Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage

Intense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin. To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel single-band IPL handpiece versus dual-band IPL handpiece in the treatment of photodamage. This was a prospective, single-center split-face study with 20 enrolled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cosmetic and laser therapy Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 213 - 216
Main Authors Varughese, Neal, Keller, Lauren, Goldberg, David J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.08.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Intense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin. To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel single-band IPL handpiece versus dual-band IPL handpiece in the treatment of photodamage. This was a prospective, single-center split-face study with 20 enrolled participants. Three treatments, 21 days apart, were administered to the subjects and follow-up was performed for 20 weeks. The left side of the face was treated with the single-band handpiece. The right side of the face was treated with the dual-band handpiece. Blinded investigators assessed the subjects' skin texture, pigmented components of photodamage, and presence of telangiectasia both before and after treatment, utilizing a five-point scale. Pigmented components of photodamage, skin texture, and presence of telangiectasias on the left and right side of the face were improved at the end of treatment. At 20-week follow-up, the side treated with single-band handpiece showed improvement in telangiectasia and pigmentation that was statistically superior to the contralateral side treated with the dual-band handpiece. Both devices equally improved textural changes. No adverse effects were noted with either device. Both single-band and dual-band IPL technology are safe and effective in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. IPL treatment with a single-band handpiece yielded results comparable or superior to dual-band technology.
AbstractList Intense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin.BACKGROUNDIntense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin.To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel single-band IPL handpiece versus dual-band IPL handpiece in the treatment of photodamage.OBJECTIVETo assess the safety and efficacy of a novel single-band IPL handpiece versus dual-band IPL handpiece in the treatment of photodamage.This was a prospective, single-center split-face study with 20 enrolled participants. Three treatments, 21 days apart, were administered to the subjects and follow-up was performed for 20 weeks. The left side of the face was treated with the single-band handpiece. The right side of the face was treated with the dual-band handpiece. Blinded investigators assessed the subjects' skin texture, pigmented components of photodamage, and presence of telangiectasia both before and after treatment, utilizing a five-point scale.STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODSThis was a prospective, single-center split-face study with 20 enrolled participants. Three treatments, 21 days apart, were administered to the subjects and follow-up was performed for 20 weeks. The left side of the face was treated with the single-band handpiece. The right side of the face was treated with the dual-band handpiece. Blinded investigators assessed the subjects' skin texture, pigmented components of photodamage, and presence of telangiectasia both before and after treatment, utilizing a five-point scale.Pigmented components of photodamage, skin texture, and presence of telangiectasias on the left and right side of the face were improved at the end of treatment. At 20-week follow-up, the side treated with single-band handpiece showed improvement in telangiectasia and pigmentation that was statistically superior to the contralateral side treated with the dual-band handpiece. Both devices equally improved textural changes. No adverse effects were noted with either device.RESULTSPigmented components of photodamage, skin texture, and presence of telangiectasias on the left and right side of the face were improved at the end of treatment. At 20-week follow-up, the side treated with single-band handpiece showed improvement in telangiectasia and pigmentation that was statistically superior to the contralateral side treated with the dual-band handpiece. Both devices equally improved textural changes. No adverse effects were noted with either device.Both single-band and dual-band IPL technology are safe and effective in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. IPL treatment with a single-band handpiece yielded results comparable or superior to dual-band technology.CONCLUSIONBoth single-band and dual-band IPL technology are safe and effective in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. IPL treatment with a single-band handpiece yielded results comparable or superior to dual-band technology.
Intense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin. To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel single-band IPL handpiece versus dual-band IPL handpiece in the treatment of photodamage. This was a prospective, single-center split-face study with 20 enrolled participants. Three treatments, 21 days apart, were administered to the subjects and follow-up was performed for 20 weeks. The left side of the face was treated with the single-band handpiece. The right side of the face was treated with the dual-band handpiece. Blinded investigators assessed the subjects' skin texture, pigmented components of photodamage, and presence of telangiectasia both before and after treatment, utilizing a five-point scale. Pigmented components of photodamage, skin texture, and presence of telangiectasias on the left and right side of the face were improved at the end of treatment. At 20-week follow-up, the side treated with single-band handpiece showed improvement in telangiectasia and pigmentation that was statistically superior to the contralateral side treated with the dual-band handpiece. Both devices equally improved textural changes. No adverse effects were noted with either device. Both single-band and dual-band IPL technology are safe and effective in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. IPL treatment with a single-band handpiece yielded results comparable or superior to dual-band technology.
