Comparison of effectiveness of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients with non-specific neck pain
Abstract Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The prevalence of neck pain in Pakistan is not known. The neck pain that persists for more than 3 months is called chronic neck pain. There are differ...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association Vol. 71; no. 6; pp. 1 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Knowledge Bylanes
30.06.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0030-9982 |
DOI | 10.47391/JPMA.981 |
Cover
Abstract | Abstract
Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The prevalence of neck pain in Pakistan is not known. The neck pain that persists for more than 3 months is called chronic neck pain. There are different physiotherapy techniques to manage nonspecific neck pain including Mulligan mobilization and muscle energy technique.
Objective: to compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients having non-specific neck pain.
Methodology: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Mayo hospital physiotherapy department, Lahore. The study duration was six months from March 2017 to September 2017. Sample size calculated was 56 by using g power software. Random sampling technique was used. Subjects were divided into two groups. In the group 1 patients; muscle energy technique was used and in group 2; Mulligan mobilization as natural apophyseal glides (NAGs) and sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) were used. The pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured before and after treatment session by using visual analogue (VAS), neck disability index (NDI) and goniometer. Independent t-test was applied for between group analysis.
Results: The mean age of participants is 36.89±9.28. The mean improvement in pain intensity was 3.61 for the Muscle energy technique group and for Mulligan group it was 4.86 after three weeks’ treatment. The functional status score according to neck disability index (NDI) pre-treatment mean for the group 1 was 12.04±4.69 and
Continuous... |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract
Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The prevalence of neck pain in Pakistan is not known. The neck pain that persists for more than 3 months is called chronic neck pain. There are different physiotherapy techniques to manage nonspecific neck pain including Mulligan mobilization and muscle energy technique.
Objective: to compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients having non-specific neck pain.
Methodology: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Mayo hospital physiotherapy department, Lahore. The study duration was six months from March 2017 to September 2017. Sample size calculated was 56 by using g power software. Random sampling technique was used. Subjects were divided into two groups. In the group 1 patients; muscle energy technique was used and in group 2; Mulligan mobilization as natural apophyseal glides (NAGs) and sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) were used. The pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured before and after treatment session by using visual analogue (VAS), neck disability index (NDI) and goniometer. Independent t-test was applied for between group analysis.
Results: The mean age of participants is 36.89±9.28. The mean improvement in pain intensity was 3.61 for the Muscle energy technique group and for Mulligan group it was 4.86 after three weeks’ treatment. The functional status score according to neck disability index (NDI) pre-treatment mean for the group 1 was 12.04±4.69 and
Continuous... To compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain.OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain.The quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to September 2017, and comprised patients of either gender having non-specific neck pain who ere divided into two groups. In group 1 patients, muscle energy technique was used, while group 2 patients had Mulligan mobilisation. Pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion were measured before and after treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.METHODSThe quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to September 2017, and comprised patients of either gender having non-specific neck pain who ere divided into two groups. In group 1 patients, muscle energy technique was used, while group 2 patients had Mulligan mobilisation. Pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion were measured before and after treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.Of the 56 patients, 28(50%) were in each of the two groups. The overall mean age was 36.89±9.28 years. Pain intensity, functional status and neck extension range of motion improved significantly more in group 2 (p<0.05).RESULTSOf the 56 patients, 28(50%) were in each of the two groups. The overall mean age was 36.89±9.28 years. Pain intensity, functional status and neck extension range of motion improved significantly more in group 2 (p<0.05).Mulligan mobilisation was found to be a better option in managing patients with non-specific neck pain.CONCLUSIONSMulligan mobilisation was found to be a better option in managing patients with non-specific neck pain. |
Audience | Professional |
Author | Mehwish Saghir Rizwan Haider Anam Manzoor Muhammad Asif Javed Naveed Anwar Kehkshan khalid |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Anwar, Naveed – sequence: 1 fullname: Khalid, Kehkshan – sequence: 1 fullname: Saghir, Mehwish – sequence: 1 fullname: Javed, Muhammad Asif – sequence: 1 fullname: Haider, Rizwan – sequence: 1 fullname: Manzoor, Anam |
BookMark | eNptkU1v1DAQhn0oEm3hwD-whITgkK2_8nVcrYCCWsEBzpbjjHcHHDvESdHy6-t0OVBU-eCZ8fOOXvm9IGchBiDkFWcbVcuWX33-ervdtA0_I-eMSVa0bSOek4uUfjAmqpKxc3LcxWE0E6YYaHQUnAM74x0ESGkdDEuyHmjup_2RzmAPAX8tQH_jfKC3i_e4N4EOsUOPf8yMeQ0GOuYKwpxOWLZVpBEsOrQ0gP2Z3zG8IM-c8Qle_r0vyfcP77_troubLx8_7bY3hZWc8UIKaaXq2wq6WqqSW2sdGNHZXnQd75molWE9L1knlFGVyYVkPWOqbljf1aW8JG9Pe8cpZudp1gMmC96bAHFJWpSKlYILzjP6-oTujQeNwcV5MnbF9baqRFNWjVqpzRNUPj0MaHMEDvP8keDNP4IDGD8fUvTL-lvpMfjuBNoppjSB0-OEg5mOmjP9EKleI9U50sxe_cdanB8CyG7QP6G4B-glpyE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3233_PPR_230741 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD004871_pub5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 Knowledge Bylanes |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Knowledge Bylanes |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.47391/JPMA.981 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | A662856841 10_47391_JPMA_981 |
GeographicLocations | Pakistan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Pakistan |
GroupedDBID | --- 0ZK 2WC 53G 5GY AAYXX ABCQX ABJIR ACGFO ACMJI ADCHZ ADEYR AEGXH AENEX AFJDA AGFXM AHHXF AHKOF AIAGR AKNUK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAI BAW CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EMOBN EOJEC F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR ITC L7B LGEZI LOTEE LXO MK0 MV. NADUK NFBOU NKUNM NXXTH OBODZ OK1 P2P PV9 RXW RZL SV3 TAA TUS UNMZH W2D ~ZZ 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3101-323c34d96eb73451cccfea2bcd2bb1d0274a0d150b24a46a50b30d004780db753 |
ISSN | 0030-9982 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 08:34:57 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:06:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:39:36 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:22:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:04:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:40 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3101-323c34d96eb73451cccfea2bcd2bb1d0274a0d150b24a46a50b30d004780db753 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.47391/jpma.981 |
PQID | 2540521211 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2540521211 gale_infotracmisc_A662856841 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A662856841 gale_healthsolutions_A662856841 crossref_primary_10_47391_JPMA_981 crossref_citationtrail_10_47391_JPMA_981 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20210630 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-06-30 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2021 text: 20210630 day: 30 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Knowledge Bylanes |
Publisher_xml | – name: Knowledge Bylanes |
SSID | ssj0026500 |
Score | 2.2661176 |
Snippet | Abstract
Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The... To compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain.OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of... |
SourceID | proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Care and treatment Comparative analysis Manipulation (Therapeutics) Methods Neck pain Patient outcomes |
Title | Comparison of effectiveness of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients with non-specific neck pain |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2540521211 |
Volume | 71 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYlhdJLSV80bZqqpdDCotSWFds6LqHtEtjQQwJ7M7Ks7YZt7LKPhO6v74wkvzZ7SHsxRhpZwvNJM9I8RMhHENLSGJGyQKmUiSiNWQqaL1MmlgkIeKMlRiOPz-PRpTibnExac4GNLlnlx3qzM67kf7gKZcBXjJL9B842H4UCeAf-whM4DM978fi0e4mgd82oVy-0m6-X0GBgXHhfm63Vnr2O0Qr0E2b3dYX-sS4ac9BmWvVhb2VVMozGRI-iQWn0HOp9su67Ki0qsV4lbU1A2wCwZw7qGh1vNlXV-AafqxsQpINheasWrRSYzZcz-NZ8BtuFojEOXW1uoXCE2S0X3WMLHtY-du1SHAUM9nq8s3qGHTHsnF23F3iRRBJX-LMf4-GxTMNWitWW-y3h1rgcwmbHNs6waSYxWv8hTxJr2v8-adyCOGisPpWnG57LRmWbfql77ekwuyW5VU8u9skTzwQ6dCB5Sh6Y8hl5NPaeE8_JnxYrtJrSHlawwGGFOqzQBisUQUBrrNAuVuhVSWusOLIuVihihSJWXpDLb18vTkfMX7vBNOj6IYt4pCNRyNjkSSROQq311Cie64LneVjgOYYKCthI5FwoESt4iYIC046mQZHD9vcl2YMOzStCQdk2oCRJrabQSKo01TrkJplKESWJEgfkc_0jM-1z0uPVKL-yO-w6IB8a0t8uEcsuonfIjczFEDdTPBvGGCkcpwIoPlkKBBX0pJWPQoHxYiK0HuVhjxKWXd2rfl9zPMMq9FUsTbVeZhw3QRxTJ76-z5jfkMft_Dgke6vF2rwFRXeVH9kDoiOLz7-zh7Di |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+effectiveness+of+muscle+energy+technique+with+Mulligan+mobilization+in+patients+with+non-specific+neck+pain&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+Pakistan+Medical+Association&rft.au=Anam+Manzoor&rft.au=Naveed+Anwar&rft.au=Kehkshan+khalid&rft.au=Rizwan+Haider&rft.date=2021-06-30&rft.issn=0030-9982&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.47391%2FJPMA.981&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_47391_JPMA_981 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon |