Incorporation and selective removal of space-forming nanofibers to enhance the permeability of cytocompatible nanofiber membranes for better cell growth

• Published in: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Vol. 91; pp. 146 - 154
• Main Authors: Kuo, Ting-Yun, Lin, Che-Min, Hung, Shih-Chieh, Hsien, Tzu-Yang, Wang, Da-Ming, Hsieh, Hsyue-Jen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.10.2018
• Subjects: Cell growth; Crosslinking; Electrospinning; Nanofiber membrane; Permeability; Space-forming; Electrospinning; Nanofiber membrane; Crosslinking; Cell growth; Space-forming; Permeability
• ISSN: 1876-1070; 1876-1089
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.06.011

•Electrospun chitosan/gelatin/PEO (CGP) composite nanofiber membrane was developed.•Space-forming Eudragit (E) nanofibers were added to enhance membrane permeability.•Removal of E nanofibers created more permeable CGP (E removed) nanofiber membrane.•Cell growth under CGP (E removed) membrane was better than that under CGP membrane.•Our approach to enhance membrane permeability for better cell growth is successful. Nanofibrous biomaterials fabricated by electrospinning attract increasing attention. However, electrospun nanofibers are stacked tightly, thus restricting cell infiltration and nutrient supply. To overcome this drawback, we developed three types of cytocompatible nanofiber membranes, namely (1) electrospun chitosan/gelatin/PEO (CGP) composite membrane, (2) co-electrospun CGP/E membrane containing CGP and Eudragit (E) nanofibers, (3) CGP (E removed) membrane which was obtained by selective removal of E nanofibers from CGP/E membrane. The permeability of albumin through CGP, CGP/E, and CGP (E removed) nanofiber membranes increased from 1.50 × 10−11 to 6.19 × 10−11 and further to 15.3 × 10−11 m2/s, respectively. Hence, incorporating large-diameter (space-forming) E nanofibers with CGP nanofibers enhanced the permeability of CGP/E membrane. Moreover, selectively removing E nanofibers from CGP/E membrane further enlarged pore size and created more permeable CGP (E removed) membrane. Membrane strength and stability were reinforced by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde for 2.5 h. To verify our approach, stem cells (KP-hMSCs) were covered by CGP (E removed) or CGP membrane and cultured for 7 days. The cell density underneath CGP (E removed) membrane was about 1.7 times of that underneath CGP membrane, indicating that improved cell growth (proliferation) occurred under CGP (E removed) membrane. Therefore, our approach to create more permeable nanofiber membranes for better cell growth is successful and can be utilized for fabricating various nanofibrous biomaterials. [Display omitted]