Author Varughese, Neal
Keller, Lauren
Goldberg, David J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Neal
  surname: Varughese
  fullname: Varughese, Neal
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lauren
  surname: Keller
  fullname: Keller, Lauren
– sequence: 3
  givenname: David J.
  surname: Goldberg
  fullname: Goldberg, David J.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27183026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctqHDEQRUVwiB_JJ9ho6U1PpH5JTVbGOLHBkEW8F9VSaUZBLXUkNcZ_nx5mJossvCjqwblVSPeSnIUYkJBrzjacSfaVt6Jvuag3NeP9hnMhuJQfyMV-XrVcsrN_tajPyWXOvxnjouPtJ3Jer3DD6v6C-F-zd6WyoJHqOM2QXI6BjlheEQPNLmw9ViMEQ_dhFvCHbl58RkO92-4KLah3Ifq4faM2JloSQpkwFBotnXexRAMTbPEz-WhhlX055ivy8v3h5f6xev754-n-7rnSDRtKxaGTtrESGwlj3UhjWzGKgdmmtqPRrB1wXF-CvdB9C6w3DLQZQAhstDbQXJHbw9o5xT8L5qImlzV6DwHjkhUXw9D1Ne_kit4c0WWc0Kg5uQnSmzp90Ap8OwA6xZwTWqVdgeJiKAmcV5ypvR3qZIfa26GOdqzq7j_16cD7ur8iao65
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_dth_12861
crossref_primary_10_1097_DSS_0000000000003602
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_12370
crossref_primary_10_1080_14764172_2017_1400171
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_16285
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_024_04098_9
Cites_doi 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01577.x
10.1055/s-0029-1243077
10.1080/14764170160260744
10.1080/14628830050516461
10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.00085.x
10.1126/science.6836297
10.1002/lsm.20877
10.1002/lsm.21151
10.1002/lsm.21032
10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00071.x
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/14764172.2016.1177188
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1476-4180
EndPage 216
ExternalDocumentID 27183026
10_1080_14764172_2016_1177188
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
00X
03L
0R~
29K
36B
4.4
53G
5GY
AAGDL
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAYXX
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLKL
ABUPF
ABWVI
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACUHS
ADCVX
ADRBQ
ADXPE
ADYSH
AECIN
AENEX
AEOZL
AFKVX
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
AMPGV
BABNJ
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CITATION
CS3
D-I
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
ESX
F5P
H13
HZ~
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
M4Z
O9-
RNANH
RVRKI
SV3
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
TUROJ
TUS
UEQFS
V1S
~1N
5VS
AALIY
ACKZS
ACOPL
ACYZI
ADFOM
ADFZZ
AEIIZ
AWYRJ
CAG
CGR
COF
CUY
CVF
CZDIS
DRXRE
DWTOO
ECM
EIF
LJTGL
M44
NPM
TASJS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1a58f3f8e38ab238df47b790f32fbdc049eb175e67c64a06d0acd9a77e3ccda3
ISSN 1476-4172
1476-4180
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 18:15:47 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:11 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:54:10 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords IPL
skin texture
photodamage
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c309t-1a58f3f8e38ab238df47b790f32fbdc049eb175e67c64a06d0acd9a77e3ccda3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 27183026
PQID 1799562158
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1799562158
pubmed_primary_27183026
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_14764172_2016_1177188
crossref_primary_10_1080_14764172_2016_1177188
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-Aug
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-Aug
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy
PublicationTitleAlternate J Cosmet Laser Ther
PublicationYear 2016
References Goldberg DJ (CIT0010) 2000; 26
Belenky I (CIT0016) 2015; 14
Sadick NS (CIT0011) 2004; 3
CIT0001
CIT0012
Goldberg DJ (CIT0002) 2012; 5
Bjerring P (CIT0009) 2000; 2
Weiss RA (CIT0013) 2002; 28
CIT0003
CIT0014
CIT0005
Kligman DE (CIT0017) 2004; 30
CIT0004
CIT0015
CIT0007
CIT0006
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01577.x
