Evaluation of Buprenorphine LUCIO Immunoassay versus GC-MS Using Urines from a Workplace Drug Testing Program
The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were screened according to the manufacturer's instruction using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 analyser. For gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-M...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of analytical toxicology Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 175 - 178 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
01.04.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0146-4760 1945-2403 1945-2403 |
DOI | 10.1093/jat/bkt006 |
Cover
Abstract | The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were screened according to the manufacturer's instruction using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 analyser. For gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmatory analysis, samples were submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis with β-glucuronidase and mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. Imprecision (coefficient of variation) for 3.0, 7.0, and 13.0 ng/mL calibrators varied within 2.8-8.7 intra-day (n = 20) and 7.7-8.6 inter-day (n = 19). Inaccuracy (bias) was between -5.6-30.5 intra-day and -13.2-4.2 inter-day. At the 5 ng/mL cut-off, the immunoassay showed 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an overall agreement of 94% between immunoassay and GC-MS. Raising the cut-off to 10 ng/mL provided an identical overall agreement between immunoassay and GC-MS (94%), despite the decrease in sensitivity (90%) and the increase in specificity (100%). According to these results, the BUP LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay provides adequate sensitivity and specificity for BUP screening in urine samples using a cut-off concentration of 5 ng/mL. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were screened according to the manufacturer's instruction using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 analyser. For gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmatory analysis, samples were submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis with β-glucuronidase and mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. Imprecision (coefficient of variation) for 3.0, 7.0, and 13.0 ng/mL calibrators varied within 2.8-8.7 intra-day (n = 20) and 7.7-8.6 inter-day (n = 19). Inaccuracy (bias) was between -5.6-30.5 intra-day and -13.2-4.2 inter-day. At the 5 ng/mL cut-off, the immunoassay showed 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an overall agreement of 94% between immunoassay and GC-MS. Raising the cut-off to 10 ng/mL provided an identical overall agreement between immunoassay and GC-MS (94%), despite the decrease in sensitivity (90%) and the increase in specificity (100%). According to these results, the BUP LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay provides adequate sensitivity and specificity for BUP screening in urine samples using a cut-off concentration of 5 ng/mL.The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were screened according to the manufacturer's instruction using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 analyser. For gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmatory analysis, samples were submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis with β-glucuronidase and mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. Imprecision (coefficient of variation) for 3.0, 7.0, and 13.0 ng/mL calibrators varied within 2.8-8.7 intra-day (n = 20) and 7.7-8.6 inter-day (n = 19). Inaccuracy (bias) was between -5.6-30.5 intra-day and -13.2-4.2 inter-day. At the 5 ng/mL cut-off, the immunoassay showed 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an overall agreement of 94% between immunoassay and GC-MS. Raising the cut-off to 10 ng/mL provided an identical overall agreement between immunoassay and GC-MS (94%), despite the decrease in sensitivity (90%) and the increase in specificity (100%). According to these results, the BUP LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay provides adequate sensitivity and specificity for BUP screening in urine samples using a cut-off concentration of 5 ng/mL. The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were screened according to the manufacturer's instruction using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 analyser. For gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmatory analysis, samples were submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis with β-glucuronidase and mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. Imprecision (coefficient of variation) for 3.0, 7.0, and 13.0 ng/mL calibrators varied within 2.8-8.7 intra-day (n = 20) and 7.7-8.6 inter-day (n = 19). Inaccuracy (bias) was between -5.6-30.5 intra-day and -13.2-4.2 inter-day. At the 5 ng/mL cut-off, the immunoassay showed 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an overall agreement of 94% between immunoassay and GC-MS. Raising the cut-off to 10 ng/mL provided an identical overall agreement between immunoassay and GC-MS (94%), despite the decrease in sensitivity (90%) and the increase in specificity (100%). According to these results, the BUP LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay provides adequate sensitivity and specificity for BUP screening in urine samples using a cut-off concentration of 5 ng/mL. The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were screened according to the manufacturer's instruction using a Roche COBAS Integra 800 analyser. For gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmatory analysis, samples were submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis with Delta *b-glucuronidase and mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. Imprecision (coefficient of variation) for 3.0, 7.0, and 13.0 ng/mL calibrators varied within 2.8-8.7 intra-day (n = 20) and 7.7-8.6 inter-day (n = 19). Inaccuracy (bias) was between -5.6-30.5 intra-day and -13.2-4.2 inter-day. At the 5 ng/mL cut-off, the immunoassay showed 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with an overall agreement of 94% between immunoassay and GC-MS. Raising the cut-off to 10 ng/mL provided an identical overall agreement between immunoassay and GC-MS (94%), despite the decrease in sensitivity (90%) and the increase in specificity (100%). According to these results, the BUP LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay provides adequate sensitivity and specificity for BUP screening in urine samples using a cut-off concentration of 5 ng/mL. |
Author | Alves, Marcela Nogueira Rabelo Piccinotti, Alberto Tameni, Silvia Polettini, Aldo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Marcela Nogueira Rabelo surname: Alves fullname: Alves, Marcela Nogueira Rabelo organization: 1 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo University, Cafè Avenue, Ribeirão Preto 14040-903, São Paulo, Brazil (CNPq scholarship holder) – sequence: 2 givenname: Alberto surname: Piccinotti fullname: Piccinotti, Alberto organization: 2 Synlab Italia Srl, Brescia, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Silvia surname: Tameni fullname: Tameni, Silvia organization: 2 Synlab Italia Srl, Brescia, Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: Aldo surname: Polettini fullname: Polettini, Aldo email: aldo.polettini@univr.it organization: 3 Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqN0c9LwzAUB_Agips_Lv4BkosgQvWlydL2qHPqYDLBDY8hy5LZrW1q0gz8763OXUTE07t83pfH-x6g3cpWGqETApcEMnq1lM3VbNUA8B3UJRnrRTEDuou6QBiPWMKhgw68XwIQnnK6jzoxZZDGPdJF5WAtiyCb3FbYGnwTaqcr6-rXvNJ4NO0Px3hYlqGy0nv5jtfa-eDxfT96fMZTn1cLPHUt9dg4W2KJX6xb1YVUGt-6sMAT7ZtP9OTswsnyCO0ZWXh9_D0P0fRuMOk_RKPx_bB_PYoUbW-MKMRcp8aQWap0omM276WSkrnUoFKqM8qBGeiBVIaQOaMsi7kyPOEqS03KZvQQnW9ya2ffQnuDKHOvdFHIStvgBaFJDBw44_-ghNOEZxlp6ek3DbNSz0Xt8lK6d7H9ZgtgA5Sz3jtthMqbr982TuaFICA-CxNtYWJTWLty8WNlm_orPttgG-q_3AfNEqOB |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_ADM_0000000000000322 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpba_2019_01_014 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408347_2022_2111196 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/jat/29.8.769 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00029-9 10.1093/jat/31.7.377 10.1093/jat/32.7.516 10.1002/jcla.20466 10.1093/jat/32.5.339 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31820aecd4 10.2165/11536010-000000000-00000 10.1258/000456307782268129 10.1258/acb.2008.007250 10.1093/jat/bks003 10.2165/11536040-000000000-00000 10.1093/jat/27.2.103 10.1093/jat/30.2.115 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.009 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.02.035 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2013 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7U7 C1K |
DOI | 10.1093/jat/bkt006 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Toxicology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health |
EISSN | 1945-2403 |
EndPage | 178 |
ExternalDocumentID | 23408251 10_1093_jat_bkt006 10.1093/jat/bkt006 |
Genre | Evaluation Studies Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- .2P .GJ .I3 .ZR 0R~ 186 1KJ 1TH 29J 4.4 48X 53G 5GY 5VS 5WD A8Z AABZA AACZT AAIMJ AAJKP AAJQQ AAKDD AAMDB AAMVS AAOGV AAPGJ AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AASNB AAUAY AAUQX AAVAP AAVLN AAWDT ABEUO ABIXL ABJNI ABKDP ABMNT ABNHQ ABNKS ABOCM ABPTD ABQLI ABSAR ABSMQ ABWST ABXVV ABZBJ ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACIPV ACUFI ACUTJ ACUTO ACZBC ADBBV ADEYI ADFTL ADGKP ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJQC ADOCK ADQBN ADRIX ADRTK ADVEK ADYVW ADZTZ ADZXQ AEGPL AEGXH AEJOX AEKSI AELWJ AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFNX AFFZL AFGWE AFIYH AFOFC AFXEN AFYAG AGINJ AGKRT AGMDO AGQXC AGSYK AHXPO AI. AIAGR AJEEA AKWXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC ANFBD APIBT APJGH AQDSO AQKUS ARIXL ASAOO ASPBG ATDFG ATGXG AVNTJ AVWKF AXUDD AYOIW AZFZN BAYMD BCRHZ BEYMZ BHONS BQDIO BSWAC BTRTY BVRKM BZKNY C45 CDBKE CXTWN DAKXR DFGAJ DILTD DU5 D~K EBD EBS EE~ EIHJH EJD ELUNK EMOBN ESTFP F3I F5P F9B FEDTE FHSFR FLUFQ FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK GAUVT GJXCC H13 H5~ HAR HH5 HVGLF HW0 HZ~ J21 KBUDW KOP KQ8 KSI KSN M49 MBLQV MBTAY NGC NLBLG NOMLY NOYVH NU- NVLIB O0~ O9- OAWHX OBOKY OCZFY ODMLO OJQWA OJZSN OK1 OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P PAFKI PB- PEELM Q1. Q5Y RHF ROX ROZ RUSNO RW1 RXO SV3 TCN TEORI TJX TLC TMA TN5 VH1 YAE YAYTL YKOAZ YXANX ZE2 ZGI ZXP AAYXX ABDFA ABEJV ABGNP ABPQP ABVGC ABXZS ADNBA AGORE AHMMS AJBYB AJNCP ALXQX CITATION JXSIZ ABIME ABNGD ABPIB ABZEO ACUKT ACVCV ADMTO AFFQV AJDVS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM OBFPC 7X8 7U7 C1K |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-3026e8ff1b8ce7e24d58a31dae0c83e93604f050acf11d434926cf676c98f84b3 |
ISSN | 0146-4760 1945-2403 |
IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 05:19:23 EDT 2025 Mon Sep 08 13:31:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:05:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:05:02 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:57 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 28 03:23:22 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3016-3026e8ff1b8ce7e24d58a31dae0c83e93604f050acf11d434926cf676c98f84b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/jat/article-pdf/37/3/175/2448649/bkt006.pdf |
PMID | 23408251 |
PQID | 1316376991 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1372060646 proquest_miscellaneous_1316376991 pubmed_primary_23408251 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jat_bkt006 crossref_primary_10_1093_jat_bkt006 oup_primary_10_1093_jat_bkt006 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20130400 2013-04-01 2013-Apr 20130401 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 4 year: 2013 text: 20130400 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of analytical toxicology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anal Toxicol |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
References | (13_41554115) 2008; 32 (18_41553920) 2008; 32 (7_45196846) 2010; 30 (11_41554161) 2003; 27 (1_41550201) 2006; 30 Lippi (17_40407789) 2011; 25 (2_42130974) 2012; 36 Cirimele (12_18252866) 2004; 143 (16_41551447) 2007; 31 Twigger (15_30933531) 2008; 45 (4_41554667) 2005; 29 Kazanga (10_39708971) 2012; 215 (6_45196845) 2010; 30 Gevirtz (3_39093495) 2011; 49 (5_26175129) 2001; 754 Leino (14_30613478) 2007; 44 |
References_xml | – volume: 29 start-page: 769 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 8 year: 2005 ident: 4_41554667 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/29.8.769 – volume: 754 start-page: 447 issn: 0378-4347 year: 2001 ident: 5_26175129 publication-title: Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical applications doi: 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00029-9 – volume: 31 start-page: 377 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 7 year: 2007 ident: 16_41551447 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/31.7.377 – volume: 32 start-page: 516 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 7 year: 2008 ident: 13_41554115 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/32.7.516 – volume: 25 start-page: 244 issn: 0887-8013 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 17_40407789 publication-title: Journal of clinical laboratory analysis doi: 10.1002/jcla.20466 – volume: 32 start-page: 339 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: 18_41553920 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/32.5.339 – volume: 49 start-page: 147 issn: 0020-5907 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 3_39093495 publication-title: International anesthesiology clinics doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31820aecd4 – volume: 30 start-page: 21 year: 2010 ident: 7_45196846 publication-title: CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION doi: 10.2165/11536010-000000000-00000 – volume: 44 start-page: 563 issn: 0004-5632 issue: 6 year: 2007 ident: 14_30613478 publication-title: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry doi: 10.1258/000456307782268129 – volume: 45 start-page: 339 issn: 0004-5632 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 15_30933531 publication-title: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry doi: 10.1258/acb.2008.007250 – volume: 36 start-page: 201 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 2_42130974 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/bks003 – volume: 30 start-page: 13 year: 2010 ident: 6_45196845 publication-title: CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION doi: 10.2165/11536040-000000000-00000 – volume: 27 start-page: 103 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 11_41554161 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/27.2.103 – volume: 30 start-page: 115 issn: 0146-4760 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 1_41550201 publication-title: Journal of Analytical Toxicology doi: 10.1093/jat/30.2.115 – volume: 215 start-page: 46 issn: 1872-6283 issue: 1-3 year: 2012 ident: 10_39708971 publication-title: Forensic Science International doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.009 – volume: 143 start-page: 153 issn: 1872-6283 issue: 2-3 year: 2004 ident: 12_18252866 publication-title: Forensic Science International doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.02.035 |
SSID | ssj0016863 |
Score | 2.000378 |
Snippet | The buprenorphine (BUP) LUCIO Nal Von Minden screening assay was evaluated. Urine samples from subjects enrolled in a workplace drug testing program were... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref oup |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 175 |
SubjectTerms | Analgesics, Opioid - urine Biomarkers - urine Buprenorphine - urine Calibration Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - standards Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques - standards Observer Variation Occupational Health Opioid-Related Disorders - diagnosis Opioid-Related Disorders - urine Predictive Value of Tests Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results Substance Abuse Detection - methods Substance Abuse Detection - standards Workplace |
Title | Evaluation of Buprenorphine LUCIO Immunoassay versus GC-MS Using Urines from a Workplace Drug Testing Program |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408251 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1316376991 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1372060646 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKeEFCiPvGZTKCFxSVJXFqJ49VtTEuG7dW2lvkODYKtM3UJhPwI_jNnGOnaapdBLxEVezEVb4vJ8fH53wm5IWMEgk4wyTHiKQfCXilMinhvRIq4bGQKg-xGvnomB9Oorcng5Ne73cna6muslfq14V1Jf-DKpwDXLFK9h-QbW8KJ-A34AtHQBiOf4XxfivVjT5fVqM-ZQkPDj3H95PRmw9egeUfJTjI8qeHCRj10ns96sPkvbYxAgy166WrMZFem6Pl5Yv6q1ehAIetVbcpXJe4sRJVTVxAvCp_FGojTD-cnjkzdIQllVPpHWOkqFhI77PM9LRsDXOhVDEvK5dbMETdraptHMuZthtPeV-K6VnRfkc-lsA5-IfNNXnZjWDgbhJt4ot2VjeJBrjMw7pm2WnBNPRjHRsbuK1Wztl-p4v1TcLH6yD7XvlWyaDq0OB0ZnkQMtxku5G53dTaXjVdI9dDIeyy_7tP61UpHnO2krhN2B4MtecGQknp5tIN_2ajZvLc1MW6MOPb5FYDGh06It0hPT2_S266wC119Wj3yGxNKloaukEqaklFO6SijlTUkopaUlFHKoqkopK2pKJIKtqQijakuk8mB_vj0WG_2ZOjr-BTgGmSIdexMUEWKy10GOWDWLIgl9pXMdMJ435k_IEvlQmCPELtS64MF1wlsYmjjD0gW_NyrrcJ9Vli9EAJk4GfGMlcxoHy9UArnmVGRGaHvFw9yVQ1gvW4b8o0dYkTLAUAUgfADnne9j11Mi0X9toFQK7s8GyFVQpmFtfO5FyX9TINGExcBIfZ1FV9ROhz8PHhPg8d0O1YK3o8urTlMbmxfjmekK1qUeun4PBW2a5l4R-d_bL7 |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+buprenorphine+LUCIO+immunoassay+versus+GC-MS+using+urines+from+a+workplace+drug+testing+program&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+analytical+toxicology&rft.au=Alves%2C+Marcela+Nogueira+Rabelo&rft.au=Piccinotti%2C+Alberto&rft.au=Tameni%2C+Silvia&rft.au=Polettini%2C+Aldo&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.eissn=1945-2403&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjat%2Fbkt006&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23408251&rft.externalDocID=23408251 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0146-4760&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0146-4760&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0146-4760&client=summon |