What is the most suitable statistical method for comparing the results of two TLD systems and the dicentric assay? An intercomparison at dose ranges exceeding 100 mGy

Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring that both techniques are well-calibrated and comparable is a key for safety in nuclear technology facilities. This study analysed different stat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied radiation and isotopes Vol. 225; p. 112022
Main Authors Mutti, Leonardo Damián, Garraza, María Soledad, Fernández, Rubén Omar, Rossich, Luciano Esteban
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0969-8043
1872-9800
1872-9800
DOI10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022

Cover

Abstract Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring that both techniques are well-calibrated and comparable is a key for safety in nuclear technology facilities. This study analysed different statistical methods to compare the responses of DCA and two TLD systems, (Harshaw 3500 and Harshaw 6600 Plus), for doses exceeding 100 mGy (up to 5Gy). Data were analysed using the determination coefficient (r2), Student's t-test, ANCOVA, and ISO 14146:2018. High correlations (r2 > 0.99) were obtained, ANCOVA revealing significant differences among systems (F = 7.671; P = 0.005; η2 = 0.006), although eta-squared indicated a minor relevance for these differences. According to ISO 14146:2018, all dosimetric systems showed similar results with overlapping confidence intervals. Based on these results, ISO 14146:2018 provided the most comprehensive comparison among dosimetry techniques, identifying deviations from optimal performance. •ISO 14146:2018 identified deviations and ensured reliable intercomparison of methods.•This is the first work to compare these techniques with ISO 14146:2018.•TLD systems accurately estimate doses without requiring recalibration above 100 mGy.
AbstractList Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring that both techniques are well-calibrated and comparable is a key for safety in nuclear technology facilities. This study analysed different statistical methods to compare the responses of DCA and two TLD systems, (Harshaw 3500 and Harshaw 6600 Plus), for doses exceeding 100 mGy (up to 5Gy). Data were analysed using the determination coefficient (r2), Student's t-test, ANCOVA, and ISO 14146:2018. High correlations (r2 > 0.99) were obtained, ANCOVA revealing significant differences among systems (F = 7.671; P = 0.005; η2 = 0.006), although eta-squared indicated a minor relevance for these differences. According to ISO 14146:2018, all dosimetric systems showed similar results with overlapping confidence intervals. Based on these results, ISO 14146:2018 provided the most comprehensive comparison among dosimetry techniques, identifying deviations from optimal performance. •ISO 14146:2018 identified deviations and ensured reliable intercomparison of methods.•This is the first work to compare these techniques with ISO 14146:2018.•TLD systems accurately estimate doses without requiring recalibration above 100 mGy.
Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring that both techniques are well-calibrated and comparable is a key for safety in nuclear technology facilities. This study analysed different statistical methods to compare the responses of DCA and two TLD systems, (Harshaw 3500 and Harshaw 6600 Plus), for doses exceeding 100 mGy (up to 5Gy). Data were analysed using the determination coefficient (r ), Student's t-test, ANCOVA, and ISO 14146:2018. High correlations (r  > 0.99) were obtained, ANCOVA revealing significant differences among systems (F = 7.671; P = 0.005; η  = 0.006), although eta-squared indicated a minor relevance for these differences. According to ISO 14146:2018, all dosimetric systems showed similar results with overlapping confidence intervals. Based on these results, ISO 14146:2018 provided the most comprehensive comparison among dosimetry techniques, identifying deviations from optimal performance.
Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring that both techniques are well-calibrated and comparable is a key for safety in nuclear technology facilities. This study analysed different statistical methods to compare the responses of DCA and two TLD systems, (Harshaw 3500 and Harshaw 6600 Plus), for doses exceeding 100 mGy (up to 5Gy). Data were analysed using the determination coefficient (r2), Student's t-test, ANCOVA, and ISO 14146:2018. High correlations (r2 > 0.99) were obtained, ANCOVA revealing significant differences among systems (F = 7.671; P = 0.005; η2 = 0.006), although eta-squared indicated a minor relevance for these differences. According to ISO 14146:2018, all dosimetric systems showed similar results with overlapping confidence intervals. Based on these results, ISO 14146:2018 provided the most comprehensive comparison among dosimetry techniques, identifying deviations from optimal performance.Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring that both techniques are well-calibrated and comparable is a key for safety in nuclear technology facilities. This study analysed different statistical methods to compare the responses of DCA and two TLD systems, (Harshaw 3500 and Harshaw 6600 Plus), for doses exceeding 100 mGy (up to 5Gy). Data were analysed using the determination coefficient (r2), Student's t-test, ANCOVA, and ISO 14146:2018. High correlations (r2 > 0.99) were obtained, ANCOVA revealing significant differences among systems (F = 7.671; P = 0.005; η2 = 0.006), although eta-squared indicated a minor relevance for these differences. According to ISO 14146:2018, all dosimetric systems showed similar results with overlapping confidence intervals. Based on these results, ISO 14146:2018 provided the most comprehensive comparison among dosimetry techniques, identifying deviations from optimal performance.
ArticleNumber 112022
Author Mutti, Leonardo Damián
Rossich, Luciano Esteban
Fernández, Rubén Omar
Garraza, María Soledad
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Leonardo Damián
  surname: Mutti
  fullname: Mutti, Leonardo Damián
  organization: División de Radiodosimetría Biológica, Departamento de Mediciones Dosimétricas, Gerencia Seguridad Radiológica y Nuclear, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Av. Gral. Paz 1499, Villa Maipú, B1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina
– sequence: 2
  givenname: María Soledad
  surname: Garraza
  fullname: Garraza, María Soledad
  organization: División de Monitoreo de La Radiación Externa, Departamento de Mediciones Dosimétricas, Gerencia Seguridad Radiológica y Nuclear, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Av. Gral. Paz 1499, Villa Maipú, B1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rubén Omar
  surname: Fernández
  fullname: Fernández, Rubén Omar
  organization: División de Radiodosimetría Biológica, Departamento de Mediciones Dosimétricas, Gerencia Seguridad Radiológica y Nuclear, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Av. Gral. Paz 1499, Villa Maipú, B1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Luciano Esteban
  surname: Rossich
  fullname: Rossich, Luciano Esteban
  email: lucianorossich@cnea.gob.ar
  organization: División de Radiodosimetría Biológica, Departamento de Mediciones Dosimétricas, Gerencia Seguridad Radiológica y Nuclear, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Av. Gral. Paz 1499, Villa Maipú, B1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40628014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc9uEzEQxi1URNPCK1Q-ckk69m68uyeoCi1IkbgUcbQce9w42rWDx1vIC_GcbJqUK6eRRr_vmz_fBTuLKSJjVwIWAoS63i7MLhsXKC0kyOVCiKnIV2wm2kbOuxbgjM2gU928hbo6ZxdEWwCo206-Yec1KNmCqGfsz4-NKTwQLxvkQ6LCaQzFrHvkVEwJVII1PR-wbJLjPmVu07AzOcTHZ0lGGvtCPHlefiX-sPrEaU8FB-ImumfEBYux5GC5ITL7D_wm8hAL5pMTpcinHVyiyc7ERySOvy2iO8wQAHy4379lr73pCd-d6iX7fvf54fbLfPXt_uvtzWpuK9GUuYNKKeGEUN4voVbCG9-1tVRN1zS28rWqoBHgrOqg7jolppZrEZp2bdF7qC7Z-6PvLqefI1LRQyCLfW8ippF0JWW7lLKRywm9OqHjekCndzkMJu_1y28nQB0BmxNRRv8PEaAPIeqtfglRH0LUxxAn4cejEKdLnwJmTTZgtNNHMtqiXQr_s_gLstipQA
Cites_doi 10.1667/RR3444.1
10.1667/RR14013.1
10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100265
10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00717-0
10.1093/rpd/ncq499
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079681
10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.347.75
10.1093/rpd/13.1-4.205
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108683
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006516
10.1088/1361-6498/ac0d63
10.1093/rpd/ncm137
10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00958.x
10.1667/RR2425.1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physics
EISSN 1872-9800
ExternalDocumentID 40628014
10_1016_j_apradiso_2025_112022
S0969804325003677
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.55
.GJ
.HR
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
23M
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABNEU
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACFVG
ACGFS
ACNNM
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AIVDX
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BBWZM
BKOJK
BLXMC
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HMV
