Repeatability and reproducibility of manifest refraction

To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. Tertiary referral center. Retrospective study. Patients attending at least 2 preoperative refractions before undergoing subsequent refractive surgery were included. All manifest refractions were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cataract and refractive surgery Vol. 46; no. 12; pp. 1659 - 1666
Main Authors Taneri, Suphi, Arba-Mosquera, Samuel, Rost, Anika, Kießler, Saskia, Dick, H Burkhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.12.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. Tertiary referral center. Retrospective study. Patients attending at least 2 preoperative refractions before undergoing subsequent refractive surgery were included. All manifest refractions were performed by 1 of 4 experienced optometrists using an automated phoropter according to a standard protocol. The first manifest refraction was performed after obtaining automated refraction and measuring the spectacles of the patient. The second refraction was typically refined from the first also considering wavefront refraction and tomography/topography. The latest 2 manifest refractions of 1000 eyes obtained at 2 separate visits showed a mean pairwise absolute difference of 0.16 ± 0.19 diopter (D) (range 0 to 1.38 D) in spherical equivalent (SE). This SD was better than 0.25 D (the minimum measurement increment of refraction itself). The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) was within 0.50 D for sphere, cylinder, and SE. The SD of the astigmatism axis was approximately 10 degrees, and the 95% LoA was within 22 degrees (the difference in axis decreasing significantly with the measured cylinder magnitude). The SD for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was half a Snellen line and the 95% LoA was within 1.5 lines (with increasing deviation with worse vision). There were no clinically meaningful differences in reproducibility (2 optometrists) compared with repeatability (same optometrist) in sphere, axis, and CDVA. Reproducibility was 0.16 D irrespective whether refractions were performed by 1 or 2 different optometrists. Obtaining multiple refractions preoperatively might increase the predictability of surgery and decrease the enhancement rate.
AbstractList PURPOSETo evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. SETTINGTertiary referral center. DESIGNRetrospective study. METHODSPatients attending at least 2 preoperative refractions before undergoing subsequent refractive surgery were included. All manifest refractions were performed by 1 of 4 experienced optometrists using an automated phoropter according to a standard protocol. The first manifest refraction was performed after obtaining automated refraction and measuring the spectacles of the patient. The second refraction was typically refined from the first also considering wavefront refraction and tomography/topography. RESULTSThe latest 2 manifest refractions of 1000 eyes obtained at 2 separate visits showed a mean pairwise absolute difference of 0.16 ± 0.19 diopter (D) (range 0 to 1.38 D) in spherical equivalent (SE). This SD was better than 0.25 D (the minimum measurement increment of refraction itself). The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) was within 0.50 D for sphere, cylinder, and SE. The SD of the astigmatism axis was approximately 10 degrees, and the 95% LoA was within 22 degrees (the difference in axis decreasing significantly with the measured cylinder magnitude). The SD for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was half a Snellen line and the 95% LoA was within 1.5 lines (with increasing deviation with worse vision). There were no clinically meaningful differences in reproducibility (2 optometrists) compared with repeatability (same optometrist) in sphere, axis, and CDVA. CONCLUSIONSReproducibility was 0.16 D irrespective whether refractions were performed by 1 or 2 different optometrists. Obtaining multiple refractions preoperatively might increase the predictability of surgery and decrease the enhancement rate.
Purpose: To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: Patients attending at least 2 preoperative refractions before undergoing subsequent refractive surgery were included. All manifest refractions were performed by 1 of 4 experienced optometrists using an automated phoropter according to a standard protocol. The first manifest refraction was performed after obtaining automated refraction and measuring the spectacles of the patient. The second refraction was typically refined from the first also considering wavefront refraction and tomography/topography. Results: The latest 2 manifest refractions of 1000 eyes obtained at 2 separate visits showed a mean pairwise absolute difference of 0.16 ± 0.19 diopter (D) (range 0 to 1.38 D) in spherical equivalent (SE). This SD was better than 0.25 D (the minimum measurement increment of refraction itself). The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) was within 0.50 D for sphere, cylinder, and SE. The SD of the astigmatism axis was approximately 10 degrees, and the 95% LoA was within 22 degrees (the difference in axis decreasing significantly with the measured cylinder magnitude). The SD for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was half a Snellen line and the 95% LoA was within 1.5 lines (with increasing deviation with worse vision). There were no clinically meaningful differences in reproducibility (2 optometrists) compared with repeatability (same optometrist) in sphere, axis, and CDVA. Conclusions: Reproducibility was 0.16 D irrespective whether refractions were performed by 1 or 2 different optometrists. Obtaining multiple refractions preoperatively might increase the predictability of surgery and decrease the enhancement rate.
