Microbiological Evaluation of Four Different Suture Materials Used for the Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molars: A Single-Center Prospective Comparative Study
Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgica...
Saved in:
Published in | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 15; no. 11; p. e49370 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Cureus Inc
24.11.2023
Cureus |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Materials and methods A total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations. Results The microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were
,
, and
. Conclusion It was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Materials and methods A total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations. Results The microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were Streptococcus viridans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactobacillus. Conclusion It was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures.Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Materials and methods A total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations. Results The microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were Streptococcus viridans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactobacillus. Conclusion It was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures. Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Materials and methods A total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations. Results The microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were Streptococcus viridans , Staphylococcus aureus , and Lactobacillus . Conclusion It was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures. Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Materials and methods A total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations. Results The microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were , , and . Conclusion It was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures. IntroductionSutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue healing. The oral cavity harbors a diverse microbial population, and oral surgical procedures can introduce potential pathogens into the surgical site. Understanding the impact of suture material on wound infection rates and the colonization of potentially harmful microorganisms is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the microbiological properties of prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures used after the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars.Materials and methodsA total of 40 patients requiring surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars were assigned to four groups: prolene, vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Surgical extraction of impacted tooth was done, and wound was sutured with the abovementioned four different materials in four groups, respectively. After seven days, the sutures were removed and sent to the microbiology lab for colony count assessment. Total microbial colony count, streptococcus count, and lactobacillus count were assessed. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test were done to compare intergroup relations.ResultsThe microbiological evaluation of the sutures revealed significant differences in bacterial colonization among the four groups. More bacterial quantities were found in the silk group followed by the monocryl, vicryl plus, and prolene groups in the descending order. Prolene demonstrated the lowest incidence of bacterial growth (p<0.001) compared to vicryl plus, monocryl, and silk sutures. Bacterial colony count was highest in the silk group. The predominant bacterial species found in all groups were Streptococcus viridans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactobacillus. ConclusionIt was found that prolene and vicryl plus sutures exhibited superior microbiological properties compared to monocryl and silk sutures when used for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. The lower incidence and less quantity of bacterial colonization on prolene sutures suggest their potential for reducing the risk of postoperative infection; hence, these sutures can be preferred for oral surgical procedures. |
