Comparison of effectiveness of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients with non-specific neck pain

Abstract Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The prevalence of neck pain in Pakistan is not known. The neck pain that persists for more than 3 months is called chronic neck pain. There are differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association Vol. 71; no. 6; pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors Anwar, Naveed, Khalid, Kehkshan, Saghir, Mehwish, Javed, Muhammad Asif, Haider, Rizwan, Manzoor, Anam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Knowledge Bylanes 30.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0030-9982
DOI10.47391/JPMA.981

Cover

Abstract Abstract Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The prevalence of neck pain in Pakistan is not known. The neck pain that persists for more than 3 months is called chronic neck pain. There are different physiotherapy techniques to manage nonspecific neck pain including Mulligan mobilization and muscle energy technique. Objective: to compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients having non-specific neck pain. Methodology: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Mayo hospital physiotherapy department, Lahore. The study duration was six months from March 2017 to September 2017. Sample size calculated was 56 by using g power software. Random sampling technique was used. Subjects were divided into two groups. In the group 1 patients; muscle energy technique was used and in group 2; Mulligan mobilization as natural apophyseal glides (NAGs) and sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) were used. The pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured before and after treatment session by using visual analogue (VAS), neck disability index (NDI) and goniometer. Independent t-test was applied for between group analysis. Results: The mean age of participants is 36.89±9.28. The mean improvement in pain intensity was 3.61 for the Muscle energy technique group and for Mulligan group it was 4.86 after three weeks’ treatment. The functional status score according to neck disability index (NDI) pre-treatment mean for the group 1 was 12.04±4.69 and Continuous...
AbstractList Abstract Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The prevalence of neck pain in Pakistan is not known. The neck pain that persists for more than 3 months is called chronic neck pain. There are different physiotherapy techniques to manage nonspecific neck pain including Mulligan mobilization and muscle energy technique. Objective: to compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients having non-specific neck pain. Methodology: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Mayo hospital physiotherapy department, Lahore. The study duration was six months from March 2017 to September 2017. Sample size calculated was 56 by using g power software. Random sampling technique was used. Subjects were divided into two groups. In the group 1 patients; muscle energy technique was used and in group 2; Mulligan mobilization as natural apophyseal glides (NAGs) and sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) were used. The pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured before and after treatment session by using visual analogue (VAS), neck disability index (NDI) and goniometer. Independent t-test was applied for between group analysis. Results: The mean age of participants is 36.89±9.28. The mean improvement in pain intensity was 3.61 for the Muscle energy technique group and for Mulligan group it was 4.86 after three weeks’ treatment. The functional status score according to neck disability index (NDI) pre-treatment mean for the group 1 was 12.04±4.69 and Continuous...
To compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain.OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain.The quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to September 2017, and comprised patients of either gender having non-specific neck pain who ere divided into two groups. In group 1 patients, muscle energy technique was used, while group 2 patients had Mulligan mobilisation. Pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion were measured before and after treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.METHODSThe quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to September 2017, and comprised patients of either gender having non-specific neck pain who ere divided into two groups. In group 1 patients, muscle energy technique was used, while group 2 patients had Mulligan mobilisation. Pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion were measured before and after treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.Of the 56 patients, 28(50%) were in each of the two groups. The overall mean age was 36.89±9.28 years. Pain intensity, functional status and neck extension range of motion improved significantly more in group 2 (p<0.05).RESULTSOf the 56 patients, 28(50%) were in each of the two groups. The overall mean age was 36.89±9.28 years. Pain intensity, functional status and neck extension range of motion improved significantly more in group 2 (p<0.05).Mulligan mobilisation was found to be a better option in managing patients with non-specific neck pain.CONCLUSIONSMulligan mobilisation was found to be a better option in managing patients with non-specific neck pain.
