Brachytherapy training in India: Results from the GEC-ESTRO-India survey

• Published in: Brachytherapy Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 562 - 569
• Main Authors: Mittal, Prachi, Chopra, Supriya, Kamrava, Mitchell, Vashistha, Rajesh, Konrad, Stefan, Senapati, Surendra, Pradhan, Satyajit, Reddy, Vijay Anand, Sharma, Daya Nand, Engineer, Reena, Sarin, Rajiv, Budrukkar, Ashwini, Ghoshal, Sushmita, Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore, Agarwal, Jai Prakash, Sturdza, Alina Emiliana
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2023
• Subjects: Brachytherapy; Education; Indian early career oncologists; Survey; Survey; Brachytherapy; Education; Indian early career oncologists
• ISSN: 1538-4721; 1873-1449
• DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.04.002

Brachytherapy (BT) is integral in treatment of gynecological malignancies and is also an option for many other cancers. Data on training and proficiency levels of early career oncologists is limited. Like other continents a survey was conducted for early career oncologists in India. An online survey was conducted from November 2019 to February 2020, through Association of Radiation Oncologists of India (AROI) for early career radiation oncologists expected to be within 6 years of training. The survey used a 22 item questionnaire that was also used for European survey. Responses to individual statements were recorded on a 1–5 Likert-type scale. Descriptive statistics were used to describe proportions. One-hundred twenty-four (17%) of 700 recipients responded to the survey. Majority of the respondents (88%) stated that being able to perform BT at the end of their training was important. Two-thirds of the respondents (81/124) had performed >10 intracavitary procedure and 22.5% had performed >10 intracavitary-interstitial implants. Many respondents had not performed nongynecological procedure- breast (64%), prostate(82%), gastro-intestinal (47%). Respondents predicted that in next 10 years, the role of BT is likely to increase. Lack of dedicated curriculum and training was perceived as the greatest barriers to achieving independence in BT (58%). Respondents suggested that BT training should be prioritized during conferences (73%) and online teaching modules (56%), along with development of BT skills labs (65%). This survey identified a lack of proficiency in gynecological intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy and non-gynecological brachytherapy, despite BT training being regarded as highly important. Dedicated programs, including standardized curriculum and assessment need to be developed for training early- career radiation oncologists in BT.