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M38
M41
MO0
N9A
NDZJH
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OGIMB
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPC
SPCBC
SPD
SPG
SSQ
SSZ
T5K
WH7
WUQ
X7M
XPP
XUV
ZMT
~02
~G-
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d03661d116ff50461faf984267977c3f4630710dc690499613f4d8e078bceff03
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0969-8043
1872-9800
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 15:41:42 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 09 02:32:34 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 10 04:47:10 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 17:18:29 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Intercomparison
ISO 14146
Dosimetry
Dicentric chromosome
TLD
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c317t-d03661d116ff50461faf984267977c3f4630710dc690499613f4d8e078bceff03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 40628014
PQID 3228522725
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3228522725
pubmed_primary_40628014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2025_112022
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_apradiso_2025_112022
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Applied radiation and isotopes
PublicationTitleAlternate Appl Radiat Isot
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References (bib24) 2008
Omanwar, Koparkar, Virk (bib20) 2014; 347
(bib28) 2011
(bib26) 2008
(bib2) 2019; 4
Monteiro-Gil, Oliveira-Martins, Rosário (bib18) 2020; 171
Deperas, Deperas-Kaminska, Lindholm, Romm, Roy, Moss, Morand, Wojcik, Edwards, Lloyd, Szuizka (bib6) 2007; 124
Solomon, Paul, Venkatachalam, Jeevanram (bib22) 1996
Di Giorgio, Barquinero, Vallerga, Radl, Taja, Seoane, Lloyd (bib7) 2011; 175
Escalona, Ryan, Balajee (bib9) 2022; 9
Beinke, Ben-Shlomo, Abend, Port (bib3) 2015; 184
Esposito-Mendes, Goes de Mendonça, Hwang, Di Giorgio, Farias de Lima, Santos (bib10) 2020; 43
Bos (bib4) 2001; 184
Rao, Natarajan (bib21) 2001; 95
(bib14) 2007; 103
Hall, Giaccia (bib11) 2012
(bib15) 2014
(bib25) 2010
Caresana, Garlati, Zorloni, Behrens, Otto, Minchillo, Rossi (bib5) 2021; 41
Venkatachalam, Paul, Prabhu, Mohankumar, Jeevanram (bib27) 2001; 45
Lloyd, Edwards, Prosser (bib17) 1986; 15
(bib13) 2003
Edwards, Lloyd, Prosser (bib8) 1985; 13
(bib16) 2018
Stadtmann, McWhan, Grimbergen, Figel, Romero, Gärtner, Hranitzky (bib23) 2018; 1
Ainsbury, Bakhanova, Barquinero, Brai, Chumak, Correcher, Darroudi, Fattibene, Gruel, Guclu (bib1) 2011; 147
Montoro, Rodriguez, Almonacid, Villaescusa, Verdú, Caballín, Barrios, Barquinero (bib19) 2005; 164
Hranitzky, Gärtner, Naber, Aslan, Duch, Haninger, Knežević (bib12) 2022
Esposito-Mendes (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib10) 2020; 43
Deperas (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib6) 2007; 124
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib16) 2018
Monteiro-Gil (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib18) 2020; 171
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib13) 2003
Escalona (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib9) 2022; 9
Solomon (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib22) 1996
Edwards (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib8) 1985; 13
Lloyd (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib17) 1986; 15
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib25) 2010
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib14) 2007; 103
Stadtmann (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib23) 2018; 1
Omanwar (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib20) 2014; 347
Bos (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib4) 2001; 184
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib15) 2014
Ainsbury (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib1) 2011; 147
Rao (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib21) 2001; 95
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib24) 2008
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib26) 2008
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib28) 2011
Beinke (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib3) 2015; 184
Hranitzky (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib12) 2022
(10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib2) 2019; 4
Montoro (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib19) 2005; 164
Venkatachalam (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib27) 2001; 45
Di Giorgio (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib7) 2011; 175
Hall (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib11) 2012
Caresana (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib5) 2021; 41
References_xml – volume: 184
  start-page: 3
  year: 2001
  end-page: 28
  ident: bib4
  article-title: High sensitivity thermoluminescence dosimetry
  publication-title: Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1110
  year: 2021
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Impact of new operational dosimetric quantities on individual monitoring services
  publication-title: J. Radiol. Prot.