Audience Professional
Author Mehwish Saghir
Rizwan Haider
Anam Manzoor
Muhammad Asif Javed
Naveed Anwar
Kehkshan khalid
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Anwar, Naveed
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Khalid, Kehkshan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Saghir, Mehwish
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Javed, Muhammad Asif
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Haider, Rizwan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Manzoor, Anam
BookMark eNptkU1v1DAQhn0oEm3hwD-whITgkK2_8nVcrYCCWsEBzpbjjHcHHDvESdHy6-t0OVBU-eCZ8fOOXvm9IGchBiDkFWcbVcuWX33-ervdtA0_I-eMSVa0bSOek4uUfjAmqpKxc3LcxWE0E6YYaHQUnAM74x0ESGkdDEuyHmjup_2RzmAPAX8tQH_jfKC3i_e4N4EOsUOPf8yMeQ0GOuYKwpxOWLZVpBEsOrQ0gP2Z3zG8IM-c8Qle_r0vyfcP77_troubLx8_7bY3hZWc8UIKaaXq2wq6WqqSW2sdGNHZXnQd75molWE9L1knlFGVyYVkPWOqbljf1aW8JG9Pe8cpZudp1gMmC96bAHFJWpSKlYILzjP6-oTujQeNwcV5MnbF9baqRFNWjVqpzRNUPj0MaHMEDvP8keDNP4IDGD8fUvTL-lvpMfjuBNoppjSB0-OEg5mOmjP9EKleI9U50sxe_cdanB8CyG7QP6G4B-glpyE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3233_PPR_230741
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD004871_pub5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2021 Knowledge Bylanes
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Knowledge Bylanes
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.47391/JPMA.981
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID A662856841
10_47391_JPMA_981
GeographicLocations Pakistan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Pakistan
GroupedDBID ---
0ZK
2WC
53G
5GY
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABJIR
ACGFO
ACMJI
ADCHZ
ADEYR
AEGXH
AENEX
AFJDA
AGFXM
AHHXF
AHKOF
AIAGR
AKNUK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAI
BAW
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EMOBN
EOJEC
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
L7B
LGEZI
LOTEE
LXO
MK0
MV.
NADUK
NFBOU
NKUNM
NXXTH
OBODZ
OK1
P2P
PV9
RXW
RZL
SV3
TAA
TUS
UNMZH
W2D
~ZZ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3101-323c34d96eb73451cccfea2bcd2bb1d0274a0d150b24a46a50b30d004780db753
ISSN 0030-9982
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 08:34:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:06:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:39:36 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:22:38 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:04:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3101-323c34d96eb73451cccfea2bcd2bb1d0274a0d150b24a46a50b30d004780db753
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.47391/jpma.981
PQID 2540521211
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2540521211
gale_infotracmisc_A662856841
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A662856841
gale_healthsolutions_A662856841
crossref_primary_10_47391_JPMA_981
crossref_citationtrail_10_47391_JPMA_981
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20210630
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-06-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2021
  text: 20210630
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Knowledge Bylanes
Publisher_xml – name: Knowledge Bylanes
SSID ssj0026500
Score 2.2661176
Snippet Abstract Background: Neck pain is very common in general population. The onset of pain may be sudden or insidious, recurrent or persistent in nature. The...
To compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain.OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of...
SourceID proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Manipulation (Therapeutics)
Methods
Neck pain
Patient outcomes
Title Comparison of effectiveness of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients with non-specific neck pain
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2540521211
Volume 71
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYlhdJLSV80bZqqpdDCotSWFds6LqHtEtjQQwJ7M7Ks7YZt7LKPhO6v74wkvzZ7SHsxRhpZwvNJM9I8RMhHENLSGJGyQKmUiSiNWQqaL1MmlgkIeKMlRiOPz-PRpTibnExac4GNLlnlx3qzM67kf7gKZcBXjJL9B842H4UCeAf-whM4DM978fi0e4mgd82oVy-0m6-X0GBgXHhfm63Vnr2O0Qr0E2b3dYX-sS4ac9BmWvVhb2VVMozGRI-iQWn0HOp9su67Ki0qsV4lbU1A2wCwZw7qGh1vNlXV-AafqxsQpINheasWrRSYzZcz-NZ8BtuFojEOXW1uoXCE2S0X3WMLHtY-du1SHAUM9nq8s3qGHTHsnF23F3iRRBJX-LMf4-GxTMNWitWW-y3h1rgcwmbHNs6waSYxWv8hTxJr2v8-adyCOGisPpWnG57LRmWbfql77ekwuyW5VU8u9skTzwQ6dCB5Sh6Y8hl5NPaeE8_JnxYrtJrSHlawwGGFOqzQBisUQUBrrNAuVuhVSWusOLIuVihihSJWXpDLb18vTkfMX7vBNOj6IYt4pCNRyNjkSSROQq311Cie64LneVjgOYYKCthI5FwoESt4iYIC046mQZHD9vcl2YMOzStCQdk2oCRJrabQSKo01TrkJplKESWJEgfkc_0jM-1z0uPVKL-yO-w6IB8a0t8uEcsuonfIjczFEDdTPBvGGCkcpwIoPlkKBBX0pJWPQoHxYiK0HuVhjxKWXd2rfl9zPMMq9FUsTbVeZhw3QRxTJ76-z5jfkMft_Dgke6vF2rwFRXeVH9kDoiOLz7-zh7Di
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+effectiveness+of+muscle+energy+technique+with+Mulligan+mobilization+in+patients+with+non-specific+neck+pain&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+Pakistan+Medical+Association&rft.au=Anam+Manzoor&rft.au=Naveed+Anwar&rft.au=Kehkshan+khalid&rft.au=Rizwan+Haider&rft.date=2021-06-30&rft.issn=0030-9982&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.47391%2FJPMA.981&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_47391_JPMA_981
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon