Detection of Hepatic Steatosis on Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: Diagnostic Accuracy of Identification of Areas of Presumed Focal Fatty Sparing

The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 199; no. 1; pp. 44 - 47
Main Authors Lawrence, David A., Oliva, Isabel B., Israel, Gary M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA American Roentgen Ray Society 01.07.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-803X
1546-3141
1546-3141
DOI10.2214/AJR.11.7838

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively. Qualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low.
AbstractList The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively. Qualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low.
The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma.MATERIALS AND METHODSFive hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma.The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively.RESULTSThe criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively.Qualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low.CONCLUSIONQualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low.
Author Israel, Gary M.
Lawrence, David A.
Oliva, Isabel B.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: David A.
  surname: Lawrence
  fullname: Lawrence, David A.
  organization: All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Isabel B.
  surname: Oliva
  fullname: Oliva, Isabel B.
  organization: All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Gary M.
  surname: Israel
  fullname: Israel, Gary M.
  organization: All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26017733$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22733892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkUFvEzEQhS1URNPCiTvyBQkJbfDYm7XNLUqbNqgSiBaJ28rrtYPRxk5t7yE_gv-Mt01BQpxmNPrmaea9M3TigzcIvQYypxTqD8tPX-cAcy6YeIZmsKibikENJ2hGWAOVIOz7KTpL6SchhAvJX6BTSjljQtIZ-nVhstHZBY-Dxddmr7LT-DYblUNyCZf5KvgcVcrVpf-hvDY9Xt3hzU5tTfqIL5za-pCmpaXWY1T6MAlteuOzs06rJ-llNCpNzZdo0rgrKuug1YDXKucDvt2r6Pz2JXpu1ZDMq2M9R9_Wl3er6-rm89VmtbypNAOZq6Zc3zEqhRAaJJeG952uy2vaWgq002KxsB21RoEU_aJvJFAwstG25j0Rip2jd4-6-xjuR5Nyu3NJm2FQ3oQxtUAoZbzhEgr65oiOXbm63Ue3U_HQPllYgLdHQKXykI3FI5f-cg0BXtDCvX_kdAwpRWP_IEDaKci2BNkCtFOQhYZ_aO3yg5klCzf8d-c3AHyf-A
CODEN AAJRDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_020_02648_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001380
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_241171
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2021_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_019_02016_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000002979
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_39842013000400004
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43066_021_00131_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fri_2024_200609
crossref_primary_10_1089_met_2020_0086
crossref_primary_10_5492_wjccm_v10_i3_47
crossref_primary_10_3350_cmh_2017_0042
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2020_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_39842013000300005
crossref_primary_10_31159_ksmrt_2017_27_1_13
crossref_primary_10_6061_clinics_2019_e1337
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2019_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2022_06_022
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038530
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cld_2017_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPA_0000000000000356
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1150
crossref_primary_10_1148_rg_240048
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000008088
crossref_primary_10_3390_curroncol28040265
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_019_01993_6
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0238824
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12071551
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejro_2023_100544
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2021_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2023_08_023
crossref_primary_10_1097_RMR_0000000000000141
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12902_021_00758_x
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMcpc2312729
crossref_primary_10_4093_jkd_2017_18_2_88
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43044_021_00222_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2019_10_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_024_04407_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_16582
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iliver_2025_100147
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43055_024_01330_y
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_75340
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2023_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2018_06_039
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_14900
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013670
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_016_0153_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11121255
crossref_primary_10_4274_BMJ_galenos_2022_2022_3_8
crossref_primary_10_7197_cmj_1079443
crossref_primary_10_1002_cld_926
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2020_11_052
crossref_primary_10_1093_bjr_tqad044
crossref_primary_10_1177_0846537120928349
Cites_doi 10.1053/gast.2002.33573
10.1016/0016-5085(94)90235-6
10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-774
10.1016/0168-8278(91)90942-5
10.1007/s002619900370
10.2214/AJR.07.2942
10.2214/AJR.06.0992
10.1148/radiology.137.3.6934563
10.1148/radiol.2371041580
10.1097/00004728-198611000-00031
10.1016/0046-8177(89)90249-9
10.2214/AJR.07.2052
10.1016/0002-9343(79)90740-X
10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725292
10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480673
10.1136/bmj.281.6247.1042
10.1148/radiol.2421052066
10.1097/00004728-197910000-00003
10.1148/radiol.10101233
10.1148/radiol.2301021176
10.1016/0899-7071(93)90060-Z
10.2214/AJR.09.2590
10.1002/hep.1840110114
10.1056/NEJMra011775
10.1148/radiol.2391050361
10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015047
10.1038/sj.ijo.0800571
10.1620/tjem.136.337
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/AJR.11.7838
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 47
ExternalDocumentID 22733892
26017733
10_2214_AJR_11_7838
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
53G
5GY
5RE
AAEJM
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABOCM
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AI.
AJJEV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
J5H
L7B
LSO
MJL
P2P
SJN
TR2
TRR
TWZ
UDS
VH1
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6733b329888c1979e7dbc4897cff212bc855fb2fea198d5d69121e96cf47d08a3
ISSN 0361-803X
1546-3141
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 18:53:04 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:07:15 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:40:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:49 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Nuclear medicine
aberrant venous drainage
Radiodiagnosis
Hepatic disease
hepatic steatosis
Drainage
focal fatty sparing
Fatty liver
Blood vessel
Radiology
Medical imagery
Digestive diseases
Computerized axial tomography
Circulatory system
Diagnosis
Vein
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c319t-6733b329888c1979e7dbc4897cff212bc855fb2fea198d5d69121e96cf47d08a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 22733892
PQID 1022376791
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1022376791
pubmed_primary_22733892
pascalfrancis_primary_26017733
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_11_7838
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_11_7838
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Reston, VA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Reston, VA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher American Roentgen Ray Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Roentgen Ray Society
References R21
R20
R23
R22
R25
R24
R27
R29
R28
Neuschwander-Tetri BA (R3) 2003; 37
R1
R2
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
Joy D (R26) 2003; 15
R30
R10
R12
R11
R14
R13
R16
R15
R18
R17
R19
References_xml – ident: R2
  doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33573
– ident: R11
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90235-6
– ident: R4
  doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-774
– ident: R8
  doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(91)90942-5
– ident: R17
  doi: 10.1007/s002619900370
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2942
– ident: R15
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0992
– ident: R28
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.3.6934563
– ident: R21
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041580
– ident: R30
  doi: 10.1097/00004728-198611000-00031
– ident: R9
  doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90249-9
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2052
– ident: R12
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(79)90740-X
– ident: R18
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725292
– ident: R23
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480673
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1202
  volume-title: Hepatology
  year: 2003
  ident: R3
– ident: R24
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6247.1042
– ident: R20
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2421052066
– ident: R25
  doi: 10.1097/00004728-197910000-00003
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101233
– ident: R29
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301021176
– ident: R27
  doi: 10.1016/0899-7071(93)90060-Z
– ident: R13
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2590
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.1002/hep.1840110114
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011775
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2391050361
– ident: R22
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015047
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800571
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.1620/tjem.136.337
– volume: 15
  start-page: 539
  year: 2003
  ident: R26
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
SSID ssj0007897
Score 2.294249
Snippet The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 44
SubjectTerms Biological and medical sciences
Contrast Media
Fatty Liver - diagnosis
Fatty Liver - diagnostic imaging
Fatty Liver - physiopathology
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Liver - diagnostic imaging
Liver - physiopathology
Liver Function Tests
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Other diseases. Semiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Title Detection of Hepatic Steatosis on Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: Diagnostic Accuracy of Identification of Areas of Presumed Focal Fatty Sparing
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22733892
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1022376791
Volume 199
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9NAFB7qCiKIeLdelhH2yZLapLn6Vrtb29X6oF3YtzBXFNa0tKmC_8H_48_znJlk0qwVVl9KGDJpk_P1nDOT73yHkKNE6kwNk8gLQiW8kAvtgc-LPRkwgXIsemDYhPMP8fQsPD2PzjudXzuspW3J--LH3rqS_7EqjIFdsUr2HyzrLgoDcAz2hU-wMHxeycbHqlSiTvmmamXUV5GhWy6Nzogp6CvXbFN6J8Vn-65_vOjNvoITMVS4Y0u0w2kjIbZr7P2OtSWy4hC5fHJkuevaUDbAncneBINgb8JKyOI_YSvDKgTWirb1m6AdaYr1Ei6LorBG9gkVoiBL2dmKeM--m9pDx7XvjfrNJvCXbybPnW0YVxe9N_0G1GtmqQZvkQE47-9uZPgN6bUp4PIhYJr2wBCaKn8cxhAmrDaWc9i2pVILmdb9WinJKpBbJc_LISII_BClKk4_QrToJ6nVlmkLcV8KkI62CAsmnJ7DZFg55Tj5GrkeJIklCMzeuRwgSU1bH3dLtjIUJ7_a-eZWLnRrxTZgOG37qfx9wWMSn8UdcrtasdCRhd9d0lHFPXJjXnEy7pOfDoV0qWmFQupQSGH8DxTS8YJaFL6mDQZpjUG8UBuDOGIwiAc1BqnBIDUYpBUGH5CzycliPPWqJh-eAO9fYunJkA-DLE1TAajLVCK5COHxCa0hreIijSLNA62Yn6UyknHmB77KYqHDRA5SNnxIDoploR4TysG7RNpPVRTLUA8Ez1TgSy0Vw0Wz4l3ysn7cuagU8LERy0W-x7BdcuROXlnhl_2nHbbs5s5Fqb4E7q1LXtSGzMFz4-s4VqjldpPjXgtqKWV-lzyyFm5mw6oClhLBk6v9iqfkZvOPekYOyvVWPYdkueSHBpe_ATP1v1M
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection+of+Hepatic+Steatosis+on+Contrast-Enhanced+CT+Images%3A+Diagnostic+Accuracy+of+Identification+of+Areas+of+Presumed+Focal+Fatty+Sparing&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Lawrence%2C+David+A.&rft.au=Oliva%2C+Isabel+B.&rft.au=Israel%2C+Gary+M.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=199&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=47&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.11.7838&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2214_AJR_11_7838
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon