Students' perceptions of assessment feedback in an undergraduate nursing and midwifery subject: a mixed-methods study
In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent...
Saved in:
Published in | Contemporary nurse : a journal for the Australian nursing profession Vol. 61; no. 2; p. 127 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
04.03.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent assessments. It is unclear how students use the feedback, and what elements of feedback are perceived as being most useful.
This study aimed to examine nursing students' perspectives of receiving feedback from scaffolded assessments and how feedback received influenced the development of the final assessment task.
A mixed-methods approach was used with a cross-sectional survey and online qualitative interviews.
This research was conducted at Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery in Melbourne, Australia.
One hundred forty-eight students (17.4%,
= 851) participated in the cross-sectional survey. Seven students participated in the online qualitative interviews.
Students enrolled in the EBP subject in Trimester, 2023 were invited to participate in a survey where they rated their experience of assessment feedback using a Likert scale. Students were also invited to participate in an online qualitative interview that further explored their perceptions.
Assessment exemplars were highly beneficial to understanding the assessment task (87.8% agree/strongly agree,
= 107). Responding to feedback was challenging (38.5%,
= 47). Qualitative themes identified were
,
, and
.
This study highlights that scaffolded feedback is valuable for student learning. Feedback in each rubric criterion helps with the alignment of learning outcomes. Resources that support students in how to respond to feedback are important. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent assessments. It is unclear how students use the feedback, and what elements of feedback are perceived as being most useful.
This study aimed to examine nursing students' perspectives of receiving feedback from scaffolded assessments and how feedback received influenced the development of the final assessment task.
A mixed-methods approach was used with a cross-sectional survey and online qualitative interviews.
This research was conducted at Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery in Melbourne, Australia.
One hundred forty-eight students (17.4%,
= 851) participated in the cross-sectional survey. Seven students participated in the online qualitative interviews.
Students enrolled in the EBP subject in Trimester, 2023 were invited to participate in a survey where they rated their experience of assessment feedback using a Likert scale. Students were also invited to participate in an online qualitative interview that further explored their perceptions.
Assessment exemplars were highly beneficial to understanding the assessment task (87.8% agree/strongly agree,
= 107). Responding to feedback was challenging (38.5%,
= 47). Qualitative themes identified were
,
, and
.
This study highlights that scaffolded feedback is valuable for student learning. Feedback in each rubric criterion helps with the alignment of learning outcomes. Resources that support students in how to respond to feedback are important. |
Author | McDonall, Jo Lakshman, Rital McTier, Lauren Tomlinson, Emily J Schoch, Monica |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Emily J orcidid: 0000-0002-8361-4774 surname: Tomlinson fullname: Tomlinson, Emily J organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Monica surname: Schoch fullname: Schoch, Monica organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: Rital surname: Lakshman fullname: Lakshman, Rital organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Jo surname: McDonall fullname: McDonall, Jo organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia – sequence: 5 givenname: Lauren surname: McTier fullname: McTier, Lauren organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39874128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1j0lLxDAcxYMozqIfQcnNU8esbeJNBjcY8KCehyz_jB1tWpIGnW9vQT09eD94ywIdxz4CQheUrChR5JoS3tS0UStGmFwxIbSuxRGaU8V1xSWXM7TIeU8I1bJWp2jGtWoEZWqOystYPMQxX-EBkoNhbPuYcR-wyRly7iaGA4C3xn3gNmITcYke0i4ZX8wIOJaU27ibgMdd67_aAOmAc7F7cOMNNpP5Db7qYHzvfcZ56jucoZNgPjOc_-kSvd3fva4fq83zw9P6dlM5TsVYMeOJkoo02sngvAapxbREqtrURDmiPBFWORuc4MbwurGOOC0cbQK1xAS2RJe_uUOxHfjtkNrOpMP2_z_7AX5RYQg |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1080/10376178.2025.2449964 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Nursing |