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243077
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1080/14764170160260744
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1115
  issue: 12
  year: 2002
  ident: CIT0013
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1080/14628830050516461
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.00085.x
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.1126/science.6836297
– volume: 26
  start-page: 196
  issue: 2
  year: 2000
  ident: CIT0010
  publication-title: Nonablative treatment of rhytids with intense pulsed light. Lasers Surg Med
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.20877
– volume: 5
  start-page: 45
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: CIT0002
  publication-title: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.21151
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1255
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  ident: CIT0016
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1002/lsm.21032
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1085
  issue: 8
  year: 2004
  ident: CIT0017
  publication-title: Dermatol Surg
– volume: 3
  start-page: 41
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: CIT0011
  publication-title: J Drugs Dermatol
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00071.x
– volume: 2
  start-page: 177
  issue: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: CIT0009
  publication-title: Intense pulsed light source for treatment of small melanocytic nevi and solar lentigines. J Cutan Laser Ther
SSID ssj0017514
Score 2.1069667
Snippet Intense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin. To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel single-band IPL...
Intense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of photodamaged skin.BACKGROUNDIntense pulsed light (IPL) has a well-recognized role in...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 213
SubjectTerms Facial Dermatoses - therapy
Female
Humans
Hyperpigmentation - etiology
Hyperpigmentation - therapy
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods
Low-Level Light Therapy - methods
Male
Phototherapy - methods
Prospective Studies
Rejuvenation
Sunlight - adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Title Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27183026
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1799562158
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaW9sIFgXi1PGQkbqssiZ04zrEFSlWJXlhQb5HtTOgh3VRtcuHf8E8Zx46TPniUw0YbK57sZr6Mx_Y3M4S8NYxJqDiPNORFlAqDr5TK6ghdBQZScqWkDRT-fCwOv6ZHJ9nJYvFzxlrqO70yP26NK_kfrWIb6tVGyd5Bs0EoNuB31C8eUcN4_Ccdf0EPsotqZcBzyYd6giP1yq4CNBBpn451aaOu3Nl5jwNitWzsxHzZhcV1RzkMzHPLhT5tu7ZSZ-oaY2jyYk17eQZj0lf0xGEgLc4TFXxTF_33U3AFHI9BNZONH8MQbXD2FJL2qW2qkXU2UO6XR6v54kQiAjVutKdpLqI0cdV5VjBvcwWcbhrhaYXBW1Q-G5yZC8y8YfcdUdJKtjezjD0xbEcnrmbg1Tzb18a_wEpMfLrUUUxpxZRezD2yzXAmgqZ0e2__w_5B2KrKXQL58E_HMDEZv7v191x1gH4zqxm8m_VD8sArlO45jD0iC9g8Js2ELzrhi3p80Rm-qP0EfFGHLzrgi074oogvGvBF25rO8PWErA8-rt8fRr46R2R4XHRRojJZ81oCl0qj41fVaa7zIq45q3VlcOaJbkCegciNSFUsqliZqlB5DtyYSvGnZGvTbuA5oZwLkTGZ1Th4pJAKCZppXZikgBiFyx2Sjk-sND5zvS2g0pR_1NgOWYVu5y51y986vBnVUaKRtTtnagNtf1kOaRMFesd4zTOnpyCSYVceM7F719u9IPenV-Yl2eoueniFHm6nX3uM_QJIAaCn
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Split-face+comparison+between+single-band+and+dual-band+pulsed+light+technology+for+treatment+of+photodamage&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cosmetic+and+laser+therapy&rft.au=Varughese%2C+Neal&rft.au=Keller%2C+Lauren&rft.au=Goldberg%2C+David+J.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.issn=1476-4172&rft.eissn=1476-4180&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F14764172.2016.1177188&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_14764172_2016_1177188
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1476-4172&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1476-4172&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1476-4172&client=summon