Hyping the Hypothetical: Talk and Temporality in US Supreme Court Oral Arguments
The US Supreme Court conducts much of its business through talk, including during oral arguments, where a central activity is the consideration of hypotheticals posed by justices. Using conversation analysis, I examine a key segment of the oral arguments for Citizens United v. FEC , one that arguabl...
Saved in:
| Published in | Qualitative sociology Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 249 - 279 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York
Springer US
01.06.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | The US Supreme Court conducts much of its business through talk, including during oral arguments, where a central activity is the consideration of hypotheticals posed by justices. Using conversation analysis, I examine a key segment of the oral arguments for
Citizens United v. FEC
, one that arguably changed the course of campaign finance history. I identify the conversational devices employed to advance and contest one particular hypothetical, involving an imagined ban on books, subject to a speech-exchange system that differentially empowers justices to dictate both the terms of the discussion and the time afforded the advocate to respond to any particular question. The article offers the first disciplined qualitative analysis of interaction during oral arguments, illustrates the place of temporality in legal reasoning and argumentation, and makes several contributions to conversation analysis: it advances the study of institutional talk to a new legal setting, identifies some ways in which the machinery of talk can be harnessed for rhetorical effect, and demonstrates the analytical utility of prior knowledge of what a participant arrives to an encounter equipped to say. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The US Supreme Court conducts much of its business through talk, including during oral arguments, where a central activity is the consideration of hypotheticals posed by justices. Using conversation analysis, I examine a key segment of the oral arguments for
Citizens United v. FEC
, one that arguably changed the course of campaign finance history. I identify the conversational devices employed to advance and contest one particular hypothetical, involving an imagined ban on books, subject to a speech-exchange system that differentially empowers justices to dictate both the terms of the discussion and the time afforded the advocate to respond to any particular question. The article offers the first disciplined qualitative analysis of interaction during oral arguments, illustrates the place of temporality in legal reasoning and argumentation, and makes several contributions to conversation analysis: it advances the study of institutional talk to a new legal setting, identifies some ways in which the machinery of talk can be harnessed for rhetorical effect, and demonstrates the analytical utility of prior knowledge of what a participant arrives to an encounter equipped to say. The US Supreme Court conducts much of its business through talk, including during oral arguments, where a central activity is the consideration of hypotheticals posed by justices. Using conversation analysis, I examine a key segment of the oral arguments for Citizens United v. FEC, one that arguably changed the course of campaign finance history. I identify the conversational devices employed to advance and contest one particular hypothetical, involving an imagined ban on books, subject to a speech-exchange system that differentially empowers justices to dictate both the terms of the discussion and the time afforded the advocate to respond to any particular question. The article offers the first disciplined qualitative analysis of interaction during oral arguments, illustrates the place of temporality in legal reasoning and argumentation, and makes several contributions to conversation analysis: it advances the study of institutional talk to a new legal setting, identifies some ways in which the machinery of talk can be harnessed for rhetorical effect, and demonstrates the analytical utility of prior knowledge of what a participant arrives to an encounter equipped to say. |
| Author | Gibson, David R. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David R. orcidid: 0000-0002-8554-4060 surname: Gibson fullname: Gibson, David R. email: dgibson1@nd.edu organization: Department of Sociology, University of Notre Dame |
| BookMark | eNp9kDFPwzAQhS1UJErhDzBZYjbYsWMnbFUFFKlSkdrOlnHskpI4wXaG9tdjCBIb053u3nt3-i7BxHXOAHBD8B3BWNwHQgilCGcM4TLnFJ3OwJTkgiJRUDEBU0x4hjCj_AJchnDAONkYn4LX5bGv3R7GdwNT26Uaa62aB7hVzQdUroJb0_adV00dj7B2cLeBm6H3pjVw0Q0-wnXawbnfD61xMVyBc6uaYK5_6wzsnh63iyVarZ9fFvMV0pSwiDgrKq24yq2oCOcq48xWpVVaG8rKQuk0KHGe5VwQQdhbqRmrmLU0rwourKIzcDvm9r77HEyI8pC-cemkpJgzlnDgMqmyUaV9F4I3Vva-bpU_SoLlNzk5kpOJnPwhJ0_JREdTSGK3N_4v-h_XF2vScrw |
| Cites_doi | 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.022 10.1086/661761 10.4324/9781315167695 10.1080/00380253.2017.1331713 10.1017/9781108304221 10.1002/9781444318135 10.1075/ds.2.04coo 10.1017/9781108859981 10.1111/0735-2751.00086 10.1163/ej.9789004187269.i-284 10.1177/01902725211004894 10.1177/000312240306800606 10.1177/019027250506800402 10.7208/chicago/9780226815992.001.0001 10.2307/2095539 10.1177/1461445615590717 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 10.4324/9781315167695-13 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 10.1075/hoph.4.11hol 10.4324/9780429464157-7 10.1080/00335638009383524 10.1017/CBO9780511933943 10.1177/07352751221110240 10.1017/ssh.2022.4 10.2307/800598 10.1007/978-1-4899-3719-3_2 10.1073/pnas.0903616106 10.1515/9781400842438 10.1353/lan.1977.0041 10.1007/s11196-004-4958-4 10.2307/2657322 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00302.x 10.1007/BF00148128 10.2307/1341127 10.1017/9781108105316 10.1007/BF00990328 10.1007/s11133-011-9206-0 10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7 10.4324/9781315250663 10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 10.1111/0735-2751.00106 10.4324/9780203082942 10.1177/1065912912442111 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.005 10.1075/ds.2.05cis 10.2139/ssrn.3653316 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 10.1080/01638538509544620 10.1177/000312240306800607 10.1002/symb.317 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 10.21832/9781800418226-004 10.1007/s11133-016-9336-5 10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 10.1353/lan.1974.0010 10.1017/S0047404500001019 10.2307/25469981 