Students' perceptions of assessment feedback in an undergraduate nursing and midwifery subject: a mixed-methods study

In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContemporary nurse : a journal for the Australian nursing profession Vol. 61; no. 2; p. 127
Main Authors Tomlinson, Emily J, Schoch, Monica, Lakshman, Rital, McDonall, Jo, McTier, Lauren
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 04.03.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent assessments. It is unclear how students use the feedback, and what elements of feedback are perceived as being most useful. This study aimed to examine nursing students' perspectives of receiving feedback from scaffolded assessments and how feedback received influenced the development of the final assessment task. A mixed-methods approach was used with a cross-sectional survey and online qualitative interviews. This research was conducted at Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery in Melbourne, Australia. One hundred forty-eight students (17.4%,  = 851) participated in the cross-sectional survey. Seven students participated in the online qualitative interviews. Students enrolled in the EBP subject in Trimester, 2023 were invited to participate in a survey where they rated their experience of assessment feedback using a Likert scale. Students were also invited to participate in an online qualitative interview that further explored their perceptions. Assessment exemplars were highly beneficial to understanding the assessment task (87.8% agree/strongly agree,  = 107). Responding to feedback was challenging (38.5%,  = 47). Qualitative themes identified were , , and . This study highlights that scaffolded feedback is valuable for student learning. Feedback in each rubric criterion helps with the alignment of learning outcomes. Resources that support students in how to respond to feedback are important.
AbstractList In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent assessments. It is unclear how students use the feedback, and what elements of feedback are perceived as being most useful. This study aimed to examine nursing students' perspectives of receiving feedback from scaffolded assessments and how feedback received influenced the development of the final assessment task. A mixed-methods approach was used with a cross-sectional survey and online qualitative interviews. This research was conducted at Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery in Melbourne, Australia. One hundred forty-eight students (17.4%,  = 851) participated in the cross-sectional survey. Seven students participated in the online qualitative interviews. Students enrolled in the EBP subject in Trimester, 2023 were invited to participate in a survey where they rated their experience of assessment feedback using a Likert scale. Students were also invited to participate in an online qualitative interview that further explored their perceptions. Assessment exemplars were highly beneficial to understanding the assessment task (87.8% agree/strongly agree,  = 107). Responding to feedback was challenging (38.5%,  = 47). Qualitative themes identified were , , and . This study highlights that scaffolded feedback is valuable for student learning. Feedback in each rubric criterion helps with the alignment of learning outcomes. Resources that support students in how to respond to feedback are important.
Author McDonall, Jo
Lakshman, Rital
McTier, Lauren
Tomlinson, Emily J
Schoch, Monica
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Emily J
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8361-4774
  surname: Tomlinson
  fullname: Tomlinson, Emily J
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Monica
  surname: Schoch
  fullname: Schoch, Monica
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rital
  surname: Lakshman
  fullname: Lakshman, Rital
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jo
  surname: McDonall
  fullname: McDonall, Jo
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lauren
  surname: McTier
  fullname: McTier, Lauren
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39874128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j0lLxDAcxYMozqIfQcnNU8esbeJNBjcY8KCehyz_jB1tWpIGnW9vQT09eD94ywIdxz4CQheUrChR5JoS3tS0UStGmFwxIbSuxRGaU8V1xSWXM7TIeU8I1bJWp2jGtWoEZWqOystYPMQxX-EBkoNhbPuYcR-wyRly7iaGA4C3xn3gNmITcYke0i4ZX8wIOJaU27ibgMdd67_aAOmAc7F7cOMNNpP5Db7qYHzvfcZ56jucoZNgPjOc_-kSvd3fva4fq83zw9P6dlM5TsVYMeOJkoo02sngvAapxbREqtrURDmiPBFWORuc4MbwurGOOC0cbQK1xAS2RJe_uUOxHfjtkNrOpMP2_z_7AX5RYQg
