Hiller, A. (2023). Comment on Gignac and Zajenkowski, “The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data”. Intelligence (Norwood), 97, 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101732
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationHiller, Avram. "Comment on Gignac and Zajenkowski, “The Dunning-Kruger Effect Is (mostly) a Statistical Artefact: Valid Approaches to Testing the Hypothesis with Individual Differences Data”." Intelligence (Norwood) 97 (2023): 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101732.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationHiller, Avram. "Comment on Gignac and Zajenkowski, “The Dunning-Kruger Effect Is (mostly) a Statistical Artefact: Valid Approaches to Testing the Hypothesis with Individual Differences Data”." Intelligence (Norwood), vol. 97, 2023, p. 101732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101732.