The differential relations between sub-domains of spatial abilities and mathematical performance in children

•Spatial abilities explain 12.6–25.7% of the variance in mathematical performance.•Sub-domains of spatial abilities explain mathematical performance differently.•Hidden figures and perspective taking significantly predict all mathematical measures. Spatial abilities are closely connected to mathemat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContemporary educational psychology Vol. 71; p. 102101
Main Authors Tam, Yuen Pui, Chan, Winnie Wai Lan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.10.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Spatial abilities explain 12.6–25.7% of the variance in mathematical performance.•Sub-domains of spatial abilities explain mathematical performance differently.•Hidden figures and perspective taking significantly predict all mathematical measures. Spatial abilities are closely connected to mathematical performance. However, previous work do not determine whether sub-domains of spatial abilities are equally important for different mathematics tasks. This study addressed this gap by adopting Uttal et al.’s (2013) typology of spatial abilities along the intrinsic/extrinsic and static/dynamic dimensions. Three hundred twenty-four Chinese first graders were tested on a battery of spatial and mathematics tasks, including hidden figures, mental rotation, spatial scaling, perspective taking, mental number line representation, place-value understanding, calculation, word problems, geometry, measurement, and algebra. Hierarchical regression models showed that after controlling for age and gender, spatial abilities explained 12.6% to 25.7% of the variance across seven measures of mathematical performance. Sub-domains of spatial abilities were found to have varying roles in explaining mathematical performance. Among them, hidden figures and perspective taking were significant predictors of all mathematics measures. The findings offer new insights into developing spatial training to support children’s mathematical learning.
ISSN:0361-476X
1090-2384
DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102101