Fuzzy assessment analysis and key improvements to a production system

Purpose The framework of Six Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control was applied in this study, and various tools and techniques were used at different stages to implement lean measures to ensure quality. The purpose of this paper is to develop a decision-making framework that assesses key qual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTQM journal Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 38 - 55
Main Authors Shiau, Yau-Ren, Chang, Hui-Min
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bingley Emerald Publishing Limited 15.01.2020
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose The framework of Six Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control was applied in this study, and various tools and techniques were used at different stages to implement lean measures to ensure quality. The purpose of this paper is to develop a decision-making framework that assesses key quality performance to ensure that practitioners improve quality and control by modeling and optimizing production processes. Design/methodology/approach A model of a quality performance index system was established. The weights of factors and sub-factors, which were estimated using an FAHP, were used as a reference for the decision maker under fuzzy uncertainly to make a decision, and thus, results present the bottlenecks in processes. Furthermore, any other factors that may affect the key process bottlenecks must be considered. The critical to quality characteristics were determined, and factor levels were set. The interaction between the factors was analyzed, their significance was studied using the Design of experiments and the parameters were predicted. Finally, quality improvement decisions were made through failure mode and effects analysis. Findings The implementation results of this research prove that the proposed model could successfully determine the key processes and focus on the improvement of critical quality factors under limited resources. Originality/value This study establishes a set of performance appraisal methods for production systems, which can be used for improving productivity and quality.
AbstractList Purpose The framework of Six Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control was applied in this study, and various tools and techniques were used at different stages to implement lean measures to ensure quality. The purpose of this paper is to develop a decision-making framework that assesses key quality performance to ensure that practitioners improve quality and control by modeling and optimizing production processes. Design/methodology/approach A model of a quality performance index system was established. The weights of factors and sub-factors, which were estimated using an FAHP, were used as a reference for the decision maker under fuzzy uncertainly to make a decision, and thus, results present the bottlenecks in processes. Furthermore, any other factors that may affect the key process bottlenecks must be considered. The critical to quality characteristics were determined, and factor levels were set. The interaction between the factors was analyzed, their significance was studied using the Design of experiments and the parameters were predicted. Finally, quality improvement decisions were made through failure mode and effects analysis. Findings The implementation results of this research prove that the proposed model could successfully determine the key processes and focus on the improvement of critical quality factors under limited resources. Originality/value This study establishes a set of performance appraisal methods for production systems, which can be used for improving productivity and quality.
PurposeThe framework of Six Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control was applied in this study, and various tools and techniques were used at different stages to implement lean measures to ensure quality. The purpose of this paper is to develop a decision-making framework that assesses key quality performance to ensure that practitioners improve quality and control by modeling and optimizing production processes.Design/methodology/approachA model of a quality performance index system was established. The weights of factors and sub-factors, which were estimated using an FAHP, were used as a reference for the decision maker under fuzzy uncertainly to make a decision, and thus, results present the bottlenecks in processes. Furthermore, any other factors that may affect the key process bottlenecks must be considered. The critical to quality characteristics were determined, and factor levels were set. The interaction between the factors was analyzed, their significance was studied using the Design of experiments and the parameters were predicted. Finally, quality improvement decisions were made through failure mode and effects analysis.FindingsThe implementation results of this research prove that the proposed model could successfully determine the key processes and focus on the improvement of critical quality factors under limited resources.Originality/valueThis study establishes a set of performance appraisal methods for production systems, which can be used for improving productivity and quality.
Author Chang, Hui-Min
Shiau, Yau-Ren
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yau-Ren
  surname: Shiau
  fullname: Shiau, Yau-Ren
  email: yrshiau@fcu.edu.tw
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hui-Min
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Hui-Min
  email: chang.bianca@msa.hinet.net
BookMark eNptkM1Lw0AQxRepYK3ePS54Xjv7kWRzlNKqUBGhgrdlu7uB1CapmURI_3o3VATB07xh3htmfpdkUjd1IOSGwx3noOeb12cGkgngOQPQ4oxMeZYoJjL1PvnVkl-QS8QdQAq5zqdkueqPx4FaxIBYhbqjtrb7AUuMwtOPMNCyOrTNVxiHSLuGWhp737uubGqKA3ahuiLnhd1juP6pM_K2Wm4Wj2z98vC0uF8zJznvWOZ4nqTaK6W3oJVTugDp0zTJCumlljotVCI1z4PPgnZ5EMrmsA1F4riTgssZuT3tjRd89gE7s2v6Nh6MRiRSpKBkoqMLTi7XNohtKMyhLSvbDoaDGWGZCMuANCMsM8KKkfkpEt9s7d7_l_iDV34DkvxsYA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1108_TQM_07_2020_0153
crossref_primary_10_1108_TQM_10_2020_0243
Cites_doi 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2017-0181
10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016
10.1111/poms.12495
10.1007/s00170-013-5119-2
10.1108/17410400810881863
10.1080/09537287.2016.1143130
10.1080/09537287.2017.1402134
10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014
10.1108/02656711211190846
10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2851258
10.1504/EJIE.2012.044813
10.1504/IJPQM.2013.056163
10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2896852
10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0018
10.1080/09537287.2012.709642
10.1108/17410400610710206
10.1108/17542730810898412
10.1108/JMTM-12-2011-0109
10.1108/09544780610671057
10.1080/09537287.2015.1078515
10.1108/IJQRM-01-2016-0010
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Emerald Publishing Limited
Emerald Publishing Limited 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: Emerald Publishing Limited
– notice: Emerald Publishing Limited 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
0U~
1-H
7TB
7WY
7WZ
7XB
8AO
8FD
AFKRA
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
F~G
K6~
K8~
L.-
L.0
M0C
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
DOI 10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0082
DatabaseName CrossRef
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
Trade PRO
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Business Collection
DELNET Management Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ABI/INFORM Global (ProquesT)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest One Business
ABI/INFORM Global
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Central Basic
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest One Community College
Trade PRO
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest DELNET Management Collection
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
Business Premium Collection
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Business
EISSN 1754-274X
EndPage 55
ExternalDocumentID 10_1108_TQM_03_2019_0082
10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0082
GroupedDBID 0R
123
1WG
29Q
3FY
4.4
5VS
70U
7WY
8AO
8FW
8R4
8R5
9F-
AADTA
AADXL
AAGBP
AAMCF
AAUDR
ABCTS
ABIJV
ABSDC
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACMTK
ADOMW
AEDOK
AEGYS
AEUCW
AFKRA
AFZLO
AJEBP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
APPLU
ASMFL
AUCOK
AVELQ
BENPR
BEZIV
BFOSL
BLEHN
BPHCQ
CAG
DWQXO
EBS
ECCUG
FNNZZ
GEA
GEB
GEI
GMM
GMN
GMX
GQ.
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
H13
HZ
IPNFZ
J1Y
JL0
K6
K8
KBGRL
M0C
MS
O9-
P2P
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
Q2X
Q3A
SLOBJ
TDZ
TEM
TET
TGG
TMD
TMF
TMI
TMK
TMT
V1G
WW
Z11
Z12
Z21
ZYZAG
.WW
0R~
AAKOT
AAPSD
AAYXX
ABEAN
ABYQI
ACTSA
ADQHX
AEFVF
AEMMR
AETHF
AFNZV
AGTVX
AGZLY
AHRLE
AIAFM
AJFKA
AODMV
CCPQU
CITATION
HZ~
K6~
K8~
M42
MS~
RIG
SCAQC
SDURG
0U~
1-H
7TB
7XB
8FD
9E0
CS3
FR3
GEC
L.-
L.0
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7c19568d448b084c48f03d6657f3d38386f453819ed7e8c9e24a90bef5c1c3213
IEDL.DBID ZYZAG
ISSN 1754-2731
IngestDate Thu Oct 10 16:13:35 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 17:09:32 EDT 2024
Tue Oct 26 21:39:38 EDT 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords DMAIC
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
Quality control
Design of experiment
Language English
License Licensed re-use rights only
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c311t-7c19568d448b084c48f03d6657f3d38386f453819ed7e8c9e24a90bef5c1c3213
PQID 2532604358
PQPubID 39743
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs emerald_primary_10_1108_TQM-03-2019-0082
proquest_journals_2532604358
crossref_primary_10_1108_TQM_03_2019_0082
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-01-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-01-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Bingley
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Bingley
PublicationTitle TQM journal
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Emerald Publishing Limited
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Emerald Publishing Limited
– name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