Author | Lakshmanan, Saravanan Krishna, Sai Bhaskaran, Rajprakash Krishnan, Murugesan Kumar, Santhosh P |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sai surname: Krishna fullname: Krishna, Sai organization: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND – sequence: 2 givenname: Rajprakash surname: Bhaskaran fullname: Bhaskaran, Rajprakash organization: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND – sequence: 3 givenname: Santhosh P surname: Kumar fullname: Kumar, Santhosh P organization: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND – sequence: 4 givenname: Murugesan surname: Krishnan fullname: Krishnan, Murugesan organization: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND – sequence: 5 givenname: Saravanan surname: Lakshmanan fullname: Lakshmanan, Saravanan organization: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38146549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkk1vGyEQhlGVqvm89Vwh9ZJDN4XdNSy9VJGbtJFspaqTM2LZwSZiFxdYR_lJ-ZfFcRqlPTHSPLwz78wcor3BD4DQe0rOOJ-Iz3oMMMazWlScvEEHJWVN0dCm3nsV76OTGO8IIZTwknDyDu1XDa3ZpBYH6HFudfCt9c4vrVYOX2yUG1WyfsDe4Es_BvzNGgMBhoQXY8oF8VwlCFa5iG8jdNj4gNMKcjbsNH5B77PMVuCqXyudMjTz9xDwzcqGDs-9UyF-wed4YYelg2KaxXP2Z_BxDTrZDeCpzz-DeooXaewejtFbk0vCyfN7hG4vL26mP4rZ9fer6fms0BUhqYDWZJu0Y6KDlhljlKiY4aIiTBlmtBY1gxoUF7qsVFcSCm1DKK9L1dUln1RH6OtOdz22PXQ6txaUk-tgexUepFdW_psZ7Eou_Ubm8daCNVuF02eF4H-PEJPsbdTgnBrAj1GWgjDKmwllGf34H3qXJz5kf1uqIYyTimbq047Kq4oxgHnphhK5vQO5uwP5dAcZ__DawQv8d-vVH1DwtQk |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.015 10.3390/polym14091637 10.1002/jbm.b.30250 10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4 10.1054/bjom.2000.0301 10.5604/12321966.1167733 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.4.185 10.1093/jac/dkh171 10.1089/sur.2006.013 10.1089/sur.2006.004 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.01.008 10.5402/2012/762095 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.011 10.1016/0030-4220(72)90221-6 10.2298/SARH170428184D 10.4317/medoral.15.e526 10.4103/japtr.japtr_361_22 10.1089/sur.2002.3.s1-89 10.1007/s10006-012-0380-3 10.4103/japtr.japtr_362_22 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01993.x 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.016 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.066 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.09.019 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90228-1 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.026 10.2174/1381612823666170526094606 10.4103/0975-9476.123691 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.015 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. 2023 Krishna et al. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. – notice: Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. 2023 Krishna et al. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.7759/cureus.49370 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Dentistry |
EISSN | 2168-8184 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_7759_cureus_49370 38146549 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | 3V. 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE KQ8 M48 NPM OK1 PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM UKHRP AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-ebf0721d69deb6fffa936f79306af6fcc946e4ea79c23ad201eb801742ad42753 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2168-8184 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:29:02 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 19 16:44:59 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 18:04:43 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 03:17:08 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 23 09:30:18 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Keywords | silk sutures bacterial colonization surgical extraction microbiological evaluation monocryl postoperative infection impacted lower third molars prolene suture material vicryl plus |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2023, Krishna et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c300t-ebf0721d69deb6fffa936f79306af6fcc946e4ea79c23ad201eb801742ad42753 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10749685/ |
PMID | 38146549 |
PQID | 2908067031 |
PQPubID | 2045583 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10749685 proquest_miscellaneous_2906178516 proquest_journals_2908067031 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_49370 pubmed_primary_38146549 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-11-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-11-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2023 text: 2023-11-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Palo Alto – name: Palo Alto (CA) |
PublicationTitle | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cureus |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Cureus Inc Cureus |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cureus Inc – name: Cureus |
References | Galal I (ref9) 2011; 202 Dragovic M (ref15) 2018; 146 Conn J Jr (ref17) 1974; 128 Moy RL (ref14) 1992; 18 Edmiston CE (ref6) 2006; 203 Fathima T (ref5) 2022; 13 Lilly GE (ref20) 1972; 33 Banche G (ref22) 2007; 65 McCaul LK (ref23) 2000; 38 Ming X (ref28) 2007; 8 Kim JS (ref19) 2011; 41 Jeyashree T (ref1) 2022; 13 Russell AD (ref8) 2004; 53 Cruz F (ref7) 2013; 116 Storch M (ref27) 2002; 3 Dragovic M (ref11) 2020; 24 Yilmaz N (ref12) 2010; 15 Gómez-Alonso A (ref29) 2007; 54 Bhardwaj N (ref2) 2017; 23 Guo J (ref26) 2016; 201 Masini BD (ref16) 2011; 68 Otten JE (ref21) 2005; 74 Xu L (ref3) 2022; 14 Pons-Vicente O (ref13) 2011; 22 Javed F (ref4) 2012; 2012 Gartti-Jardim EC (ref18) 2013; 17 Marco F (ref30) 2007; 8 Yedke SR (ref24) 2013; 4 Pelz K (ref10) 2015; 22 Sortino F (ref25) 2008; 105 |
References_xml | – volume: 68 year: 2011 ident: ref16 article-title: Bacterial adherence to suture materials publication-title: J Surg Educ doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.015 contributor: fullname: Masini BD – volume: 14 year: 2022 ident: ref3 article-title: Electrospun medical sutures for wound healing: a review publication-title: Polymers (Basel) doi: 10.3390/polym14091637 contributor: fullname: Xu L – volume: 74 year: 2005 ident: ref21 article-title: Bacterial colonization on different suture materials--a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery publication-title: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30250 contributor: fullname: Otten JE – volume: 24 year: 2020 ident: ref11 article-title: Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study publication-title: Clin Oral Investig doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4 contributor: fullname: Dragovic M – volume: 38 year: 2000 ident: ref23 article-title: Rate of loss of irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) from the mouth: a prospective study publication-title: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0301 contributor: fullname: McCaul LK – volume: 22 year: 2015 ident: ref10 article-title: Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria publication-title: Ann Agric Environ Med doi: 10.5604/12321966.1167733 contributor: fullname: Pelz K – volume: 18 year: 1992 ident: ref14 article-title: A review of sutures and suturing techniques publication-title: J Dermatol Surg Oncol doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x contributor: fullname: Moy RL – volume: 41 year: 2011 ident: ref19 article-title: Tissue reactions to suture materials in the oral mucosa of beagle dogs publication-title: J Periodontal Implant Sci doi: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.4.185 contributor: fullname: Kim JS – volume: 53 year: 2004 ident: ref8 article-title: Whither triclosan? publication-title: J Antimicrob Chemother doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh171 contributor: fullname: Russell AD – volume: 8 year: 2007 ident: ref30 article-title: Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopedic surgery publication-title: Surg Infect (Larchmt) doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.013 contributor: fullname: Marco F – volume: 8 year: 2007 ident: ref28 article-title: In vivo antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan) publication-title: Surg Infect (Larchmt) doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.004 contributor: fullname: Ming X – volume: 54 year: 2007 ident: ref29 article-title: Study of the efficacy of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) in two animal models of general surgery publication-title: J Infect doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.01.008 contributor: fullname: Gómez-Alonso A – volume: 2012 year: 2012 ident: ref4 article-title: Tissue reactions to various suture materials used in oral surgical interventions publication-title: ISRN Dent doi: 10.5402/2012/762095 contributor: fullname: Javed F – volume: 202 year: 2011 ident: ref9 article-title: Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.011 contributor: fullname: Galal I – volume: 33 year: 1972 ident: ref20 article-title: Reaction of oral tissues to suture materials. IV publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(72)90221-6 contributor: fullname: Lilly GE – volume: 146 year: 2018 ident: ref15 article-title: Microbial adherence affinity and clinical characteristics of polypropylene versus silk sutures in oral surgery publication-title: Srp Arh Celok Lek doi: 10.2298/SARH170428184D contributor: fullname: Dragovic M – volume: 15 year: 2010 ident: ref12 article-title: Effects of polyglecaprone 25, silk and catgut suture materials on oral mucosa wound healing in diabetic rats: an evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics publication-title: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e526 contributor: fullname: Yilmaz N – volume: 13 year: 2022 ident: ref5 article-title: Evaluation of quality of life following dental extraction publication-title: J Adv Pharm Technol Res doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_361_22 contributor: fullname: Fathima T – volume: 3 year: 2002 ident: ref27 article-title: A 28-day study of the effect of coated VICRYL* plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) on wound healing in guinea pig linear incisional skin wounds publication-title: Surg Infect (Larchmt) doi: 10.1089/sur.2002.3.s1-89 contributor: fullname: Storch M – volume: 17 year: 2013 ident: ref18 article-title: Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue publication-title: Oral Maxillofac Surg doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0380-3 contributor: fullname: Gartti-Jardim EC – volume: 13 year: 2022 ident: ref1 article-title: Evaluation of difficulty index of impacted mandibular third molar extractions publication-title: J Adv Pharm Technol Res doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_362_22 contributor: fullname: Jeyashree T – volume: 22 year: 2011 ident: ref13 article-title: A comparative study between two different suture materials in oral implantology publication-title: Clin Oral Implants Res doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01993.x contributor: fullname: Pons-Vicente O – volume: 116 year: 2013 ident: ref7 article-title: Sutures coated with antiseptic pomade to prevent bacterial colonization: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.016 contributor: fullname: Cruz F – volume: 65 year: 2007 ident: ref22 article-title: Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.066 contributor: fullname: Banche G – volume: 105 year: 2008 ident: ref25 article-title: Silk and polyglycolic acid in oral surgery: a comparative study publication-title: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.09.019 contributor: fullname: Sortino F – volume: 128 year: 1974 ident: ref17 article-title: Vicryl (polyglactin 910) synthetic absorbable sutures publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(74)90228-1 contributor: fullname: Conn J Jr – volume: 203 year: 2006 ident: ref6 article-title: Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.026 contributor: fullname: Edmiston CE – volume: 23 year: 2017 ident: ref2 article-title: Tissue engineered skin and wound healing: current strategies and future directions publication-title: Curr Pharm Des doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170526094606 contributor: fullname: Bhardwaj N – volume: 4 year: 2013 ident: ref24 article-title: Experimental evaluation of horse hair as a nonabsorbable monofilament suture publication-title: J Ayurveda Integr Med doi: 10.4103/0975-9476.123691 contributor: fullname: Yedke SR – volume: 201 year: 2016 ident: ref26 article-title: Efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of surgical site infection in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials publication-title: J Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.015 contributor: fullname: Guo J |
SSID | ssj0001072070 |
Score | 2.2931662 |
Snippet | Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue... IntroductionSutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue... Introduction Sutures play a crucial role in the postoperative healing process, as they help approximate wound edges, promote hemostasis, and support tissue... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | e49370 |
