Deep learning-based automatic dose optimization for brachytherapy
The purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to investigate the feasibility of using the inverse dose optimization algorithm to improve treatment planning quality. BT data from 186 patients with ce...
Saved in:
Published in | Applied radiation and isotopes Vol. 225; p. 111988 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.11.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0969-8043 1872-9800 1872-9800 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to investigate the feasibility of using the inverse dose optimization algorithm to improve treatment planning quality.
BT data from 186 patients with cervical cancer were retrospectively collected. The data were divided into three sets: training, validation, and test, with a ratio of 150:18:18. The dose data was normalized using square-root transformation normalization, logarithmic normalization, and linear normalization. For dose distribution prediction, a 3D U-Net architecture was used. The predicted results were compared to unprocessed dose data. The four groups of dose predictions were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). The group with the best overall performance was chosen, and the dose prediction results were fed into a gradient-based planning optimization (GBPO) algorithm for additional optimization. The target D90 % was normalized to 6 Gy. The D1cc and D2cc of the OARs were compared prior to and following optimization.
The dose prediction method using unprocessed doses produced the best overall performance on the DSC, CI, and HI metrics. The (DSC, CI, HI) values for unprocessed dose, square-root transformation normalized, log normalized, and linear normalized were (0.94, 0.74, 0.49), (0.93, 0.72, 0.50), (0.91, 0.71, 0.45) and (0.90, 0.71, 0.47), respectively. The predicted dose results for the unprocessed dose group were further optimized by the GBPO algorithm. The outcomes demonstrated that the (D1cc, D2cc) values for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid decreased by (2.11 %, 2.09 %), (2.62 %, 2.14 %) and (3.16 %, 2.98 %), respectively, and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The small intestine dose increased slightly; the average increase in the D1cc and D2cc doses was 2.08 % and 1.63 %, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).
When using deep learning for BT dose prediction in the 3D U-Net model with the cervical cancer BT data used in this study, dose normalization processing is not recommended The predicted dose can be further optimized using inverse dose optimization algorithms to improve the treatment plan's quality.
•When using deep learning for BT dose prediction, preprocessing the dose data is not recommended.•Predicted doses can be further optimized inversely, improving plan quality. Bladder, rectum, and sigmoid doses reduced by 2–4% (p < 0.05).•Combining deep learning and inverse optimization enables automated, personalized brachytherapy planning. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to investigate the feasibility of using the inverse dose optimization algorithm to improve treatment planning quality.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to investigate the feasibility of using the inverse dose optimization algorithm to improve treatment planning quality.BT data from 186 patients with cervical cancer were retrospectively collected. The data were divided into three sets: training, validation, and test, with a ratio of 150:18:18. The dose data was normalized using square-root transformation normalization, logarithmic normalization, and linear normalization. For dose distribution prediction, a 3D U-Net architecture was used. The predicted results were compared to unprocessed dose data. The four groups of dose predictions were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). The group with the best overall performance was chosen, and the dose prediction results were fed into a gradient-based planning optimization (GBPO) algorithm for additional optimization. The target D90 % was normalized to 6 Gy. The D1cc and D2cc of the OARs were compared prior to and following optimization.METHODS AND MATERIALSBT data from 186 patients with cervical cancer were retrospectively collected. The data were divided into three sets: training, validation, and test, with a ratio of 150:18:18. The dose data was normalized using square-root transformation normalization, logarithmic normalization, and linear normalization. For dose distribution prediction, a 3D U-Net architecture was used. The predicted results were compared to unprocessed dose data. The four groups of dose predictions were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). The group with the best overall performance was chosen, and the dose prediction results were fed into a gradient-based planning optimization (GBPO) algorithm for additional optimization. The target D90 % was normalized to 6 Gy. The D1cc and D2cc of the OARs were compared prior to and following optimization.The dose prediction method using unprocessed doses produced the best overall performance on the DSC, CI, and