Enhanced POLYMER atmospheric correction algorithm for water-leaving radiance retrievals from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in inland and coastal waters
Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a challenge due to the excessive concentrations of phytoplankton and suspended sediments as well as the inaccurate estimation and extrapolation...
Saved in:
Published in | Optics express Vol. 32; no. 5; p. 7659 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
26.02.2024
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a challenge due to the excessive concentrations of phytoplankton and suspended sediments as well as the inaccurate estimation and extrapolation of aerosol radiance over the visible wavelengths. In recent years, reasonably accurate methods were established to estimate the enhanced contribution of suspended sediments in the near-infrared (NIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands to enable atmospheric correction in coastal waters, but solutions to derive the dominant phytoplankton contribution in the NIR and SWIR bands are less generalizable and subject to large uncertainties in the remotely-derived water color products. These issues are not only associated with the standard atmospheric correction algorithm in the SeaDAS processing system but with the non-traditional algorithms such as POLYMER (POLYnomial-based approach established for the atmospheric correction of MERIS data). This study attempts to enhance the POLYMER algorithm to enable atmospheric correction of hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data over a wide range of inland and ocean waters. The original POLYMER algorithm is less suitable owing to its complete reliance on a polynomial approach to model the atmospheric reflectance as a function of the wavelength and retrieve the water-leaving reflectance using two semi-analytical models (MM01 and PR05). The polynomial functions calculate the bulk atmospheric contribution instead of using an explicit method to estimate aerosol radiance separately, resulting the erroneous water color products in inland and coastal waters. The modified POLYMER algorithm (mPOLYMER) employs more realistic approaches to estimate aerosol contributions with a combination of UV and Visible-NIR bands and enables accurate retrievals of water-leaving radiance from both hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data. To assess the relative performance and wider applicability of mPOLYMER, the original and enhanced algorithms were tested on a variety of HICO, MSI and MODIS-Aqua data and the retrieved
L
wn
products were compared with AERONET-OC and OOIL-regional in-situ data. Expectedly, the mPOLYMER algorithm greatly improved the accuracy of
L
wn
(in terms of magnitude and spectral shape) when applied to MODIS-Aqua and HICO data in highly turbid productive waters (with higher concentrations of phytoplankton or with dense algal blooms) in Muttukadu Lagoon, Lake Erie, Yangtze River Estuary, Baltic Sea and Arabian Sea. In contrast, the original POLYMER algorithm overestimated
L
wn
in the visible and NIR bands and produced unphysical negative
L
wn
or distorted
L
wn
spectra in turbid productive waters. The mPOLYMER yielded a relative mean error reduction of more than 50% (i.e., from 79% to 34%) in
L
wn
for a large number of matchup data. The improved accuracy and data quality is because the mPOLYMER algorithm’s funio and coefficients sufficiently accounted for the enhanced backscattering contribution of phytoplankton and suspended sediments in optically complex waters. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a challenge due to the excessive concentrations of phytoplankton and suspended sediments as well as the inaccurate estimation and extrapolation of aerosol radiance over the visible wavelengths. In recent years, reasonably accurate methods were established to estimate the enhanced contribution of suspended sediments in the near-infrared (NIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands to enable atmospheric correction in coastal waters, but solutions to derive the dominant phytoplankton contribution in the NIR and SWIR bands are less generalizable and subject to large uncertainties in the remotely-derived water color products. These issues are not only associated with the standard atmospheric correction algorithm in the SeaDAS processing system but with the non-traditional algorithms such as POLYMER (POLYnomial-based approach established for the atmospheric correction of MERIS data). This study attempts to enhance the POLYMER algorithm to enable atmospheric correction of hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data over a wide range of inland and ocean waters. The original POLYMER algorithm is less suitable owing to its complete reliance on a polynomial approach to model the atmospheric reflectance as a function of the wavelength and retrieve the water-leaving reflectance using two semi-analytical models (MM01 and PR05). The polynomial functions calculate the bulk atmospheric contribution instead of using an explicit method to estimate aerosol radiance separately, resulting the erroneous water color products in inland and coastal waters. The modified POLYMER algorithm (mPOLYMER) employs more realistic approaches to estimate aerosol contributions with a combination of UV and Visible-NIR bands and enables accurate retrievals of water-leaving radiance from both hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data. To assess the relative performance and wider applicability of mPOLYMER, the original and enhanced algorithms were tested on a variety of HICO, MSI and MODIS-Aqua data and the retrieved
L
wn
products were compared with AERONET-OC and OOIL-regional in-situ data. Expectedly, the mPOLYMER algorithm greatly improved the accuracy of
L
wn
(in terms of magnitude and spectral shape) when applied to MODIS-Aqua and HICO data in highly turbid productive waters (with higher concentrations of phytoplankton or with dense algal blooms) in Muttukadu Lagoon, Lake Erie, Yangtze River Estuary, Baltic Sea and Arabian Sea. In contrast, the original POLYMER algorithm overestimated
L
wn
in the visible and NIR bands and produced unphysical negative
L
wn
or distorted
L
wn
spectra in turbid productive waters. The mPOLYMER yielded a relative mean error reduction of more than 50% (i.e., from 79% to 34%) in
L
wn
for a large number of matchup data. The improved accuracy and data quality is because the mPOLYMER algorithm’s funio and coefficients sufficiently accounted for the enhanced backscattering contribution of phytoplankton and suspended sediments in optically complex waters. Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a challenge due to the excessive concentrations of phytoplankton and suspended sediments as well as the inaccurate estimation and extrapolation of aerosol radiance over the visible wavelengths. In recent years, reasonably accurate methods were established to estimate the enhanced contribution of suspended sediments in the near-infrared (NIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands to enable atmospheric correction in coastal waters, but solutions to derive the dominant phytoplankton contribution in the NIR and SWIR bands are less generalizable and subject to large uncertainties in the remotely-derived water color products. These issues are not only associated with the standard atmospheric correction algorithm in the SeaDAS processing system but with the non-traditional algorithms such as POLYMER (POLYnomial-based approach established for the atmospheric correction of MERIS data). This study attempts to enhance the POLYMER algorithm to enable atmospheric correction of hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data over a wide range of inland and ocean waters. The original POLYMER algorithm is less suitable owing to its complete reliance on a polynomial approach to model the atmospheric reflectance as a function of the wavelength and retrieve the water-leaving reflectance using two semi-analytical models (MM01 and PR05). The polynomial functions calculate the bulk atmospheric contribution instead of using an explicit method to estimate aerosol radiance separately, resulting the erroneous water color products in inland and coastal waters. The modified POLYMER algorithm (mPOLYMER) employs more realistic approaches to estimate aerosol contributions with a combination of UV and Visible-NIR bands and enables accurate retrievals of water-leaving radiance from both hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data. To assess the relative performance and wider applicability of mPOLYMER, the original and enhanced algorithms were tested on a variety of HICO, MSI and MODIS-Aqua data and the retrieved L products were compared with AERONET-OC and OOIL-regional in-situ data. Expectedly, the mPOLYMER algorithm greatly improved the accuracy of L (in terms of magnitude and spectral shape) when applied to MODIS-Aqua and HICO data in highly turbid productive waters (with higher concentrations of phytoplankton or with dense algal blooms) in Muttukadu Lagoon, Lake Erie, Yangtze River Estuary, Baltic Sea and Arabian Sea. In contrast, the original POLYMER algorithm overestimated L in the visible and NIR bands and produced unphysical negative L or distorted L spectra in turbid productive waters. The mPOLYMER yielded a relative mean error reduction of more than 50% (i.e., from 79% to 34%) in L for a large number of matchup data. The improved accuracy and data quality is because the mPOLYMER algorithm's funio and coefficients sufficiently accounted for the enhanced backscattering contribution of phytoplankton and suspended sediments in optically complex waters. Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a challenge due to the excessive concentrations of phytoplankton and suspended sediments as well as the inaccurate estimation and extrapolation of aerosol radiance over the visible wavelengths. In recent years, reasonably accurate methods were established to estimate the enhanced contribution of suspended sediments in the near-infrared (NIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands to enable atmospheric correction in coastal waters, but solutions to derive the dominant phytoplankton contribution in the NIR and SWIR bands are less generalizable and subject to large uncertainties in the remotely-derived water color products. These issues are not only associated with the standard atmospheric correction algorithm in the SeaDAS processing system but with the non-traditional algorithms such as POLYMER (POLYnomial-based approach established for the atmospheric correction of MERIS data). This study attempts to enhance the POLYMER algorithm to enable atmospheric correction of hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data over a wide range of inland and ocean waters. The original POLYMER algorithm is less suitable owing to its complete reliance on a polynomial approach to model the atmospheric reflectance as a function of the wavelength and retrieve the water-leaving reflectance using two semi-analytical models (MM01 and PR05). The polynomial functions calculate the bulk atmospheric contribution instead of using an explicit method to estimate aerosol radiance separately, resulting the erroneous water color products in inland and coastal waters. The modified POLYMER algorithm (mPOLYMER) employs more realistic approaches to estimate aerosol contributions with a combination of UV and Visible-NIR bands and enables accurate retrievals of water-leaving radiance from both hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data. To assess the relative performance and wider applicability of mPOLYMER, the original and enhanced algorithms were tested on a variety of HICO, MSI and MODIS-Aqua data and the retrieved Lwn products were compared with AERONET-OC and OOIL-regional in-situ data. Expectedly, the mPOLYMER algorithm greatly improved the accuracy of Lwn (in terms of magnitude and spectral shape) when applied to MODIS-Aqua and HICO data in highly turbid productive waters (with higher concentrations of phytoplankton or with dense algal blooms) in Muttukadu Lagoon, Lake Erie, Yangtze River Estuary, Baltic Sea and Arabian Sea. In contrast, the original POLYMER algorithm overestimated Lwn in the visible and NIR bands and produced unphysical negative Lwn or distorted Lwn spectra in turbid productive waters. The mPOLYMER yielded a relative mean error reduction of more than 50% (i.e., from 79% to 34%) in Lwn for a large number of matchup data. The improved accuracy and data quality is because the mPOLYMER algorithm's funio and coefficients sufficiently accounted for the enhanced backscattering contribution of phytoplankton and suspended sediments in optically complex waters.Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a challenge due to the excessive concentrations of phytoplankton and suspended sediments as well as the inaccurate estimation and extrapolation of aerosol radiance over the visible wavelengths. In recent years, reasonably accurate methods were established to estimate the enhanced contribution of suspended sediments in the near-infrared (NIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands to enable atmospheric correction in coastal waters, but solutions to derive the dominant phytoplankton contribution in the NIR and SWIR bands are less generalizable and subject to large uncertainties in the remotely-derived water color products. These issues are not only associated with the standard atmospheric correction algorithm in the SeaDAS processing system but with the non-traditional algorithms such as POLYMER (POLYnomial-based approach established for the atmospheric correction of MERIS data). This study attempts to enhance the POLYMER algorithm to enable atmospheric correction of hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data over a wide range of inland and ocean waters. The original POLYMER algorithm is less suitable owing to its complete reliance on a polynomial approach to model the atmospheric reflectance as a function of the wavelength and retrieve the water-leaving reflectance using two semi-analytical models (MM01 and PR05). The polynomial functions calculate the bulk atmospheric contribution instead of using an explicit method to estimate aerosol radiance separately, resulting the erroneous water color products in inland and coastal waters. The modified POLYMER algorithm (mPOLYMER) employs more realistic approaches to estimate aerosol contributions with a combination of UV and Visible-NIR bands and enables accurate retrievals of water-leaving radiance from both hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data. To assess the relative performance and wider applicability of mPOLYMER, the original and enhanced algorithms were tested on a variety of HICO, MSI and MODIS-Aqua data and the retrieved Lwn products were compared with AERONET-OC and OOIL-regional in-situ data. Expectedly, the mPOLYMER algorithm greatly improved the accuracy of Lwn (in terms of magnitude and spectral shape) when applied to MODIS-Aqua and HICO data in highly turbid productive waters (with higher concentrations of phytoplankton or with dense algal blooms) in Muttukadu Lagoon, Lake Erie, Yangtze River Estuary, Baltic Sea and Arabian Sea. In contrast, the original POLYMER algorithm overestimated Lwn in the visible and NIR bands and produced unphysical negative Lwn or distorted Lwn spectra in turbid productive waters. The mPOLYMER yielded a relative mean error reduction of more than 50% (i.e., from 79% to 34%) in Lwn for a large number of matchup data. The improved accuracy and data quality is because the mPOLYMER algorithm's funio and coefficients sufficiently accounted for the enhanced backscattering contribution of phytoplankton and suspended sediments in optically complex waters. |
Author | Karthick, Murugan He, Xianqiang Shanmugam, Palanisamy |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Murugan surname: Karthick fullname: Karthick, Murugan – sequence: 2 givenname: Palanisamy orcidid: 0000-0002-5659-4464 surname: Shanmugam fullname: Shanmugam, Palanisamy – sequence: 3 givenname: Xianqiang surname: He fullname: He, Xianqiang |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38439443$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNplkctq3DAUhkVIaS7tIi9QtEwXzsgj2bKWIbgXmDKlJIuuxBn5OKNgS66kScgj9S0rdzIQWpDQEXznk_jPGTl23iEhFyW7KnktFuv2qmKCNc0ROS2ZEkWu5fGr-oScxfjAWCmkkm_JCW8EV0LwU_K7dVtwBjv6fb36-a39QSGNPk5bDNZQ40NAk6x3FIZ7H2zajrT3gT5BwlAMCI_W3dMAnZ0lNGAKFh9hiLQPfqTb5wlDnLIiwLAYd0Oyh1tmR5-QRnRxdnSQgFqX1wCuo_M2HmLK5N_H4jvyps9ifP9ynpO7T-3tzZditf789eZ6VRi-ZKnAptlIBkvZ1aKuFYe678u6QWWQVcgZFxvV9ZWoleRVzaQApQzn5RIVg4obfk4u994p-F87jEmPNhoc8rfQ76JeKi4lywmKjH54QXebETs9BTtCeNaHeDOw2AMm-BgD9trYBHOeOQI76JLpeYB63er9AHPHx386DtL_2T-6xJ3D |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_177180 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2025_103001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpolbul_2024_117036 |
Cites_doi | 10.1364/AO.22.000020 10.1029/2010JC006796 10.1364/OE.20.000741 10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1526208 10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.008 10.1364/AO.39.003582 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112366 10.3390/rs13214206 10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.013 10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.004 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.07.005 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.07.015 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112284 10.5194/angeo-30-203-2012 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.013 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112848 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112022 10.1364/OE.19.009783 10.3389/feart.2019.00145 10.1080/10106049.2021.1958014 10.1364/OE.18.007521 10.1364/OE.27.0A1118 10.1080/01431161.2019.1675330 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.021 10.3390/s21124125 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2227993 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.09.011 10.1364/OE.27.030116 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.041 10.1016/j.asr.2018.02.024 10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.006 10.3390/rs11060668 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2969900 10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.018 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.001 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.016 10.1364/AO.33.000443 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2520501 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.03.020 10.1029/2000JC000319 10.1364/OE.393968 10.1364/AO.44.001236 10.5194/osd-11-2791-2014 10.1016/0034-4257(87)90029-0 10.3390/rs11232820 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.03.010 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2907884 10.1029/2004JD004950 10.1364/AO.40.004790 10.3390/rs14020386 10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.045 10.1029/2006GL028599 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.033 10.1016/j.rse.2008.11.005 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105308 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1364/OE.504088 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physics |
EISSN | 1094-4087 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38439443 10_1364_OE_504088 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29N 2WC 8SL AAFWJ AAWJZ AAYXX ACGFO ADBBV AEDJG AENEX AFPKN AKGWG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATHME AYPRP AZSQR AZYMN BAWUL BCNDV CITATION CS3 DIK DSZJF DU5 E3Z EBS F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 KQ8 M~E OFLFD OK1 OPJBK OPLUZ OVT P2P RNS ROL ROS TR2 TR6 XSB NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-e88b70a27d646693a6ff168e9ce05e3034b9df54697356074a99c3312e90a53c3 |
ISSN | 1094-4087 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 08:27:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:01:52 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:37 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c320t-e88b70a27d646693a6ff168e9ce05e3034b9df54697356074a99c3312e90a53c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-5659-4464 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.504088 |
PMID | 38439443 |
PQID | 2937703844 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2937703844 pubmed_primary_38439443 crossref_citationtrail_10_1364_OE_504088 crossref_primary_10_1364_OE_504088 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-02-26 2024-Feb-26 20240226 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-02-26 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2024 text: 2024-02-26 day: 26 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Optics express |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Opt Express |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
References | Singh (oe-32-5-7659-R41) 2014; 142 Siegel (oe-32-5-7659-R6) 2000; 39 Tavares (oe-32-5-7659-R24) 2021; 174 Singh (oe-32-5-7659-R42) 2014; 11 Shanmugam (oe-32-5-7659-R16) 2012; 30 Morel (oe-32-5-7659-R62) 2001; 106 Gordon (oe-32-5-7659-R13) 1987; 22 Zhang (oe-32-5-7659-R51) 2019; 57 Park (oe-32-5-7659-R15) 2005; 44 Shanmugam (oe-32-5-7659-R40) 2018; 61 Kulshreshtha (oe-32-5-7659-R44) 2018; 44 Lenoble (oe-32-5-7659-R60) 2007; 107 Xue (oe-32-5-7659-R20) 2021; 179 He (oe-32-5-7659-R2) 2004; 23 Wang (oe-32-5-7659-R5) 2007; 34 Wang (oe-32-5-7659-R4) 2005; 110 Zhang (oe-32-5-7659-R35) 2020; 58 Wei (oe-32-5-7659-R26) 2018; 215 Singh (oe-32-5-7659-R39) 2016; 9 Gordon (oe-32-5-7659-R12) 1983; 22 Pahlevan (oe-32-5-7659-R52) 2021; 258 Banerjee (oe-32-5-7659-R43) 2021; 67 Fan (oe-32-5-7659-R21) 2017; 199 Warren (oe-32-5-7659-R33) 2019; 225 Varunan (oe-32-5-7659-R37) 2015; 158 Gordon (oe-32-5-7659-R1) 1994; 33 Wang (oe-32-5-7659-R3) 2001; 40 Al Shehhi (oe-32-5-7659-R27) 2017; 133 Li (oe-32-5-7659-R46) 2020; 249 Goyens (oe-32-5-7659-R22) 2013; 131 Nazeer (oe-32-5-7659-R28) 2021; 249 Ibrahim (oe-32-5-7659-R23) 2018; 204 Liu (oe-32-5-7659-R19) 2019; 153 Jaelani (oe-32-5-7659-R31) 2015; 39 Wang (oe-32-5-7659-R8) 2009; 113 Vanhellemont (oe-32-5-7659-R53) 2021; 256 Schamberger (oe-32-5-7659-R54) 2022; 14 Shanmugam (oe-32-5-7659-R47) 2013; 6 Shanmugam (oe-32-5-7659-R30) 2019; 27 Tan (oe-32-5-7659-R49) 2019; 11 Bailey (oe-32-5-7659-R14) 2010; 18 Soppa (oe-32-5-7659-R55) 2021; 21 Steinmetz (oe-32-5-7659-R9) 2011; 19 Qiao (oe-32-5-7659-R18) 2021; 13 Nelder (oe-32-5-7659-R61) 1965; 7 Singh (oe-32-5-7659-R38) 2019; 27 Schroeder (oe-32-5-7659-R29) 2022; 270 Ahn (oe-32-5-7659-R10) 2005; 1 Mograne (oe-32-5-7659-R36) 2019; 11 Karthick (oe-32-5-7659-R45) 2020; 41 Wang (oe-32-5-7659-R34) 2020; 28 Pan (oe-32-5-7659-R25) 2017; 191 Wang (oe-32-5-7659-R7) 2005; 110 Shanmugam (oe-32-5-7659-R17) 2011; 116 Grendaitė (oe-32-5-7659-R11) 2022; 37 Frouin (oe-32-5-7659-R32) 2019; 7 Shanmugam (oe-32-5-7659-R48) 2016; 175 |
References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 20 year: 1983 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R12 publication-title: Appl. Opt. doi: 10.1364/AO.22.000020 – volume: 116 start-page: C04016 year: 2011 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R17 publication-title: J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. doi: 10.1029/2010JC006796 – volume: 110 start-page: 1 year: 2005 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R7 publication-title: J. Geophys. Res. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.000741 – volume: 1 start-page: 452 year: 2005 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R10 publication-title: Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2005.1526208 – volume: 158 start-page: 235 year: 2015 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R37 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.008 – volume: 39 start-page: 3582 year: 2000 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R6 publication-title: Appl. Opt. doi: 10.1364/AO.39.003582 – volume: 258 start-page: 112366 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R52 publication-title: Remote Sens Environ doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112366 – volume: 13 start-page: 4206 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R18 publication-title: Remote Sens. doi: 10.3390/rs13214206 – volume: 191 start-page: 197 year: 2017 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R25 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.013 – volume: 39 start-page: 128 year: 2015 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R31 publication-title: Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.004 – volume: 179 start-page: 92 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R20 publication-title: ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.07.005 – volume: 44 start-page: 1010 year: 2018 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R44 publication-title: J. Great Lakes Res. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.07.015 – volume: 256 start-page: 112284 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R53 publication-title: Remote Sens Environ doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112284 – volume: 30 start-page: 203 year: 2012 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R16 publication-title: Ann. Geophys. doi: 10.5194/angeo-30-203-2012 – volume: 153 start-page: 59 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R19 publication-title: ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.013 – volume: 270 start-page: 112848 year: 2022 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R29 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112848 – volume: 249 start-page: 112022 year: 2020 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R46 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112022 – volume: 19 start-page: 9783 year: 2011 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R9 publication-title: Opt. Express doi: 10.1364/OE.19.009783 – volume: 7 start-page: 145 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R32 publication-title: Front. Earth Sci. doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00145 – volume: 37 start-page: 6867 year: 2022 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R11 publication-title: Geocarto Int. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1958014 – volume: 18 start-page: 7521 year: 2010 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R14 publication-title: Opt. Express doi: 10.1364/OE.18.007521 – volume: 27 start-page: A1118 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R38 publication-title: Opt. Express doi: 10.1364/OE.27.0A1118 – volume: 41 start-page: 1839 year: 2020 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R45 publication-title: Int. J. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1675330 – volume: 174 start-page: 215 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R24 publication-title: ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.021 – volume: 21 start-page: 4125 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R55 publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s21124125 – volume: 6 start-page: 1879 year: 2013 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R47 publication-title: IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2227993 – volume: 23 start-page: 609 year: 2004 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R2 publication-title: Acta Oceanol. Sin. – volume: 133 start-page: 46 year: 2017 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R27 publication-title: ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.09.011 – volume: 27 start-page: 30116 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R30 publication-title: Opt. Express doi: 10.1364/OE.27.030116 – volume: 7 start-page: 308 year: 1965 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R61 publication-title: Comput. J. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 – volume: 204 start-page: 60 year: 2018 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R23 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.041 – volume: 61 start-page: 2491 year: 2018 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R40 publication-title: Adv. Sp. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.02.024 – volume: 131 start-page: 63 year: 2013 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R22 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.006 – volume: 11 start-page: 668 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R36 publication-title: Remote Sens. doi: 10.3390/rs11060668 – volume: 58 start-page: 5764 year: 2020 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R35 publication-title: IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2969900 – volume: 225 start-page: 267 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R33 publication-title: Remote Sensing of Environment doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.018 – volume: 142 start-page: 188 year: 2014 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R41 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.001 – volume: 199 start-page: 218 year: 2017 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R21 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.016 – volume: 33 start-page: 443 year: 1994 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R1 publication-title: Appl. Opt. doi: 10.1364/AO.33.000443 – volume: 9 start-page: 5223 year: 2016 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R39 publication-title: IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2520501 – volume: 175 start-page: 126 year: 2016 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R48 publication-title: Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.03.020 – volume: 106 start-page: 7163 year: 2001 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R62 publication-title: J. Geophys. Res. doi: 10.1029/2000JC000319 – volume: 28 start-page: 26953 year: 2020 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R34 publication-title: Opt. Express doi: 10.1364/OE.393968 – volume: 44 start-page: 1236 year: 2005 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R15 publication-title: Appl. Opt. doi: 10.1364/AO.44.001236 – volume: 11 start-page: 2791 year: 2014 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R42 publication-title: Ocean Sci. Discuss. doi: 10.5194/osd-11-2791-2014 – volume: 22 start-page: 103 year: 1987 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R13 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(87)90029-0 – volume: 11 start-page: 2820 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R49 publication-title: Remote Sens. doi: 10.3390/rs11232820 – volume: 107 start-page: 479 year: 2007 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R60 publication-title: J. Quant. Spect. Radiat. Transf. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.03.010 – volume: 57 start-page: 6666 year: 2019 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R51 publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2907884 – volume: 110 start-page: 1 year: 2005 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R4 publication-title: J. Geophys. Res. doi: 10.1029/2004JD004950 – volume: 40 start-page: 4790 year: 2001 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R3 publication-title: Appl. Opt. doi: 10.1364/AO.40.004790 – volume: 14 start-page: 386 year: 2022 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R54 publication-title: Remote Sens (Basel doi: 10.3390/rs14020386 – volume: 67 start-page: 266 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R43 publication-title: Adv. Sp. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.045 – volume: 34 start-page: 1 year: 2007 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R5 publication-title: Geophys. Res. Lett. doi: 10.1029/2006GL028599 – volume: 215 start-page: 18 year: 2018 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R26 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.033 – volume: 113 start-page: 635 year: 2009 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R8 publication-title: Remote Sens. Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.11.005 – volume: 249 start-page: 105308 year: 2021 ident: oe-32-5-7659-R28 publication-title: Atmos. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105308 |
SSID | ssj0014797 |
Score | 2.4578016 |
Snippet | Accurate retrieval of the water-leaving radiance from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in optically complex inland and coastal waters remains a... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 7659 |
Title | Enhanced POLYMER atmospheric correction algorithm for water-leaving radiance retrievals from hyperspectral/multispectral remote sensing data in inland and coastal waters |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38439443 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2937703844 |
Volume | 32 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbKIiQuiDflsTKIA9Iqu6ntvI4IdVUhliKxK5VT5LhOW6lNS5MC4sDvgX_JjO0kLVukhUOixkrsOvPFnrFnviHkZRAgCxiLvMAfc0_kEfMkQyJIMJlzX8E3kmNw8tn7cHAh3o6CUafzc8traVNlx-r73riS_5EqlIFcMUr2HyTbVAoF8BvkC2eQMJyvJON-MbUb-B-G7z4hwYGsFssSiQJm6khh3g2XCHw-Wa5n1XRhnAq_gnq59uZamrWEtSEnUJg9BXNrfUE6ZRNzMgUL1QZirjEpwKlxPayv4W6QsT4q0f8dakFHU1w6mRVzx_4K7csSIy1Nc-W2EjxcGW5o_W3V-H_gkA8dnLq87iD-zaTF7Ufo5gIKFlbnhSZmpWxDMQZmUXYE3fgMx2R7IYMJExgebo29YGmCOevmX72nzA3Y7YJouyVuRt8otOzil6YFHgp4T8P-cQBjlk0juEu9_ceU2Dgqmv2-UKTDfmofvUauMzBIMFfG2Y9-s18lIpvGp_67jsMKHj1pWt3VfP5izhi15vw2ueXsEfragusO6ejiLrlh_IJVeY_8qiFGHcToFsRoCzHaQIwCxOgOxGgNMdpCjCLE6A7ETnYARi3AqAMYRYDRWUEtwCgeDmC2sfI-uTjtn78ZeC67h6c48ytPx3EW-ZJF41CEYcJlmOe9MNaJ0n6gQbMSWTLOAxEmEQe1PBIySRTnPaYTXwZc8QfkoFgW-hGhWZ6MuRIZG4N1HEsuZcwSFUiue6jisy55Vb_5VDnqe8zAMk8vybdLXjS3rizfy76bntfiS2E0xi02WejlpkxBeY5gDo2F6JKHVq5NNVCKUej88VWaeEJutt_IU3JQrTf6Gai_VXZolo0ODf5-A8BDuWw |
linkProvider | ISSN International Centre |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced+POLYMER+atmospheric+correction+algorithm+for+water-leaving+radiance+retrievals+from+hyperspectral%2Fmultispectral+remote+sensing+data+in+inland+and+coastal+waters&rft.jtitle=Optics+express&rft.au=Karthick%2C+Murugan&rft.au=Shanmugam%2C+Palanisamy&rft.au=He%2C+Xianqiang&rft.date=2024-02-26&rft.issn=1094-4087&rft.eissn=1094-4087&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=7659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364%2FOE.504088&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1364_OE_504088 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1094-4087&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1094-4087&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1094-4087&client=summon |