– volume: 43
  year: 2020
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Calibration curves by 60Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
  publication-title: Genet. Mol. Biol.
– volume: 147
  start-page: 573
  year: 2011
  end-page: 592
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
– year: 2018
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Radiological Protection – Criteria and Performance Limits for the Periodic Evaluation of Dosimetry Services
– year: 2008
  ident: bib24
  article-title: WinAlgorithms: dose calculation algorithm for type 8825 dosimeter. User's manual
  publication-title: Publication No. ALGM-W25-U-0908-004
– volume: 124
  start-page: 115
  year: 2007
  end-page: 123
  ident: bib6
  article-title: CABAS: a freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
– year: 1996
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Chromosome Aberration Analysis for Biological Dosimetry: a Review
– volume: 95
  start-page: 17
  year: 2001
  end-page: 23
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Retrospective biological dosimetry of absorbed radiation
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
– volume: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Current developments in biodosimetry tools for radiological/nuclear mass casualty incidents
  publication-title: Environ. Adv.
– volume: 347
  start-page: 75
  year: 2014
  end-page: 110
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Recent advances and opportunities in TLD materials: a review
  publication-title: Defect Diffus. Forum
– volume: 45
  start-page: 464
  year: 2001
  end-page: 471
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Comparison of chronic exposures received by radiation workers using different biological end-points with the doses recorded by TLD
  publication-title: Australas. Radiol.
– volume: 15
  start-page: 83
  year: 1986
  end-page: 88
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by in vitro acute X and gamma radiation
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
– volume: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Norma básica de seguridad radiológica
  publication-title: Rev.
– volume: 171
  year: 2020
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Use of biological dosimetry to confirm radiation exposure: case study
  publication-title: Radiat. Phys. Chem.
– year: 2014
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Radiation Protection – Performance Criteria for Service Laboratories Performing Biological Dosimetry by Cytogenetics
– year: 2010
  ident: bib25
  publication-title: Harshaw Model 6600 PLUS TLD Reader. Operator’s Manual. Publication No. 6600PC-W-O-1110-007
– year: 2008
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2006 Report, Volume I: Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annexes A and B
– volume: 13
  start-page: 205
  year: 1985
  end-page: 209
  ident: bib8
  article-title: The induction of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes by accelerated charged particles
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
– volume: 164
  start-page: 612
  year: 2005
  end-page: 617
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Biological dosimetry in a group of radiologists by the analysis of dicentrics and translocations
  publication-title: Radiat. Res.
– year: 2003
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Radiaciones de referencia X y gamma para calibrar dosímetros y medidores de tasa de dosis, y para determinar su respuesta en función de la energía fotónica
  publication-title: Parte 3: Calibración De Dosímetros De Área Y Personas, Y Medición De Su Respuesta En Función De La Energía Y El Ángulo De Incidencia
– volume: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: bib23
  article-title: EURADOS intercomparison 2014 for whole body dosemeters in photon fields
  publication-title: EURADOS Report
– volume: 175
  start-page: 638
  year: 2011
  end-page: 649
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods
  publication-title: Radiat. Res.
– year: 2022
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Intercomparison IC2021area of passive area dosimetry systems
  publication-title: EURADOS Report 2022-01
– year: 2012
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Radiobiology for the Radiologist
– volume: 184
  start-page: 66
  year: 2015
  end-page: 72
  ident: bib3
  article-title: A case report: cytogenetic dosimetry after accidental radiation exposure during 192Ir industrial radiography testing
  publication-title: Radiat. Res.
