Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods in beam halo experiments
In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the...
Saved in:
Published in | Chinese physics C Vol. 38; no. 8; pp. 73 - 77 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.08.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam. The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT. For the quadrupole scan method, we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations. For the multi-wire scanner method, we choose the case of a matched beam. By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data, we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam. The difference between the two methods is about eight percent, which is acceptable in our experiments. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam. The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT. For the quadrupole scan method, we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations. For the multi-wire scanner method, we choose the case of a matched beam. By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data, we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam. The difference between the two methods is about eight percent, which is acceptable in our experiments. |
Author | 蒋洪平 傅世年 彭军 程鹏 黄涛 李鹏 李芳 李健 刘华昌 刘美飞 孟鸣 孟才 慕振成 荣林艳 欧阳华甫 孙彪 王博 田建民 王标 王盛昌 姚远 徐韬光 徐新安 辛文曲 赵富祥 曾磊 周文中 |
AuthorAffiliation | Accelerator Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 蒋洪平 傅世年 彭军 程鹏 黄涛 李鹏 李芳 李健 刘华昌 刘美飞 孟鸣 孟才 慕振成 荣林艳 欧阳华甫 孙彪 王博 田建民 王标 王盛昌 姚远 徐韬光 徐新安 辛文曲 赵富祥 曾磊 周文中 |
BookMark | eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEm3hJyBZTCwhvjiJHTGhii-pEgwwW45jN0ZJ3MauCvx6XLXqwMJ0w73Pe6dnik4HN2iEroDcAuE8hZLlCQBlKeUpTwlnhGQnaEKyIk8oKbJTNDlmztHU-09CyjyiE_Q2b-UoVdCj_bHDEku8Gl1wA6617PHWhhaHrcONNUaPegi416F1jcf2EGll57D-WsWCPu79BTozsvP68jBn6OPx4X3-nCxen17m94tEUaAhKUxTVrVihGcN4wy0YTVoVhcc8qqmOeeNyWqSK6XBlFRVqqlLJsE0mTYVL-kM3ex747_rjfZB9NYr3XVy0G7jBbCKZpRBBTFa7KNqdN6P2ohVfFaO3wKI2BkUOztiZ0dQLrjYG4zc3R9O2SCDdUMYpe3-pa8PdOuG5TrKPZ4tywygAE7oLzHLhIQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevSTAB_18_054201 |
Cites_doi | 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/020 10.1002/9783527622047 10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/037002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP ~WA AAYXX CITATION 7U5 8FD H8D L7M |
DOI | 10.1088/1674-1137/38/8/087002 |
DatabaseName | 维普_期刊 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Technology Research Database Aerospace Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Aerospace Database Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Technology Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace |
DatabaseTitleList | Aerospace Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physics |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods in beam halo experiments |
EISSN | 0254-3052 |
EndPage | 77 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1088_1674_1137_38_8_087002 662115180 |
GroupedDBID | 02O 1JI 1WK 29B 2B. 2C. 2RA 4.4 5B3 5GY 5VR 5VS 7.M 92E 92I 92L 92Q 93N AAGCD AAGID AAJIO AAJKP AALHV AATNI ABCXL ABHWH ABJNI ACAFW ACGFS ACHIP AENEX AFUIB AFYNE AIBLX AKPSB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATQHT BBWZM CCEZO CCVFK CEBXE CHBEP CJUJL CQIGP CRLBU CW9 DU5 EBS EDWGO EJD EPQRW EQZZN ER. FA0 FEDTE HVGLF IJHAN IOP IZVLO JCGBZ KNG KOT M45 N5L NT- NT. OK1 PJBAE Q02 RIN RNS ROL RPA RW3 SY9 TCJ TGP W28 ~WA -SA -SC -S~ AAYXX ADEQX AERVB AOAED CAJEA CAJEC CITATION Q-- U1G U5K U5M 7U5 8FD H8D L7M |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-5fd69bc7082d7871ef7b1e7b58149b3488df2b04cce1f63c9cdb67a1fd2ef9863 |
ISSN | 1674-1137 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 07:53:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:03:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:39 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 10:34:16 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
License | http://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining http://iopscience.iop.org/page/copyright |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c313t-5fd69bc7082d7871ef7b1e7b58149b3488df2b04cce1f63c9cdb67a1fd2ef9863 |
Notes | 11-5641/O4 In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam. The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT. For the quadrupole scan method, we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations. For the multi-wire scanner method, we choose the case of a matched beam. By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data, we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam. The difference between the two methods is about eight percent, which is acceptable in our experiments. characterizing proton beam, quadrupole scans, multi-wire scanners, low energy intensity proton JIANG Hong-Ping,FU Shi-Nian, PENG Jun, CHENG Peng, HUANG Tao, LI Peng,LI Fang,LI Jian, LIU Hua-Chang,LIU Mei-Fei, MENG Ming,MENG Cai, MU Zhen-Cheng,RONG Lin-Yan, OUYANG Hua-Fu, SUN Biao, WANG Bo,TIAN Jian-Min,WANG Biao, WANG Sheng-Chang,YAO Yuan, XU Wao-Guang, XU Xin-An, XIN Wen-Qu, ZHAO Fu-Xiang, ZENG Lei, ZHOU Wen-Zhong(Accelerator Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China) ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1793237191 |
PQPubID | 23500 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1793237191 crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_1137_38_8_087002 crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1674_1137_38_8_087002 chongqing_primary_662115180 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2014 text: 2014-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Chinese physics C |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Chinese Physica C |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
References | Crandall K R (7) 1997 Peng Jun (3) 2013; 37 Lysenko W P (9) 2000 Jiang H (1) 2013 8 Wangler T P (10) 2001; 4 Ruan Yu-Fang (2) 2010; 34 Qiang J (5) 1999 Schulze M E (4) 2001; 1 Ross M C (6) 1991 |
References_xml | – year: 1997 ident: 7 – volume: 34 start-page: 1655 year: 2010 ident: 2 publication-title: Chinese Physics C (HEP & NP) doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/10/020 – volume: 4 start-page: 2923 year: 2001 ident: 10 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1002/9783527622047 – start-page: 55 year: 1999 ident: 5 – year: 2000 ident: 9 – volume: 1 start-page: 591 year: 2001 ident: 4 – volume: 37 start-page: 037002 year: 2013 ident: 3 publication-title: Chinese Physics C (HEP & NP) doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/3/037002 – start-page: 3860 year: 2013 ident: 1 – year: 1991 ident: 6 |
