Simulated skill complexity and perceived cognitive load during preclinical dental training

Cognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort associated with new task. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the perceived cognitive load and performance amongst dental students dur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of dental education Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 992 - 1003
Main Author Al-Saud, Loulwa M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Cognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort associated with new task. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the perceived cognitive load and performance amongst dental students during preclinical simulation training at various levels of procedural task complexity. Additionally, some cognitive load-modifying factors were examined. This cross-sectional study evaluated the perceived cognitive load amongst second-year dental students (n = 34), using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index (NASA TLX index) after training on four dental tasks at two levels of complexity, in addition to structured online anonymous questionnaire about demographics, feedback and performance. The NASA TLX raw scores and the weighted global score were calculated for each exercise. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlations between performance and the corresponding NASA TLX-weighted score were calculated. Mean differences in the perceived cognitive load across the exercise levels were assessed using RM-ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections at p < .05. Reduced performance was significantly associated with higher cognitive load particularly in high complexity dental task (class II-mirror vision). Simulated exercise complexity significantly influenced the students' perceived mental demand, physical demand and temporal demand; all were significantly higher for class II- mirror vision task than for direct vision tasks. The majority of participants (82.1%) preferred detailed feedback from instructors, and more than half of the participants (60.7%) preferred continuous feedback throughout the training session. Complex dental tasks are associated with higher cognitive load in novice dental students during preclinical training. The NASA TLX index is a useful instrument to explore the level of perceived cognitive load associated with performance of simulated complex dental skills. Cognitive load theory is relevant to simulation-based dental education to improve the preclinical instructional efficiency and to enhance students learning.
AbstractList IntroductionCognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort associated with new task. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the perceived cognitive load and performance amongst dental students during preclinical simulation training at various levels of procedural task complexity. Additionally, some cognitive load‐modifying factors were examined.Materials and MethodsThis cross‐sectional study evaluated the perceived cognitive load amongst second‐year dental students (n = 34), using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index (NASA TLX index) after training on four dental tasks at two levels of complexity, in addition to structured online anonymous questionnaire about demographics, feedback and performance. The NASA TLX raw scores and the weighted global score were calculated for each exercise. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlations between performance and the corresponding NASA TLX‐weighted score were calculated. Mean differences in the perceived cognitive load across the exercise levels were assessed using RM‐ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections at p < .05.ResultsReduced performance was significantly associated with higher cognitive load particularly in high complexity dental task (class II—mirror vision). Simulated exercise complexity significantly influenced the students' perceived mental demand, physical demand and temporal demand; all were significantly higher for class II‐ mirror vision task than for direct vision tasks. The majority of participants (82.1%) preferred detailed feedback from instructors, and more than half of the participants (60.7%) preferred continuous feedback throughout the training session.ConclusionComplex dental tasks are associated with higher cognitive load in novice dental students during preclinical training. The NASA TLX index is a useful instrument to explore the level of perceived cognitive load associated with performance of simulated complex dental skills. Cognitive load theory is relevant to simulation‐based dental education to improve the preclinical instructional efficiency and to enhance students learning.
Cognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort associated with new task. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the perceived cognitive load and performance amongst dental students during preclinical simulation training at various levels of procedural task complexity. Additionally, some cognitive load-modifying factors were examined. This cross-sectional study evaluated the perceived cognitive load amongst second-year dental students (n = 34), using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index (NASA TLX index) after training on four dental tasks at two levels of complexity, in addition to structured online anonymous questionnaire about demographics, feedback and performance. The NASA TLX raw scores and the weighted global score were calculated for each exercise. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlations between performance and the corresponding NASA TLX-weighted score were calculated. Mean differences in the perceived cognitive load across the exercise levels were assessed using RM-ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections at p < .05. Reduced performance was significantly associated with higher cognitive load particularly in high complexity dental task (class II-mirror vision). Simulated exercise complexity significantly influenced the students' perceived mental demand, physical demand and temporal demand; all were significantly higher for class II- mirror vision task than for direct vision tasks. The majority of participants (82.1%) preferred detailed feedback from instructors, and more than half of the participants (60.7%) preferred continuous feedback throughout the training session. Complex dental tasks are associated with higher cognitive load in novice dental students during preclinical training. The NASA TLX index is a useful instrument to explore the level of perceived cognitive load associated with performance of simulated complex dental skills. Cognitive load theory is relevant to simulation-based dental education to improve the preclinical instructional efficiency and to enhance students learning.
Abstract Introduction Cognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort associated with new task. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the perceived cognitive load and performance amongst dental students during preclinical simulation training at various levels of procedural task complexity. Additionally, some cognitive load‐modifying factors were examined. Materials and Methods This cross‐sectional study evaluated the perceived cognitive load amongst second‐year dental students ( n  = 34), using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index (NASA TLX index) after training on four dental tasks at two levels of complexity, in addition to structured online anonymous questionnaire about demographics, feedback and performance. The NASA TLX raw scores and the weighted global score were calculated for each exercise. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlations between performance and the corresponding NASA TLX‐weighted score were calculated. Mean differences in the perceived cognitive load across the exercise levels were assessed using RM‐ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections at p  < .05. Results Reduced performance was significantly associated with higher cognitive load particularly in high complexity dental task (class II—mirror vision). Simulated exercise complexity significantly influenced the students' perceived mental demand, physical demand and temporal demand; all were significantly higher for class II‐ mirror vision task than for direct vision tasks. The majority of participants (82.1%) preferred detailed feedback from instructors, and more than half of the participants (60.7%) preferred continuous feedback throughout the training session. Conclusion Complex dental tasks are associated with higher cognitive load in novice dental students during preclinical training. The NASA TLX index is a useful instrument to explore the level of perceived cognitive load associated with performance of simulated complex dental skills. Cognitive load theory is relevant to simulation‐based dental education to improve the preclinical instructional efficiency and to enhance students learning.
Author Al-Saud, Loulwa M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Loulwa M
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6522-8549
  surname: Al-Saud
  fullname: Al-Saud, Loulwa M
  organization: Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkEtLxDAUhYOMODq68A9IwY0uqknTJs1SBl8guFA3bkoet0PGNK1JK86_Nz4X3s25j4_D5eyhme89IHRI8BlJdQ5rOCNFLcgW2iUM4xxXXMxSTwXLq7qmc7QX4xpjXFcU76A5ZVWZJrGLnh9sNzk5gsnii3Uu0303OHi34yaT3mQDBA32LZ11v_J2TG3memkyMwXrV9kQQDvrrZYuM-DHJGOQaeFX-2i7lS7CwY8u0NPV5ePyJr-7v75dXtzlmhI65lTURUlZQSWUuC01Z0KUbUmUkYrjwkCNFaNCc6UVaKO1IkUrOKuwVCUrFV2gk2_fIfSvE8Sx6WzU4Jz00E-xKXjFGCeEVgk9_oeu-yn49F1T1JxzLGghEnX6TenQxxigbYZgOxk2DcHNZ-BNCrz5CjyxRz-Ok-rA_JG_CdMPmDl9ug
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jdd_13412
Cites_doi 10.1111/eje.12595
10.1080/01421590500046924
10.1038/s41415-022-4979-y
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003058
10.21815/JDE.019.113
10.1080/00222899809601335
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2658-05.2005
10.1111/eje.12670
10.1111/eje.12059
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
10.1023/A:1022193728205
10.1002/bjs.10795
10.1111/medu.13086
10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.084
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x
10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e3f329
10.3758/BF03196276
10.3390/dj10110198
10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290
10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00031-7
10.1111/opo.12393
10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.06.001
10.1186/s12909-019-1752-2
10.1097/ACM.0000000000000893
10.1111/eje.12245
10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
10.1007/s11251-014-9323-8
10.1002/j.0022-0337.1986.50.6.tb02007.x
10.1002/jdd.12027
10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
10.1177/1541931215591373
10.3390/brainsci11050647
10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8
10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00699.x
10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.3.tb04711.x
10.1177/0018720813484498
10.1109/NER.2019.8716925
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QP
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1111/eje.12891
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1600-0579