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1080/10376178.2025.2449964
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Nursing
EISSN 1839-3535
ExternalDocumentID 39874128
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Australia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Australia
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29F
4.4
53G
5GY
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AALUX
AAMIU
AAORF
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABEIZ
ABFIM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABUPF
ABUWG
ABWCV
ABWVI
ABXYU
ABZEW
ACENM
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIEZ
ACKZS
ACNCT
ACOPL
ACTOA
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADFOM
ADFZZ
ADYSH
AECIN
AEIIZ
AENEX
AFKRA
AFLEI
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AH1
AHMBA
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJVHN
AKBVH
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
AMPGV
ARJSQ
AVBZW
BENPR
BKEYQ
BLEHA
BMOTO
BOHLJ
BPHCQ
BRMBE
BVXVI
CCCUG
CCPQU
CGR
CUY
CVF
CYYVM
CZDIS
DGFLZ
DKSSO
DRXRE
DU5
DWTOO
EBS
ECM
EIF
EIHBH
EJD
EX3
F5P
FYUFA
GTTXZ
H13
HMCUK
INR
IPNFZ
J5H
JENTW
KRBQP
KSSTO
KTM
KWAYT
KYCEM
LJTGL
M1P
M4Z
NAPCQ
NPM
NUSFT
O9-
P2P
PCD
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
QQXMO
RIG
RNANH
RVRKI
SJN
STATR
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFL
TFW
TNTFI
TUROJ
UEQFS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
WQ9
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2ad0858079c5fcd9e594edb586a608c08d04b8cbfc43aa367bc0c94c17f1b0af2
IngestDate Tue May 27 01:35:06 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords feedback
scaffolded assessment
nursing
undergraduate
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c314t-2ad0858079c5fcd9e594edb586a608c08d04b8cbfc43aa367bc0c94c17f1b0af2
ORCID 0000-0002-8361-4774
PMID 39874128
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_39874128
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-03-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-03-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-03-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Contemporary nurse : a journal for the Australian nursing profession
PublicationTitleAlternate Contemp Nurse
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0019568
Score 2.347552
Snippet In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 127
SubjectTerms Adult
Australia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate
Educational Measurement - methods
Feedback
Female
Humans
Male
Midwifery - education
Qualitative Research
Students, Nursing - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Title Students' perceptions of assessment feedback in an undergraduate nursing and midwifery subject: a mixed-methods study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39874128
Volume 61
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZSEKiXijeUh3xA4hA57MPeR28IFVUIOEAr9VaNvTaNSjZRk4jH7-QHdfza3YaCgMsqWifrleeLPf483wwhz02jDWhRsrSWhnFugElZZsykJlO10aVwdcjefygOjvjbY3E8Gv0cRC2tV3KiflypK_kfq-I9tKtVyf6DZbuH4g38jPbFK1oYr39l408-MaULhFj0ESrubL_LuDk2uEBJUGeW2sB_s1WNnX8-h2aNbmZ39G_589m0-WojXb6Pl2tp-RmvhJ5Nv-mG-VLTy0E-2pjfYJjfysWEjIOCOvi6MZBxQKvEXhddYpCe7Z596QRp-4586Q-ucKr2lavsTNTHGL2Ds-VpYHI_2iIoG9S3Z7nnQ4IjEy7Cy5MM2k_K6MSxXPi0JnHW9incAzqzwRSc-lwDvywNPpbSyiKtKnJie5qgb4P7PT78Po7QYubwktcVulteuv7n1o2M3bFpi2zh3sUWY7UMUjjZsvLMqCSrkpdXvs82uRmfsbHbcV7P4S2yE7Yr9JXH3m0y0u0dciNQTHfJOiLwBR3gj84N7fFHI_7otKXQ0kv4owEJ2NDQDn804G-PAr2EPurQd48cvdk_fH3AQiEPpvKUr1gGDXr2VVLWShjV1FrUHHsWVQFFUqmkahIuKyWN4jlAXpRSJarmKi1NKhMw2X1yrZ23-iGh9pegjeG1KnkhFAAu0CnIXNdQcoBH5IEfr5OFz9ZyEkdy97ctj8l2j7sn5LrB6UE_RV9zJZ85410AkWKGFg
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students%27+perceptions+of+assessment+feedback+in+an+undergraduate+nursing+and+midwifery+subject%3A+a+mixed-methods+study&rft.jtitle=Contemporary+nurse+%3A+a+journal+for+the+Australian+nursing+profession&rft.au=Tomlinson%2C+Emily+J&rft.au=Schoch%2C+Monica&rft.au=Lakshman%2C+Rital&rft.au=McDonall%2C+Jo&rft.date=2025-03-04&rft.eissn=1839-3535&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F10376178.2025.2449964&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39874128&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39874128&rft.externalDocID=39874128