To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. Tertiary referral center. Retrospective study. Patients attending at least 2 preoperative refractions before undergoing subsequent refractive surgery were included. All manifest refractions were performed by 1 of 4 experienced optometrists using an automated phoropter according to a standard protocol. The first manifest refraction was performed after obtaining automated refraction and measuring the spectacles of the patient. The second refraction was typically refined from the first also considering wavefront refraction and tomography/topography. The latest 2 manifest refractions of 1000 eyes obtained at 2 separate visits showed a mean pairwise absolute difference of 0.16 ± 0.19 diopter (D) (range 0 to 1.38 D) in spherical equivalent (SE). This SD was better than 0.25 D (the minimum measurement increment of refraction itself). The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) was within 0.50 D for sphere, cylinder, and SE. The SD of the astigmatism axis was approximately 10 degrees, and the 95% LoA was within 22 degrees (the difference in axis decreasing significantly with the measured cylinder magnitude). The SD for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was half a Snellen line and the 95% LoA was within 1.5 lines (with increasing deviation with worse vision). There were no clinically meaningful differences in reproducibility (2 optometrists) compared with repeatability (same optometrist) in sphere, axis, and CDVA. Reproducibility was 0.16 D irrespective whether refractions were performed by 1 or 2 different optometrists. Obtaining multiple refractions preoperatively might increase the predictability of surgery and decrease the enhancement rate.
Author Kießler, Saskia
Rost, Anika
Taneri, Suphi
Arba-Mosquera, Samuel
Dick, H Burkhard
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Suphi
  surname: Taneri
  fullname: Taneri, Suphi
  organization: From the Center for Refractive Surgery, Eye Department at St. Francis Hospital (Taneri, Rost, Kießler), Muenster, Ruhr-University, University Eye Hospital (Taneri, Dick), Bochum, and SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions (Arba-Mosquera), Kleinostheim, Germany
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Samuel
  surname: Arba-Mosquera
  fullname: Arba-Mosquera, Samuel
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Anika
  surname: Rost
  fullname: Rost, Anika
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Saskia
  surname: Kießler
  fullname: Kießler, Saskia
– sequence: 5
  givenname: H Burkhard
  surname: Dick
  fullname: Dick, H Burkhard
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkE1LBDEMhousuB_6F3SPXmZtm7bTOcriFywIoufS6WSgw3ys7cxh_72VXUXMJSR5k7w8SzLrhx4JuWF0w2iR3zWbxoW4oX8DBJyRBdM5ZEJSPiMLqrXKACSdk2WMTdIIDvKCzAG4LKCgC6LfcI92tKVv_XhY275aB9yHoZqcP_WGet3Z3tcYxzSrg3WjH_pLcl7bNuLVKa_Ix-PD-_Y5270-vWzvd5kDBmOmsdLoSoYOBAMHqtSWc2nRSqd0BbksueOCC8aLHCTaOqeqlJVyUKeSworcHu8mU59T8mA6Hx22re1xmKLhQilecMp1kuZHqQtDjMmq2Qff2XAwjJpvbKYx39jMf2xp8_r0ZCo7rH73fjjBFyfda40
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2021_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_08164622_2023_2266498
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13047
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjophth_2021_000954
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2021_11_002
crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20240422_03
crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20240112_03
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optom_2022_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13263
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_023_02601_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optom_2021_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721221123883
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optom_2023_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000834
crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_11_11_16
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2024_04_023
crossref_primary_10_37039_1982_8551_20240036
Cites_doi 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000923
10.1007/s00347-005-1290-7
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.043
10.3928/1081597X-20110317-01
10.1159/000496865
10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80043-6
10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.042
10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00022.x
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00549.x
10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819fa590
10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.032
10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.053
10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00596.x
10.1007/s00417-019-04405-z
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.12.053
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
10.3928/1081-597X-20040501-08