SubjectTerms | Bacteria Dentistry Epidemiology/Public Health Maxillofacial surgery Patients Quality Improvement Surgical site infections Sutures Variance analysis |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwELYoSFUvVYE-0gJypfaYkofXiblUFHYFVYMQsBK3yInHYqU2odnsoT-p_5KZxJtlW4nzOE6UGXve3zD2SQOoyNLUAFQfvkiM8tM0FD6E2ib4TKAsOYrZhTybiu-3o1sXcJu7ssrlndhd1KYuKUZ-GCm0bSShrX-9_-3T1CjKrroRGs_YVhQKStNufRtfXF6toixBEqFQ9xXvSTJSh-WigcX8i0C1HKzrov8MzH_rJB8pnskr9tJZjPy4Z_E224Bqhz3PXE58l_3NZgOYEv1xPh4AvHlt-QSf56duDErLrzsMEZ7pthc9Pp2D4Wi5crQEkdr0e1zBrxq3oQ3Ouz5KXPSDBqrxm7tZY3jWecRH_Jhfo-77CT5FiZF62dTL3k1-sgIW51Su-Oc1m07GNydnvhvA4JdxELQ-FJbg04xUBgpprdUqlhZPdCC1lbYslZAgQCeqjGJt0JaAAjUeetvaiAgdoTdss6oreMc4OtrSihICG6dCp4Srr1MT6lJBpBMoPPZ5yYr8vsfZyNE_IZblPcvyjmUe21vyKXenbZ6vZMNjHwcynhNKfugK6kW3hrohR6H02NuercOLYoqDoqPssXSN4cMCwuBep1Szuw6Lm-pZlUxH75_-rg_sBc2ppybGSOyxzbZZwD5aM21x4ET2AbLB_CY priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Open Access Journals dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV1ba90wDDalg9KX0d2zdcOD7TFnieM4cV9K6XroxjLG2gN9C04i0wNtsubkwPqT-i8rOZe16_YsRwFLRp9s6RNjHwyAFpamBmD48GVSaT9NQ-lDaGyC3wTaUqKYfVfHC_n1LD7bYOO00WEDV_9M7Wie1KK9mP2-ut7HA4_4dZYksf5UrltYr2YSIy0m74-EjCT5ejYAfXfbEiQicJPjRKhSH6OU7KvgHyjYZlsRXYvFxK55N1Q9wJ9_l1HeiUvzHfZ4AJT8oPeAJ2wD6qdsKxuezJ-xm2w5cS2RQfjRxO_NG8vn-D3_PExJ6fiJoxjhmel6z-SLFVQcgS1HoIjSttfxEy4bVEMKvrg2S1z0jeat8dPzZVvxzO3qHj_gJxgaL8CnS2SU_mibsbWTH_7hHedUzXj9nC3mR6eHx_4wn8EvoyDofCgssatVSldQKGut0ZGyeOADZayyZamlAgkm0aWITIVQAwoMiJiMm0oKzJNesM26qeEV45iHKytLCGyUSpMS7b5Jq9CUGoRJoPDYx9EU-a-ehiPH9IWsl_fWy531PLY72ikffSkXGmGxIqJ-j72fxHiM6G3E1NCs3RpqloxD5bGXvVmnH43-4LH0nsGnBUTRfV9SL88dVTeVu2qVxq__q_QN26YJ9tTeKOQu2-zaNbxFnNMV75wL3wLG_f_R priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Microbiological Evaluation of Four Different Suture Materials Used for the Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molars: A Single-Center Prospective Comparative Study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38146549 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2908067031 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2906178516 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10749685 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9swDCbaDth2Gbbu5a4LNGA7OnFsRbZ269IE3TAXQdsAuRmyLaEBGrtwnMN-Uv_lSPmxZrvtaFCSDZMCSenjR4DPSmvpG-oagO7D5WEu3Sgac1ePlQlxjicNJYrxpbhY8h-ryeoARFcLY0H7WboeFnebYbG-tdjK-0026nBio0U8JRChFNFkdAiHYRA8ytHtyYoX-mjIDco9DCdylO0qvdsOObpib9___BNU_o2NfORs5i_hRRslsrPma17BgS6O4dk5IXuoOdsxPI3bO_HX8BCvezIl-uNs1hN4s9KwOa7Fzts2KDW7thwiLFZ1Y3psudU5w8iVYSSI0qpZ40pvSlyGFvhu6yhx0E9qqMZubtdVzmKbEX9lZ-wafd-ddumUGKWLquxqN9n0D7E4I7jirzewnM9uphdu24DBzQLPq12dGqJPy4XMdSqMMUoGwuCO9oQywmSZ5EJzrUKZ-YHKMZbQKXo8zLZVzn1MhN7CUVEW-j0wTLSF4Zn2TBBxFRGvvoryscqk9lWoUwe-dGpJ7huejQTzE1Jf0qgvsepz4LTTWdLutm3iS4x7BTHxO_CpF-M-ocsPVehyZ8dQNeRkLBx416i4f1FA56CYKDsQ7Sm_H0Ac3PsSNE3Lxd2Z4sn_T_0Az6mHPRU4-vwUjupqpz9ipFOnAzTvVTiAJ99ml4srfIp5NLDG_hv3hAnT |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,891,2236,12083,21416,24346,27955,27956,31752,31753,33777,33778,43343,43838,53825,53827,74100,74657 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwEB7BIgEXxHMJLGAkOIZNE9eJuaDVslUXmhViW6m3yInH2kqQLGl64CfxL5lJ0pSCxNmOE-Ubex6e-QbgjUHUoeOuAaQ-fBlb7SfJSPo4Mi6mZwLt2FFML9R0IT8tx8s-4Lbu0yq3Z2J7UNuq4Bj5cajJtlHMtv7h-ofPXaP4drVvoXETbskokizn8TLexViCOCSR7vLd43isj4tNjZv1O0lKOdjXRP-Yl39nSf6hdib34V5vL4qTDuAHcAPLh3A77W_EH8GvdDVQKfH_FmcDfbeonJjQ8-Jj3wSlEZctg4hITdMJnlis0QqyWwXZgTRad2t8xe8VLcMLnLdVlDRpxu3UxPxqVVuRtv7we3EiLknzfUOfY8Q0-qWutpWb4nRHKy44WfHnY1hMzuanU79vv-AXURA0PuaOydOs0hZz5ZwzOlKO9nOgjFOuKLRUKNHEuggjY8mSwJz0HfnaxsqQ3KAncFBWJT4FQW62crLAwEWJNAmz6pvEjkyhMTQx5h683UKRXXcsGxl5JwxZ1kGWtZB5cLTFKev32jrbSYYHr4dh2iV89WFKrDbtHK6FHI-UB4cdrMOLIo6CkpvsQbIH-DCBGbj3R8rVVcvEzdmsWiXjZ___rldwZzpPZ9ns_OLzc7jLHeu5nDGUR3DQ1Bt8QXZNk79shfc3efv9rQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwELZgSBMviN_LNsBI8BiaJq4d84KmbdUGyzSxVepb5MRnrRIkI00f-JP4L7lL3JSCxPM5TpQ7--7su-9j7J0B0LEj1gB0H6FQVodpOhYhjI1T-EykHSWK2aU8m4nP88nc1z8tfVnlek_sNmpbl3RGPoo1xjaS0NZHzpdFXJ1MP939CIlBim5aPZ3GffYAvWRENA5qrjbnLZGK0bz72nelJnpUrhpYLT8IdNDRtlf6J9T8u2LyDxc0fcwe-diRH_XKfsLuQfWU7Wb-dvwZ-5UtBlgl-vf8dIDy5rXjU3yen3hClJZfd2giPDNtb4R8tgTLMYblGBOitOnn-Arfa5yGJjjvOipx0AVRq_Gb20Vjedblxh_5Eb9GL_gNQjovRulVU6-7OPnxBmKcU-Hiz-dsNj29OT4LPRVDWCZR1IZQOAJSs1JbKKRzzuhEOlzbkTROurLUQoIAo3QZJ8ZiVAEF-j7Mu40VMaZEL9hOVVewxzim3NKJEiKXpMKkhLBvUjs2pYbYKCgC9n6tivyuR9zIMVMhleW9yvJOZQE7XOsp9-tumW-sJGBvBzGuGLoGMRXUq24M9UVOxjJgL3u1Di9K6EQUU-aApVsKHwYQGve2pFrcdqjcVNmqZTrZ__93vWG7aLf5xfnllwP2kMjrqbMxFodsp21W8ApDnLZ43dnub9oYAeg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiological+Evaluation+of+Four+Different+Suture+Materials+Used+for+the+Surgical+Removal+of+Impacted+Lower+Third+Molars%3A+A+Single-Center+Prospective+Comparative+Study&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us+%28Palo+Alto%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Krishna%2C+Sai&rft.au=Bhaskaran%2C+Rajprakash&rft.au=Kumar%2C+Santhosh+P&rft.au=Krishnan%2C+Murugesan&rft.date=2023-11-24&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e49370&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759%2Fcureus.49370&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38146549&rft.externalDocID=38146549 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |