The additional role of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the prediction of renal damage in systemic lupus erythematosus based on CSTAR (XXV)
Objectives The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patien...
Saved in:
Published in | Lupus Vol. 33; no. 9; pp. 986 - 997 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.08.2024
Sage Publications Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients.
Methods
Based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records.
Results
Of 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, p < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, p < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, p < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, p < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, p < .001).
Conclusion
Besides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objectives The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients. Methods Based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records. Results Of 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, p < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, p < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, p < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, p < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, p < .001). Conclusion Besides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients. The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients.OBJECTIVESThe predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients.Based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records.METHODSBased on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records.Of 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, p < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, p < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, p < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, p < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, p < .001).RESULTSOf 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, p < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, p < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, p < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, p < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, p < .001).Besides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients.CONCLUSIONBesides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients. The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients. Based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records. Of 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, < .001). Besides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients. Objectives The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients. Methods Based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records. Results Of 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, p < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, p < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, p < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, p < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, p < .001). Conclusion Besides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients. |
Author | Li, Mengtao Jiang, Nan Zhang, Li Li, Jing Xu, Dong Ding, Yufang Tian, Xinping Zhang, Shangzhu Zeng, Xiaofeng Wu, Chanyuan Qian, Junyan Wang, Qian Zhou, Yangzhong Zhao, Jiuliang Leng, Xiaomei |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yufang orcidid: 0000-0001-6426-840X surname: Ding fullname: Ding, Yufang organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 2 givenname: Yangzhong surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Yangzhong organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 3 givenname: Jiuliang orcidid: 0000-0001-9308-2858 surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Jiuliang organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 4 givenname: Chanyuan surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Chanyuan organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 5 givenname: Shangzhu surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Shangzhu organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 6 givenname: Nan surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Nan organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 7 givenname: Junyan surname: Qian fullname: Qian, Junyan organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 8 givenname: Li orcidid: 0000-0003-0251-5457 surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Li organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 9 givenname: Jing surname: Li fullname: Li, Jing email: mengtao.li@cstar.org.cn organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 10 givenname: Dong orcidid: 0000-0002-6413-3043 surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Dong organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 11 givenname: Xiaomei surname: Leng fullname: Leng, Xiaomei organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 12 givenname: Qian surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Qian organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 13 givenname: Xinping surname: Tian fullname: Tian, Xinping organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 14 givenname: Mengtao orcidid: 0000-0003-4252-2889 surname: Li fullname: Li, Mengtao email: mengtao.li@cstar.org.cn organization: Department of Rheumatology – sequence: 15 givenname: Xiaofeng surname: Zeng fullname: Zeng, Xiaofeng organization: Department of Rheumatology |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38853349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kcFu1DAQQC1URLeFD-CCLHEph7QeOxs7x2oFFKkSUrug3qKJPQFXSbzYyWH_gM_G6bYggTiNRvPejGbmhB2NYSTGXoM4B9D6QtQVSKGULEFWQip4xlZQal3kgjxiq6VeLMAxO0npXgihoK5esGNlzFqpsl6xn9vvxNE5P_kwYs9j6ImHjuM4-WKcbU8hhYEe8jY4T4n7kU9Z2kVy3i7awkdabIcDfqOFSPs00eAt7-fdnDjFfXYGnELKWYuJHM_i5nZ7ecPP7u6-vnvJnnfYJ3r1GE_Zlw_vt5ur4vrzx0-by-vCKimmAtadEaUiZ4ywGrCVaEHJlsh2uEZbCkRhbItlLVthazAE0lkh7Vq5ToA6ZWeHvrsYfsyUpmbwyVLf40hhTo0SVaWUrkqT0bd_ofdhjnnPhTJaaW2gztSbR2puB3LNLvoB4755unEG4ADYGFKK1P1GQDTLH5t__pid84OT8j3_jP2_8Av9AJyF |
Cites_doi | 10.3390/ijms20225799 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.10.003 10.2215/cjn.01910213 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.11.001 10.1681/asn.2019121285 10.1002/art.1780400928 10.1093/rheumatology/keh024 10.1002/jcla.20280 10.1016/j.jaut.2003.12.005 10.1038/sj.ki.5002133 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808008 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.06.009 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205171 10.1074/jbc.M112.341339 10.3899/jrheum.090019 10.1002/art.1780400506 10.1186/s13075-022-02766-1 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.06.005 10.1155/2014/809389 10.1177/0961203313499086 10.1038/ki.2011.484 10.1038/nrneph.2015.33 10.1007/s10875-012-9825-6 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.02.003 10.1093/rheumatology/kew377 10.3390/ijms16047917 10.1177/0961203315625460 10.1093/rheumatology/kez292 10.1056/NEJMra1100359 10.1177/0961203311417033 10.1681/asn.2009080805 10.1093/rheumatology/ker368 10.1007/s10067-017-3538-4 10.1177/0961203309345753 10.1002/art.1780350606 10.1186/s13075-017-1442-6 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01104 10.1002/art.40930 10.1002/acr.21664 10.1038/s41598-020-69608-5 10.1002/art.34473 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.002 10.1002/art.1780390303 10.1093/rheumatology/kep062 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 H94 K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1177/09612033241260231 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Immunology Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Immunology Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1477-0962 |
EndPage | 997 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38853349 10_1177_09612033241260231 10.1177_09612033241260231 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding grantid: 2022-PUMCH-A-008 – fundername: Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project grantid: No. Z 201100005520022,23, 25-27 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100012401 – fundername: Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program, Ministry of Science and Technology grantid: 2021YFC2501300 – fundername: CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) grantid: 2021-I2M-1-005 |
GroupedDBID | --- -TM .2E .2F .2G .2J .2N .GJ 01A 0R~ 18M 1~K 29L 31R 31S 31U 31X 31Y 31Z 36B 39C 4.4 53G 54M 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AABMB AABOD AACKU AACMV AACTG AADUE AAEWN AAGGD AAGLT AAGMC AAJIQ AAJOX AAJPV AAKGS AANSI AAPEO AAQDB AAQXH AAQXI AARDL AARIX AATAA AATBZ AAUAS AAXOT AAYTG AAZBJ ABAFQ ABAWP ABCCA ABCJG ABDBF ABDWY ABEIX ABFWQ ABHKI ABHQH ABIDT ABJIS ABJZC ABKRH ABLUO ABOCM ABPGX ABPNF ABQKF ABQXT ABRHV ABUJY ABUWG ABVFX ABVVC ABYTW ACARO ACDSZ ACDXX ACFEJ ACFMA ACFYK ACGBL ACGFO ACGFS ACGZU ACJER ACJTF ACLFY ACLHI ACLZU ACOFE ACOXC ACPRK ACROE ACRPL ACSIQ ACUAV ACUHS ACUIR ACXKE ACXMB ADBBV ADDLC ADEBD ADEIA ADMPF ADNBR ADNMO ADNON ADRRZ ADSTG ADTBJ ADUCT ADUKL ADVBO ADYCS ADZZY AECGH AECVZ AEDTQ AEGXH AEKYL AENEX AEPTA AEQLS AERKM AESZF AEUHG AEWDL AEWHI AEXFG AEXNY AFEET AFKBI AFKRA AFKRG AFMOU AFOSN AFQAA AFUIA AFWMB AGHKR AGKLV AGNHF AGPXR AGQPQ AGWFA AGWNL AHDMH AHMBA AIAGR AIGRN AJABX AJEFB AJMMQ AJSCY AJUZI AJXAJ ALIPV ALKWR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMCVQ ANDLU ARTOV ASPBG AUTPY AUVAJ AVWKF AYAKG AZFZN AZQEC B3H B8M B8O B8R B8Z B93 B94 BBRGL BDDNI BENPR BKIIM BKNYI BKSCU BPACV BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI BWJAD BYIEH C45 CBRKF CCPQU CDWPY CFDXU CORYS CQQTX CS3 CUTAK DB0 DC- DC0 DD- DD0 DE- DF0 DO- DOPDO DU5 DV7 DV9 D~Y EAD EAP EBC EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPL ESX F5P FEDTE FHBDP FYUFA GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION H13 HF~ HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ J8X K.F K.J K9- M0R M1P N9A O9- OVD P.B P2P PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q1R Q2X Q7K Q7L Q7R Q7U Q7X Q82 Q83 ROL S01 SASJQ SAUOL SCNPE SDB SFB SFC SFK SFN SFT SGA SGO SGP SGR SGV SGX SGZ SHG SNB SPJ SPQ SPV SQCSI STM SV3 TEORI TUS UKHRP ZONMY ZPPRI ZRKOI ZSSAH AAYXX AJGYC CITATION AAEJI AAPII AJVBE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY 7T5 H94 K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-15f8043ed880c71ab2ac132beecfa5ac40aa08cba492b0c918e12dc02c53df013 |
ISSN | 0961-2033 1477-0962 |
IngestDate | Tue Aug 05 09:27:28 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 02:50:52 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:31:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:27:19 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | lupus nephritis anti-dsDNA antibodies Systemic lupus erythematosus anti-nucleosome antibodies autoantibodies |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c320t-15f8043ed880c71ab2ac132beecfa5ac40aa08cba492b0c918e12dc02c53df013 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-6413-3043 0000-0003-0251-5457 0000-0001-9308-2858 0000-0003-4252-2889 0000-0001-6426-840X |
PMID | 38853349 |
PQID | 3087377819 |
PQPubID | 32637 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3066337648 proquest_journals_3087377819 pubmed_primary_38853349 crossref_primary_10_1177_09612033241260231 sage_journals_10_1177_09612033241260231 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20240800 2024-08-00 2024-Aug 20240801 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 8 year: 2024 text: 20240800 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London, England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Lupus |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Lupus |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd |
References | Aringer, Costenbader, Daikh 2019; 71 Mohan, Putterman 2015; 11 Gensous, Marti, Barnetche 2017; 19 Sui, Lin, Xu 2013; 33 Jacob, Viard 1992; 1 Reátegui-Sokolova, Ugarte-Gil, Gamboa-Cárdenas 2017; 36 Yung, Cheung, Zhang 2010; 21 Alduraibi, Fatima, Hamilton 2022; 24 Kalaaji, Fenton, Mortensen 2007; 71 Tsokos 2011; 365 Hochberg 1997; 40 Moura, Lima, Barbosa 2009; 23 Yaniv, Twig, Shor 2015; 14 Bombardier, Gladman, Urowitz 1992; 35 Petri, Singh, Tesfasyone 2009; 36 Rekvig 2019; 10 Gómez-Puerta, Burlingame, Cervera 2008; 7 Yap, Lai 2015; 16 Tsang, Bultink, Heslinga 2017; 56 Olson, Lee, Prince 2013; 8 Fava, Petri 2019; 96 Bruce, O'Keeffe, Farewell 2015; 74 Maddison, Farewell, Isenberg 2002; 29 Bizzaro, Villalta, Giavarina 2012; 12 Ghirardello, Doria, Zampieri 2004; 22 Heidenreich, Mayer, Herold 2009; 18 Segura, Bernstein, McDonnell 2020; 59 Gladman, Goldsmith, Urowitz 2000; 27 Gatto, Iaccarino, Ghirardello 2016; 69 Rodriguez-Jimenez, Perez-Guerrero, Gamez-Nava 2020; 10 Lopez, Davidson, Beeby 2012; 51 Hahn, McMahon, Wilkinson 2012; 64 Krishnan, Wang, Marion 2012; 82 Hung, Chen, Lan 2011; 20 Petri, Orbai, Alarcón 2012; 64 Gladman, Urowitz, Goldsmith 1997; 40 Mejia-Vilet, Zhang, Cruz 2020; 31 Ghiggeri, D'Alessandro, Bartolomeo 2019; 20 Simón, Cabiedes, Ortiz 2004; 43 Li, Zhang, Leng 2013; 22 Martin, Leffler, Blom 2012; 287 Li, Leng, Li 2014; 2014 Chambers, Allen, Rahman 2009; 48 van der Vlag, Berden 2011; 31 Zhao, Bai, Zhu 2016; 25 Rekvig 2021; 12 Gladman, Ginzler, Goldsmith 1996; 39 bibr35-09612033241260231 bibr45-09612033241260231 bibr32-09612033241260231 bibr25-09612033241260231 bibr12-09612033241260231 bibr15-09612033241260231 bibr22-09612033241260231 bibr2-09612033241260231 bibr4-09612033241260231 bibr7-09612033241260231 bibr17-09612033241260231 bibr27-09612033241260231 bibr43-09612033241260231 bibr30-09612033241260231 bibr33-09612033241260231 bibr46-09612033241260231 bibr13-09612033241260231 bibr9-09612033241260231 bibr36-09612033241260231 bibr23-09612033241260231 bibr26-09612033241260231 bibr40-09612033241260231 bibr20-09612033241260231 bibr10-09612033241260231 bibr19-09612033241260231 bibr3-09612033241260231 bibr6-09612033241260231 bibr16-09612033241260231 Gladman DD (bibr21-09612033241260231) 2000; 27 bibr29-09612033241260231 bibr39-09612033241260231 bibr31-09612033241260231 bibr47-09612033241260231 bibr11-09612033241260231 bibr37-09612033241260231 bibr34-09612033241260231 bibr44-09612033241260231 bibr8-09612033241260231 bibr14-09612033241260231 bibr1-09612033241260231 Maddison P (bibr41-09612033241260231) 2002; 29 bibr5-09612033241260231 bibr42-09612033241260231 bibr18-09612033241260231 bibr28-09612033241260231 bibr38-09612033241260231 Jacob L (bibr24-09612033241260231) 1992; 1 |
References_xml | – volume: 40 start-page: 809 year: 1997 end-page: 813 article-title: The reliability of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Arthritis Rheum – volume: 12 start-page: 97 year: 2012 end-page: 106 article-title: Are anti-nucleosome antibodies a better diagnostic marker than anti-dsDNA antibodies for systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and a study of metanalysis publication-title: Autoimmun Rev – volume: 2014 start-page: 809389 year: 2014 article-title: Chinese SLE treatment and research group registry: III. association of autoantibodies with clinical manifestations in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: J Immunol Res – volume: 21 start-page: 1912 year: 2010 end-page: 1927 article-title: Anti-dsDNA antibodies bind to mesangial annexin II in lupus nephritis publication-title: J Am Soc Nephrol – volume: 36 start-page: 845 year: 2017 end-page: 852 article-title: Serum uric acid levels contribute to new renal damage in systemic lupus erythematosus patients publication-title: Clin Rheumatol – volume: 20 start-page: 1404 year: 2011 end-page: 1410 article-title: Antinucleosome antibodies as a potential biomarker for the evaluation of renal pathological activity in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis publication-title: Lupus – volume: 31 start-page: 376 year: 2011 end-page: 389 article-title: Lupus nephritis: role of antinucleosome autoantibodies publication-title: Semin Nephrol – volume: 39 start-page: 363 year: 1996 end-page: 369 article-title: The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Arthritis Rheum – volume: 71 start-page: 664 year: 2007 end-page: 672 article-title: Glomerular apoptotic nucleosomes are central target structures for nephritogenic antibodies in human SLE nephritis publication-title: Kidney Int – volume: 82 start-page: 184 year: 2012 end-page: 192 article-title: Anti-DNA autoantibodies initiate experimental lupus nephritis by binding directly to the glomerular basement membrane in mice publication-title: Kidney Int – volume: 31 start-page: 1335 year: 2020 end-page: 1347 article-title: Urinary soluble CD163: a novel noninvasive biomarker of activity for lupus nephritis publication-title: J Am Soc Nephrol – volume: 69 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 11 article-title: Clinical and pathologic considerations of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of lupus nephritogenic autoantibodies: a comprehensive review publication-title: J Autoimmun – volume: 40 start-page: 1725 year: 1997 article-title: Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Arthritis Rheum – volume: 8 start-page: 1702 year: 2013 end-page: 1708 article-title: Elevated subclinical double-stranded DNA antibodies and future proliferative lupus nephritis publication-title: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol – volume: 22 start-page: 235 year: 2004 end-page: 240 article-title: Antinucleosome antibodies in SLE: a two-year follow-up study of 101 patients publication-title: J Autoimmun – volume: 18 start-page: 1276 year: 2009 end-page: 1280 article-title: Sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody tests in the differential diagnosis of lupus nephritis publication-title: Lupus – volume: 22 start-page: 1192 year: 2013 end-page: 1199 article-title: Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry: I. Major clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Lupus – volume: 33 start-page: 378 year: 2013 end-page: 387 article-title: Simultaneous positivity for anti-DNA, anti-nucleosome and anti-histone antibodies is a marker for more severe lupus nephritis publication-title: J Clin Immunol – volume: 64 start-page: 2677 year: 2012 end-page: 2686 article-title: Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Arthritis Rheum – volume: 25 start-page: 652 year: 2016 end-page: 657 article-title: Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry VII: prevalence and clinical significance of serositis in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Lupus – volume: 27 start-page: 373 year: 2000 end-page: 376 article-title: The systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus international comparison publication-title: J Rheumatol – volume: 7 start-page: 606 year: 2008 end-page: 611 article-title: Anti-chromatin (anti-nucleosome) antibodies: diagnostic and clinical value publication-title: Autoimmun Rev – volume: 1 start-page: 425 year: 1992 end-page: 431 article-title: Anti-DNA antibodies and their relationships with anti-histone and anti-nucleosome specificities publication-title: Eur J Med – volume: 16 start-page: 7917 year: 2015 end-page: 7931 article-title: Pathogenesis of renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus--the role of autoantibodies and lymphocytes subset abnormalities publication-title: Int J Mol Sci – volume: 24 start-page: 87 year: 2022 article-title: Lupus nephritis correlates with B cell interferon-β, anti-Smith, and anti-DNA: a retrospective study publication-title: Arthritis Res Ther – volume: 20 start-page: 2019 year: 2019 article-title: An update on antibodies to necleosome components as biomarkers of sistemic lupus erythematosus and of lupus flares publication-title: Int J Mol Sci – volume: 36 start-page: 2476 year: 2009 end-page: 2480 article-title: Prevalence of flare and influence of demographic and serologic factors on flare risk in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study publication-title: J Rheumatol – volume: 10 start-page: 12698 year: 2020 article-title: Anti-nucleosome antibodies increase the risk of renal relapse in a prospective cohort of patients with clinically inactive systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Sci Rep – volume: 64 start-page: 797 year: 2012 end-page: 808 article-title: American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis publication-title: Arthritis Care Res – volume: 48 start-page: 673 year: 2009 end-page: 675 article-title: Damage and mortality in a group of British patients with systemic lupus erythematosus followed up for over 10 years publication-title: Rheumatology – volume: 96 start-page: 1 year: 2019 end-page: 13 article-title: Systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and clinical management publication-title: J Autoimmun – volume: 23 start-page: 19 year: 2009 end-page: 23 article-title: Anti-C1q antibodies: association with nephritis and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: J Clin Lab Anal – volume: 74 start-page: 1706 year: 2015 end-page: 1713 article-title: Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort publication-title: Ann Rheum Dis – volume: 29 start-page: 913 year: 2002 end-page: 917 article-title: The rate and pattern of organ damage in late onset systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: J Rheumatol – volume: 365 start-page: 2110 year: 2011 end-page: 2121 article-title: Systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 71 start-page: 1400 year: 2019 end-page: 1412 article-title: 2019 European league against rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Arthritis Rheumatol – volume: 59 start-page: 524 year: 2020 end-page: 533 article-title: Damage accrual and mortality over long-term follow-up in 300 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a multi-ethnic British cohort publication-title: Rheumatology – volume: 287 start-page: 33733 year: 2012 end-page: 33744 article-title: Annexin A2 and A5 serve as new ligands for C1q on apoptotic cells publication-title: J Biol Chem – volume: 14 start-page: 75 year: 2015 end-page: 79 article-title: A volcanic explosion of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a diversity of 180 different antibodies found in SLE patients publication-title: Autoimmun Rev – volume: 51 start-page: 491 year: 2012 end-page: 498 article-title: Lupus disease activity and the risk of subsequent organ damage and mortality in a large lupus cohort publication-title: Rheumatology – volume: 35 start-page: 630 year: 1992 end-page: 640 article-title: Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE publication-title: Arthritis Rheum – volume: 56 start-page: 121 year: 2017 end-page: 128 article-title: Both prolonged remission and Lupus Low Disease Activity State are associated with reduced damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus publication-title: Rheumatology – volume: 10 start-page: 1104 year: 2019 article-title: The dsDNA, anti-dsDNA antibody, and lupus nephritis: what we agree on, what must Be done, and what the best strategy forward could Be publication-title: Front Immunol – volume: 11 start-page: 329 year: 2015 end-page: 341 article-title: Genetics and pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis publication-title: Nat Rev Nephrol – volume: 19 start-page: 238 year: 2017 article-title: Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review publication-title: Arthritis Res Ther – volume: 12 start-page: 808008 year: 2021 article-title: The anti-DNA antibodies: their specificities for unique DNA structures and their unresolved clinical impact-A system criticism and a hypothesis publication-title: Front Immunol – volume: 43 start-page: 220 year: 2004 end-page: 224 article-title: Anti-nucleosome antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of recent onset. Potential utility as a diagnostic tool and disease activity marker publication-title: Rheumatology – ident: bibr4-09612033241260231 doi: 10.3390/ijms20225799 – ident: bibr2-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.10.003 – ident: bibr28-09612033241260231 doi: 10.2215/cjn.01910213 – ident: bibr6-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.11.001 – ident: bibr47-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1681/asn.2019121285 – ident: bibr14-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928 – ident: bibr34-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh024 – ident: bibr9-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/jcla.20280 – ident: bibr33-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2003.12.005 – ident: bibr35-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002133 – ident: bibr44-09612033241260231 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808008 – ident: bibr10-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.06.009 – ident: bibr11-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205171 – ident: bibr37-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.341339 – ident: bibr26-09612033241260231 doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090019 – ident: bibr22-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/art.1780400506 – ident: bibr46-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02766-1 – ident: bibr29-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.06.005 – ident: bibr17-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1155/2014/809389 – ident: bibr13-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1177/0961203313499086 – ident: bibr38-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.484 – ident: bibr5-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.33 – volume: 1 start-page: 425 year: 1992 ident: bibr24-09612033241260231 publication-title: Eur J Med – ident: bibr8-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1007/s10875-012-9825-6 – ident: bibr39-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.02.003 – volume: 29 start-page: 913 year: 2002 ident: bibr41-09612033241260231 publication-title: J Rheumatol – ident: bibr43-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew377 – volume: 27 start-page: 373 year: 2000 ident: bibr21-09612033241260231 publication-title: J Rheumatol – ident: bibr36-09612033241260231 doi: 10.3390/ijms16047917 – ident: bibr16-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1177/0961203315625460 – ident: bibr12-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez292 – ident: bibr1-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1100359 – ident: bibr7-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1177/0961203311417033 – ident: bibr27-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1681/asn.2009080805 – ident: bibr40-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker368 – ident: bibr42-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3538-4 – ident: bibr31-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1177/0961203309345753 – ident: bibr19-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/art.1780350606 – ident: bibr25-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1442-6 – ident: bibr45-09612033241260231 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01104 – ident: bibr3-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/art.40930 – ident: bibr18-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/acr.21664 – ident: bibr32-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69608-5 – ident: bibr15-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/art.34473 – ident: bibr30-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.002 – ident: bibr20-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1002/art.1780390303 – ident: bibr23-09612033241260231 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep062 |
SSID | ssj0003196 |
Score | 2.4169073 |
Snippet | Objectives
The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage.... The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This... Objectives The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage.... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref sage |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 986 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Anti-DNA antibodies Antibodies Antibodies, Antinuclear - blood Antibodies, Antinuclear - immunology Autoantibodies Autoantibodies - blood Autoantibodies - immunology China Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Kidney - immunology Kidney - pathology Kidneys Lupus Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - complications Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology Lupus nephritis Lupus Nephritis - immunology Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Nucleosomes - immunology Patients Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Prospective Studies Registries Systemic lupus erythematosus Young Adult |
Title | The additional role of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the prediction of renal damage in systemic lupus erythematosus based on CSTAR (XXV) |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09612033241260231 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38853349 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3087377819 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3066337648 |
Volume | 33 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZKJyFe0LiXDWQkJC5TpsRxbo_dYJqQ4IUOylPlOI5WiSVV2zxsv4C_wr_kHF-SpmMS4yVqfE1zvvgcH38-JuQ1V3mcceF7ZZwzjyd-5AkluCfwOOuoDPF0HGRbfIlPz_inaTQdDH5vsJaadX4or_66r-R_pAppIFfcJXsLybaNQgL8BvnCFSQM13-WMRKCrD_PMQXhZc29CgMV16v6Qun7vEa6oGM1Lpa4PuOMxaXC2oW4QP4OlDDRnefy4GezaFYHanlpQrvWK7hDtVfgEsPx18kY2X7pdPrN-RPcxmqs15rI9tSUH00prJrUjuq60amQdnVeb2YIsxg0b9AD06Z_byw7oLpsLKKts4LxlirXeh3jAERoYl8cKjPm8iTxIKM3KNsSBnzZxgibucjZ5s6Qe6_rAb0Sjb1hZ2ClwLSNWXXTi7m9pQtbhmLgwqBvN3GH7DCYkbAh2RkffTg6adU-jmU6sKP9h3YJXUf32m6kbwRdm9n0WIXa0Jnskvt2hkLHBm4PyEBVD8ndz5aD8Yj8AtTRDnUUUUfrkm6hjnaoo_OKAoJohzosr1FHDeqwhEMd1aijPdRRjToKFTXq6FvA3LvH5Ozk4-T41LPneXgyZP7aC6Iy9XmoCtAZMglEzoQMQpYrJUsRCcl9IfxU5oJnLPdlFqQqYIX0mYzCooS5yhMyrOpKPSO0hFkB42UI6klyqJ_5qUrAVg15HBWChyPy3r3g2cKEbZndKNIR2XcimNmvezXDSJlhAm1mI_KqzYaxFxfURKXqBsuAvQ4amqcj8tSIru0tTFPc5Q6136Asu4ZvfIznt3nmPXKv-772yXC9bNQLMI_X-UsLzD8SUrHZ |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+additional+role+of+anti-nucleosome+antibodies+in+the+prediction+of+renal+damage+in+systemic+lupus+erythematosus+based+on+CSTAR+%28XXV%29&rft.jtitle=Lupus&rft.au=Ding%2C+Yufang&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Yangzhong&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Jiuliang&rft.au=Wu%2C+Chanyuan&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.issn=0961-2033&rft.eissn=1477-0962&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=986&rft.epage=997&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F09612033241260231&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_09612033241260231 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0961-2033&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0961-2033&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0961-2033&client=summon |