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 – notice: The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION 0-V 3V. 7U4 7UB 7XB 88J 8BJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR BHHNA CCPQU DWI DWQXO FQK GNUQQ GUQSH HEHIP JBE M2O M2R M2S MBDVC PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL POGQB PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PRQQA Q9U WZK |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11133-024-09563-z |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Social Science Database (Alumni Edition) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Sociological Abstracts ProQuest One Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Central International Bibliography of the Social Sciences ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library Sociology Collection (OCUL) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Research Library Social Science Database Sociology Database Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic Sociological Abstracts (Ovid) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Research Library Prep ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Sociology Collection Worldwide Political Science Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Sociology Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Sociology Collection Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) ProQuest Social Science Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Sociological Abstracts ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
| DatabaseTitleList | Research Library Prep CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: Proquest Central Journals url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sociology & Social History Law |
| EISSN | 1573-7837 |
| EndPage | 279 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1007_s11133_024_09563_z |
| GeographicLocations | United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
| GroupedDBID | -51 -5C -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C -~X .86 0-V 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 199 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29P 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 8G5 8TC 8UJ 8V8 95- 95. 95~ 96X 9M8 AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAGAY AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANTL AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACTDY ACYUM ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZJE ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFFNX AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARALO ARMRJ ASOEW ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AYQZM AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS C6C CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBLON EBO EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GUQSH GXS H13 HEHIP HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ K1G KDC KOV KOW LAK LLZTM LPU M2O M2R M2S M4Y MA- MQGED MVM N2Q NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O-J O9- O93 O9G O9I OAM OHT OVD P19 P2P P9Q PF- PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOS R-Y R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RSV RZC RZD RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3B SAP SCLPG SDA SDH SDM SHS SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 T16 TEORI TH9 TN5 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A UG4 ULY UOJIU UQL UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW VQA VXZ W23 W48 WH7 WIP WK6 WK8 XSW YLTOR YNT Z45 ZCA ZMTXR ZWUKE ~8M ~A9 ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG ADXHL AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT POGQB PRQQA PUEGO 7U4 7UB 7XB 8BJ 8FK BHHNA DWI FQK JBE MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U WZK |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-648dca6a5f7d166a264fd9facce3498ac26490525671714b9c44d4ff35d867fa3 |
| IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
| ISSN | 0162-0436 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 25 09:37:07 EDT 2025 Mon Aug 25 03:12:06 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:42:10 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Keywords | Hypotheticals Conversation analysis Temporality Supreme Court |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c314t-648dca6a5f7d166a264fd9facce3498ac26490525671714b9c44d4ff35d867fa3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8554-4060 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-024-09563-z |
| PQID | 3064413309 |
| PQPubID | 54067 |
| PageCount | 31 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_3064413309 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11133_024_09563_z springer_journals_10_1007_s11133_024_09563_z |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20240600 2024-06-00 20240601 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 6 year: 2024 text: 20240600 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | New York |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York |
| PublicationTitle | Qualitative sociology |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Qual Sociol |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | DrewPaulHeritageJohnTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings1992CambridgeCambridge University Press StiversTanyaEnfieldNJBrownPenelopeEnglertChristinaHayashiMakotoHeinemannTrineHoymannGertieUniversals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversationPNAS200910626105871059210.1073/pnas.0903616106 Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1984. Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting applause. In Structures of social action, ed. J Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 370–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DeLandMichael FMen and their moments: Character-driven ethnography and interaction analysis in a park basketball rule disputeSocial Psychology Quarterly202184215517610.1177/01902725211004894 Bilmes, Jack. 1985. “Why that now?” Two kinds of conversational meaning. Discourse Processes 8 (3): 319–355. Hall, Matthew E.K.. 2011. The nature of Supreme Court power. New York: Cambridge University Press. Black, Ryan C., and Timothy R. Johnson. 2018. Behind the velvet curtain: Understanding Supreme Court conference discussions through justices’ personal conference notes. The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 19 (2): 223–259. GibsonDavid RTalk at the brink: Deliberation and decision during the cuban missile crisis2012Princeton, NJPrinceton University Press10.1515/9781400842438 MalphursRyan ARhetoric and discourse in supreme court oral arguments2013New YorkOxford University Press10.4324/9780203082942 Heritage, John. 2015. Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 88: 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008. HeritageJohnAtkinsonJohn MaxwellHeritageJohnA change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placementStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis1984CambridgeCambridge University Press299345 Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Gibson, David R. 2018. The Micro-foundations of macro-violence: How heads of state justify the use of force. In Ritual, emotion, violence: Studies on the micro-sociology of Randall Collins, ed. Elliott B. Weininger, Annette Lareau, and Omar Lizardo, 179–208. New York: Routledge. Johnson, Timothy R. 2004. Oral arguments and decision making on the United States Supreme Court. Albany, NY: State University of New York. Jackson, Clayton. 2020. Sua sponte conversions of constitutional challenges. (July 16). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3653316 MayerLloyd HitoshiBreaching a leaking dam: Corporate money and electionsCharleston Law Review20094191148 SouthworthAnnBig money unleashed: The campaign to deregulate election spending2024ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press StiversTanyaAn overview of the question-response system in american english conversationJournal of Pragmatics201042102772278110.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 Lerner, Gene H. 1992. Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15 (3): 247–271. Atkinson, J. Maxwell., and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press. Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks. 1970. “On formal structures of practical actions”. In Theoretical sociology, ed. J.C. McKinney and E.A. Tiryakian, 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Latour, Bruno. 2010. The making of law: An ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat, translated by Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage, and revised by Bruno Latour. Malden, MA: Polity. LatourBrunoReassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory2005OxfordOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 DrewPaulPrecision and exaggeration in interactionAmerican Sociological Review200368691793810.1177/000312240306800606 SegallEric JOriginalism as faith2018CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/9781108105316 PomerantzAnitaAtkinsonJohnHeritageJohnAgreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapesStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis1984CambridgeCambridge University Press57101 MaynardDouglas WTurowetzJasonAutistic intelligence: Interaction, individuality, and the challenges of diagnosis2022ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226815992.001.0001 TraversMaxManzoJohn FLaw in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law2016New YorkRoutledge10.4324/9781315250663 Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 470–520. New York: Cambridge University Press. SiegelStephen AThe origin of the compelling state interest test and strict scrutinyThe American Journal of Legal History200648435540710.2307/25469981 WurmanIlanA debt against the living: An introduction to originalism2017CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/9781108304221 GibsonDavid ROpportunistic interruptions: Interactional vulnerabilities deriving from linearizationSocial Psychology Quarterly200568431633710.1177/019027250506800402 HudsonJudith ALucarielloJoan MHudsonJudith AFivushRobynBauerPatricia JThe development of future thinking: Constructing future events in mother-child conversationThe development of the mediated mind: Sociocultural context and cognitive development2008Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum127150 Drew, Paul. 1990. Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination. In Language in the judicial process, ed. Judith N. Levi and Anne Graffam Walker, 39–64. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. MaynardDouglas WPlacement of topic changes in conversationSemiotica1980303/4263290 Aspers, Patrik, and Ugo Corte. 2019. What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology 42 (2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7. ClaymanSteven EDisplaying neutrality in television news interviewsSocial Problems198835447449210.2307/800598 Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press. SchegloffEmanuel ASacksHarveyOpening up closingsSemiotica19738428932710.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 ScaliaAntoninGarnerBryan AMaking your case: The art of persuading judges2008St. Paul, MNThomas/West PomerantzAnitaExtreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claimsHuman Studies198692/321922910.1007/BF00148128 SchegloffEmanuel AOverlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversationLanguage in Society200029116310.1017/S0047404500001019 Cissna, Kenneth N., and Rob Anderson. 2008. Dialogic rhetoric, coauthorship, and moments of meeting. In Dialogue and rhetoric, ed. Edda Weigand, 39–53. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. SchegloffEmanuel AGlennPhillipLeBaronCurtis DMandelbaumJenny“The surfacing of the suppressed”Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper2002Mahwah, NJErlbaum204223 MooreAbigail CarySigns and their temporality: The performative power of interpretation in the Supreme CourtSociological Theory202240432234110.1177/07352751221110240 GarciaAngela CoraWhat went right: Interactional strategies for managing crisis negotiations during an emergency service callThe Sociological Quarterly201758349551810.1080/00380253.2017.1331713 Gibson, David R. 2011. Avoiding catastrophe: The interactional production of possibility during the Cuban missile crisis. American Journal of Sociology 117 (2): 361–419. SacksHarveySchegloffEmanuel AJeffersonGailA simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversationLanguage197450469673510.1353/lan.1974.0010 Ayaß, Ruth. 2015. Doing data: The status of transcripts in conversation analysis. Discourse Studies 17 (5): 505–528. GibsonDavid RIgnorance at risk: Interaction at the epistemic boundary of bernard madoff's ponzi schemeQualitative Sociology201639322124610.1007/s11133-016-9336-5 HoltElizabethD’hondtSigurdÖstmanJan-OlaVerschuerenJefReported speechThe pragmatics of interaction2009AmsterdamJohn Benjamins19020510.1075/hoph.4.11hol SacksHarveyButtonGrahamLeeJohn REOn the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversationTalk and social organisation1987PhiladelphiaMultilingual Matters546910.21832/9781800418226-004 HeritageJohnRobinsonJeffrey DElliotMarc NBeckettMeganWikesMichaelReducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can makeJournal of General Internal Medicine200722101429143310.