Process architecture development using Riva and ARIS: comparative study

• Published in: Business process management journal Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 837 - 858
• Main Author: Tbaishat, Dina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 04.06.2018; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Academic libraries; Access to materials; Alliances; Architecture; Business administration; Business process reengineering; Collection management; Colleges & universities; Comparative analysis; Digital libraries; Digitization; Feasibility studies; Information literacy; Information systems; Internal customers; Internet resources; Learning management systems; Library catalogs; Library management; Software; Students; Studies; Systems development; Value-added chain; Process architecture; Riva; ARIS; Business process modelling
• DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-04-2016-0086
• ISSN: 1463-7154

Purpose Business process modeling has been given great attention due to its crucial role in developing computer-based systems that support (and automate) organizational processes. In information systems, building the right process architecture is vital, since a poor division of organizational processes can lead to complex designs or incoherent structure. Moreover, process architecture acts as a “big picture” of what the organization does, and represents dynamic relationships between the existing processes, which, in turn, helps understand how the organization works (Ould, 2005). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper discusses the derivation of a process architecture diagram (PAD) using the Riva method in detail, in contrast to the PAD developed using Architecture of Integrated Information Systems (ARIS). The information system selected as an example for this comparative study is in the context of academic libraries, embedding various yet generic library processes. Findings Organizational process architecture provides a basis for business management, based on specific framework supported by integrated tools and methods (Kozina, 2006). ARIS and Riva process architecture methods can be used to visualize and document organizational processes. Understanding the merits and weaknesses of each method is essential to identify possible areas of application. Research limitations/implications The processes selected were generic in most academic libraries not taking into consideration special personalized processes. These can be added though. Practical implications Both techniques are feasible and can be used to view and analyze library processes, allowing bridging the gap between theory and practice. Originality/value A number of process architecture methods are available, however, few studies focused on assessing these methods, and comparing some of them to find out how easy they are to be used in particular contexts, and whether they can be standardized.