Quantitative estimation of disposition index from postprandial glucose data across the spectrum of glucose tolerance

The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism Vol. 329; no. 2; pp. E355 - E367
Main Authors Schiavon, Michele, Vella, Adrian, Dalla Man, Chiara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.08.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0193-1849
1522-1555
1522-1555
DOI10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2024

Cover

Abstract The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI G ) was developed and validated against a reference. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices. Disposition index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity, is the best measure of β-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical dataset with mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, whereas the second consisted of 62 individuals with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DI MM ), whereas glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DI G ). DI G was well correlated with DI MM in both the clinical and simulated datasets ( R between 0.88 and 0.79, P < 0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess β-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI G ) was developed and validated against a reference. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.
AbstractList Disposition Index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell responsivity, is the best measure of beta-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals, raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, while the second consisted of 62 individuals, with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM ( DI MM ), while glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI ( DI G ). DI G was well correlated with DI MM in both the clinical and simulated datasets (R between 0.88 and 0.79, p<0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess beta-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM. The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying Disposition Index (DI), a key metric of beta-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only ( DI G ) was developed and validated against reference. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.
The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI G ) was developed and validated against a reference. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices. Disposition index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity, is the best measure of β-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical dataset with mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, whereas the second consisted of 62 individuals with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DI MM ), whereas glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DI G ). DI G was well correlated with DI MM in both the clinical and simulated datasets ( R between 0.88 and 0.79, P < 0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess β-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI G ) was developed and validated against a reference. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.
Disposition index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity, is the best measure of β-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical dataset with mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, whereas the second consisted of 62 individuals with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DI ), whereas glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DI ). DI was well correlated with DI in both the clinical and simulated datasets ( between 0.88 and 0.79, < 0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DI can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess β-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM. The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI ) was developed and validated against a reference. DI can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.
Disposition Index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell responsivity, is the best measure of beta-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals, raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, while the second consisted of 62 individuals, with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DIMM), while glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DIG). DIG was well correlated with DIMM in both the clinical and simulated datasets (R between 0.88 and 0.79, p<0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DIG can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess beta-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM.Disposition Index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell responsivity, is the best measure of beta-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals, raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, while the second consisted of 62 individuals, with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DIMM), while glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DIG). DIG was well correlated with DIMM in both the clinical and simulated datasets (R between 0.88 and 0.79, p<0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DIG can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess beta-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM.
Author Vella, Adrian
Dalla Man, Chiara
Schiavon, Michele
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
2 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
– name: 2 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michele
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0590-2399
  surname: Schiavon
  fullname: Schiavon, Michele
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Adrian
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6493-7837
  surname: Vella
  fullname: Vella, Adrian
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Chiara
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4908-0596
  surname: Dalla Man
  fullname: Dalla Man, Chiara
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40650912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVUU1v1DAQtVArui38AQ7IRy5Zxh-J4xNCVQtIlVCl3i2vM2ldJXawnQr-Pd7ttoKTxzNv3tO8d05OQgxIyAcGW8Za_tk-LhiGuAWQoLYcuHxDNnXAG9a27QnZANOiYb3UZ-Q850cAUK3kb8mZhK4FzfiGlNvVhuKLLf4JKebi51rGQONIB5-XmP3h68OAv-mY4kxrryzJhsHbid5Pq4sZ6WCLpdalmDMtD0jzgq6kdd7zvGBKnLDuOXxHTkc7ZXx_fC_I3fXV3eX35ubntx-XX28aJ0CxZtS2ZwpG1yrGtHKohkFJhFb0GkfdS1T96ITS3a6zvGOAUvU7oaE2eiXEBfnyTLusuxkHh6EkO5kl1RvTHxOtN_9Pgn8w9_HJMC6qIteV4dORIcVfa3XHzD47nCYbMK7ZCM51J0BKqNCP_4q9qrxYXQH8GXAwKeH4CmFg9nmaY57mkKfZ5yn-ApMLl58
Cites_doi 10.1089/dia.2024.0197
10.2337/db06-1272
10.1152/ajpendo.00421.2006
10.1177/1932296814559746
10.1089/dia.2015.0119
10.2337/dc17-1600
10.1152/ajpendo.90842.2008
10.1089/dia.2017.0248
10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1963
10.1089/dia.2017.0024
10.1111/dom.14949
10.2337/dc06-1331
10.1177/19322968241242487
10.2337/diabetes.42.11.1663
10.2337/dc08-1512
10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.4.E693
10.1089/dia.2022.0397
10.2337/dc13-1120
10.1089/15209150050194332
10.1152/ajpendo.1979.236.6.E667
10.1038/oby.2008.307
10.2337/dc08-1826
10.1109/TBME.2015.2505507
10.1177/19322968251333441
10.2337/diabetes.50.1.150
10.3389/fendo.2021.611253
10.1089/dia.2021.0212
10.1210/jc.2015-2081
10.1109/10.995680
10.1210/jcem-51-3-520
10.1002/oby.23503
10.1152/ajpendo.00473.2004
10.2337/db13-1198
10.1111/dom.14418
10.1089/dia.2020.0110
10.1152/ajpendo.90340.2008
10.1172/JCI113011
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6
10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3265
10.1007/s11517-014-1226-y
10.2337/dc17-1188
10.1172/jci110398
10.2337/dc16-2482
10.2337/ds20-0069
10.2337/diabetes.41.3.368
10.7326/M16-2855
10.1210/clinem/dgab857
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2024
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1555
EndPage E367
ExternalDocumentID PMC12371129
40650912
10_1152_ajpendo_00407_2024
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  grantid: DK78646
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK078646
– fundername: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  grantid: DK126206
– fundername: HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  grantid: DK116231
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK126206
– fundername: Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca (MUR)
  grantid: PRIN 20222 PNRR - P2022XSFA7
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK116231
GroupedDBID ---
23M
39C
4.4
5GY
6J9
AAYXX
ABJNI
ACPRK
ADBBV
AENEX
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BKOMP
BTFSW
CITATION
E3Z
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
H13
ITBOX
KQ8
OK1
P2P
P6G
PQQKQ
RAP
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
TR2
WH7
WOQ
XSW
YSK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3071-f9a8170fc571197ce7dd74e05389ef984e78fc3796b6a2610e478b39096b8733
ISSN 0193-1849
1522-1555
IngestDate Tue Aug 26 05:21:48 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 13 18:30:42 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 28 04:44:02 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 16:27:44 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords CGM
mathematical modeling
non-insulin-treated
outpatient
decision support system
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3071-f9a8170fc571197ce7dd74e05389ef984e78fc3796b6a2610e478b39096b8733
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
MS developed the method, performed the analysis, contributed to the discussion and wrote the manuscript. CDM developed the method, supervised the analysis, contributed to the discussion and edited the manuscript. AV designed and conducted the clinical study, contributed to the discussion and critically revised the manuscript. CDM is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
ORCID 0000-0002-4908-0596
0000-0003-0590-2399
0000-0001-6493-7837
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2024
PMID 40650912
PQID 3229630440
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12371129
proquest_miscellaneous_3229630440
pubmed_primary_40650912
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpendo_00407_2024
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
PublicationYear 2025
References B20
B42
B21
B43
B22
B23
B45
B24
B46
B25
B47
B26
B48
B27
B28
B29
Cobelli C (B44) 2008
B30
B31
B10
B32
B11
B33
B12
B34
B13
B35
B14
B36
B15
B37
B16
B38
B17
B39
B18
B19
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B40
B41
References_xml – ident: B8
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0197
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.2337/db06-1272
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00421.2006
– ident: B42
  doi: 10.1177/1932296814559746
– ident: B41
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0119
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.2337/dc17-1600
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90842.2008
– volume-title: Introduction to Modeling in Physiology and Medicine
  year: 2008
  ident: B44
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0248
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1963
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0024
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1111/dom.14949
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.2337/dc06-1331
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1177/19322968241242487
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.2337/diabetes.42.11.1663
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.2337/dc08-1512
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.4.E693
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0397
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.2337/dc13-1120
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.1089/15209150050194332
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1979.236.6.E667
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.307
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.2337/dc08-1826
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2505507
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1177/19322968251333441
– ident: B43
  doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.1.150
– ident: B48
  doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.611253
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0212
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2081
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1109/10.995680
– ident: B35
  doi: 10.1210/jcem-51-3-520
– ident: B16
  doi: 10.1002/oby.23503
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00473.2004
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.2337/db13-1198
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1111/dom.14418
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0110
– ident: B45
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90340.2008
– ident: B46
  doi: 10.1172/JCI113011
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6
– ident: B47
  doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3265
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1226-y
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.2337/dc17-1188
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1172/jci110398
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.2337/dc16-2482
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.2337/ds20-0069
– ident: B37
  doi: 10.2337/diabetes.41.3.368
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.7326/M16-2855
– ident: B13
  doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab857
SSID ssj0007542
Score 2.4766083
Snippet The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric...
Disposition index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity, is the best measure of β-cell function. This is usually assessed...
Disposition Index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell responsivity, is the best measure of beta-cell function. This is usually...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage E355
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Blood Glucose - analysis
Blood Glucose - metabolism
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
C-Peptide - blood
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - blood
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - metabolism
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Female
Glucose Intolerance - blood
Glucose Tolerance Test
Humans
Insulin - blood
Insulin Resistance - physiology
Insulin-Secreting Cells - metabolism
Male
Middle Aged
Postprandial Period - physiology
Title Quantitative estimation of disposition index from postprandial glucose data across the spectrum of glucose tolerance
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40650912
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229630440
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12371129
Volume 329
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkKa9INi4lJuMhHiZUto4qZPHaStMoKJNKmhvkZPYWqY2qUqKgD_G3-Mc35pSHmAvUZW6Tprvy7nY50LI65GA14jnMpCKsSAalSIQKuZBVLJ0LMKSJQqTk6efxuefow9X8VWv96sTtbRu80Hx8695JbdBFc4Brpgl-x_I-knhBHwGfOEICMPxnzC-XItaJ4lh-M8EXtaFNwDPKh-PBTKglN9NIgn25l2uMJUFoHlvw9XPRCuOhdaX2g7FnvTtar3AedyYWTOXK88QV7bWbfd06k_opRKTAoNNf-qyAblUbyo9LWQLvJu7yoV6D-i6Et82Ufxy7sn2BWOztPgqVx0eT4UNFajESsDtm8ZJfvUijH3snF_QTFkAXqYRm9IKYXCQwc6Ju1Ka2YWRquMtG5k7YaYMtdXfE2bauOzqhhhrzYob7C3cDFB68QHcUtQdDE9mudBsiXRtQRvivV2R-2J6Cvqeo6V6h9wNOdfxAR8vN2Xqsa2wydM3f85la8Xh293rH5B9d7Ft42jH4_kzcLdjCc3uk3vWhaEnho8PSE_Wh-TopBZts_hB39ALz4BDsj-1sRtHpO2ylW7YShtFO2ylmq0U2Uq7bKWWiRTZSg1bKbCVOrbiPG6MZ-tDMns3mZ2eB7bnR1CAthkFKhVYMlIVMccN7kLysuQR9i9JUqnSJJIcpAfj6TgHUQK2v4x4krMUPPE84Yw9Int1U8snhColVAn-RBGO8igWQwHOyXgYqjIqWDKM8z45ds86W5rKLpn2iOMwsyBlGqQMQeqTVw6ODAQw7qqJWjbrrxloRFBi2Lm9Tx4bePx8Dtc-SbaA8wOwuPv2N3V1rYu8O4Y9vf1Pn5GDzSv3nOwBFvIFmNBt_lLT9Tefas2f
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative+Estimation+of+Disposition+Index+from+Postprandial+Glucose+Data+across+the+Spectrum+of+Glucose+Tolerance&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+physiology%3A+endocrinology+and+metabolism&rft.au=Schiavon%2C+Michele&rft.au=Vella%2C+Adrian&rft.au=Man%2C+Chiara+Dalla&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.issn=0193-1849&rft.eissn=1522-1555&rft.volume=329&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E354&rft.epage=E366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fajpendo.00407.2024&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40650912&rft.externalDocID=PMC12371129
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0193-1849&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0193-1849&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0193-1849&client=summon