Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study
The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease. One hundred ei...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A Vol. 22; no. 6; p. 550 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.07.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease.
One hundred eighty patients were prospectively randomized to either the spinal anesthesia DCLC group (SA-DCLC group) or the general anesthesia DCLC group (GA-DCLC group). Intraoperative events related to spinal anesthesia, postoperative complications, and pain scores were recorded. The incidences of both overnight stay and readmissions were also recorded. Patient satisfaction values as to the anesthetic technique and same-day discharge were assessed by direct questionnaire at the end of the first postoperative week.
In both groups, all procedures were completed laparoscopically. In the SA-DCLC group, there were 4 (4.4%) anesthetic conversions due to intolerable right shoulder pain, and those 4 patients were excluded from further analysis. In the SA-DCLC group, all patients were discharged on the same day. Overnight stay was required in 8 patients (8.9%) in the GA-DCLC group (P<.001). The cause of overnight stay was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients (4.4%), inadequate pain control in 3 patients (3.3%), and unexplained hypotension in 1 patient (1.1%). Readmission was required in 1 patient (1.1%) in the GA-DCLC group. The difference in patient satisfaction scores with regard to both anesthetic technique and same-day discharge was not statistically significant between the two groups studied.
DCLC performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia is feasible and safe and is associated with less postoperative pain and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and therefore a lower incidence of overnight stay compared with that performed with the patient under general anesthesia. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease.
One hundred eighty patients were prospectively randomized to either the spinal anesthesia DCLC group (SA-DCLC group) or the general anesthesia DCLC group (GA-DCLC group). Intraoperative events related to spinal anesthesia, postoperative complications, and pain scores were recorded. The incidences of both overnight stay and readmissions were also recorded. Patient satisfaction values as to the anesthetic technique and same-day discharge were assessed by direct questionnaire at the end of the first postoperative week.
In both groups, all procedures were completed laparoscopically. In the SA-DCLC group, there were 4 (4.4%) anesthetic conversions due to intolerable right shoulder pain, and those 4 patients were excluded from further analysis. In the SA-DCLC group, all patients were discharged on the same day. Overnight stay was required in 8 patients (8.9%) in the GA-DCLC group (P<.001). The cause of overnight stay was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients (4.4%), inadequate pain control in 3 patients (3.3%), and unexplained hypotension in 1 patient (1.1%). Readmission was required in 1 patient (1.1%) in the GA-DCLC group. The difference in patient satisfaction scores with regard to both anesthetic technique and same-day discharge was not statistically significant between the two groups studied.
DCLC performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia is feasible and safe and is associated with less postoperative pain and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and therefore a lower incidence of overnight stay compared with that performed with the patient under general anesthesia. |
Author | Katri, Khaled M El-Kayal, El-Saed A Bessa, Samer S Tawfik, Tarek A Abdel-Salam, Wael N |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Samer S surname: Bessa fullname: Bessa, Samer S email: samerbessa@gmail.com organization: Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. samerbessa@gmail.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Khaled M surname: Katri fullname: Katri, Khaled M – sequence: 3 givenname: Wael N surname: Abdel-Salam fullname: Abdel-Salam, Wael N – sequence: 4 givenname: El-Saed A surname: El-Kayal fullname: El-Kayal, El-Saed A – sequence: 5 givenname: Tarek A surname: Tawfik fullname: Tawfik, Tarek A |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo1j01LxDAYhIMo7ocevUr-QNckbdPEmyx-wYIH9by8Sd64XdqmJO1C_fUW1LkMDwMzzIqcd6FDQm4423Cm9F0D_UYwLjaMc3ZGlrwsq0yzvFiQVUpHNkvnxSVZCCGV5IovyfG9rzto6AljGhP9wg7jjNBhGg6YaqA-ROpgyiwkpPMCxJBs6GtL7SE0aKc0oB1CO91ToP0c9jPWJ6QROhfa-hsdTcPopity4aFJeP3na_L59Pixfcl2b8-v24ddZoXOh0x5hUYa4R0vFAifMwmgnTbGlVVlfcFUbq2zqIzjValLaSTksvJeKtAlijW5_e3tR9Oi2_exbiFO-__T4gfkVVyq |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10628_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_019_01171_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10667_w crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v11_i13_3002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_021_03059_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2017_01_032 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000126 