Profiling and (automated) decision-making under the GDPR: A two-step approach

This paper examines profiling and decision-making under the GDPR and analyses how these two processes are interconnected. The GDPR's definition of profiling is analysed and put in relation to both automated and human decision-making. This contribution works with a two-step approach. It can be d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer law & security review Vol. 45; p. 105662
Main Author Wiedemann, Klaus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2212-473X
2212-4748
DOI10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105662

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This paper examines profiling and decision-making under the GDPR and analyses how these two processes are interconnected. The GDPR's definition of profiling is analysed and put in relation to both automated and human decision-making. This contribution works with a two-step approach. It can be derived from the structure and wording of the GDPR and provides for an enhanced level of legal certainty. Within this approach, profiling is considered to be step 1 and decision-making to be step 2. The two steps are treated as distinct, yet logically interconnected. This helps understand how profiling and decision-making are conducted. It makes it possible to identify the legal implications of these two steps and to allocate who is legally responsible, no matter how many parties are involved. The approach might be particularly helpful in the context of joint controllership, as it makes it possible to delineate whether joint controllership is given in the first place and to allocate the respective responsibilities of the parties concerned. Profiling (step 1) leads to implications of primary relevance for the data subjects’ right to the protection of personal data. Decision-making (step 2) regularly does not lead to such data protection implications but is primarily relevant from a personal autonomy and (economic) freedom perspective. A notable exception is the rare scenario of solely automated decision-making falling under Art. 22(1) GDPR. The two-step approach is eventually applied to a use case that concerns profiling and automated decision-making in the context of credit scoring conducted by a social network.
AbstractList This paper examines profiling and decision-making under the GDPR and analyses how these two processes are interconnected. The GDPR's definition of profiling is analysed and put in relation to both automated and human decision-making. This contribution works with a two-step approach. It can be derived from the structure and wording of the GDPR and provides for an enhanced level of legal certainty. Within this approach, profiling is considered to be step 1 and decision-making to be step 2. The two steps are treated as distinct, yet logically interconnected. This helps understand how profiling and decision-making are conducted. It makes it possible to identify the legal implications of these two steps and to allocate who is legally responsible, no matter how many parties are involved. The approach might be particularly helpful in the context of joint controllership, as it makes it possible to delineate whether joint controllership is given in the first place and to allocate the respective responsibilities of the parties concerned. Profiling (step 1) leads to implications of primary relevance for the data subjects’ right to the protection of personal data. Decision-making (step 2) regularly does not lead to such data protection implications but is primarily relevant from a personal autonomy and (economic) freedom perspective. A notable exception is the rare scenario of solely automated decision-making falling under Art. 22(1) GDPR. The two-step approach is eventually applied to a use case that concerns profiling and automated decision-making in the context of credit scoring conducted by a social network.
ArticleNumber 105662
Author Wiedemann, Klaus
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Klaus
  surname: Wiedemann
  fullname: Wiedemann, Klaus
  email: klaus.wiedemann@ip.mpg.de
  organization: Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Germany
BookMark eNp9kEtLAzEQgINUsNb-AU856mFrHpttKl5K1SooFlHwFvK0qdtNSVLFf-8uFQ8eOpcZZviGme8Y9JrQWABOMRphhKuL1UjXKY4IIqRtsKoiB6BPCCZFOS5576-mb0dgmNIKtUEpRrzsg8dFDM7XvnmHsjHwTG5zWMtszTk0VvvkQ1Os5Uc33zbGRpiXFs6vF8-XcArzVyhSthsoN5sYpF6egEMn62SHv3kAXm9vXmZ3xcPT_H42fSg0RSgXminGJKow00pP1KTCjipZScwNQpxSpblkzJUTiZgbG8U5LQ2zhjmtiFOEDgDf7dUxpBStE9pnmdtjc5S-FhiJzoxYic6M6MyInZkWJf_QTfRrGb_3Q1c7yLZPfXobRdLeNtoaH63OwgS_D_8BjvJ-wA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_17803_2713_0533_2024_3_29_491_513
crossref_primary_10_1080_10496491_2023_2251465
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_omega_2024_103077
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Authors
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105662
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
EISSN 2212-4748
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_clsr_2022_105662
S0267364922000103
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.DC
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29F
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
8P~
9JN
9JO
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYFN
ABBOA
ABFNM
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACNNM
ACRLP
ACZNC
ADEZE
ADJOM
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AFJKZ
AFKWA
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHZHX
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
CS3
DU5
EFJIC
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBOLZ
HLX
HLZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LG8
LG9
M41
MO0
MS~
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
PRBVW
Q38
R2-
RIG
RPZ
SBC
SBM
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPC
SSB
SSO
SSV
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WUQ
YK3
~G-
AATTM
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEUPX
AFPUW
AFXIZ
AIALX
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKYEP
AOMHK
AOUOD
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AZFZN
BNPGV
CITATION
EBS
EJD
GBLVA
ROL
SSH
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c5b55a0615cbc9b961f3ba6a18d00833bc8a55f49a05f7db8834d5ed5fcb2fb23
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 2212-473X
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 05:14:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:22 EDT 2025
Tue Dec 03 05:07:57 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Automated decision-making
Data protection law
Profiling
Anti-discrimination law
Credit scoring
GDPR
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c300t-c5b55a0615cbc9b961f3ba6a18d00833bc8a55f49a05f7db8834d5ed5fcb2fb23
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_clsr_2022_105662
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clsr_2022_105662
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clsr_2022_105662
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July 2022
2022-07-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2022
  text: July 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Computer law & security review
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
SSID ssj0000331084
ssj0016986
Score 2.2862418
Snippet This paper examines profiling and decision-making under the GDPR and analyses how these two processes are interconnected. The GDPR's definition of profiling is...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 105662
SubjectTerms Anti-discrimination law
Automated decision-making
Credit scoring
Data protection law
GDPR
Profiling
Title Profiling and (automated) decision-making under the GDPR: A two-step approach
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105662
Volume 45
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LSgMxFA21btyIT6yPkoULRcZOMsk83JVqrY-Woha6G_KESm1LndKd324ykykK0oXLCXMhnAn3HjL3ngPAeRQhHgpJvVgx5ZEIay_GEtmJZaJNiSeU2fuObi_sDMjjkA4roFXOwti2Spf7i5yeZ2u30nBoNmajUePVeicFIUmwnTZBueInIZHVz7_-Qqt7Fj8wBMbOYro_C2GSuz9ik7LN1oKhG6Qper7E-NNqhGKcG9KH-O9i9aMAtXfAtmOOsFlsbhdU1GQPbDyz5T7o9nPnbVOFIJtIeMEW2dQwUSUvoXQeOt5HbjsF7czYHBrWB-9v-y83sAmz5dQzn3oGS3nxAzBo3721Op7zSfBE4PuZJyinlFluIrhIeBIiHXAWMhRLy7ACLmJGqSYJ86mOJI_jgEiqJNWCY81xcAiqk-lEHQGItY6F4Xy-0iFBOmbK8CMsMJJc-CTiNYBKQFLhRMStl8U4LbvF3lMLYmpBTAsQa-BqFTMrJDTWvk1LnNNfByE1OX5N3PE_407Aln0qOnBPQTWbL9SZ4RkZr-cHqQ42mw9Pnd4356_OIQ
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1JS8NAFB5qPehFXLGuc_CgSGxmy-JN3Kq2pWgLvYVZoaJt0ZTe_O3OJBNREA9eMxkYvjze-5i8730AHMUxEpFULEg01wGNsQkSrJBTLFNjSzxl3N13dLpRa0Dvh2xYA5eVFsa1VfrcX-b0Ilv7J02PZnM6GjWfnHcSiWiKndoEuYmfi5SR2IX22Qf6umgJiWUwTozpfy1EaWH_iG3OtmcjQ6-kKZu-5Mu7GxKKceFIH-Hfq9W3CnSzClY8dYQX5enWQE2P18FCm883QKdXWG_bMgT5WMFjPssnlopqdQKVN9EJXgvfKehEY2_Q0j54e9V7PIcXMJ9PAvutp7CaL74JBjfX_ctW4I0SAknCMA8kE4xxR06kkKlII2SI4BFHiXIUiwiZcMYMTXnITKxEkhCqmFbMSIGNwGQL1MeTsd4GEBuTSEv6Qm0iikzCtSVIWGKkhAxpLBoAVYBk0k8Rd2YWL1nVLvacORAzB2JWgtgAp197puUMjT_fZhXO2Y9IyGyS_2Pfzj_3HYKlVr_Tztp33YddsOxWynbcPVDP32Z635KOXBwUQfUJ4lzPtw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Profiling+and+%28automated%29+decision-making+under+the+GDPR%3A+A+two-step+approach&rft.jtitle=Computer+law+%26+security+review&rft.au=Wiedemann%2C+Klaus&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.issn=2212-473X&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=105662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clsr.2022.105662&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_clsr_2022_105662
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2212-473X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2212-473X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2212-473X&client=summon