Environmental And Occupational Health Hazards Associated With The Presence Of Asbestos In Brake Linings and Pads (1900 To Present): A "State-of-the-Art" Review

• Published in: Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 25 - 80
• Main Authors: Paustenbach, Dennis J., Finley, Brent L., Lu, Elizabeth T., Brorby, Gregory P., Sheehan, Patrick J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2004
• Subjects: Air Pollutants, Occupational - toxicity; Asbestos - toxicity; Asbestosis - epidemiology; Automobiles; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects; Humans; Manufactured Materials; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects
• DOI: 10.1080/10937400490231494
• ISSN: 1093-7404

Throughout the history of automobile development, chrysotile asbestos has been an essential component of vehicle brake linings and pads. Acceptable alternatives were not fully developed until the 1980s, and these were installed in vehicles produced over the past decade. This article presents a "state-of-the-art" analysis of what was known over time about the potential environmental and occupational health hazards associated with the presence of chrysotile asbestos in brake linings and pads. As part of this analysis, the evolution of automobile brakes and brake friction materials, beginning with the early 1900s, is described. Initial concerns regarding exposures to asbestos among workers involved in the manufacture of friction products were raised as early as 1930. Between 1930 and 1959, eight studies were conducted for which friction product manufacturing workers were part of the population assessed. These studies provided evidence of asbestosis among highly exposed workers, but provided little information on the magnitude of exposure. The U.S. Public Health Service proposed the first occupational guideline for asbestos exposure in 1938. The causal relationship between asbestos exposure and lung cancer was confirmed in 1955 in asbestos textile workers in the United Kingdom, and later, in 1960, in South Africa, mesothelioma was attributed to asbestos exposure to even relatively low airborne concentrations of crocidolite. Between 1960 and 1974, five epidemiology studies of friction product manufacturing workers were conducted. During this same time period, the initial studies of brake lining wear (dust or debris) emissions were conducted showing that automobile braking was not a substantial contributor of asbestos fibers greater than 5μm in length to ambient air. The first exposure surveys, as well as preliminary health effects studies, for brake mechanics were also conducted during this period. In 1971, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration promulgated the first national standards for workplace exposure to asbestos. During the post-1974 time period, most of the information on exposure of brake mechanics to airborne asbestos during brake repair was gathered, primarily from a series of sampling surveys conducted by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health in the United States. These surveys indicated that the time-weighted average asbestos concentrations (about 1-6h in duration) during brake servicing were between 0.004 and 0.28 fibers per cubic centimeter, and the mean time-weighted average concentration was about 0.05 fibers per cubic centimeter. The data also showed that brake mechanics were not exposed to time-weighted average concentrations above workplace exposure limits in effect at the time of the study. From 1975 to 2002, more than 25 epidemiology studies were conducted examining the risks of asbestos-related diseases in brake mechanics. These studies clearly indicated that brake mechanics were not at increased risk of adverse health effects due to exposure to asbestos. Specifically, the studies found no increased risk of mesothelioma or asbestosis in brake mechanics, and no evidence that lung cancer in this occupational group can be attributed to exposure to asbestos during brake repair. This could be due to one or a number of factors: the airborne concentration of chrysotile asbestos and the duration of exposure are too small to be significant, the chrysotile fibers are too short to be biologically important, that chrysotile fibers are substantially less potent than amphibole fibers in inducing lung cancer and mesothelioma, or other yet-to-be-understood factors. Finally, there were 20 studies published during this time period evaluating asbestos exposure or asbestos-related health effects in friction product manufacturing workers. These studies indicated that these workers were historically exposed to concentrations of chrysotile fibers perhaps 10 to 50 times greater than those of brake mechanics, but the risk of asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer, if any, was not apparent, except for those workers who had some degree of exposure to amphibole asbestos during their careers.