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 HeritageJCWatsonDRPsathasGeorgeFormulations as conversational objectsEveryday language: Studies in ethnomethodology1979New YorkJohn Wiley & Sons123162 DavidGary CRawlsAnne WarfieldTrainumJamesPlaying the interrogation game: Rapport, coercion, and confessions in police interrogationsSymbolic Interaction201741132410.1002/symb.317 SchefferThomasMaterialities of legal proceedingsInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law200417436538910.1007/s11196-004-4958-4 SchegloffEmanuel AJeffersonGailSacksHarveyThe preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversationLanguage197753236138210.1353/lan.1977.0041 RaymondGeoffrey TGrammar and social organization: Yes/No type interrogatives and the structure of respondingAmerican Sociological Review20036893996710.1177/000312240306800607 JeffersonGailD’UrsoVLeonardiPNotes on some orderlinesses of overlap onsetDiscourse analysis and natural rhetorics1984PadovaCLEUP1138 MatoesianGregory M‘You were interested in him as a person?’: Rhythms of domination in the kennedy smith rape trialLaw and Social Inquiry1997221559310.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00302.x JacobiTonjaSagMatthewThe new oral arguments: Justices as advocatesNotre Dame Law Review201994311611254 JacobiTonjaSchweersDylanJustice, interrupted: The effect of gender, ideology, and seniority at supreme court oral argumentsVirginia Law Review2017103713791486 Cooren, François. 2008. The selection of agency as a rhetorical device opening up the scene of dialogue through ventriloquism. In Dialogue and rhetoric, ed. E. Weigand, 23–37. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. GibsonDavid RSpeaking of the future: C Angela Cora Garcia (9563_CR22) 2017; 58 Gary C David (9563_CR14) 2017; 41 Emanuel A Schegloff (9563_CR73) 2002 Abigail Cary Moore (9563_CR59) 2022; 40 Jeffrey Toobin (9563_CR85) 2013 Judith A Hudson (9563_CR41) 2008 Ann Southworth (9563_CR80) 2024 Paul Drew (9563_CR20) 1992 Thomas Scheffer (9563_CR70) 2004; 17 Tonja Jacobi (9563_CR45) 2017; 103 9563_CR47 9563_CR49 Ryan A Malphurs (9563_CR52) 2013 Emanuel A Schegloff (9563_CR74) 1977; 53 9563_CR43 Douglas W Maynard (9563_CR55) 1980; 30 Tanya Stivers (9563_CR83) 2009; 106 Anita Pomerantz (9563_CR60) 1984 9563_CR84 JC Heritage (9563_CR34) 1979 John Heritage (9563_CR36) 1984 9563_CR42 Geoffrey T Raymond (9563_CR63) 2003; 68 Tanya Stivers (9563_CR81) 2010; 42 9563_CR9 Eric J Segall (9563_CR77) 2018 9563_CR6 Harvey Sacks (9563_CR67) 1974; 50 9563_CR5 Steven E Clayman (9563_CR11) 1998; 63 David R Gibson (9563_CR29) 2016; 39 Elizabeth Mertz (9563_CR57) 2007 9563_CR8 Stephen Vladeck (9563_CR90) 2023 9563_CR7 9563_CR19 David R Gibson (9563_CR31) 2022; 46 Bruno Latour (9563_CR48) 2005 Richard H Fallon (9563_CR21) 2011; 99 9563_CR17 Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer (9563_CR54) 2009; 4 Thomas Scheffer (9563_CR71) 2010 9563_CR16 9563_CR13 Melvin I Urofsky (9563_CR87) 2020 9563_CR12 E. Barrett Prettyman Jr (9563_CR62) 1984; 33 Tonja Jacobi (9563_CR44) 2019; 94 Anita Pomerantz (9563_CR61) 1986; 9 9563_CR50 Steven Lubet (9563_CR51) 1992; 18 Antonin Scalia (9563_CR68) 2008 Eve M Ringsmuth (9563_CR64) 2012; 66 Steven E Clayman (9563_CR10) 1988; 35 David R Gibson (9563_CR28) 2012 Irene van Oorschot (9563_CR89) 2021 Gail Jefferson (9563_CR46) 1984 Frederick Schauer (9563_CR69) 1985; 99 Steven Shapin (9563_CR78) 1994 Gregory M Matoesian (9563_CR53) 1997; 22 JC Heritage (9563_CR35) 1980; 30 David R Gibson (9563_CR25) 2005; 68 9563_CR2 Emanuel A Schegloff (9563_CR75) 1973; 8 9563_CR1 David R Gibson (9563_CR27) 2011; 34 9563_CR4 Tanya Stivers (9563_CR82) 2011 9563_CR3 9563_CR26 Irene van Oorschot (9563_CR88) 2018 Michael F DeLand (9563_CR15) 2021; 84 9563_CR23 John Heritage (9563_CR39) 2007; 22 Elizabeth Holt (9563_CR40) 2009 Paul Drew (9563_CR18) 2003; 68 Emanuel A Schegloff (9563_CR72) 2000; 29 Douglas W Maynard (9563_CR56) 2022 Harvey Sacks (9563_CR66) 1987 Max Travers (9563_CR86) 2016 9563_CR37 Stephen A Siegel (9563_CR79) 2006; 48 9563_CR38 9563_CR33 9563_CR32 9563_CR76 David R Gibson (9563_CR24) 2000; 18 H Sacks (9563_CR65) 1984 Ilan Wurman (9563_CR91) 2017 9563_CR30 Harvey L Molotch (9563_CR58) 1985; 50 |
| References_xml | – reference: Collins, Randall. 2000. Situational stratification: A micro-macro theory of inequality. Sociological Theory 18 (1): 17–43. – reference: van OorschotIreneThe Law multiple: Judgment and knowledge in practice2021New YorkCambridge University Press10.1017/9781108859981 – reference: ClaymanSteven EReisnerAnnGatekeeping in action: Editorial conferences and assessments of newsworthinessAmerican Sociological Review199863217819910.2307/2657322 – reference: UrofskyMelvin IThe campaign finance cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon2020Lawrence, KSUniversity of Kansas Press – reference: ScaliaAntoninGarnerBryan AMaking your case: The art of persuading judges2008St. Paul, MNThomas/West – reference: Black, Ryan C., and Timothy R. Johnson. 2018. Behind the velvet curtain: Understanding Supreme Court conference discussions through justices’ personal conference notes. The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 19 (2): 223–259. – reference: Gibson, David R. 2011. Avoiding catastrophe: The interactional production of possibility during the Cuban missile crisis. American Journal of Sociology 117 (2): 361–419. – reference: Heritage, John. 2015. Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 88: 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008. – reference: HoltElizabethD’hondtSigurdÖstmanJan-OlaVerschuerenJefReported speechThe pragmatics of interaction2009AmsterdamJohn Benjamins19020510.1075/hoph.4.11hol – reference: ShapinStevenA social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England1994ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 – reference: ToobinJeffreyThe oath: The Obama White House and The Supreme Court2013New YorkAnchor – reference: Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks. 1970. “On formal structures of practical actions”. In Theoretical sociology, ed. J.C. McKinney and E.A. Tiryakian, 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. – reference: StiversTanyaEnfieldNJBrownPenelopeEnglertChristinaHayashiMakotoHeinemannTrineHoymannGertieUniversals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversationPNAS200910626105871059210.1073/pnas.0903616106 – reference: HeritageJCWatsonDRAspects of the properties of formulationsSemiotica1980302245262 – reference: SacksHAtkinsonJ MaxwellHeritageJohnNotes on methodologyStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis1984CambridgeCambridge University Press2127 – reference: GibsonDavid RSeizing the moment: The problem of conversational agencySociological Theory200018336938210.1111/0735-2751.00106 – reference: RingsmuthEve MBryanAmanda CJohnsonTimothy RVoting fluidity and oral argument on the us supreme courtPolitical Research Quarterly201266242944010.1177/1065912912442111 – reference: SacksHarveyButtonGrahamLeeJohn REOn the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversationTalk and social organisation1987PhiladelphiaMultilingual Matters546910.21832/9781800418226-004 – reference: RaymondGeoffrey TGrammar and social organization: Yes/No type interrogatives and the structure of respondingAmerican Sociological Review20036893996710.1177/000312240306800607 – reference: TraversMaxManzoJohn FLaw in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law2016New YorkRoutledge10.4324/9781315250663 – reference: Lerner, Gene H. 1992. Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15 (3): 247–271. – reference: DrewPaulHeritageJohnTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings1992CambridgeCambridge University Press – reference: SchauerFrederickSlippery slopesHarvard Law Review198599236138310.2307/1341127 – reference: Toobin, Jeffrey. 2012. “Money unlimited.” The New Yorker, May 21. – reference: GibsonDavid RMinutes of history: Talk and its written incarnationsSocial Science History202246364366910.1017/ssh.2022.4 – reference: GibsonDavid ROpportunistic interruptions: Interactional vulnerabilities deriving from linearizationSocial Psychology Quarterly200568431633710.1177/019027250506800402 – reference: Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – reference: GibsonDavid RIgnorance at risk: Interaction at the epistemic boundary of bernard madoff's ponzi schemeQualitative Sociology201639322124610.1007/s11133-016-9336-5 – reference: MalphursRyan ARhetoric and discourse in supreme court oral arguments2013New YorkOxford University Press10.4324/9780203082942 – reference: MayerLloyd HitoshiBreaching a leaking dam: Corporate money and electionsCharleston Law Review20094191148 – reference: MaynardDouglas WTurowetzJasonAutistic intelligence: Interaction, individuality, and the challenges of diagnosis2022ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226815992.001.0001 – reference: PomerantzAnitaExtreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claimsHuman Studies198692/321922910.1007/BF00148128 – reference: VladeckStephenThe shadow docket: How the supreme court uses stealth rulings to amass power and undermine the Republic2023New YorkBasic – reference: SegallEric JOriginalism as faith2018CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/9781108105316 – reference: MolotchHarvey LBodenDeirdreTalking social structure: Discourse, domination and the watergate hearingsAmerican Sociological Review198550327328810.2307/2095539 – reference: StiversTanyaAn overview of the question-response system in american english conversationJournal of Pragmatics201042102772278110.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 – reference: Hall, Matthew E.K.. 2011. The nature of Supreme Court power. New York: Cambridge University Press. – reference: SouthworthAnnBig money unleashed: The campaign to deregulate election spending2024ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press – reference: HeritageJCWatsonDRPsathasGeorgeFormulations as conversational objectsEveryday language: Studies in ethnomethodology1979New YorkJohn Wiley & Sons123162 – reference: Ayaß, Ruth. 2015. Doing data: The status of transcripts in conversation analysis. Discourse Studies 17 (5): 505–528. – reference: Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1984. Public speaking and audience responses: Some techniques for inviting applause. In Structures of social action, ed. J Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 370–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – reference: Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 470–520. New York: Cambridge University Press. – reference: GibsonDavid RTalk at the brink: Deliberation and decision during the cuban missile crisis2012Princeton, NJPrinceton University Press10.1515/9781400842438 – reference: PrettymanE. BarrettJrThe Supreme court’s use of hypothetical questions at oral argumentCatholic University Law Review1984333555592 – reference: Bilmes, Jack. 1985. “Why that now?” Two kinds of conversational meaning. Discourse Processes 8 (3): 319–355. – reference: MertzElizabethThe language of law: Learning to “think like a lawyer”2007OxfordOxford University Press – reference: Beynon-Jones, Sian, and Emily Grabham. 2018. Law and time. New York: Routledge. – reference: SchegloffEmanuel AOverlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversationLanguage in Society200029116310.1017/S0047404500001019 – reference: SchefferThomasMaterialities of legal proceedingsInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law200417436538910.1007/s11196-004-4958-4 – reference: SchegloffEmanuel AGlennPhillipLeBaronCurtis DMandelbaumJenny“The surfacing of the suppressed”Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper2002Mahwah, NJErlbaum204223 – reference: Segall, Eric J. 2011. Is the Roberts Court really a court? Stetson Law Review 40 (3): 701–716. – reference: SchegloffEmanuel AJeffersonGailSacksHarveyThe preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversationLanguage197753236138210.1353/lan.1977.0041 – reference: StiversTanyaStiversTanyaMondadaLorenzaSteensigJakobMorality and question design: ‘Of course’ as contesting a presupposition of askabilityThe morality of knowledge in conversation2011CambridgeCambridge University Press8210610.1017/CBO9780511921674.005 – reference: HeritageJohnAtkinsonJohn MaxwellHeritageJohnA change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placementStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis1984CambridgeCambridge University Press299345 – reference: DeLandMichael FMen and their moments: Character-driven ethnography and interaction analysis in a park basketball rule disputeSocial Psychology Quarterly202184215517610.1177/01902725211004894 – reference: Cooren, François. 