HI metrics. The (DSC, CI, HI) values for unprocessed dose, square-root transformation normalized, log normalized, and linear normalized were (0.94, 0.74, 0.49), (0.93, 0.72, 0.50), (0.91, 0.71, 0.45) and (0.90, 0.71, 0.47), respectively. The predicted dose results for the unprocessed dose group were further optimized by the GBPO algorithm. The outcomes demonstrated that the (D1cc, D2cc) values for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid decreased by (2.11 %, 2.09 %), (2.62 %, 2.14 %) and (3.16 %, 2.98 %), respectively, and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The small intestine dose increased slightly; the average increase in the D1cc and D2cc doses was 2.08 % and 1.63 %, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).RESULTSThe dose prediction method using unprocessed doses produced the best overall performance on the DSC, CI, and HI metrics. The (DSC, CI, HI) values for unprocessed dose, square-root transformation normalized, log normalized, and linear normalized were (0.94, 0.74, 0.49), (0.93, 0.72, 0.50), (0.91, 0.71, 0.45) and (0.90, 0.71, 0.47), respectively. The predicted dose results for the unprocessed dose group were further optimized by the GBPO algorithm. The outcomes demonstrated that the (D1cc, D2cc) values for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid decreased by (2.11 %, 2.09 %), (2.62 %, 2.14 %) and (3.16 %, 2.98 %), respectively, and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The small intestine dose increased slightly; the average increase in the D1cc and D2cc doses was 2.08 % and 1.63 %, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).When using deep learning for BT dose prediction in the 3D U-Net model with the cervical cancer BT data used in this study, dose normalization processing is not recommended The predicted dose can be further optimized using inverse dose optimization algorithms to improve the treatment plan's quality.CONCLUSIONWhen using deep learning for BT dose prediction in the 3D U-Net model with the cervical cancer BT data used in this study, dose normalization processing is not recommended The predicted dose can be further optimized using inverse dose optimization algorithms to improve the treatment plan's quality. The purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to investigate the feasibility of using the inverse dose optimization algorithm to improve treatment planning quality. BT data from 186 patients with cervical cancer were retrospectively collected. The data were divided into three sets: training, validation, and test, with a ratio of 150:18:18. The dose data was normalized using square-root transformation normalization, logarithmic normalization, and linear normalization. For dose distribution prediction, a 3D U-Net architecture was used. The predicted results were compared to unprocessed dose data. The four groups of dose predictions were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). The group with the best overall performance was chosen, and the dose prediction results were fed into a gradient-based planning optimization (GBPO) algorithm for additional optimization. The target D90 % was normalized to 6 Gy. The D1cc and D2cc of the OARs were compared prior to and following optimization. The dose prediction method using unprocessed doses produced the best overall performance on the DSC, CI, and HI metrics. The (DSC, CI, HI) values for unprocessed dose, square-root transformation normalized, log normalized, and linear normalized were (0.94, 0.74, 0.49), (0.93, 0.72, 0.50), (0.91, 0.71, 0.45) and (0.90, 0.71, 0.47), respectively. The predicted dose results for the unprocessed dose group were further optimized by the GBPO algorithm. The outcomes demonstrated that the (D1cc, D2cc) values for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid decreased by (2.11 %, 2.09 %), (2.62 %, 2.14 %) and (3.16 %, 2.98 %), respectively, and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The small intestine dose increased slightly; the average increase in the D1cc and D2cc doses was 2.08 % and 1.63 %, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). When using deep learning for BT dose prediction in the 3D U-Net model with the cervical cancer BT data used in this study, dose normalization processing is not recommended The predicted dose can be further optimized using inverse dose optimization algorithms to improve the treatment plan's quality. The purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to investigate the feasibility of using the inverse dose optimization algorithm to improve treatment planning quality. BT data from 186 patients with cervical cancer were retrospectively collected. The data were divided into three sets: training, validation, and test, with a ratio of 150:18:18. The dose data was normalized using square-root transformation normalization, logarithmic normalization, and linear normalization. For dose distribution prediction, a 3D U-Net architecture was used. The predicted results were compared to unprocessed dose data. The four groups of dose predictions were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). The group with