EndPage 1003
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_eje_12891
36540009
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
29G
33P
34H
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHSB
AANLZ
AAONW
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AHBTC
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AUFTA
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
F00
F01
F04
F5P
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HGLYW
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NPM
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WBNRW
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WPGGZ
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
XG1
YUY
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
.Y3
31~
AAKAS
AASGY
AAYXX
ACBWZ
ADZCM
AFFNX
AFZJQ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
CAG
CITATION
COF
EJD
FEDTE
HF~
HVGLF
LW6
7QP
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-398243623ae40f4c76994f41bdab702de80b639c7bcbecdccb12f97650ab464b3
ISSN 1396-5883
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 03:53:53 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 05:59:04 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:50:24 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 27 13:44:55 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords feedback
dental education
cognitive load theory
fine motor skill
mental workload
simulation
Language English
License 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c313t-398243623ae40f4c76994f41bdab702de80b639c7bcbecdccb12f97650ab464b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6522-8549
PMID 36540009
PQID 2877709329
PQPubID 29137
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2756671135
proquest_journals_2877709329
crossref_primary_10_1111_eje_12891
pubmed_primary_36540009
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle European journal of dental education
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur J Dent Educ
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References e_1_2_10_23_1
e_1_2_10_46_1
e_1_2_10_24_1
e_1_2_10_45_1
e_1_2_10_21_1
e_1_2_10_44_1
e_1_2_10_22_1
e_1_2_10_43_1
e_1_2_10_42_1
e_1_2_10_20_1
e_1_2_10_41_1
e_1_2_10_40_1
Tresilian J (e_1_2_10_26_1) 2012
Hart SG (e_1_2_10_17_1) 1986
Gottlieb R (e_1_2_10_3_1) 2014
e_1_2_10_2_1
e_1_2_10_4_1
e_1_2_10_18_1
e_1_2_10_19_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_16_1
e_1_2_10_39_1
e_1_2_10_5_1
e_1_2_10_38_1
e_1_2_10_14_1
e_1_2_10_37_1
e_1_2_10_7_1
e_1_2_10_15_1
e_1_2_10_36_1
e_1_2_10_12_1
e_1_2_10_35_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_13_1
e_1_2_10_34_1
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_33_1
e_1_2_10_11_1
e_1_2_10_32_1
e_1_2_10_31_1
e_1_2_10_30_1
Fitts PM (e_1_2_10_8_1) 1967
e_1_2_10_29_1
e_1_2_10_27_1
e_1_2_10_28_1
e_1_2_10_25_1
e_1_2_10_47_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_2_10_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/eje.12595
– ident: e_1_2_10_37_1
  doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924
– ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4979-y
– ident: e_1_2_10_24_1
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003058
– ident: e_1_2_10_29_1
  doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.113
– ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
  doi: 10.1080/00222899809601335
– ident: e_1_2_10_27_1
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2658-05.2005
– ident: e_1_2_10_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/eje.12670
– ident: e_1_2_10_40_1
  doi: 10.1111/eje.12059
– ident: e_1_2_10_38_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
– start-page: 329
  volume-title: The Comprehensive Textbook of Healthcare Simulation
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Gottlieb R
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205
– ident: e_1_2_10_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.10795
– ident: e_1_2_10_23_1
  doi: 10.1111/medu.13086
– ident: e_1_2_10_14_1
  doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
– ident: e_1_2_10_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.084
– ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x
– volume-title: Human Performance
  year: 1967
  ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Fitts PM
– ident: e_1_2_10_21_1
  doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e3f329
– ident: e_1_2_10_43_1
  doi: 10.3758/BF03196276
– ident: e_1_2_10_33_1
  doi: 10.3390/dj10110198