2008. The selection of agency as a rhetorical device opening up the scene of dialogue through ventriloquism. In Dialogue and rhetoric, ed. E. Weigand, 23–37. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. – reference: WurmanIlanA debt against the living: An introduction to originalism2017CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/9781108304221 – reference: Latour, Bruno. 2010. The making of law: An ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat, translated by Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage, and revised by Bruno Latour. Malden, MA: Polity. – reference: SchefferThomasAdversarial case-making: An ethnography of english crown court procedure2010BostonBrill10.1163/ej.9789004187269.i-284 – reference: JacobiTonjaSchweersDylanJustice, interrupted: The effect of gender, ideology, and seniority at supreme court oral argumentsVirginia Law Review2017103713791486 – reference: Drew, Paul. 1990. Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination. In Language in the judicial process, ed. Judith N. Levi and Anne Graffam Walker, 39–64. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. – reference: SchegloffEmanuel ASacksHarveyOpening up closingsSemiotica19738428932710.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 – reference: GarciaAngela CoraWhat went right: Interactional strategies for managing crisis negotiations during an emergency service callThe Sociological Quarterly201758349551810.1080/00380253.2017.1331713 – reference: Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. – reference: DavidGary CRawlsAnne WarfieldTrainumJamesPlaying the interrogation game: Rapport, coercion, and confessions in police interrogationsSymbolic Interaction201741132410.1002/symb.317 – reference: MooreAbigail CarySigns and their temporality: The performative power of interpretation in the Supreme CourtSociological Theory202240432234110.1177/07352751221110240 – reference: LubetStevenReasserting control in cross-examinationLitigation19921842429 – reference: Aspers, Patrik, and Ugo Corte. 2019. What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology 42 (2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7. – reference: Jackson, Sally and Scott Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66(3): 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383524 – reference: Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press. – reference: PomerantzAnitaAtkinsonJohnHeritageJohnAgreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapesStructures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis1984CambridgeCambridge University Press57101 – reference: DrewPaulPrecision and exaggeration in interactionAmerican Sociological Review200368691793810.1177/000312240306800606 – reference: Jackson, Clayton. 2020. Sua sponte conversions of constitutional challenges. (July 16). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3653316 – reference: Gibson, David R. 2018. The Micro-foundations of macro-violence: How heads of state justify the use of force. In Ritual, emotion, violence: Studies on the micro-sociology of Randall Collins, ed. Elliott B. Weininger, Annette Lareau, and Omar Lizardo, 179–208. New York: Routledge. – reference: HudsonJudith ALucarielloJoan MHudsonJudith AFivushRobynBauerPatricia JThe development of future thinking: Constructing future events in mother-child conversationThe development of the mediated mind: Sociocultural context and cognitive development2008Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum127150 – reference: MatoesianGregory M‘You were interested in him as a person?’: Rhythms of domination in the kennedy smith rape trialLaw and Social Inquiry1997221559310.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00302.x – reference: MaynardDouglas WPlacement of topic changes in conversationSemiotica1980303/4263290 – reference: JacobiTonjaSagMatthewThe new oral arguments: Justices as advocatesNotre Dame Law Review201994311611254 – reference: ClaymanSteven EDisplaying neutrality in television news interviewsSocial Problems198835447449210.2307/800598 – reference: FallonRichard HFact and fiction about facial challengesCalifornia Law Review2011994915974 – reference: GibsonDavid RSpeaking of the future: Contentious narration during the cuban missile crisisQualitative Sociology201134450352210.1007/s11133-011-9206-0 – reference: Johnson, Timothy R. 2004. Oral arguments and decision making on the United States Supreme Court. Albany, NY: State University of New York. – reference: SiegelStephen AThe origin of the compelling state interest test and strict scrutinyThe American Journal of Legal History200648435540710.2307/25469981 – reference: HeritageJohnRobinsonJeffrey DElliotMarc NBeckettMeganWikesMichaelReducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can makeJournal of General Internal Medicine200722101429143310.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 – reference: van OorschotIreneBeynon-JonesSiân MGrabhamEmilyDoing times, doing truths: The legal case file as a folded objectLaw and time2018New YorkRoutledge22924610.4324/9781315167695-13 – reference: SacksHarveySchegloffEmanuel AJeffersonGailA simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversationLanguage197450469673510.1353/lan.1974.0010 – reference: Cissna, Kenneth N., and Rob Anderson. 2008. Dialogic rhetoric, coauthorship, and moments of meeting. In Dialogue and rhetoric, ed. Edda Weigand, 39–53. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. – reference: Atkinson, J. Maxwell., and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press. – reference: Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. – reference: JeffersonGailD’UrsoVLeonardiPNotes on some orderlinesses of overlap onsetDiscourse analysis and natural rhetorics1984PadovaCLEUP1138 – reference: LatourBrunoReassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory2005OxfordOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 – volume-title: The language of law: Learning to “think like a lawyer” year: 2007 ident: 9563_CR57 – ident: 9563_CR2 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.022 – volume: 94 start-page: 1161 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 9563_CR44 publication-title: Notre Dame Law Review – volume: 4 start-page: 91 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 9563_CR54 publication-title: Charleston Law Review – volume-title: The shadow docket: How the supreme court uses stealth rulings to amass power and undermine the Republic year: 2023 ident: 9563_CR90 – ident: 9563_CR26 doi: 10.1086/661761 – start-page: 299 volume-title: Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis year: 1984 ident: 9563_CR36 – ident: 9563_CR6 doi: 10.4324/9781315167695 – volume: 58 start-page: 495 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 9563_CR22 publication-title: The Sociological Quarterly doi: 10.1080/00380253.2017.1331713 – volume-title: A debt against the living: An introduction to originalism year: 2017 ident: 9563_CR91 doi: 10.1017/9781108304221 – ident: 9563_CR38 doi: 10.1002/9781444318135 – ident: 9563_CR17 – start-page: 127 volume-title: The development of the mediated mind: Sociocultural context and cognitive development year: 2008 ident: 9563_CR41 – ident: 9563_CR8 – ident: 9563_CR13 doi: 10.1075/ds.2.04coo – volume-title: The Law multiple: Judgment and knowledge in practice year: 2021 ident: 9563_CR89 doi: 10.1017/9781108859981 – ident: 9563_CR12 doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00086 – volume-title: Adversarial case-making: An ethnography of english crown court procedure year: 2010 ident: 9563_CR71 doi: 10.1163/ej.9789004187269.i-284 – ident: 9563_CR4 – volume: 84 start-page: 155 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 9563_CR15 publication-title: Social Psychology Quarterly doi: 10.1177/01902725211004894 – volume: 68 start-page: 917 issue: 6 year: 2003 ident: 9563_CR18 publication-title: American Sociological Review doi: 10.1177/000312240306800606 – volume: 68 start-page: 316 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 9563_CR25 publication-title: Social Psychology Quarterly doi: 10.1177/019027250506800402 – volume-title: Autistic intelligence: Interaction, individuality, and the challenges of diagnosis year: 2022 ident: 9563_CR56 doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226815992.001.0001 – volume: 50 start-page: 273 issue: 3 year: 1985 ident: 9563_CR58 publication-title: American Sociological Review doi: 10.2307/2095539 – ident: 9563_CR5 doi: 10.1177/1461445615590717 – ident: 9563_CR49 – volume-title: The oath: The Obama White House and The Supreme Court year: 2013 ident: 9563_CR85 – volume-title: Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory year: 2005 ident: 9563_CR48 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 – start-page: 229 volume-title: Law and time year: 2018 ident: 9563_CR88 doi: 10.4324/9781315167695-13 – volume: 8 start-page: 289 issue: 4 year: 1973 ident: 9563_CR75 publication-title: Semiotica doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 – volume: 33 start-page: 555 issue: 3 year: 1984 ident: 9563_CR62 publication-title: Catholic University Law Review – volume: 30 start-page: 263 issue: 3/4 year: 1980 ident: 9563_CR55 publication-title: Semiotica – start-page: 190 volume-title: The pragmatics of interaction year: 2009 ident: 9563_CR40 doi: 10.1075/hoph.4.11hol – ident: 9563_CR30 doi: 10.4324/9780429464157-7 – ident: 9563_CR76 – ident: 9563_CR43 doi: 10.1080/00335638009383524 – start-page: 57 volume-title: Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis year: 1984 ident: 9563_CR60 – ident: 9563_CR33 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511933943 – start-page: 204 volume-title: Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper year: 2002 ident: 9563_CR73 – volume: 40 start-page: 322 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 9563_CR59 publication-title: Sociological Theory doi: 10.1177/07352751221110240 – ident: 9563_CR3 – start-page: 123 volume-title: Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology year: 1979 ident: 9563_CR34 – ident: 9563_CR23 – volume: 46 start-page: 643 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 9563_CR31 publication-title: Social Science History doi: 10.1017/ssh.2022.4 – volume: 35 start-page: 474 issue: 4 year: 1988 ident: 9563_CR10 publication-title: Social Problems doi: 10.2307/800598 – ident: 9563_CR16 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3719-3_2 – volume: 99 start-page: 915 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 9563_CR21 publication-title: California Law Review – start-page: 11 volume-title: Discourse analysis and natural rhetorics year: 1984 ident: 9563_CR46 – volume: 106 start-page: 10587 issue: 26 year: 2009 ident: 9563_CR83 publication-title: PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106 – volume-title: Talk at the brink: Deliberation and decision during the cuban missile crisis year: 2012 ident: 9563_CR28 doi: 10.1515/9781400842438 – volume: 53 start-page: 361 issue: 2 year: 1977 ident: 9563_CR74 publication-title: Language doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041 – volume: 17 start-page: 365 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 9563_CR70 publication-title: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law doi: 10.1007/s11196-004-4958-4 – volume: 63 start-page: 178 issue: 2 year: 1998 ident: 9563_CR11 publication-title: American Sociological Review doi: 10.2307/2657322 – volume: 22 start-page: 55 issue: 1 year: 1997 ident: 9563_CR53 publication-title: Law and Social Inquiry doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00302.x – ident: 9563_CR19 – volume: 9 start-page: 219 issue: 2/3 year: 1986 ident: 9563_CR61 publication-title: Human Studies doi: 10.1007/BF00148128 – volume: 99 start-page: 361 issue: 2 year: 1985 ident: 9563_CR69 publication-title: Harvard Law Review doi: 10.2307/1341127 – volume-title: Originalism as faith year: 2018 ident: 9563_CR77 doi: 10.1017/9781108105316 – volume: 103 start-page: 1379 issue: 7 year: 2017 ident: 9563_CR45 publication-title: Virginia Law Review – ident: 9563_CR50 doi: 10.1007/BF00990328 – volume: 18 start-page: 24 issue: 4 year: 1992 ident: 9563_CR51 publication-title: Litigation – volume: 34 start-page: 503 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 9563_CR27 publication-title: Qualitative Sociology doi: 10.1007/s11133-011-9206-0 – ident: 9563_CR1 doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7 – volume-title: Law in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law year: 2016 ident: 9563_CR86 doi: 10.4324/9781315250663 – start-page: 21 volume-title: Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis year: 1984 ident: 9563_CR65 – ident: 9563_CR47 – volume: 22 start-page: 1429 issue: 10 year: 2007 ident: 9563_CR39 publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 – volume: 18 start-page: 369 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 9563_CR24 publication-title: Sociological Theory doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00106 – volume-title: Rhetoric and discourse in supreme court oral arguments year: 2013 ident: 9563_CR52 doi: 10.4324/9780203082942 – volume-title: Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings year: 1992 ident: 9563_CR20 – volume: 66 start-page: 429 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 9563_CR64 publication-title: Political Research Quarterly doi: 10.1177/1065912912442111 – start-page: 82 volume-title: The morality of knowledge in conversation year: 2011 ident: 9563_CR82 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.005 – ident: 9563_CR9 doi: 10.1075/ds.2.05cis – ident: 9563_CR42 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3653316 – ident: 9563_CR37 doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 – ident: 9563_CR7 doi: 10.1080/01638538509544620 – volume: 68 start-page: 939 year: 2003 ident: 9563_CR63 publication-title: American Sociological Review doi: 10.1177/000312240306800607 – volume: 41 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 9563_CR14 publication-title: Symbolic Interaction doi: 10.1002/symb.317 – volume-title: The campaign finance cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon year: 2020 ident: 9563_CR87 – volume: 42 start-page: 2772 issue: 10 year: 2010 ident: 9563_CR81 publication-title: Journal of Pragmatics doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 – ident: 9563_CR32 – start-page: 54 volume-title: Talk and social organisation year: 1987 ident: 9563_CR66 doi: 10.21832/9781800418226-004 – ident: 9563_CR84 – volume: 39 start-page: 221 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 9563_CR29 publication-title: Qualitative Sociology doi: 10.1007/s11133-016-9336-5 – volume: 30 start-page: 245 issue: 2 year: 1980 ident: 9563_CR35 publication-title: Semiotica – volume-title: A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England year: 1994 ident: 9563_CR78 doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 – volume-title: Big money unleashed: The campaign to deregulate election spending year: 2024 ident: 9563_CR80 – volume: 50 start-page: 696 issue: 4 year: 1974 ident: 9563_CR67 publication-title: Language doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010 – volume-title: Making your case: The art of persuading judges year: 2008 ident: 9563_CR68 – volume: 29 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 9563_CR72 publication-title: Language in Society doi: 10.1017/S0047404500001019 – volume: 48 start-page: 355 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 9563_CR79 publication-title: The American Journal of Legal History doi: 10.2307/25469981 |
| SSID | ssj0010046 |
| Score | 2.3433578 |
| Snippet | The US Supreme Court conducts much of its business through talk, including during oral arguments, where a central activity is the consideration of... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref springer |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 249 |
| SubjectTerms | Bans Citizen participation Conversation analysis Cross Cultural Psychology Debates Federal court decisions Law Machinery Personality and Social Psychology Political finance Prior knowledge Qualitative research Social Sciences Sociology Speech Supreme courts Time Verbal communication |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1NS8NAEB20XryIn9haZQ_iRReT7GY38SbFUgQ_oC30FnazWRElljY9tL_enSRtsejBW0jCBN5umLczvDcAl1yyzDOpop40WK0KfKqkjihz5EBENlMRR73z07PoDfnjKBzVNjmohdno399OcRQ6dho5Rcs8RhfbsBP6TOKYho7orDoGeNCrfLwDirbqtUDm9xg_k9CaWW40Q8sc092HvZockvtqNQ9gK8sPobXSlJArUqlpSWXuMT-C194cBU_E0TjiLlFOVRan78hAfX4QlRsyqMynkG6T95wM-6Q_G2NVkOC8uoK8TMpPvs1KsdsxDLsPg06P1kMSaMp8XlDBIwe1UKGVxhdCOYJjTWxVmmaMx5FK3Y0Yh9UJibPOdZxybri1LDSRkFaxE2jkX3l2CiSUJnDZSktPBy4Ij5mOpE0zxwpCrWPehOslasm48sJI1q7HiHHiME5KjJNFE9pLYJP6v5gmeN5xaZN5cRNulmCvH_8drfW_189gNyjXG8slbWgUk1l27thDoS_KbfMNUA66RA priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Hyping the Hypothetical: Talk and Temporality in US Supreme Court Oral Arguments |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11133-024-09563-z https://www.proquest.com/docview/3064413309 |
| Volume | 47 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NS8NAEB1se_EiWhWrtexBvOhim93sbrxILdXiRy3agp7CJpuIKLHWFLG_3p0ktSjoJYQEJjCTzLzM7nsDsMcli5om1LQpDXarnBbVMlCUWXAgVBxpxZHvfN0XvRG_uHfvi4bbe7Gtcp4Ts0RtXkPskR8hUrYJlzW9k_EbxalRuLpajNAoQcWmYKXKUDnt9ge33-sI-PuXq3s7FMXWC9pMTp5rWXPU1iiKYnyMzn6WpgXe_LVEmlWes1VYKSAjaecxXoOlKKlC6Up_VGH7m29C9knOtCW58MfnOgx6n0iGIhbiEXuKVKuscX1MhvrlmejEkGEuTIVQnDwlZHRH7qZj7BgSnGWXkptJ9uDHaUaE24DRWXfY6dFigAINWYunVHBlwyC0G0vTEkJb8BMbL9ZhGDHuKR3aCx4OshMS56AHXsi54XHMXKOEjDXbhHLymkRbQFxpHFvJAtkMHGuEeyxQMg4jixjcIPB4DQ7mvvPHuU6Gv1BERk_71tN-5ml_VoP63L1-8c28-4sI1-Bw7vLF7b-tbf9vbQeWnSzK2DqpQzmdTKNdiyTSoAGV9vnDZbdRvDYNKHVExx5HTvsLGEzG3w |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEB5BOLQXBGmrhkfZQ-mlXdXxrndtJFTxVCghoJJI3MzaayMEMoEkisKP4jcy40cikMqNm2VL49XseOfbWX_fAHyXWiSOjQ13tKVqldvkRkc-FwgOlJ8mxpfEdz7pqFZP_r3wLubgqeLC0G-V1ZqYL9T2LqYa-W9CyrjgCif407_n1DWKTlerFhpFWBwnkzFu2QbbR_s4v5uue3jQ3WvxsqsAj0VTDrmSPo5NGS_VtqmUQUSQ2iA1cZwIGfgmxhsBdXdTmpqDR0EspZVpKjzrK50agXbnYUEK5bg1WNg96Jz9m55b0HazUBN3OYm7lzSdgqzXxOFzzImcxP8Ef3yZCmf49tWRbJ7pDpdgsYSobKeIqWWYS7I6zLfNuA4rU34L-8EKZi8rhEYmn-CsNSHyFUNIyfCSqF15oXyLdc3tDTOZZd1CCIugP7vOWO-cnY_6VKFk1DtvyE4f8hdfjXLi3WfovYtrv0Atu8uSr8A8bV3MnJF2IheNyEBEvk7jBBGKF0WBbMDPyndhv9DlCGcKzOTpED0d5p4OHxuwVrk3LL_RQTiLqAb8qlw-e_x_aytvW9uAD63uSTtsH3WOV-Gjm884lW3WoDZ8GCXriGKG0bcydBhcvne0PgNPPQBj |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT-MwEB5BkdBeVjwWbcvLh4XLYtHGTpwgIcSrKq9SQStxyzpxjBAoFGiFyk_j1zGTBxVIy41blEiTZDz2fDP2NwPwRyqR1E2seV0ZylY5Da5V5HOB4MDzbaJ9SXzns7bX6snjK_dqAl5LLgwdqyzXxGyhNvcx5cg3CSnjgivqwaYtjkV0Dpo7_QdOHaRop7Vsp5GbyEkyesbw7Wn76ADHes1xmofd_RYvOgzwWDTkgHvSx-_0tGuVaXieRnRgTWB1HCdCBr6O8UZAnd48RY3CoyCW0khrhWt8T1ktUO4kTCmKiiowtXfY7ly872FQ6JlXFnc4FXovKDs5ca-Bv8LRP3IqBCj4y0e3OMa6n7ZnM6_XnIGfBVxlu7l9zcJEks7B5Kl-noPaO9eFrbOc5cvyoiOjeei0RkTEYggvGV4SzStLmm-xrr67ZTo1rJsXxaIwgN2krHfJLod9ylYy6qM3YOeP2YuvhxkJ7xf0vkW1C1BJ79PkNzBXGQe9aKTqkYNCZCAiX9k4QbTiRlEgq_C31F3Yz2t0hONqzKTpEDUdZpoOX6qwVKo3LObrUzi2ripslCofP_6_tNrX0lZhGq00PD1qnyzCDycbcMrgLEFl8DhMlhHQDKKVwnIY_PtuY30DOBoEmA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hyping+the+Hypothetical%3A+Talk+and+Temporality+in+US+Supreme+Court+Oral+Arguments&rft.jtitle=Qualitative+sociology&rft.au=Gibson%2C+David+R&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0162-0436&rft.eissn=1573-7837&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11133-024-09563-z&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0162-0436&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0162-0436&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0162-0436&client=summon |