the best overall performance was chosen, and the dose prediction results were fed into a gradient-based planning optimization (GBPO) algorithm for additional optimization. The target D90 % was normalized to 6 Gy. The D1cc and D2cc of the OARs were compared prior to and following optimization. The dose prediction method using unprocessed doses produced the best overall performance on the DSC, CI, and HI metrics. The (DSC, CI, HI) values for unprocessed dose, square-root transformation normalized, log normalized, and linear normalized were (0.94, 0.74, 0.49), (0.93, 0.72, 0.50), (0.91, 0.71, 0.45) and (0.90, 0.71, 0.47), respectively. The predicted dose results for the unprocessed dose group were further optimized by the GBPO algorithm. The outcomes demonstrated that the (D1cc, D2cc) values for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid decreased by (2.11 %, 2.09 %), (2.62 %, 2.14 %) and (3.16 %, 2.98 %), respectively, and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The small intestine dose increased slightly; the average increase in the D1cc and D2cc doses was 2.08 % and 1.63 %, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). When using deep learning for BT dose prediction in the 3D U-Net model with the cervical cancer BT data used in this study, dose normalization processing is not recommended The predicted dose can be further optimized using inverse dose optimization algorithms to improve the treatment plan's quality. •When using deep learning for BT dose prediction, preprocessing the dose data is not recommended.•Predicted doses can be further optimized inversely, improving plan quality. Bladder, rectum, and sigmoid doses reduced by 2–4% (p < 0.05).•Combining deep learning and inverse optimization enables automated, personalized brachytherapy planning. |
ArticleNumber | 111988 |
Author | Liang, Ranxi Wang, Siqi Zeng, Fanrui Yang, Qiang Wang, Xianliang Liu, Tao Wen, Shijing |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tao surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Tao organization: Applied Nuclear Technology in Geosciences Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Shijing surname: Wen fullname: Wen, Shijing organization: Applied Nuclear Technology in Geosciences Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Siqi surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Siqi organization: Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Ranxi surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Ranxi organization: Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Fanrui surname: Zeng fullname: Zeng, Fanrui organization: Applied Nuclear Technology in Geosciences Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Qiang surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Qiang email: myoiqq@vip.163.com organization: Applied Nuclear Technology in Geosciences Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Xianliang orcidid: 0000-0003-3928-9983 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Xianliang email: wangxianliang@scszlyy.org.cn organization: Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40532513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkEtLAzEUhYNU7EP_QpmlmxnzaNLMzlKfUHCj65DHHZvSmYzJVKi_3ilt3bq6cPnOgfON0aAJDSA0JbggmIi7TaHbqJ1PoaCY8oIQUkp5gUZEzmleSowHaIRLUeYSz9gQjVPaYIxnsqRXaDjDnFFO2AgtHgDabAs6Nr75zI1O4DK960KtO28zFxJkoe187X_6R2iyKsTMRG3X-24NUbf7a3RZ6W2Cm9OdoI-nx_flS756e35dLla5ZWTe5RyswU4KXgnBtaRWVk46Jg0TlnNNTQUWtKFGSO6sJI7LOWacWy3MjOKKTdDtsbeN4WsHqVO1Txa2W91A2CXFKKWMC8rnPTo9oTtTg1Nt9LWOe3We3QPiCNgYUopQ_SEEq4NftVFnv-rgVx399sH7YxD6pd8eokrWQ2PB-Qi2Uy74_yp-AUtchws |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.009 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.008 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.045 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.012 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.011 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.029 10.5772/intechopen.107726 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.038 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.10.009 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.002 10.1002/mp.16289 10.1007/s00285-022-01819-y 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104755 10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3098507 10.1088/1361-6560/acecd2 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.10.004 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.014 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.03.002 10.1038/s41598-018-37741-x 10.1186/s12885-023-10875-6 10.5114/jcb.2019.88762 10.1088/0031-9155/58/4/1041 10.3389/fonc.2021.632104 10.4103/0971-6203.103606 10.1002/acm2.14015 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.008 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025 Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Physics |
EISSN | 1872-9800 |
