Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 14; no. 12; p. e32791
• Main Authors: Rajput, Ajay K, Gupta, Pradeep K, Gill, Simrat Pal S, Singh, Santosh Kumar, Raj, Manish, Singh, Jasveer, Dubey, Pawan, Sharma, Pranav
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Cureus Inc 21.12.2022; Cureus
• Subjects: Closed reduction; Ethics; Fractures; Geriatrics; Hospitals; Orthopedics; Osteoporosis; Patients; Surgeons; Trauma; India; unstable; proximal femoral nail; intertrochanteric; lateral wall augmentation; pfn; trochanteric fractures; screw-augmented
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32791

Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognosis of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of the management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using PFN and the screw-augmented PFN (aPFN). Methods This prospective comparative study was undertaken from January 2020 to July 2021 and included 60 patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3) at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2) and were managed with screw-augmented PFN and PFN, respectively. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Salvati and Wilson score at the 12-month follow-up. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant. Results The average time to union of the fractures in group 1 was 12.66 ± 1.68 weeks, while it was 13.47 ± 1.47 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.055). At the 12-month follow-up, the average functional outcome, as evaluated by Salvati and Wilson score, was 34 ± 2.40 in group 1, whereas it was 31.58 ± 4.4 in group 2; and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (p = 0.011). Group 1 had 28 patients (93.33%) with excellent to good results, while group 2 had 25 patients (83.33%) with excellent to good results. One patient in group 1 and five patients in group 2 had poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion Screw-augmented PFN has better functional outcomes as compared to PFN alone for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, screw augmentation of PFN may be the better fixation technique for most unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.