Regulatory Challenges and Solutions for Fintech in Turkey
Regulators often have three different approaches when it comes to regulating FinTech; Ignore, liken, or regulate. As one of the most regulated sectors in Turkish economy, financial services are far from being ignored. FinTech companies in Turkey have been developing innovative products and services...
Saved in:
Published in | Procedia computer science Vol. 158; pp. 929 - 937 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Regulators often have three different approaches when it comes to regulating FinTech; Ignore, liken, or regulate. As one of the most regulated sectors in Turkish economy, financial services are far from being ignored.
FinTech companies in Turkey have been developing innovative products and services that provide great value for consumers and businesses. Fast pace of development in areas based on electronic services such as e-invoice, e-payments, e-government services, importance of FinTechs have become more apparent with their agility in taking action and offering innovative services. However, as agile as they might be, FinTech companies tend to ignore the regulations which financial institutions are subject to. “If it works here, it works everywhere” approach may have a serious downside when it comes to execution stage. From definition of the service to areas of application, to formation of the company and background of the investors, the ever-dictating financial sector regulations change dramatically from one country to another. As in the example of popular payment provider PayPal, failing to keep primary systems domestically may lead to a rejection of license application from BRSA (Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency) [1]
Another example of such regulations is the need to do Due Diligence and monitor suspicious customer activity for AML/CTF purposes for some FinTechs in payment industry. Such requirements can be daunting for a technology-oriented point of view, and many of these companies face these facts at a later stage when they try to coexist or collaborate with other financial institutions. As these requirements may alter operational costs, human resources, and even IT infrastructure, they struggle to find investment or sign contracts with financial institutions.
This study covers both successful and unsuccessful FinTech projects in payments and their position against regulations and offer remediations for better acceptance within Turkish financial sector. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Regulators often have three different approaches when it comes to regulating FinTech; Ignore, liken, or regulate. As one of the most regulated sectors in Turkish economy, financial services are far from being ignored.
FinTech companies in Turkey have been developing innovative products and services that provide great value for consumers and businesses. Fast pace of development in areas based on electronic services such as e-invoice, e-payments, e-government services, importance of FinTechs have become more apparent with their agility in taking action and offering innovative services. However, as agile as they might be, FinTech companies tend to ignore the regulations which financial institutions are subject to. “If it works here, it works everywhere” approach may have a serious downside when it comes to execution stage. From definition of the service to areas of application, to formation of the company and background of the investors, the ever-dictating financial sector regulations change dramatically from one country to another. As in the example of popular payment provider PayPal, failing to keep primary systems domestically may lead to a rejection of license application from BRSA (Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency) [1]
Another example of such regulations is the need to do Due Diligence and monitor suspicious customer activity for AML/CTF purposes for some FinTechs in payment industry. Such requirements can be daunting for a technology-oriented point of view, and many of these companies face these facts at a later stage when they try to coexist or collaborate with other financial institutions. As these requirements may alter operational costs, human resources, and even IT infrastructure, they struggle to find investment or sign contracts with financial institutions.
This study covers both successful and unsuccessful FinTech projects in payments and their position against regulations and offer remediations for better acceptance within Turkish financial sector. |
Author | Degerli, Kazim |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kazim surname: Degerli fullname: Degerli, Kazim email: kazimdegerli@gmail.com organization: Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank Inc, Turkey |
BookMark | eNqFkM1OAjEURhuDiYg8gZu-wIz9GdrpwoUhIiYkJorrprR3oDi2pB1MeHsHcWFc6N3cuzlf7ncu0SDEAAhdU1JSQsXNttylaHPJCFUlUSXl_AwNaS1lQSZEDX7cF2ic85b0w-taUTlE6hnW-9Z0MR3wdGPaFsIaMjbB4ZfY7jsfQ8ZNTHjmQwd2g33Ay316g8MVOm9Mm2H8vUfodXa_nM6LxdPD4_RuUVhOBS9MpSZGmWolqWFSSOkqJaERVgjrrGLMgnHUAVDKGAdJhbOThshqVbO6b8RHSJ1ybYo5J2i09Z05PtYl41tNiT5q0Fv9pUEfNWiidK-hZ_kvdpf8u0mHf6jbEwV9rQ8PSWfrIVhwPoHttIv-T_4TbFR59A |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_risks9010021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2024_123599 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2024_03_134 crossref_primary_10_1177_00202940221124130 crossref_primary_10_3390_info16020078 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40854_023_00469_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11036_023_02246_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s40854_021_00289_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440231200199 crossref_primary_10_35609_jfbr_2022_7_1_4 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Computer Science |
EISSN | 1877-0509 |
EndPage | 937 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_procs_2019_09_133 S1877050919313043 |
GroupedDBID | --K 0R~ 0SF 1B1 457 5VS 6I. 71M AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAIKJ AALRI AAQFI AAXUO ABMAC ACGFS ADBBV ADEZE AEXQZ AFTJW AGHFR AITUG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ E3Z EBS EJD EP3 FDB FNPLU HZ~ IXB KQ8 M41 M~E NCXOZ O-L O9- OK1 P2P RIG ROL SES SSZ AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO ADVLN AEUPX AFPUW AIGII AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-a495a9a4b71a27677d497ef6c66cdc922cead1dee11223e716dc5f074b8280193 |
IEDL.DBID | IXB |
ISSN | 1877-0509 |
IngestDate | Thu Apr 24 23:08:44 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:53:26 EDT 2025 Tue May 16 22:33:24 EDT 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Regulation Planning Fintech Finance |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3163-a495a9a4b71a27677d497ef6c66cdc922cead1dee11223e716dc5f074b8280193 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050919313043 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_procs_2019_09_133 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2019_09_133 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_procs_2019_09_133 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019 2019-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2019 text: 2019 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Procedia computer science |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
References | Payment Services Directive (PSD), Directive 2007/64/EC (2007) Fintechtime (2018) “Finans Sektörü 300 Kat Daha Fazla Saldırıya Uğruyor” UK-Turkey FinTech Working Group Initiative (2018) “Case studies and insights”: 35 Banking Law no. 5411 (2005) Martina Francesca Ferracane, Hosuk Lee-Makiyama, Erik van der Marel (2018) “Digital Trade Restrictiveness Index” Regulation on Support Services Procurement of Banks (2011) Bank Cards and Credit Cards Law no. 5464 Payment Services (PSD 2) - Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (2015) C. Skinner (2019) “Five Phases of FinTech (2005-2027)” Law no. 6493 on Payment And Securities Settlement Systems, Payment Services And Electronic Money Institutions (2013) Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BRSA) 55. 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0003 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib00010 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0004 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib00011 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0001 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0002 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0007 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0008 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0005 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0006 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0009 |
References_xml | – reference: UK-Turkey FinTech Working Group Initiative (2018) “Case studies and insights”: 35 – reference: Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BRSA): – reference: Bank Cards and Credit Cards Law no. 5464 – reference: C. Skinner (2019) “Five Phases of FinTech (2005-2027)”: – reference: Payment Services Directive (PSD), Directive 2007/64/EC (2007) – reference: Regulation on Support Services Procurement of Banks (2011) – reference: Martina Francesca Ferracane, Hosuk Lee-Makiyama, Erik van der Marel (2018) “Digital Trade Restrictiveness Index” – reference: Law no. 6493 on Payment And Securities Settlement Systems, Payment Services And Electronic Money Institutions (2013) – reference: Banking Law no. 5411 (2005) – reference: Fintechtime (2018) “Finans Sektörü 300 Kat Daha Fazla Saldırıya Uğruyor”: – reference: 55. – reference: Payment Services (PSD 2) - Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (2015) – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0006 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0005 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0002 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib00011 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0001 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib00010 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0003 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0004 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0007 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0008 – ident: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133_bib0009 |
SSID | ssj0000388917 |
Score | 2.1254063 |
Snippet | Regulators often have three different approaches when it comes to regulating FinTech; Ignore, liken, or regulate. As one of the most regulated sectors in... |
SourceID | crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 929 |
SubjectTerms | Finance Fintech Planning Regulation |
Title | Regulatory Challenges and Solutions for Fintech in Turkey |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.133 |
Volume | 158 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEA5FL158i_VRcvBoaHc3zeNYi0Useqgt9haySRYrsi21PfjvndlHUZAePGbJwO63yeSbYfINITcJlw6DH6ZUqhgqYLFUR12WdYLy3ItMOcxDPj2Lhwl_nHanDdKv78JgWWXl-0ufXnjr6km7QrO9mM3aL5GSEtVLgIKAI-ao-JlwVVzim95t8iyodqKLxrs4n6FBLT5UlHnhOYGy3ZFGvdMoSf4-oH4cOoNDsl-xRdorX-iINEJ-TA7qTgy02pgnRI_KlvLz5Rft1-1RPqnNPd3kvSjQUzpAeQj3Rmc5Ha-XsIFPyWRwP-4_sKopAnMJcCdmIaKx2vJURjaWQkrPtQyZcEI473QcO1gbkQ8BiFScBAiHvOtmQBRSiK3gK5MzspPP83BOKADjXcdZkSYZB3sYxcFqxV0klU19k8Q1EsZViuHYuOLD1KVh76aAzyB8pqMNwNcktxujRSmYsX26qCE2v_67AZe-zfDiv4aXZA9HZRrliuyslutwDcRilbbIbm84eh22ihX0DYkJzKg |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LTwIxEG4QD3rxbcRnDx5tYLelj6MSCSh6UEi4Nd22GzFmIQgH_73TfRBNDAeP-5hk99vO9JvJ7DcIXVMmbEh-iJSJJEEBiyQqapO05aVjjqfShjrk0zPvjdjDuD2uoU71L0xoqyxjfxHT82hdnmmWaDZnk0nzNZJCBPUSoCAQiBndQJvABkTwzv74blVoCXInKp-8GwxIsKjUh_I-r7BRBN3uSAXB04jSv3eoH7tOdw_tlHQR3xZPtI9qPjtAu9UoBlx65iFSL8VM-en8C3eq-Sif2GQOrwpfGPgp7gZ9CPuGJxkeLufgwUdo1L0fdnqknIpALAXyRAykNEYZlojIxIIL4ZgSPuWWc-usimMLiyNy3gOTiqmHfMjZdgpMIYHkCt6SHqN6Ns38CcIAjLMta3hCUwb2cBR7oySzkZAmcQ0UV0hoW0qGh8kVH7rqDXvXOXw6wKdbSgN8DXSzMpoVihnrb-cVxPrXh9cQ09cZnv7X8Apt9YZPAz3oPz-eoe1wpaipnKP6Yr70F8AyFsllvoq-AW6XziU |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulatory+Challenges+and+Solutions+for+Fintech+in+Turkey&rft.jtitle=Procedia+computer+science&rft.au=Degerli%2C+Kazim&rft.date=2019&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=1877-0509&rft.eissn=1877-0509&rft.volume=158&rft.spage=929&rft.epage=937&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.procs.2019.09.133&rft.externalDocID=S1877050919313043 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1877-0509&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1877-0509&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1877-0509&client=summon |