Improving accessibility of digitization outputs: EODOPEN project research findings

Purpose The current predominant delivery format resulting from digitization is PDF, which is not appropriate for the blind, partially sighted and people who read on mobile devices. To meet the needs of both communities, as well as broader ones, alternative file formats are required. With the finding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDigital library perspectives Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 187 - 211
Main Authors Kavčič Čolić, Alenka, Hari, Andreja
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Emerald Publishing Limited 14.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose The current predominant delivery format resulting from digitization is PDF, which is not appropriate for the blind, partially sighted and people who read on mobile devices. To meet the needs of both communities, as well as broader ones, alternative file formats are required. With the findings of the eBooks-On-Demand-Network Opening Publications for European Netizens project research, this study aims to improve access to digitized content for these communities. Design/methodology/approach In 2022, the authors conducted research on the digitization experiences of 13 EODOPEN partners at their organizations. The authors distributed the same sample of scans in English with different characteristics, and in accordance with Web content accessibility guidelines, the authors created 24 criteria to analyze their digitization workflows, output formats and optical character recognition (OCR) quality. Findings In this contribution, the authors present the results of a trial implementation among EODOPEN partners regarding their digitization workflows, used delivery file formats and the resulting quality of OCR results, depending on the type of digitization output file format. It was shown that partners using the OCR tool ABBYY FineReader Professional and producing scanning outputs in tagged PDF and PDF/UA formats achieved better results according to set criteria. Research limitations/implications The trial implementations were limited to 13 project partners’ organizations only. Originality/value This research paper can be a valuable contribution to the field of massive digitization practices, particularly in terms of improving the accessibility of the output delivery file formats.
ISSN:2059-5816
2059-5816
DOI:10.1108/DLP-09-2023-0080