+Gachene&rft.au=Klaus+Dittert&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.eissn=2639-6696&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n%2Fa&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fagg2.20468&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_81a450e9d8c943e4b5ee4f82c8e9c12c |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2639-6696&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2639-6696&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2639-6696&client=summon |