10.2147/OPTO.S132572
10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.044
10.1097/00006324-199508000-00007
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000343
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1873-4502
EndPage 1666
ExternalDocumentID 10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000343
33259390
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~5
29K
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
AAAAV
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQKA
AAQQT
AAQXK
AASCR
AAXUO
ABASU
ABDIG
ABIID
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABVCZ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACIUM
ACLDA
ACXJB
ADBBV
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADMUD
ADPAM
AEETU
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFDTB
AFRHN
AFTJW
AHOMT
AHQNM
AINUH
AITUG
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJUYK
AJZMW
AKRWK
AKULP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C45
C5W
CS3
D-I
DIWNM
DU5
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
ERAAH
F5P
FCALG
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IKREB
IKYAY
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OF-
OPF
OQ~
OVD
P2P
R2-
RIG
RLZ
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
TSPGW
UHS
UV1
XH2
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
ZZMQN
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-8ed8ecb1ec3413c36b8a225aea5c68d375b2c2424129735eaf706b5d6c3f35e03
ISSN 0886-3350
IngestDate Sat Aug 17 00:27:08 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:59:22 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:43:02 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c313t-8ed8ecb1ec3413c36b8a225aea5c68d375b2c2424129735eaf706b5d6c3f35e03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 33259390
PQID 2466292028
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2466292028
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000343
pubmed_primary_33259390
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-Dec
2020-12-00
20201201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-Dec
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate J Cataract Refract Surg
PublicationYear 2020
References Epitropoulos (R12-20230819) 2015; 41
Shah (R20-20230819) 2009; 86
Perches (R4-20230819) 2016; 93
Taneri (R15-20230819) 2011; 27
Raasch (R19-20230819) 2001; 21
St Clair (R7-20230819) 2016; 42
Allan (R8-20230819) 2015; 41
Piñero (R3-20230819) 2017; 9
Liyanage (R9-20230819) 2012; 38
Smith (R1-20230819) 2006; 89
Çakır (R13-20230819) 2018; 41
Michael (R16-20230819) 2019; 62
Mrochen (R5-20230819) 2006; 103
Montés-Micó (R11-20230819) 2004; 20
Yang (R6-20230819) 1998; 24
MacKenzie (R17-20230819) 2008; 28
Montés-Micó (R10-20230819) 2010; 36
Chen (R14-20230819) 2019; 257
Rosenfield (R18-20230819) 1995; 72
Reinstein (R21-20230819) 2014; 40
References_xml – volume: 93
  start-page: 1243
  year: 2016
  ident: R4-20230819
  article-title: Repeatability and reproducibility of virtual subjective refraction
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000923
  contributor:
    fullname: Perches
– volume: 103
  start-page: 331
  year: 2006
  ident: R5-20230819
  article-title: Verbesserung der refraktiven Ergebnisse durch Nomogramme
  publication-title: Der Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1290-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Mrochen
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1232
  year: 2012
  ident: R9-20230819
  article-title: Multiple regression analysis in myopic wavefront laser in situ keratomileusis nomogram development
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.043
  contributor:
    fullname: Liyanage
– volume: 27
  start-page: 678
  year: 2011
  ident: R15-20230819
  article-title: Influence of mydriatic eye drops on wavefront sensing with the Zywave aberrometer
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110317-01
  contributor:
    fullname: Taneri
– volume: 62
  start-page: 157
  year: 2019
  ident: R16-20230819
  article-title: Cortical cataract and refractive error
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Res
  doi: 10.1159/000496865
  contributor:
    fullname: Michael
– volume: 24
  start-page: 917
  year: 1998
  ident: R6-20230819
  article-title: Neural network computer program to determine photorefractive keratectomy nomograms
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80043-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Yang
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1009
  year: 2015
  ident: R8-20230819
  article-title: Multiple regression analysis in nomogram development for myopic wavefront laser in situ keratomileusis: improving astigmatic outcomes
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.042
  contributor:
    fullname: Allan
– volume: 89
  start-page: 66
  year: 2006
  ident: R1-20230819
  article-title: Refraction and visual acuity measurements: what are their measurement uncertainties?
  publication-title: Clin Exp Optom
  doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00022.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Smith
– volume: 28
  start-page: 143
  year: 2008
  ident: R17-20230819
  article-title: Reproducibility of sphero-cylindrical prescriptions
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00549.x
  contributor:
    fullname: MacKenzie
– volume: 86
  start-page: 517
  year: 2009
  ident: R20-20230819
  article-title: Standardized patient methodology to assess refractive error reproducibility
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819fa590
  contributor:
    fullname: Shah
– volume: 41
  start-page: 407
  year: 2018
  ident: R13-20230819
  article-title: Effects of artificial tear treatment on corneal epithelial thickness and corneal topography findings in dry eye patients
  publication-title: J Fr Ophtalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.032
  contributor:
    fullname: Çakır
– volume: 40
  start-page: 450
  year: 2014
  ident: R21-20230819
  article-title: Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice
  publication-title: J Cat Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.053
  contributor:
    fullname: Reinstein
– volume: 21
  start-page: 376
  year: 2001
  ident: R19-20230819
  article-title: Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00596.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Raasch
– volume: 257
  start-page: 1997
  year: 2019
  ident: R14-20230819
  article-title: The influence of age, refractive error, visual demand and lighting conditions on accommodative ability in Malay children and adults
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04405-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Chen
– volume: 42
  start-page: 556
  year: 2016
  ident: R7-20230819
  article-title: Development of a nomogram for femtosecond laser astigmatic keratotomy for astigmatism after keratoplasty
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.12.053
  contributor:
    fullname: St Clair
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1672
  year: 2015
  ident: R12-20230819
  article-title: Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
  contributor:
    fullname: Epitropoulos
– volume: 20
  start-page: 243
  year: 2004
  ident: R11-20230819
  article-title: Wavefront analysis of higher order aberrations in dry eye patients
  publication-title: J Refract Surg
  doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20040501-08
  contributor:
    fullname: Montés-Micó
– volume: 9
  start-page: 91
  year: 2017
  ident: R3-20230819
  article-title: Intrasession repeatability of refractive and ocular aberrometric measurements obtained using a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes
  publication-title: Clin Optom
  doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S132572
  contributor:
    fullname: Piñero
– volume: 36
  start-page: 935
  year: 2010
  ident: R10-20230819
  article-title: Optical quality after instillation of eyedrops in dry-eye syndrome
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.044
  contributor:
    fullname: Montés-Micó
– volume: 72
  start-page: 577
  year: 1995
  ident: R18-20230819
  article-title: Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/00006324-199508000-00007
  contributor:
    fullname: Rosenfield
SSID ssj0004235
Score 2.448272
Snippet To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. Tertiary referral center. Retrospective study....
Purpose: To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Design:...
PURPOSETo evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and the interobserver reproducibility of manifest refraction. SETTINGTertiary referral center....
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1659
Title Repeatability and reproducibility of manifest refraction
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259390
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2466292028
Volume 46
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db5swELe2VJr2Mu172ZeYtLeKDmxszGM0NaqWtpOaRMsbMubQSDVSBbKH_fU7YxOSbpG68YCwMX64Ox1n-36_I-Qjl9pk4gQ-F3nuRwKUrwrIfUohKpgSoVYt2-elOJtHXxZ80dMTtOiSJjvRv_6KK_kfrWIf6tWgZP9Bs9tJsQOfUb94Rw3j_U46xugZXall2rY8Soaj0lC4lq7PnJ4rk75SN_iuWFsYw4GI1GzlmBFuJjv6JxzXO9DpdpFfOXz6dHPzvexNJlP-xarGH01bu-h4qn5sYJvAceXQJaOqvN7-CiYlmJP6ZOzwiFNVX5dqdyeC7mZ1gPWeMmZ-xIM99-p2GJ0Z0R1nGQpHBg6uaeuv_OHULVnw8mSp17Xlm-wuZime9mm0L7-m4_n5eTo7XczukyMaJ5wPyNFocvVt0kNmKeNdul8Sfzow-X6wcmAF0kYis8fkkVOYN7L28ITcg-opeXDhkiSeEblnFh4q07tlFt6q8Dqz8HqzeE7m49PZ5zPfFcjwNQtZ40vIJegsBG1iEc1EJhX6ZwWKayFzFvOMaoP_CU2FMg6qiAOR8VxoVmAzYC_IoFpV8Ip4BacZLQocE6oIIMa4LwHA6FZLUELBkASdJNIby4OSdvkLy9QIL70tvCH50EksRZ9lDqLQPlebOqWREKZKGpVD8tKKcjspY7ggZ0nw-g5fvyEPezt8SwbNegPvMEZssvdO378BFFBp4A
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27955,27956
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeatability+and+reproducibility+of+manifest+refraction&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cataract+and+refractive+surgery&rft.au=Taneri%2C+Suphi&rft.au=Arba-Mosquera%2C+Samuel&rft.au=Rost%2C+Anika&rft.au=Kie%C3%9Fler%2C+Saskia&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1659&rft.epage=1666&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2Fj.jcrs.0000000000000343&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0886-3350&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0886-3350&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0886-3350&client=summon