The Status of Vitamin D Among Children Aged 0 to 18 Years

Aim:This study aimed to examine the status of vitamin D in children, to compare vitamin D levels according to the seasons, and to estimate vitamin D testing trends during the years of the study.Materials and Methods:Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels of 51,560 children aged between 0-18 year...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of pediatric research Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 438 - 443
Main Authors Sarı, Eyüp, Çoban, Gülnur, Öztek Çelebi, Fatma Zehra, Altınel Açoğlu, Esma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Galenos Yayinevi 01.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim:This study aimed to examine the status of vitamin D in children, to compare vitamin D levels according to the seasons, and to estimate vitamin D testing trends during the years of the study.Materials and Methods:Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels of 51,560 children aged between 0-18 years who had been admitted to nine hospitals between 2015 and 2017 were evaluated. Comparisons of 25(OH)D levels with age groups, gender, and seasons were made. Additionally, vitamin D testing was compared year by year in terms of frequency.Results:Of the patients, 20% (n=10,611) had vitamin D deficiency and 34% (n=17,385) had vitamin D insufficiency. Serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly higher in boys than in girls (p<0.01). There was a significant difference between serum 25(OH)D levels and the age groups. The highest mean 25(OH)D levels were detected in infants (33.95 ng/mL) and the lowest in adolescents (18.3 ng/mL). Significant seasonal variability of 25(OH)D levels was detected (p<0.01). Vitamin D deficiency was determined most frequently in winter with a frequency of 30.7%. A three-fold increase in 25(OH)D testing was determined over the 3-year period.Conclusion:Female gender, adolescence, and the winter season were found to be important risk factors for vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. Further evidence is needed to clarify whom to test in order to avoid over-testing.
ISSN:2147-9445
2587-2478
DOI:10.4274/jpr.galenos.2021.09851