References (key2020011508004033100_ref013) 2014; 25
(key2020011508004033100_ref008) 2013; 12
(key2020011508004033100_ref020) 2005
(key2020011508004033100_ref027) 2019; 36
(key2020011508004033100_ref018) 2014; 21
(key2020011508004033100_ref015) 2006; 171
(key2020011508004033100_ref031) 2018; 29
(key2020011508004033100_ref021) 2014; 63
(key2020011508004033100_ref011) 2013; 52
(key2020011508004033100_ref002) 2008; 57
(key2020011508004033100_ref030) 2016; 25
(key2020011508004033100_ref023) 2015; 4
(key2020011508004033100_ref033) 1965; 8
(key2020011508004033100_ref019) 2012; 29
(key2020011508004033100_ref022) 2016; 27
(key2020011508004033100_ref001) 2008; 20
(key2020011508004033100_ref017) 2013; 69
(key2020011508004033100_ref029) 2018; 26
(key2020011508004033100_ref012) 2014; 25
(key2020011508004033100_ref004) 2004; 33
(key2020011508004033100_ref028) 2016; 27
(key2020011508004033100_ref034) 2015; 229
(key2020011508004033100_ref009) 2006; 18
(key2020011508004033100_ref003) 2006; 55
(key2020011508004033100_ref010) 2014
(key2020011508004033100_ref026) 2014; 10
(key2020011508004033100_ref032) 2019; 323
(key2020011508004033100_ref006) 1996; 95
(key2020011508004033100_ref024) 1980
(key2020011508004033100_ref005) 2012; 6
(key2020011508004033100_ref016) 2019
(key2020011508004033100_ref025) 2013; 9
(key2020011508004033100_ref014) 2017; 34
(key2020011508004033100_ref007) 1992
References_xml – volume: 36
  start-page: 137
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref027
  article-title: Assessment of Lean Six Sigma Readiness (LESIRE) for manufacturing industries using fuzzy logic
  publication-title: International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
  doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2017-0181
– volume: 171
  start-page: 390
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref015
  article-title: A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach
  publication-title: European Journal of Operational Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016
– volume-title: Design and Analysis of Experiments
  year: 2005
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref020
– volume: 25
  start-page: 751
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref030
  article-title: Product modularity, process modularity, and new product introduction performance: does complexity matter?
  publication-title: Production & Operations Management
  doi: 10.1111/poms.12495
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1403
  issue: 5-8
  year: 2013
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref017
  article-title: Application of Six-Sigma DMAIC methodology to sand-casting process with response surface methodology
  publication-title: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
  doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5119-2
– volume-title: Pengendalian dan Perbaikan Kualitas Produk Kawat Baja dengan Metode Aplikasi Six Sigma (DMAIC) dan Kaizen (5 W+1 H) pada Divisi Wire Rod Mill (Studi Kasus: PT. Krakatau Steel Tbk)
  year: 2014
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref010
– volume: 57
  start-page: 420
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref002
  article-title: Reflective practice: can Six Sigma be effectively implemented in SMEs
  publication-title: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
  doi: 10.1108/17410400810881863
– volume: 33
  start-page: 259
  issue: 2–3
  year: 2004
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref004
  article-title: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection
  publication-title: International Journal of General Systems
– volume: 27
  start-page: 810
  issue: 10
  year: 2016
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref028
  article-title: Enhancement of sigma level in the manufacturing of furnace nozzle through DMAIC approach of Six Sigma: a case study
  publication-title: Production Planning & Control
  doi: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1143130
– volume: 29
  start-page: 185
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref031
  article-title: Application of hybrid framework to facilitate lean six sigma implementation: a manufacturing company case experience
  publication-title: Production Planning & Control
  doi: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1402134
– volume: 21
  start-page: 194
  year: 2014
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref018
  article-title: A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection
  publication-title: Applied Soft Computing
  doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014
– volume-title: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation
  year: 1980
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref024
– volume: 29
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref019
  article-title: Critical success factors for Lean Six Sigma programmes: a view from middle management
  publication-title: International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
  doi: 10.1108/02656711211190846
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3860
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref029
  article-title: On modelling of data-driven monotone zero-order TSK fuzzy inference systems using a system identification framework
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2851258
– volume: 6
  start-page: 118
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref005
  article-title: Lean Six Sigma (LSS): an implementation experience
  publication-title: European Journal of Industrial Engineering
  doi: 10.1504/EJIE.2012.044813
– volume: 229
  start-page: 261
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref034
  article-title: Metrological interpretation of a six-sigma process for improving the online optical measurement of automotive turbocharger dimensions
  publication-title: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering
– volume: 323
  start-page: 344
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref032
  article-title: Accurate fuzzy predictive models through complexity reduction based on decision of needed fuzzy rules
  publication-title: Neurocomputing
– volume: 12
  start-page: 345
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref008
  article-title: Differences between Six Sigma applications in manufacturing and the service industry
  publication-title: International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management
  doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2013.056163
– volume: 8
  start-page: 338
  issue: 3
  year: 1965
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref033
  article-title: Fuzzy sets
  publication-title: Information and Control
  doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
– volume: 52
  start-page: 804
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref011
  article-title: Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy
  publication-title: International Journal of Production Research
– volume: 95
  start-page: 649
  issue: 3
  year: 1996
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref006
  article-title: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP
  publication-title: European Journal of Operation Research
  doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref026
  article-title: A DMAIC approach for process capability improvement an engine crankshaft manufacturing process
  publication-title: Journal of Industrial Engineering International
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref025
  article-title: Process capability improvement of an engine connecting rod machining process
  publication-title: Journal of Industrial Engineering International
– start-page: 352
  year: 1992
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref007
  article-title: Extent analysis and synthetic decision
– start-page: 1
  issue: 99
  year: 2019
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref016
  article-title: Monotone interval fuzzy inference systems
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
  doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2896852
– volume: 63
  start-page: 103
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref021
  article-title: Adoption of Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce cost of poor quality
  publication-title: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
  doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0018
– volume: 25
  start-page: 478
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref012
  article-title: Data mining driven DMAIC framework for improving foundry quality – a case study
  publication-title: Production Planning & Control
  doi: 10.1080/09537287.2012.709642
– volume: 55
  start-page: 671
  issue: 8
  year: 2006
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref003
  article-title: A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an aerospace company
  publication-title: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
  doi: 10.1108/17410400610710206
– volume: 4
  start-page: 441
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref023
  article-title: Synergy of fuzzy AHP and Six Sigma for capacity waste management in Indian automotive industry
  publication-title: Decision Science Letters
– volume: 20
  start-page: 436
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref001
  article-title: The influence of soft factors on quality improvement and performance
  publication-title: TQM Journal
  doi: 10.1108/17542730810898412
– volume: 25
  start-page: 125
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref013
  article-title: An application of Six Sigma methodology for improving the first pass yield of a grinding process
  publication-title: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
  doi: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2011-0109
– volume: 18
  start-page: 386
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref009
  article-title: Guidelines to help practitioners of design of experiments
  publication-title: TQM Magazine
  doi: 10.1108/09544780610671057
– volume: 27
  start-page: 83
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref022
  article-title: Using Shainin DOE for Six Sigma: an Indian case study
  publication-title: Production Planning & Control
  doi: 10.1080/09537287.2015.1078515
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1167
  issue: 8
  year: 2017
  ident: key2020011508004033100_ref014
  article-title: A fuzzy AHP approach to prioritize the barriers of integrated Lean Six Sigma
  publication-title: International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
  doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-01-2016-0010
SSID ssj0060989
ssj0003385
Score 2.2799282
Snippet Purpose The framework of Six Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control was applied in this study, and various tools and techniques were used at different...
PurposeThe framework of Six Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control was applied in this study, and various tools and techniques were used at different...
SourceID proquest
crossref
emerald
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 38
SubjectTerms Decision analysis
Decision making
Design of experiments
Design optimization
Failure analysis
Failure modes
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy sets
Hierarchies
Manufacturing
Performance appraisal
Performance evaluation
Performance indices
Product quality
Production methods
Q factors
Quality assessment
Quality control
Quality improvement
Quality management
Semantics
Six Sigma
Total quality
Variables
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3LS8MwGA-6gXgRnzidkoMHPQTzbNOTqGwMYUNlg91Kmgd42abrDu6vN-nSjYl4K7Tk8Pua7_e9PwBuGLVUJ6pA3hSliBPHUCZdipTnImWJpcKE0EB_kPRG_GUsxjHgNo9llbVOrBS1meoQI7-nwhsa2JO7fJh9orA1KmRX4wqNXdCkhIc0bfOpM3h9X-ti74CJqiVS8NCEQupEJZb3w7d-qCXyBJihQIRbxPSrO3ejoSva6R6Cg2gvwseVgI_Ajp0cg726XP0EdLqL5fIbqvWATajimBH_YKC_ovCjihtUYcA5LKdQwdlqzKsXCVxNcj4Fo25n-NxDcTUC0oyQEqW66vMz3rkqsOSaS4eZCVkUx4x3OmXiuAjOmDWplTqzlKsMF9YJTTSjhJ2BxmQ6secAFmlWOJPYxIqUG5GpjOlU-yNsIpzLSAvc1bjks9UEjLzyHLDMPYY5ZnnAMA8YtsBtBO6vT7fgboF2jWwer8083wj54v_Xl2CfBscXE0REGzTKr4W98tZBWVzHX-AHFI-1Vw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Fuzzy assessment analysis and key improvements to a production system
URI https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0082/full/html
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2532604358
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT8MwDLaASQgOvBHjpRw4wCGsaZq2OQLamJCYAG0S7FK1aSIQsCHWHdivx-kDGNoFiVsPVao4ru3PsT8DHHFXu8qPE4qhqEs9ZjiVoQlojL4o1ky7IrWpgeuO3-55V_fifg46VS9MXlZZpGNyO_00GFmQ2rCF22iFvwgH7PSa7u21rQZCFyapdWUNm7FuPGavL_NQw1CbIxir9R_6Z5eVbfYdmQ_FQ5_p2aYUVl1czlhtylH96tb9tti5G2qtwrDaQFF98nw6zpJTNfnF7fh_O1yDlTJiJWeFiq3DnB5swGJVML8Byz8oDTeh2RpPJh8k_iL8JHFJe4IPKUGTQZ7yPEaelhyRbEhi8lbQzqKKkIJZegt6rWb3ok3LUQ1UccYyGqi87zBFsJc4oae80Dg8tbc6hqcIgkPfeMKCQ50GOlRSu14snUQboZjiLuPbsDAYDvQOkCSQiUl97WsReKmQseQqULiE9oUxktXhpDqX6K1g5IhyJOOEEcorcnhk5RVZedXhuBT1rFenRFuH_epko_I3HkWuwOjWwYgy3P3DV_dgybWo3GGUiX1YyN7H-gBDlyw5hNp5s3Nzd1jq5SeguOh1
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,21416,21737,27955,27956,33777,43838,53298,74657
linkProvider Emerald
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV07T8MwED5BKwEL4ikKBTwwwGARx3EeEwLUqkBbAWqlblbih8TSFpoO9NdjJ06rIsQWKZGH7-J733cAV9RXvgjTDBtX1McB0RQnsY5wamxRqojymbSpgV4_7AyD5xEbuYTbzLVVVjqxUNRyImyO_NZnxtHwjHGP76af2G6NstVVt0JjE-qWcjOuQf2h1X99X-piE4CxYiSSBXYIhVSFSi--Hbz1bC-RMYAJtoZwzTD9ms5daejC7LT3YNf5i-i-FPA-bKjxAWxV7eqH0GrPF4tvlC4JNlHqaEbMg0TmiqKPIm9QpAFnKJ-gFE1LmlcjElQyOR_BsN0aPHawW42ABSUkx5Eo5vykCa4yLw5EEGuPSltF0VRaJEIdMBuMKRmpWCTKD9LEy5RmggjqE3oMtfFkrE4AZVGSaRmqULEokCxJEyoiYY5QIdM6IQ24qXDh05IBgxeRgxdzgyH3KLcYcothA64dcH99ugZ3A5oVstxdmxlfCfn0_9eXsN0Z9Lq8-9R_OYMd3wbBHsGENaGWf83VufEU8uzC_Q4_zdm4TQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV05T8MwFLaglSoWxCkKBTwwwGA1ju0cE-JoVI5WBbVSNyvxIbG0haYD_fXYidOqCLFFSpThe_Z773snAFfEV74I0gwZV9RHFGuC4kiHKDW2KFVY-Uza0ECvH3RH9HnMxq7-ae7KKiudWChqORU2Rt72mXE0PGPco7Z2ZRGDx-R29onsBimbaXXrNLZBPaQBM0Ssft_pD95XetmQMVa0RzJqG1JwlbT0ovbwrWfriowxjJE1ihtG6len7lpbFyYo2QO7zneEd6Ww98GWmhyARlW6fgg6yWK5_IbpatgmTN3IEfMgobmu8KOIIRQhwTnMpzCFs3LkqxEPLKc6H4FR0hk-dJFbk4AEwThHoSh6_qQhWpkXUUEj7RFpMyqaSENAo0BTZomZkqGKRKx8msZepjQTWBAfk2NQm0wn6gTALIwzLQMVKBZSyeI0JiIU5hcqYFrHuAluKlz4rJyGwQsW4UXcYMg9wi2G3GLYBNcOuL8-3YC7CVoVstxdoTlfC_z0_9eXoGFOAn996r-cgR3f8mEPI8xaoJZ_LdS5cRry7MKdhh911byB
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fuzzy+assessment+analysis+and+key+improvements+to+a+production+system&rft.jtitle=TQM+journal&rft.au=Shiau%2C+Yau-Ren&rft.au=Chang%2C+Hui-Min&rft.date=2020-01-15&rft.issn=1754-2731&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=55&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FTQM-03-2019-0082&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1108_TQM_03_2019_0082
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1754-2731&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1754-2731&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1754-2731&client=summon