To Rethink Standards of Civilisation, Start with the End

Many people recognise that there is a need to distinguish between states in the international system, such as on the basis of legitimacy. For much of the system’s history the means of drawing such distinctions have been standards of civilisation. For some, the need to divide and separate is unavoida...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMillennium Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 614 - 631
Main Author Bowden, Brett
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2014
Subjects
Civilization
Cosmopolitanism
International system
Legitimacy
Modernity
standards of civilisation
progress
cosmopolitanism
universal history
modernity
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Many people recognise that there is a need to distinguish between states in the international system, such as on the basis of legitimacy. For much of the system’s history the means of drawing such distinctions have been standards of civilisation. For some, the need to divide and separate is unavoidable; others are more critical of standards of civilisation because of the consequences that come with exclusion or the pressure to conform. On both sides it is often downplayed that standards of civilisation are, by and large, a means to an end. If we want to rethink the way standards of civilisation work and mitigate some of their more unsavoury consequences, then we need to rethink the end they are designed to achieve, which is best captured in Kant’s title ‘Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View’.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-8298
1477-9021
DOI:10.1177/0305829814537543