SSID | ssj0064088 |
Score | 1.9502962 |
Snippet | In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam. In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must... |
SourceID | proquest crossref chongqing |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 73 |
SubjectTerms | Beams (radiation) Fittings Halos Proton beams Quadrupoles Scanners Simulation Three dimensional 光束参数 实验数据 束晕 测量数据 线扫描 表征 质子束 非线性仿真 |
Title | Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods in beam halo experiments |
URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/92043A/201408/662115180.html https://www.proquest.com/docview/1793237191 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1rb9NALIIhJL4gnmIMUJC4T1W2XB73-HjXphpIwD5s0r5FeVwY0miBdULaD-P3YfuSLBWIl1S1V9uxXdvy-dLLOQheVVVS8crlUZK5Ksqyqo0qpbMoybtcda2sW7p18fadODzJ3pzmpzd2vk92LV1u6v3m6pfPlfyPVwEGfsWnZP_BsyNTAMAY_Avv4GF4_ysfz8fTlq_oWUPcbYXHZNSu-tTfYf22HnugbPp20bQDlkjOqvP15Iz_i2mlyoqMWcXMghU505ZZGEimNDMaBzpmSsxZsWR2zrRhhWIKiDgrBNOCKdlTq3GrLJLoBKmAxGbMGORsNbPpDEcKcHkvFTj0uIxwINwrooC7nSFvQwILjVRqOaORZSoj7j0VfCyYKqZUIwguN170CAL2nJncawNKKBp4nMCvaj7FSWaLnrtJmS4IB2rqJQkE26VTkCBzLEgg_FCd02DOjMcBz3hGai2QHQosmJYE0YOiBsglcgf5Np2oBw4Bi9pRnh6sZshYQILGInLtQUBvY6ICtxmyWsw0n5KDPPCynIIkhoK22_YAlXwE2CXTHgSWgQhBRZeoNEqGl57iKE68CqbwOEU4O4khQaGXeFyOLyRfot0wBnLvLk9FZgDTKUNiNMcYuWbVh_P0NhfPxk2Ww8wsZBZx7k8I2nd-hkxy_FsvTyaJSk1mY98kp6_rfLegnyoGmGXx5tXAHcbUMIAejYG5LE6uC6Vx-6oQCSykuIpvBrcSWJ5i55TX74-GClBkMfW7HZkOTw4qdTDCDlJ1oA68CDzX5Wy9-vAFcsV2fbxdHlLNe3wvuNsvVkPjM8_94IZbPQhu06bx5uJhcLSdf8Iq9PknxOQSYv4JIf-EY_4J-_wTfuxJMP-Ek_zzKDhZFsfzw6jv0BI1KU83Ud61QteNhHVECzM_d52suZN1rnim6xSKg7ZL6jhrGsc7kTa6aWshK961ieu0EunjYGe1XrknQahhoeFEnKoWCuYuAWzuKikd56Kr6rreDfZGG5Wf_Uk85eiI3SAbrFY2fXMD7LFzXtImG6VKNHyJhi9TVarSG3432B8vG3j-4YKXg0tKmIfxz9Vq5daXFyUWOkkqueZPf6vpXnDnOryfBTubr5fuOaxrNvULCqIfwCjrZA |
linkProvider | IOP Publishing |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing+a+proton+beam+with+two+different+methods+in+beam+halo+experiments&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%89%A9%E7%90%86C%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=%E8%92%8B%E6%B4%AA%E5%B9%B3+%E5%82%85%E4%B8%96%E5%B9%B4+%E5%BD%AD%E5%86%9B+%E7%A8%8B%E9%B9%8F+%E9%BB%84%E6%B6%9B+%E6%9D%8E%E9%B9%8F+%E6%9D%8E%E8%8A%B3+%E6%9D%8E%E5%81%A5+%E5%88%98%E5%8D%8E%E6%98%8C+%E5%88%98%E7%BE%8E%E9%A3%9E+%E5%AD%9F%E9%B8%A3+%E5%AD%9F%E6%89%8D+%E6%85%95%E6%8C%AF%E6%88%90+%E8%8D%A3%E6%9E%97%E8%89%B3+%E6%AC%A7%E9%98%B3%E5%8D%8E%E7%94%AB+%E5%AD%99%E5%BD%AA+%E7%8E%8B%E5%8D%9A+%E7%94%B0%E5%BB%BA%E6%B0%91+%E7%8E%8B%E6%A0%87+%E7%8E%8B%E7%9B%9B%E6%98%8C+%E5%A7%9A%E8%BF%9C+%E5%BE%90%E9%9F%AC%E5%85%89+%E5%BE%90%E6%96%B0%E5%AE%89+%E8%BE%9B%E6%96%87%E6%9B%B2+%E8%B5%B5%E5%AF%8C%E7%A5%A5+%E6%9B%BE%E7%A3%8A+%E5%91%A8%E6%96%87%E4%B8%AD&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.issn=1674-1137&rft.eissn=0254-3052&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=77&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1674-1137%2F38%2F8%2F087002&rft.externalDocID=662115180 |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F92043A%2F92043A.jpg |