– ident: e_1_2_10_46_1
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290
– ident: e_1_2_10_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
– ident: e_1_2_10_42_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00031-7
– ident: e_1_2_10_35_1
  doi: 10.1111/opo.12393
– volume-title: Sensorimotor Control and Learning an Introduction to the Behavioral Neuroscience of Action
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_10_26_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Tresilian J
– ident: e_1_2_10_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.06.001
– ident: e_1_2_10_20_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1752-2
– ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
  doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000893
– ident: e_1_2_10_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/eje.12245
– volume-title: NASA Task Load Index (TLX). Volume 1.0. Paper and Pencil Package
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_10_17_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Hart SG
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
– ident: e_1_2_10_39_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11251-014-9323-8
– ident: e_1_2_10_44_1
  doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1986.50.6.tb02007.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_32_1
  doi: 10.1002/jdd.12027
– ident: e_1_2_10_47_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
– ident: e_1_2_10_15_1
  doi: 10.1177/1541931215591373
– ident: e_1_2_10_18_1
  doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050647
– ident: e_1_2_10_25_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
– ident: e_1_2_10_41_1
  doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8
– ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00699.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
  doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.3.tb04711.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_22_1
  doi: 10.1177/0018720813484498
– ident: e_1_2_10_28_1
  doi: 10.1109/NER.2019.8716925
SSID ssj0008530
Score 2.3727164
Snippet Cognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort associated with new...
Abstract Introduction Cognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort...
IntroductionCognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort...
INTRODUCTIONCognitive Load theory (CLT) focuses on the information processing aspect of learning and how the working memory handles the mental effort...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 992
SubjectTerms Cognitive ability
Cognitive load
Feedback
Information processing
Learning
Short term memory
Students
Training
Title Simulated skill complexity and perceived cognitive load during preclinical dental training
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540009
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2877709329/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2756671135
Volume 27
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3faxQxEMcHraB9EX972koUX7dkN9nN5rG0ShH1wbZQfFmSTRZat3eHvUPxr3fycyt4UH1Zjk3uFuaTm3yTnckAvG2o7RnTohi0aQuuG-cHEYhqDc7XsjalLzbx6XNzdMo_nNVnU8VTn12y0nv9r7_mlfwPVbyHXF2W7D-QzT-KN_Az8sUrEsbrjRgfn1-66luoGa--nY9jiA-3P52w9vn_LmgFvZlLXEtBQuNCmZSbuERvlxIjTUiLTBUjNm7YR_Eau9sUHpLHzVgcq7UfNR8X6_GHirutcV-hYjHBzk8LwRc2Lum8DrVeNnhae2H3cIYLBbeuWXx56U3OGhSElMppsskhgKnpNtyphKzduvnwy3TyF6oIGg-CcoFX-TnbcDd9808lsWF54GXCyQO4H_U92Q-wHsItO38E9w5dTJYrq_cYvmZoxEMjEzSC0EiGRjI04qCRAI1cg0YCBZKgPYHT9-9ODo6KWOCi6FnJVgWTbcVRQTBlOR14Lxop-cBLbZQWtDK2pRoVZC90j3810_e6rAbUjzVVmjdcs6ewNV_M7XMgLTfYcWhbXWtuhZK8srbmfBB8kJSZGbxJxuqW4RyTLq3_0LidN-4MdpIZuzikrrrKnRhJUebLGbzOzeiE3JslNbeLNfYRuCoQZcnqGTwL5s9PSbhebGx5CdvTANyBrdX3td1FqbfSr_yg-A1Ablg9
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27957,27958
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulated+skill+complexity+and+perceived+cognitive+load+during+preclinical+dental+training&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+dental+education&rft.au=Al-Saud%2C+Loulwa+M&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.eissn=1600-0579&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Feje.12891&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36540009&rft.externalDocID=36540009
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1396-5883&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1396-5883&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1396-5883&client=summon