EISSN | 1839-3535 |
ExternalDocumentID | 39874128 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Australia |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Australia |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29F 4.4 53G 5GY 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AALUX AAMIU AAORF AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL ABBKH ABEIZ ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABPEM ABTAI ABUPF ABUWG ABWCV ABWVI ABXYU ABZEW ACENM ACGFS ACHQT ACIEZ ACKZS ACNCT ACOPL ACTOA ADBBV ADCVX ADFOM ADFZZ ADYSH AECIN AEIIZ AENEX AFKRA AFLEI AFRVT AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AH1 AHMBA AIJEM AIRBT AJVHN AKBVH ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ALYBC AMDAE AMPGV ARJSQ AVBZW BENPR BKEYQ BLEHA BMOTO BOHLJ BPHCQ BRMBE BVXVI CCCUG CCPQU CGR CUY CVF CYYVM CZDIS DGFLZ DKSSO DRXRE DU5 DWTOO EBS ECM EIF EIHBH EJD EX3 F5P FYUFA GTTXZ H13 HMCUK INR IPNFZ J5H JENTW KRBQP KSSTO KTM KWAYT KYCEM LJTGL M1P M4Z NAPCQ NPM NUSFT O9- P2P PCD PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X QQXMO RIG RNANH RVRKI SJN STATR TBQAZ TDBHL TERGH TFL TFW TNTFI TUROJ UEQFS UKHRP WOQ WOW WQ9 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2ad0858079c5fcd9e594edb586a608c08d04b8cbfc43aa367bc0c94c17f1b0af2 |
IngestDate | Tue May 27 01:35:06 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | feedback scaffolded assessment nursing undergraduate |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c314t-2ad0858079c5fcd9e594edb586a608c08d04b8cbfc43aa367bc0c94c17f1b0af2 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8361-4774 |
PMID | 39874128 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_39874128 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-03-04 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-03-04 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2025 text: 2025-03-04 day: 04 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Contemporary nurse : a journal for the Australian nursing profession |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Contemp Nurse |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
SSID | ssj0019568 |
Score | 2.347552 |
Snippet | In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 127 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Australia Cross-Sectional Studies Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate Educational Measurement - methods Feedback Female Humans Male Midwifery - education Qualitative Research Students, Nursing - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
Title | Students' perceptions of assessment feedback in an undergraduate nursing and midwifery subject: a mixed-methods study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39874128 |
Volume | 61 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZSEKiXijeUh3xA4hA57MPeR28IFVUIOEAr9VaNvTaNSjZRk4jH7-QHdfza3YaCgMsqWifrleeLPf483wwhz02jDWhRsrSWhnFugElZZsykJlO10aVwdcjefygOjvjbY3E8Gv0cRC2tV3KiflypK_kfq-I9tKtVyf6DZbuH4g38jPbFK1oYr39l408-MaULhFj0ESrubL_LuDk2uEBJUGeW2sB_s1WNnX8-h2aNbmZ39G_589m0-WojXb6Pl2tp-RmvhJ5Nv-mG-VLTy0E-2pjfYJjfysWEjIOCOvi6MZBxQKvEXhddYpCe7Z596QRp-4586Q-ucKr2lavsTNTHGL2Ds-VpYHI_2iIoG9S3Z7nnQ4IjEy7Cy5MM2k_K6MSxXPi0JnHW9incAzqzwRSc-lwDvywNPpbSyiKtKnJie5qgb4P7PT78Po7QYubwktcVulteuv7n1o2M3bFpi2zh3sUWY7UMUjjZsvLMqCSrkpdXvs82uRmfsbHbcV7P4S2yE7Yr9JXH3m0y0u0dciNQTHfJOiLwBR3gj84N7fFHI_7otKXQ0kv4owEJ2NDQDn804G-PAr2EPurQd48cvdk_fH3AQiEPpvKUr1gGDXr2VVLWShjV1FrUHHsWVQFFUqmkahIuKyWN4jlAXpRSJarmKi1NKhMw2X1yrZ23-iGh9pegjeG1KnkhFAAu0CnIXNdQcoBH5IEfr5OFz9ZyEkdy97ctj8l2j7sn5LrB6UE_RV9zJZ85410AkWKGFg |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students%27+perceptions+of+assessment+feedback+in+an+undergraduate+nursing+and+midwifery+subject%3A+a+mixed-methods+study&rft.jtitle=Contemporary+nurse+%3A+a+journal+for+the+Australian+nursing+profession&rft.au=Tomlinson%2C+Emily+J&rft.au=Schoch%2C+Monica&rft.au=Lakshman%2C+Rital&rft.au=McDonall%2C+Jo&rft.date=2025-03-04&rft.eissn=1839-3535&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F10376178.2025.2449964&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39874128&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39874128&rft.externalDocID=39874128 |