Instruments and scales for the evaluation of acute radiation dermatitis: A systematic review

Various assessment instruments have been proposed to document and evaluate radiation dermatitis. In this systematic review, we identified nineteen instruments or scales for the evaluation of radiation dermatitis and performed a critical review of the signs and symptoms included in each of them. Of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCritical reviews in oncology/hematology Vol. 191; p. 104116
Main Authors Bontempo, Priscila de Souza Maggi, Menêses, Amanda Gomes de, Ciol, Marcia A., Ferreira, Elaine Barros, Reis, Paula Elaine Diniz dos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Various assessment instruments have been proposed to document and evaluate radiation dermatitis. In this systematic review, we identified nineteen instruments or scales for the evaluation of radiation dermatitis and performed a critical review of the signs and symptoms included in each of them. Of those scales, only two have been validated. There is a need to revise the currently used instruments so to improve their capability to measure all relevant aspects of radiation dermatitis and their severity. In addition, it would be important to add the patients’ view of their conditions and how they affect their lives. Finally, in order to be useful in clinical and research settings, instruments for evaluation of radiation dermatitis should be submitted to the validation process that is currently prescribed in the field of outcome measures development. [Display omitted] •In the literature, 19 scales for acute radiation dermatitis evaluation were found.•Only four instruments had patient-reported items of acute radiation dermatitis.•Only two instruments were validated.•Better scales for acute radiation dermatitis evaluation are needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1040-8428
1879-0461
DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104116