ExternalDocumentID | 40532513 10_1016_j_apradiso_2025_111988 S0969804325003331 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .55 .GJ .HR .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 23M 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JN AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABNEU ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACFVG ACGFS ACNNM ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFTJW AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AIVDX AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BBWZM BKOJK BLXMC CS3 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HMV HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M38 M41 MO0 N9A NDZJH O-L O9- OAUVE OGIMB OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RNS ROL RPZ SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPC SPCBC SPD SPG SSQ SSZ T5K WH7 WUQ X7M XPP XUV ZMT ~02 ~G- AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5ecb0d865f665a82c8fd8d38b36c55a2bfeceab2b685dc81d5870355ca6b420f3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0969-8043 1872-9800 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 15:52:45 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 02:15:40 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 16:26:07 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 17:18:29 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Deep learning Dose prediction and optimization Brachytherapy |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c317t-5ecb0d865f665a82c8fd8d38b36c55a2bfeceab2b685dc81d5870355ca6b420f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3928-9983 |
PMID | 40532513 |
PQID | 3222356257 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3222356257 pubmed_primary_40532513 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2025_111988 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_apradiso_2025_111988 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2025 text: 2025-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Applied radiation and isotopes |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Appl Radiat Isot |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Tanderup, Eifel, Yashar (bib31) 2014; 88 Pötter, Georg, Dimopoulos (bib27) 2011; 100 Yusufaly, Kallis, Simon (bib36) 2020; 19 Chen, Qiu, Wang, Momin, Yang (bib6) 2024 Li, Yang, Lu (bib17) 2023; 68 Feuvret, Noël, Mazeron (bib9) 2006; 64 Pötter, Tanderup, Kirisits (bib28) 2018; 9 Åström, Behrens, Calmels (bib2) 2022; 171 Wang, Wang, Tang (bib33) 2020; 10 Xia, Feng, Wang (bib35) 2021; 11 Jung, Gonzalez, Shen, Klages, Albuquerque, Jia (bib14) 2019; 18 Swamidas, Mahantshetty (bib30) 2017; 42 Zhang, Zhong, Zhang, Pang (bib37) 2023; 23 Hu, Yang, Li (bib11) 2021; 13 Pálvölgyi (bib26) 2009; 1 Mao, Pineau, Keyes, SajijoROBP (bib21) 2020; 108 Meaney, Kohandel, Novruzi (bib22) 2022; 85 Mahmood, Babier, McNiven (bib20) 2018 Bracewell (bib3) 2000 Bray, Laversanne, Sung (bib4) 2024; 74 Rigaud, Anderson, Zhiqian (bib29) 2021; 109 Jastaniyah, Yoshida, Tanderup (bib12) 2016; 120 Nguyen, Long, Jia (bib24) 2019; 9 Kirisits, Rivard, Baltas (bib16) 2014; 110 Mohammadi, Mahdavi, Jaberi (bib23) 2019; 11 Wang, Wang, Liu (bib34) 2023; 50 Cortes, Kallis, Simon, Mayadev, Meyers, Moore (bib7) 2022; 21 Osman, Tamam, Yousif (bib25) 2023; 24 Chargari, Peignaux, Escande (bib5) 2022; 26 Cunha, Siauw, Hsu (bib8) 2016; 15 Gorissen, Den Hertog, Hoffmann (bib10) 2013; 58 Jia, Albuquerque (bib13) 2022; 32 Ma, Kidd, Fahimian (bib19) 2021; 6 Liu, Wen, Wang, Yang, Wang (bib18) 2024; 17 Vinh-Hung, Leduc, Verellen (bib32) 2020; 45 Kataria, Sharma, Subramani, Karrthick, Homogeneity Index (bib15) 2012; 37 Akhavanallaf, Mohammadi, Shiri (bib1) 2021; 136 Ma (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib19) 2021; 6 Pálvölgyi (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib26) 2009; 1 Feuvret (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib9) 2006; 64 Pötter (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib27) 2011; 100 Vinh-Hung (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib32) 2020; 45 Jastaniyah (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib12) 2016; 120 Mao (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib21) 2020; 108 Mahmood (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib20) 2018 Hu (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib11) 2021; 13 Li (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib17) 2023; 68 Kataria (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib15) 2012; 37 Osman (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib25) 2023; 24 Wang (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib33) 2020; 10 Cunha (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib8) 2016; 15 Tanderup (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib31) 2014; 88 Bracewell (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib3) 2000 Mohammadi (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib23) 2019; 11 Cortes (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib7) 2022; 21 Yusufaly (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib36) 2020; 19 Kirisits (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib16) 2014; 110 Swamidas (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib30) 2017; 42 Wang (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib34) 2023; 50 Chargari (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib5) 2022; 26 Gorissen (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib10) 2013; 58 Rigaud (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib29) 2021; 109 Jung (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib14) 2019; 18 Pötter (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib28) 2018; 9 Åström (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib2) 2022; 171 Jia (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib13) 2022; 32 Meaney (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib22) 2022; 85 Akhavanallaf (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib1) 2021; 136 Chen (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib6) 2024 Liu (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib18) 2024; 17 Zhang (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib37) 2023; 23 Xia (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib35) 2021; 11 Bray (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib4) 2024; 74 Nguyen (10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib24) 2019; 9 |
References_xml | – volume: 136 year: 2021 ident: bib1 article-title: Personalized brachytherapy dose reconstruction using deep learning publication-title: Comput. Biol. Med. – start-page: 61 year: 2000 end-page: 65 ident: bib3 article-title: Heaviside's unit step function publication-title: The Fourier Transform and its Applications – volume: 42 start-page: 48 year: 2017 ident: bib30 article-title: ICRU report 89: prescribing, recording, and reporting brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix publication-title: J. Med. Phys. – volume: 109 start-page: 1096 year: 2021 end-page: 1110 ident: bib29 article-title: Automatic segmentation using deep learning to enable online dose optimization during adaptive radiation therapy of cervical cancer publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. – volume: 120 start-page: 404 year: 2016 end-page: 411 ident: bib12 article-title: A volumetric analysis of GTVD and CTVHR as defined by the GEC ESTRO recommendations in FIGO stage IIB and IIIB cervical cancer patients treated with IGABT in a prospective multicentric trial (EMBRACE) publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. – year: 2024 ident: bib6 article-title: A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Brachytherapy – volume: 74 start-page: 229 year: 2024 end-page: 263 ident: bib4 article-title: Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. – volume: 15 start-page: 246 year: 2016 end-page: 251 ident: bib8 article-title: A method for restricting intracatheter dwell time variance in high-dose-rate brachytherapy plan optimization publication-title: Brachytherapy – volume: 45 start-page: 186 year: 2020 end-page: 189 ident: bib32 article-title: The mean absolute dose deviation–A common metric for the evaluation of dose-volume histograms in radiation therapy publication-title: Med. Dosim. [J] – volume: 26 start-page: 298 year: 2022 end-page: 308 ident: bib5 article-title: Radiotherapy of cervical cancer publication-title: Cancer Radiother. – volume: 6 start-page: 214 year: 2021 end-page: 221 ident: bib19 article-title: Dose prediction for cervical cancer brachytherapy using 3-D deep convolutional neural network publication-title: IEEE Trans. Rad. Plasma Med. Sci. – volume: 32 start-page: 389 year: 2022 end-page: 399 ident: bib13 article-title: Artificial intelligence and deep learning for brachytherapy publication-title: Semin. Radiat. Oncol. – volume: 108 start-page: 802 year: 2020 end-page: 812 ident: bib21 article-title: RapidBrachyDL: rapid radiation dose calculations in brachytherapy via deep learning publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. – volume: 13 start-page: 325 year: 2021 end-page: 330 ident: bib11 article-title: Deep learning applications in automatic segmentation and reconstruction in CT-based cervix brachytherapy – volume: 23 start-page: 385 year: 2023 ident: bib37 article-title: Dose prediction of organs at risk in patients with cervical cancer receiving brachytherapy using needle insertion based on a neural network method publication-title: BMC Cancer – volume: 9 start-page: 1076 year: 2019 ident: bib24 article-title: A feasibility study for predicting optimal radiation therapy dose distributions of prostate cancer patients from patient anatomy using deep learning publication-title: Sci. Rep. – volume: 11 start-page: 469 year: 2019 end-page: 478 ident: bib23 article-title: Evaluation of deformable image registration algorithm for determination of accumulated dose for brachytherapy of cervical cancer patients publication-title: J. Contemp. Brachytherapy – volume: 110 start-page: 199 year: 2014 end-page: 212 ident: bib16 article-title: Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. – volume: 37 start-page: 207 year: 2012 end-page: 213 ident: bib15 article-title: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments publication-title: J. Med. Phys. Bisht – volume: 10 year: 2020 ident: bib33 article-title: An inverse dose optimization algorithm for three-dimensional brachytherapy publication-title: Front. Oncol. – volume: 68 year: 2023 ident: bib17 article-title: Deep learning-based dose map prediction for high-dose-rate brachytherapy publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 171 start-page: 37 year: 2022 end-page: 42 ident: bib2 article-title: Online adaptive radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer with full re-optimization to the anatomy of the day: initial experience and dosimetric benefits publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. – volume: 50 start-page: 3773 year: 2023 end-page: 3787 ident: bib34 article-title: High‐dimensional automated radiation therapy treatment planning via Bayesian optimization publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 64 start-page: 333 year: 2006 end-page: 342 ident: bib9 article-title: Pierre. 'Conformity index: a review' publication-title: Int. J. Rad. Oncol.∗ Biol.∗ Phys. Bey – volume: 24 year: 2023 ident: bib25 article-title: A comparative study of deep learning‐based knowledge‐based planning methods for 3D dose distribution prediction of head and neck publication-title: J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. – volume: 9 start-page: 48 year: 2018 end-page: 60 ident: bib28 article-title: The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies publication-title: Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. – volume: 85 start-page: 51 year: 2022 ident: bib22 article-title: Temporal optimization of radiation therapy to heterogeneous tumor populations and cancer stem cells publication-title: J. Math. Biol. – start-page: 484 year: 2018 end-page: 499 ident: bib20 article-title: Automated Treatment Planning in Radiation Therapy Using Generative Adversarial networks[C]//Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference – volume: 11 year: 2021 ident: bib35 article-title: Deep learning for differentiating benign from malignant parotid lesions on MR images publication-title: Front. Oncol. – volume: 1 start-page: 154 year: 2009 end-page: 156 ident: bib26 article-title: The consistency of Fletcher-Suit applicator geometry and of the rectal probe's position in high dose rate brachytherapy treatment fraction of cervix carcinoma publication-title: J. Contemp. Brachytherapy – volume: 100 start-page: 116 year: 2011 end-page: 123 ident: bib27 article-title: Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. – volume: 21 start-page: 532 year: 2022 end-page: 542 ident: bib7 article-title: Knowledge-based three-dimensional dose prediction for tandem-and-ovoid brachytherapy publication-title: Brachytherapy – volume: 88 start-page: 537 year: 2014 end-page: 539 ident: bib31 article-title: Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. – volume: 17 year: 2024 ident: bib18 article-title: Artificial intelligence in brachytherapy publication-title: J. Rad. Res. Appl. Sci. – volume: 58 start-page: 1041 year: 2013 ident: bib10 article-title: Mixed integer programming improves comprehensibility and plan quality in inverse optimization of prostate HDR brachytherapy publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 18 start-page: 841 year: 2019 end-page: 851 ident: bib14 article-title: Deep-learning–assisted automatic digitization of applicators in 3D CT image-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy of gynecological cancer – volume: 19 start-page: 624 year: 2020 end-page: 634 ident: bib36 article-title: A knowledge-based organ dose prediction tool for brachytherapy treatment planning of patients with cervical cancer publication-title: Brachytherapy – volume: 26 start-page: 298 issue: 1–2 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib5 article-title: Radiotherapy of cervical cancer publication-title: Cancer Radiother. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.009 – volume: 19 start-page: 624 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib36 article-title: A knowledge-based organ dose prediction tool for brachytherapy treatment planning of patients with cervical cancer publication-title: Brachytherapy doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.008 – volume: 74 start-page: 229 issue: 3 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib4 article-title: Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. – volume: 64 start-page: 333 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib9 article-title: Pierre. 'Conformity index: a review' publication-title: Int. J. Rad. Oncol.∗ Biol.∗ Phys. Bey doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028 – volume: 108 start-page: 802 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib21 article-title: RapidBrachyDL: rapid radiation dose calculations in brachytherapy via deep learning publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.045 – volume: 100 start-page: 116 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib27 article-title: Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.012 – volume: 88 start-page: 537 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib31 article-title: Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.011 – volume: 10 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib33 article-title: An inverse dose optimization algorithm for three-dimensional brachytherapy publication-title: Front. Oncol. – volume: 120 start-page: 404 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib12 article-title: A volumetric analysis of GTVD and CTVHR as defined by the GEC ESTRO recommendations in FIGO stage IIB and IIIB cervical cancer patients treated with IGABT in a prospective multicentric trial (EMBRACE) publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.029 – volume: 9 start-page: 48 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib28 article-title: The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies publication-title: Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. – year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib6 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.107726 – volume: 109 start-page: 1096 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib29 article-title: Automatic segmentation using deep learning to enable online dose optimization during adaptive radiation therapy of cervical cancer publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.038 – volume: 15 start-page: 246 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib8 article-title: A method for restricting intracatheter dwell time variance in high-dose-rate brachytherapy plan optimization publication-title: Brachytherapy doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.10.009 – volume: 17 issue: 2 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib18 article-title: Artificial intelligence in brachytherapy publication-title: J. Rad. Res. Appl. Sci. – volume: 42 start-page: 48 issue: Suppl. 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib30 article-title: ICRU report 89: prescribing, recording, and reporting brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix publication-title: J. Med. Phys. – volume: 110 start-page: 199 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib16 article-title: Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.002 – volume: 50 start-page: 3773 issue: 6 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib34 article-title: High‐dimensional automated radiation therapy treatment planning via Bayesian optimization publication-title: Med. Phys. doi: 10.1002/mp.16289 – volume: 85 start-page: 51 issue: 5 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib22 article-title: Temporal optimization of radiation therapy to heterogeneous tumor populations and cancer stem cells publication-title: J. Math. Biol. doi: 10.1007/s00285-022-01819-y – volume: 136 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib1 article-title: Personalized brachytherapy dose reconstruction using deep learning publication-title: Comput. Biol. Med. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104755 – volume: 6 start-page: 214 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib19 article-title: Dose prediction for cervical cancer brachytherapy using 3-D deep convolutional neural network publication-title: IEEE Trans. Rad. Plasma Med. Sci. doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3098507 – volume: 68 issue: 17 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib17 article-title: Deep learning-based dose map prediction for high-dose-rate brachytherapy publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acecd2 – volume: 45 start-page: 186 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib32 article-title: The mean absolute dose deviation–A common metric for the evaluation of dose-volume histograms in radiation therapy publication-title: Med. Dosim. [J] doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.10.004 – volume: 171 start-page: 37 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib2 article-title: Online adaptive radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer with full re-optimization to the anatomy of the day: initial experience and dosimetric benefits publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.014 – volume: 13 start-page: 325 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib11 article-title: Deep learning applications in automatic segmentation and reconstruction in CT-based cervix brachytherapy – volume: 21 start-page: 532 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib7 article-title: Knowledge-based three-dimensional dose prediction for tandem-and-ovoid brachytherapy publication-title: Brachytherapy doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.03.002 – volume: 9 start-page: 1076 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib24 article-title: A feasibility study for predicting optimal radiation therapy dose distributions of prostate cancer patients from patient anatomy using deep learning publication-title: Sci. Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37741-x – volume: 1 start-page: 154 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib26 article-title: The consistency of Fletcher-Suit applicator geometry and of the rectal probe's position in high dose rate brachytherapy treatment fraction of cervix carcinoma publication-title: J. Contemp. Brachytherapy – start-page: 61 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib3 article-title: Heaviside's unit step function – volume: 23 start-page: 385 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib37 article-title: Dose prediction of organs at risk in patients with cervical cancer receiving brachytherapy using needle insertion based on a neural network method publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10875-6 – volume: 11 start-page: 469 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib23 article-title: Evaluation of deformable image registration algorithm for determination of accumulated dose for brachytherapy of cervical cancer patients publication-title: J. Contemp. Brachytherapy doi: 10.5114/jcb.2019.88762 – volume: 58 start-page: 1041 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib10 article-title: Mixed integer programming improves comprehensibility and plan quality in inverse optimization of prostate HDR brachytherapy publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/4/1041 – volume: 11 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib35 article-title: Deep learning for differentiating benign from malignant parotid lesions on MR images publication-title: Front. Oncol. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.632104 – volume: 37 start-page: 207 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib15 article-title: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments publication-title: J. Med. Phys. Bisht doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.103606 – volume: 18 start-page: 841 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib14 article-title: Deep-learning–assisted automatic digitization of applicators in 3D CT image-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy of gynecological cancer – volume: 24 issue: 9 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib25 article-title: A comparative study of deep learning‐based knowledge‐based planning methods for 3D dose distribution prediction of head and neck publication-title: J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14015 – start-page: 484 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib20 – volume: 32 start-page: 389 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988_bib13 article-title: Artificial intelligence and deep learning for brachytherapy publication-title: Semin. Radiat. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.008 |
SSID | ssj0004892 |
Score | 2.4247139 |
Snippet | The purpose of this study is to determine the best dose processing method for deep learning-based dose prediction in brachytherapy (BT), as well as to... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 111988 |
SubjectTerms | Algorithms Brachytherapy Brachytherapy - methods Deep Learning Dose prediction and optimization Female Humans Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Retrospective Studies Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy |
Title | Deep learning-based automatic dose optimization for brachytherapy |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111988 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40532513 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3222356257 |
Volume | 225 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTsMwEB1VRSAuCMpWlipIXN3FiVPnWBWqAmovUKk3y8sEWomm6nLohW_HzsIigThwTOIo1nM8fqOZNwNwLRkqjW1DItpSJECDJAokklC2Y8WRxjJy4uTBMOyPgvsxG5egW2hhXFplbvszm55a6_xOI0ezMZ9MGo-WfEfcVZRjriFZqqUOgrarn19_-0zzCHjaGNkNJm70F5XwtC7nC-mydqyfSJmzHlHageXHA-o3ApoeRL192MsZpNfJJnkAJZxVYGeQx8grsJ0mderlIXRuEOde3hfimbgDy3hyvUrSMq2eSZboJdZkvOZaTM8SWM96z_plk8myNkcw6t0-dfskb5lAtCUCK8JQq6bhIYvDkElONY8NNz5XfqgZk1TFqFEqqkLOjLZcldn9aimHlqEKaDP2j6E8S2Z4Cp6v7ONW05cxtT40i5SlZki5tZDKoG90FRoFTmKeVcYQRcrYVBTICoesyJCtQlTAKb6tsbDm-893rwr8hd0ALqohZ5isl8KFinznxrWrcJItzMd8Atf3grX8s398-Rx23VWmP7yA8mqxxktLRFaqlv5pNdjq3D30h-9_7N5C |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTsMwEB0hEMsFsVPWIHE1be04dY6IRWUpF0DiZnmZsEg0FW0PXPh2PFlYJBAHrnGiWM_28xt5ngdg30i0DjuepbxtWYweWRobZInpZFYhz0xK5uTeVdK9jc_v5N0EHNVeGEqrrLi_5PSCrasnzQrN5uDxsXkdxHeq6EY5SQXJyEs9FUvRoal98PaZ5xGrojIyvc3o9S824acDM3gxlLYTAkUuiT7SogTLjzvUbwq02IlOF2C-kpDRYdnLRZjA_hLM9KpD8iWYLrI63XAZDo8RB1FVGOKe0Y7lIzMe5cU9rZHPhxjlgTOeKzNmFBRsFMJn9_Ba-rJeV-D29OTmqMuqmgnMBSUwYhKdbXmVyCxJpFHcqcwrL5QViZPScJuhQ2O5TZT0LohVGRZs0BzOJDbmrUyswmQ_7-M6RMKG5nZLmIyHIFqmNmgz5CpQpPUovGtAs8ZJD8qrMXSdM_aka2Q1IatLZBuQ1nDqb4OsA3__-e1ejb8OK4CONUwf8_FQ01mRoDiu04C1cmA--hNT4QvZFhv_-PMuzHZvepf68uzqYhPmqKU0I27B5OhljNtBlYzsTjHr3gHEY9_Y |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep+learning-based+automatic+dose+optimization+for+brachytherapy&rft.jtitle=Applied+radiation+and+isotopes&rft.au=Liu%2C+Tao&rft.au=Wen%2C+Shijing&rft.au=Wang%2C+Siqi&rft.au=Liang%2C+Ranxi&rft.date=2025-11-01&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft.volume=225&rft.spage=111988&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apradiso.2025.111988&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40532513&rft.externalDocID=40532513 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0969-8043&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0969-8043&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0969-8043&client=summon |