Detection of Hepatic Steatosis on Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: Diagnostic Accuracy of Identification of Areas of Presumed Focal Fatty Sparing
The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 199; no. 1; pp. 44 - 47 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Reston, VA
American Roentgen Ray Society
01.07.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 1546-3141 |
DOI | 10.2214/AJR.11.7838 |
Cover
Abstract | The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.
Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma.
The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively.
Qualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.
Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma.
The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively.
Qualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low. The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the periphery of segment IV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.Five hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma.MATERIALS AND METHODSFive hundred consecutive three-phase CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated. Two reference standards for hepatic steatosis were determined using the unenhanced CT examination: a liver-spleen attenuation difference of greater than 10 HU and the absolute attenuation of the liver less than 40 HU. The portal venous phase was independently analyzed by two radiologists. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the contrast-enhanced images if there was increased attenuation in the liver, either at the gallbladder fossa or in the posterior medial aspect of segment IV, when compared with background liver parenchyma.The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively.RESULTSThe criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference diagnosed 38 cases. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU diagnosed 44 cases. Of these cases, hepatic steatosis was diagnosed on the portal venous phase in 23 cases (κ = 1.0), with no false-positive cases. The criterion of relative liver-spleen attenuation difference yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.5%, 100%, 100%, and 96.9%, respectively. The criterion of absolute liver attenuation less than 40 HU yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 52.5%, 100%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively.Qualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low.CONCLUSIONQualitative evaluation of the liver on a portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT is highly specific for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis; the sensitivity of the method, however, is rather low. |
Author | Israel, Gary M. Lawrence, David A. Oliva, Isabel B. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David A. surname: Lawrence fullname: Lawrence, David A. organization: All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520 – sequence: 2 givenname: Isabel B. surname: Oliva fullname: Oliva, Isabel B. organization: All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520 – sequence: 3 givenname: Gary M. surname: Israel fullname: Israel, Gary M. organization: All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520 |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26017733$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22733892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkUFvEzEQhS1URNPCiTvyBQkJbfDYm7XNLUqbNqgSiBaJ28rrtYPRxk5t7yE_gv-Mt01BQpxmNPrmaea9M3TigzcIvQYypxTqD8tPX-cAcy6YeIZmsKibikENJ2hGWAOVIOz7KTpL6SchhAvJX6BTSjljQtIZ-nVhstHZBY-Dxddmr7LT-DYblUNyCZf5KvgcVcrVpf-hvDY9Xt3hzU5tTfqIL5za-pCmpaXWY1T6MAlteuOzs06rJ-llNCpNzZdo0rgrKuug1YDXKucDvt2r6Pz2JXpu1ZDMq2M9R9_Wl3er6-rm89VmtbypNAOZq6Zc3zEqhRAaJJeG952uy2vaWgq002KxsB21RoEU_aJvJFAwstG25j0Rip2jd4-6-xjuR5Nyu3NJm2FQ3oQxtUAoZbzhEgr65oiOXbm63Ue3U_HQPllYgLdHQKXykI3FI5f-cg0BXtDCvX_kdAwpRWP_IEDaKci2BNkCtFOQhYZ_aO3yg5klCzf8d-c3AHyf-A |
CODEN | AAJRDX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_020_02648_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001380 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_241171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2021_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_019_02016_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000002979 crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_39842013000400004 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43066_021_00131_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fri_2024_200609 crossref_primary_10_1089_met_2020_0086 crossref_primary_10_5492_wjccm_v10_i3_47 crossref_primary_10_3350_cmh_2017_0042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2020_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_39842013000300005 crossref_primary_10_31159_ksmrt_2017_27_1_13 crossref_primary_10_6061_clinics_2019_e1337 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2019_01_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2022_06_022 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038530 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cld_2017_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPA_0000000000000356 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1150 crossref_primary_10_1148_rg_240048 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000008088 crossref_primary_10_3390_curroncol28040265 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_019_01993_6 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0238824 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12071551 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejro_2023_100544 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2021_03_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2023_08_023 crossref_primary_10_1097_RMR_0000000000000141 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12902_021_00758_x crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMcpc2312729 crossref_primary_10_4093_jkd_2017_18_2_88 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43044_021_00222_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2019_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_024_04407_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_16582 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iliver_2025_100147 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43055_024_01330_y crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_75340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2023_04_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2018_06_039 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_14900 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013670 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_016_0153_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11121255 crossref_primary_10_4274_BMJ_galenos_2022_2022_3_8 crossref_primary_10_7197_cmj_1079443 crossref_primary_10_1002_cld_926 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2020_11_052 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjr_tqad044 crossref_primary_10_1177_0846537120928349 |
Cites_doi | 10.1053/gast.2002.33573 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90235-6 10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-774 10.1016/0168-8278(91)90942-5 10.1007/s002619900370 10.2214/AJR.07.2942 10.2214/AJR.06.0992 10.1148/radiology.137.3.6934563 10.1148/radiol.2371041580 10.1097/00004728-198611000-00031 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90249-9 10.2214/AJR.07.2052 10.1016/0002-9343(79)90740-X 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725292 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480673 10.1136/bmj.281.6247.1042 10.1148/radiol.2421052066 10.1097/00004728-197910000-00003 10.1148/radiol.10101233 10.1148/radiol.2301021176 10.1016/0899-7071(93)90060-Z 10.2214/AJR.09.2590 10.1002/hep.1840110114 10.1056/NEJMra011775 10.1148/radiol.2391050361 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015047 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800571 10.1620/tjem.136.337 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.2214/AJR.11.7838 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1546-3141 |
EndPage | 47 |
ExternalDocumentID | 22733892 26017733 10_2214_AJR_11_7838 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -DD .55 .GJ 1CY 1KJ 23M 2WC 34G 39C 3O- 53G 5GY 5RE AAEJM AAWTL AAYXX ABOCM ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AI. AJJEV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 J5H L7B LSO MJL P2P SJN TR2 TRR TWZ UDS VH1 W2D W8F WH7 WOQ X7M YJK YQI YQJ ZGI ZVN ZXP IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6733b329888c1979e7dbc4897cff212bc855fb2fea198d5d69121e96cf47d08a3 |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 18:53:04 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:07:15 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:15:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:40:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:49 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Nuclear medicine aberrant venous drainage Radiodiagnosis Hepatic disease hepatic steatosis Drainage focal fatty sparing Fatty liver Blood vessel Radiology Medical imagery Digestive diseases Computerized axial tomography Circulatory system Diagnosis Vein |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c319t-6733b329888c1979e7dbc4897cff212bc855fb2fea198d5d69121e96cf47d08a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 22733892 |
PQID | 1022376791 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1022376791 pubmed_primary_22733892 pascalfrancis_primary_26017733 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_11_7838 crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_11_7838 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2012 text: 2012-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Reston, VA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Reston, VA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | AJR Am J Roentgenol |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | American Roentgen Ray Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Roentgen Ray Society |
References | R21 R20 R23 R22 R25 R24 R27 R29 R28 Neuschwander-Tetri BA (R3) 2003; 37 R1 R2 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 Joy D (R26) 2003; 15 R30 R10 R12 R11 R14 R13 R16 R15 R18 R17 R19 |
References_xml | – ident: R2 doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33573 – ident: R11 doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90235-6 – ident: R4 doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-774 – ident: R8 doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(91)90942-5 – ident: R17 doi: 10.1007/s002619900370 – ident: R19 doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2942 – ident: R15 doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0992 – ident: R28 doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.3.6934563 – ident: R21 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041580 – ident: R30 doi: 10.1097/00004728-198611000-00031 – ident: R9 doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90249-9 – ident: R6 doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2052 – ident: R12 doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(79)90740-X – ident: R18 doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725292 – ident: R23 doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480673 – volume: 37 start-page: 1202 volume-title: Hepatology year: 2003 ident: R3 – ident: R24 doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6247.1042 – ident: R20 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2421052066 – ident: R25 doi: 10.1097/00004728-197910000-00003 – ident: R14 doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101233 – ident: R29 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301021176 – ident: R27 doi: 10.1016/0899-7071(93)90060-Z – ident: R13 doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2590 – ident: R10 doi: 10.1002/hep.1840110114 – ident: R1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011775 – ident: R16 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2391050361 – ident: R22 doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015047 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800571 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1620/tjem.136.337 – volume: 15 start-page: 539 year: 2003 ident: R26 publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol |
SSID | ssj0007897 |
Score | 2.294249 |
Snippet | The purpose of this article is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of identifying focal areas of increased density along the gallbladder fossa or in the... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 44 |
SubjectTerms | Biological and medical sciences Contrast Media Fatty Liver - diagnosis Fatty Liver - diagnostic imaging Fatty Liver - physiopathology Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Liver - diagnostic imaging Liver - physiopathology Liver Function Tests Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Observer Variation Other diseases. Semiology Predictive Value of Tests Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
Title | Detection of Hepatic Steatosis on Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: Diagnostic Accuracy of Identification of Areas of Presumed Focal Fatty Sparing |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22733892 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1022376791 |
Volume | 199 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9NAFB7qCiKIeLdelhH2yZLapLn6Vrtb29X6oF3YtzBXFNa0tKmC_8H_48_znJlk0qwVVl9KGDJpk_P1nDOT73yHkKNE6kwNk8gLQiW8kAvtgc-LPRkwgXIsemDYhPMP8fQsPD2PzjudXzuspW3J--LH3rqS_7EqjIFdsUr2HyzrLgoDcAz2hU-wMHxeycbHqlSiTvmmamXUV5GhWy6Nzogp6CvXbFN6J8Vn-65_vOjNvoITMVS4Y0u0w2kjIbZr7P2OtSWy4hC5fHJkuevaUDbAncneBINgb8JKyOI_YSvDKgTWirb1m6AdaYr1Ei6LorBG9gkVoiBL2dmKeM--m9pDx7XvjfrNJvCXbybPnW0YVxe9N_0G1GtmqQZvkQE47-9uZPgN6bUp4PIhYJr2wBCaKn8cxhAmrDaWc9i2pVILmdb9WinJKpBbJc_LISII_BClKk4_QrToJ6nVlmkLcV8KkI62CAsmnJ7DZFg55Tj5GrkeJIklCMzeuRwgSU1bH3dLtjIUJ7_a-eZWLnRrxTZgOG37qfx9wWMSn8UdcrtasdCRhd9d0lHFPXJjXnEy7pOfDoV0qWmFQupQSGH8DxTS8YJaFL6mDQZpjUG8UBuDOGIwiAc1BqnBIDUYpBUGH5CzycliPPWqJh-eAO9fYunJkA-DLE1TAajLVCK5COHxCa0hreIijSLNA62Yn6UyknHmB77KYqHDRA5SNnxIDoploR4TysG7RNpPVRTLUA8Ez1TgSy0Vw0Wz4l3ysn7cuagU8LERy0W-x7BdcuROXlnhl_2nHbbs5s5Fqb4E7q1LXtSGzMFz4-s4VqjldpPjXgtqKWV-lzyyFm5mw6oClhLBk6v9iqfkZvOPekYOyvVWPYdkueSHBpe_ATP1v1M |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection+of+Hepatic+Steatosis+on+Contrast-Enhanced+CT+Images%3A+Diagnostic+Accuracy+of+Identification+of+Areas+of+Presumed+Focal+Fatty+Sparing&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Lawrence%2C+David+A.&rft.au=Oliva%2C+Isabel+B.&rft.au=Israel%2C+Gary+M.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=199&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=47&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.11.7838&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2214_AJR_11_7838 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |