Acupuncture for Treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder：A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Chinese journal of integrative medicine Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 257 - 260
• Main Authors: Lee, Myeong Soo, Choi, Tae-Young, Kim, Jong-In, Kim, Lakhyung, Ernst, Edzard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Heidelberg Chinese Association of Traditional and Western Medicine 01.04.2011
• Subjects: Acupuncture; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - therapy; Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine; Humans; Information Storage and Retrieval; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; MEDLINE; Treatment Outcome; 医学数据库; 评估工具; 试验中心; 针灸治疗; 随机对照试验; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; systematic review; acupuncture
• DOI: 10.1007/s11655-011-0701-7
• ISSN: 1672-0415

Objective：To assess the effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment option for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder（ADHD）.Methods：The literatures were searched using 15 databases,including MEDLINE, AMED,CINAHL,EMBASE,Psyclnfo,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,six Korean medical databases and two Chinese databases without language restritions.Prospective controlled clinical studies of any type of acupuncture therapy for ADHD autistic patients were included.Trials in which acupuncture was part of a complex intervention were also included.All articles were read by two independent reviewers,who extracted data from the articles according to predefined criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.Results：Of 114 articles,only three randomized clinical trials（RCTs） met our inclusion criteria.One RCT found that electroacupuncture（EA） plus behavioural treatment was superior to sham EA plus behavioural treatment.Two RCTs reported a significant benefit of acupuncture or auricular acupuncture over conventional drug therapies.Conclusions：Limited evidence exists for the effectiveness of acupuncture as a symptomatic treatment of ADHD.Given that the risk of bias of the included studies was high,firm conclusions cannot be drawn.