crossref_primary_10_22159_ajpcr_2023_v16i6_48397 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2024_05_059 crossref_primary_10_4103_0019_5049_204247 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2016_06_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2020_101813 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2023_04_001 crossref_primary_10_4103_0970_9185_173384 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2023_04_002 crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2017_92_3_136 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_015_0158_x crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1958_7989 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40064_015_1153_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2017_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_019_0762_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2022_03_008 crossref_primary_10_2147_LRA_S395376 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0b013e3283606b71 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_020_03630_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_018_1707_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_pan_12543 crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v13_i5_137 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_9480539 crossref_primary_10_31071_promedosvity2019_02_084 crossref_primary_10_36106_2836306 crossref_primary_10_17116_hirurgia20151195_98 crossref_primary_10_1002_vrc2_861 crossref_primary_10_1097_DCR_0000000000001985 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2012_9992 crossref_primary_10_1136_bcr_2020_241503 crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_23018 crossref_primary_10_1177_1553350620914198 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1089/lap.2012.0110 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1557-9034 |
ExternalDocumentID | 22686181 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | Egypt |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Egypt |
GroupedDBID | --- .GJ 0R~ 1-M 34G 36B 39C 4.4 53G 5GY AAWTL ABBKN ABJNI ACGFS ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BNQNF CAG CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF DU5 EBS ECM EIF EJD EMOBN ESX F5P IM4 L7B MV1 NPM NQHIM O9- RIG RML RMSOB UE5 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8f8eb6b2fd148a2f306aa9d9bbd577cf4083ccdce8bd175956b6a367ff68a95e2 |
IngestDate | Sat Sep 28 07:55:08 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c293t-8f8eb6b2fd148a2f306aa9d9bbd577cf4083ccdce8bd175956b6a367ff68a95e2 |
PMID | 22686181 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_22686181 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012 Jul-Aug |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2012 text: 2012 Jul-Aug |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
References | 22812576 - J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jul-Aug;22(6):556 |
References_xml | |
SSID | ssj0000934 |
Score | 2.1991394 |
Snippet | The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 550 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Ambulatory Care Anesthesia, General Anesthesia, Spinal Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Egypt Female Gallstones - surgery Humans Intraoperative Complications Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Pain Measurement Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data Patient Satisfaction Postoperative Complications Prospective Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome |
Title | Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686181 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6lcOGCQLwp1R64WRsSP9Z2b1EVVFHRS1vRW7VPEZSXEueQ_j_-V7_1rmM3BQRcrMi7Xlk7X2a-Gc_OEPIxixWsolFMDEzMUi6HTNi8ZKV1rS0sOAl3B5y_nvPTq_TLdXbd6_3sZC1tKtlXt788V_I_UsU9yNWdkv0Hye4WxQ38hnxxhYRx_SsZXyzrnlYus2Kzds2QXYApEtBeoHXriahzCLXYMgVbFU1hF13tysVyoiJV98V1ZZxVtZht_ZlnaNPm5GUEG6YXs8ktCGlbgvYhi_WLGswNCzso7RIL1puV16y7UrHrPkjrquqEUF0PFh-bnplVG4k9c70DajX0HTZMt1HbkdRmyi5EgPI3Yabt96TxlJ2Jbd3EIBq7WXhy1I1sDNssWBimoI2znJWDEO0M6jqOO7Ds6t7MV7B9YBMGhSupiu1wiXxx3xGe7jxs8HJWAwRMtOBD30Hmz6N7JbqboQNykBdO2Z67kFFDB8okDcVd8Saf7r2HK0Udnt1za2p6c_mMPA0SpSMPsuekZ-YvyA8PMOoBRgPAaAswCoDRBmC0CzC6B7BjKmgHXrSFF63h9ZJcfR5fnpyy0JyDKTDEihW2MJLL2Go41CK2cD2FKHUppc7yXNkU3F4prUwhNSgq3HDJRcJza3khyszEr8ij-WJu3hCqUp6IjKcFlkpzroVUcLKl1YlVhZbJW_Lab83N0ldguWk27d1vR96TJy2kDslji7-8-QD-WMmjWj53dzp28A |
link.rule.ids | 783 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal+versus+general+anesthesia+for+day-case+laparoscopic+cholecystectomy%3A+a+prospective+randomized+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+laparoendoscopic+%26+advanced+surgical+techniques.+Part+A&rft.au=Bessa%2C+Samer+S&rft.au=Katri%2C+Khaled+M&rft.au=Abdel-Salam%2C+Wael+N&rft.au=El-Kayal%2C+El-Saed+A&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.eissn=1557-9034&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089%2Flap.2012.0110&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22686181&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22686181&rft.externalDocID=22686181 |