– year: 2011
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies
  publication-title: EPR-Biodosimetry
– volume: 103
  year: 2007
  ident: bib14
  publication-title: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib11
– volume: 164
  start-page: 612
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib19
  article-title: Biological dosimetry in a group of radiologists by the analysis of dicentrics and translocations
  publication-title: Radiat. Res.
  doi: 10.1667/RR3444.1
– volume: 184
  start-page: 66
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib3
  article-title: A case report: cytogenetic dosimetry after accidental radiation exposure during 192Ir industrial radiography testing
  publication-title: Radiat. Res.
  doi: 10.1667/RR14013.1
– volume: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib9
  article-title: Current developments in biodosimetry tools for radiological/nuclear mass casualty incidents
  publication-title: Environ. Adv.
  doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100265
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib25
  publication-title: Harshaw Model 6600 PLUS TLD Reader. Operator’s Manual. Publication No. 6600PC-W-O-1110-007
– volume: 184
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib4
  article-title: High sensitivity thermoluminescence dosimetry
  publication-title: Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B
  doi: 10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00717-0
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib28
  article-title: Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib16
– volume: 43
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib10
  article-title: Calibration curves by 60Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study
  publication-title: Genet. Mol. Biol.
– volume: 147
  start-page: 573
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib1
  article-title: Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
  doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq499
– volume: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib23
  article-title: EURADOS intercomparison 2014 for whole body dosemeters in photon fields
  publication-title: EURADOS Report
– volume: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib2
  article-title: Norma básica de seguridad radiológica
  publication-title: Rev.
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib13
  article-title: Radiaciones de referencia X y gamma para calibrar dosímetros y medidores de tasa de dosis, y para determinar su respuesta en función de la energía fotónica
– volume: 15
  start-page: 83
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib17
  article-title: Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by in vitro acute X and gamma radiation
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079681
– volume: 347
  start-page: 75
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib20
  article-title: Recent advances and opportunities in TLD materials: a review
  publication-title: Defect Diffus. Forum
  doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.347.75
– volume: 13
  start-page: 205
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib8
  article-title: The induction of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes by accelerated charged particles
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
  doi: 10.1093/rpd/13.1-4.205
– year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib24
  article-title: WinAlgorithms: dose calculation algorithm for type 8825 dosimeter. User's manual
  publication-title: Publication No. ALGM-W25-U-0908-004
– year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib22
– volume: 171
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib18
  article-title: Use of biological dosimetry to confirm radiation exposure: case study
  publication-title: Radiat. Phys. Chem.
  doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108683
– volume: 95
  start-page: 17
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib21
  article-title: Retrospective biological dosimetry of absorbed radiation
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006516
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1110
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib5
  article-title: Impact of new operational dosimetric quantities on individual monitoring services
  publication-title: J. Radiol. Prot.
  doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac0d63
– volume: 124
  start-page: 115
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib6
  article-title: CABAS: a freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry
  publication-title: Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
  doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm137
– volume: 45
  start-page: 464
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib27
  article-title: Comparison of chronic exposures received by radiation workers using different biological end-points with the doses recorded by TLD
  publication-title: Australas. Radiol.
  doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00958.x
– year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib12
  article-title: Intercomparison IC2021area of passive area dosimetry systems
  publication-title: EURADOS Report 2022-01
– year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib15
– volume: 175
  start-page: 638
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib7
  article-title: Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods
  publication-title: Radiat. Res.
  doi: 10.1667/RR2425.1
– volume: 103
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib14
– year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022_bib26
SSID ssj0004892
Score 2.4238899
Snippet Thermoluminescent dosemeter (TLD) systems and dicentric chromosome assays (DCA) are crucial for accurate radiation dose estimation in emergencies. Ensuring...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 112022
SubjectTerms Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects
Dicentric chromosome
Dosimetry
Humans
Intercomparison
ISO 14146
Radiation Dosage
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - methods
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - standards
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - statistics & numerical data
TLD
Title What is the most suitable statistical method for comparing the results of two TLD systems and the dicentric assay? An intercomparison at dose ranges exceeding 100 mGy
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112022
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40628014
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3228522725
Volume 225
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9xADLZgUateEKWvpS1ypV7DJtk8JqdqRaHbB1wKErfR7DykIEhWm6wKF35Of2ftTELbA-qhx0Tz0nhif874swHeO6ETGxoRGLJ9QUIQPVjYyAaRKbLIqVxnHRfm5DSbnydfLtKLDTgcuDAcVtnrfq_TO23dv5n0uzlZluXkO4HvQnBGuZSTquT5JmzF0yJLR7A1-_x1fvqbHim62sjcPuAOfxCFLw_UcqU4cIdcxThlQk0Yxw_ZqIcwaGeLjndguweROPPrfAobttqFxyf9NfkuPOriOnXzDH5yam4sGySch9d102KzLlumSyFTiboszTSSryONBGDRB6WTQeu6kDO-vmobrB22P2o8-_YRfe7nBlVluiY0Kf8hLjUSDle3H3BWISehWOn7EodIazB1Q8MxlaFBe9MbTYzCEK8_3T6H8-Ojs8N50JdmCDQBjjYwtONZZKIocy7lnO1OuUKQtc8JT-qpS7IpYxejyfkmn4owg0uMsIRHFto6F05fwKiqK_sKUOSGQIVOVBKHiXKxKsh-WptbYVKj4mwMk0EYcukzcMghNO1SDuKTLD7pxTeGYpCZ_OssSTIT_-z7bhCypA-Nb09UZet1I0nzCQKreZyO4aWX_v16EmaikrO59x8zv4Yn_OR5jm9g1K7W9i0BnnaxD5sHd9F-f6x_AWoYAEs
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZKEZQLgkLp8hwkrukmWSdxTqgqlAV2e2Er9WZ5_ZBS0WS1zqrthZ_D72QmTgocKg5cE7_kcWa-ieebYeydE5rb2IjIoO2LOEL0aGkTGyWmzBOnCp13XJj5ST495V_OsrMtdjRwYSisstf9Qad32rp_Mu53c7yqqvE3BN-loIxyGSVVKYo77C7PJgXF9R38-B3nwUVXGZlaR9T8D5rw-YFarRWF7aCjmGZEp4nT9DYLdRsC7SzR8SP2sIeQcBhW-Zht2XqX3Z_3l-S77F4X1an9E_aTEnND5QFRHlw0vgW_qVoiSwERiboczThSqCINCF8hhKSjOeu6oCu--d56aBy0lw0sZh8gZH72oGrTNcFJ6f9wpQFRuLp-D4c1UAqKtb4pcAi4BtN4HI6IDB7sVW8yIYljuPh0_ZSdHn9cHE2jvjBDpBFutJHB_c4TkyS5cxllbHfKlQJtfYFoUk8czyeEXIxG1xs9KkQMjhthEY0stXUunuyx7bqp7T4DURiEFJornsZcuVSVaD2tLawwmVFpPmLjQRhyFfJvyCEw7VwO4pMkPhnEN2LlIDP510mSaCT-2fftIGSJnxndnajaNhsvUe8JhKpFmo3YsyD9m_Vw4qGiq_n8P2Z-w3ami_lMzj6ffH3BHtCbwHh8ybbb9ca-QujTLl93R_sXl24BFg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What+is+the+most+suitable+statistical+method+for+comparing+the+results+of+two+TLD+systems+and+the+dicentric+assay%3F+An+intercomparison+at+dose+ranges+exceeding+100+mGy&rft.jtitle=Applied+radiation+and+isotopes&rft.au=Mutti%2C+Leonardo+Dami%C3%A1n&rft.au=Garraza%2C+Mar%C3%ADa+Soledad&rft.au=Fern%C3%A1ndez%2C+Rub%C3%A9n+Omar&rft.au=Rossich%2C+Luciano+Esteban&rft.date=2025-11-01&rft.issn=1872-9800&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft.volume=225&rft.spage=112022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apradiso.2025.112022&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0969-8043&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0969-8043&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0969-8043&client=summon