Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study

The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease. One hundred ei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A Vol. 22; no. 6; p. 550
Main Authors Bessa, Samer S, Katri, Khaled M, Abdel-Salam, Wael N, El-Kayal, El-Saed A, Tawfik, Tarek A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease. One hundred eighty patients were prospectively randomized to either the spinal anesthesia DCLC group (SA-DCLC group) or the general anesthesia DCLC group (GA-DCLC group). Intraoperative events related to spinal anesthesia, postoperative complications, and pain scores were recorded. The incidences of both overnight stay and readmissions were also recorded. Patient satisfaction values as to the anesthetic technique and same-day discharge were assessed by direct questionnaire at the end of the first postoperative week. In both groups, all procedures were completed laparoscopically. In the SA-DCLC group, there were 4 (4.4%) anesthetic conversions due to intolerable right shoulder pain, and those 4 patients were excluded from further analysis. In the SA-DCLC group, all patients were discharged on the same day. Overnight stay was required in 8 patients (8.9%) in the GA-DCLC group (P<.001). The cause of overnight stay was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients (4.4%), inadequate pain control in 3 patients (3.3%), and unexplained hypotension in 1 patient (1.1%). Readmission was required in 1 patient (1.1%) in the GA-DCLC group. The difference in patient satisfaction scores with regard to both anesthetic technique and same-day discharge was not statistically significant between the two groups studied. DCLC performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia is feasible and safe and is associated with less postoperative pain and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and therefore a lower incidence of overnight stay compared with that performed with the patient under general anesthesia.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease. One hundred eighty patients were prospectively randomized to either the spinal anesthesia DCLC group (SA-DCLC group) or the general anesthesia DCLC group (GA-DCLC group). Intraoperative events related to spinal anesthesia, postoperative complications, and pain scores were recorded. The incidences of both overnight stay and readmissions were also recorded. Patient satisfaction values as to the anesthetic technique and same-day discharge were assessed by direct questionnaire at the end of the first postoperative week. In both groups, all procedures were completed laparoscopically. In the SA-DCLC group, there were 4 (4.4%) anesthetic conversions due to intolerable right shoulder pain, and those 4 patients were excluded from further analysis. In the SA-DCLC group, all patients were discharged on the same day. Overnight stay was required in 8 patients (8.9%) in the GA-DCLC group (P<.001). The cause of overnight stay was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients (4.4%), inadequate pain control in 3 patients (3.3%), and unexplained hypotension in 1 patient (1.1%). Readmission was required in 1 patient (1.1%) in the GA-DCLC group. The difference in patient satisfaction scores with regard to both anesthetic technique and same-day discharge was not statistically significant between the two groups studied. DCLC performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia is feasible and safe and is associated with less postoperative pain and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and therefore a lower incidence of overnight stay compared with that performed with the patient under general anesthesia.
Author Katri, Khaled M
El-Kayal, El-Saed A
Bessa, Samer S
Tawfik, Tarek A
Abdel-Salam, Wael N
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Samer S
  surname: Bessa
  fullname: Bessa, Samer S
  email: samerbessa@gmail.com
  organization: Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. samerbessa@gmail.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Khaled M
  surname: Katri
  fullname: Katri, Khaled M
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Wael N
  surname: Abdel-Salam
  fullname: Abdel-Salam, Wael N
– sequence: 4
  givenname: El-Saed A
  surname: El-Kayal
  fullname: El-Kayal, El-Saed A
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Tarek A
  surname: Tawfik
  fullname: Tawfik, Tarek A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1j01LxDAYhIMo7ocevUr-QNckbdPEmyx-wYIH9by8Sd64XdqmJO1C_fUW1LkMDwMzzIqcd6FDQm4423Cm9F0D_UYwLjaMc3ZGlrwsq0yzvFiQVUpHNkvnxSVZCCGV5IovyfG9rzto6AljGhP9wg7jjNBhGg6YaqA-ROpgyiwkpPMCxJBs6GtL7SE0aKc0oB1CO91ToP0c9jPWJ6QROhfa-hsdTcPopity4aFJeP3na_L59Pixfcl2b8-v24ddZoXOh0x5hUYa4R0vFAifMwmgnTbGlVVlfcFUbq2zqIzjValLaSTksvJeKtAlijW5_e3tR9Oi2_exbiFO-__T4gfkVVyq
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10628_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_019_01171_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10667_w
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v11_i13_3002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_021_03059_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2017_01_032
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000126
crossref_primary_10_22159_ajpcr_2023_v16i6_48397
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2024_05_059
crossref_primary_10_4103_0019_5049_204247
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2016_06_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2020_101813
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2023_04_001
crossref_primary_10_4103_0970_9185_173384
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2023_04_002
crossref_primary_10_4174_astr_2017_92_3_136
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_015_0158_x
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1958_7989
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40064_015_1153_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2017_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_019_0762_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2022_03_008
crossref_primary_10_2147_LRA_S395376
crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0b013e3283606b71
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_020_03630_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_018_1707_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_pan_12543
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v13_i5_137
crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_9480539
crossref_primary_10_31071_promedosvity2019_02_084
crossref_primary_10_36106_2836306
crossref_primary_10_17116_hirurgia20151195_98
crossref_primary_10_1002_vrc2_861
crossref_primary_10_1097_DCR_0000000000001985
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2012_9992
crossref_primary_10_1136_bcr_2020_241503
crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_23018
crossref_primary_10_1177_1553350620914198
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1089/lap.2012.0110
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1557-9034
ExternalDocumentID 22686181
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Egypt
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Egypt
GroupedDBID ---
.GJ
0R~
1-M
34G
36B
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
AAWTL
ABBKN
ABJNI
ACGFS
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BNQNF
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
IM4
L7B
MV1
NPM
NQHIM
O9-
RIG
RML
RMSOB
UE5
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8f8eb6b2fd148a2f306aa9d9bbd577cf4083ccdce8bd175956b6a367ff68a95e2
IngestDate Sat Sep 28 07:55:08 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c293t-8f8eb6b2fd148a2f306aa9d9bbd577cf4083ccdce8bd175956b6a367ff68a95e2
PMID 22686181
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_22686181
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012 Jul-Aug
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2012
  text: 2012 Jul-Aug
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A
PublicationTitleAlternate J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
PublicationYear 2012
References 22812576 - J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jul-Aug;22(6):556
References_xml
SSID ssj0000934
Score 2.1991394
Snippet The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 550
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Ambulatory Care
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesia, Spinal
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Egypt
Female
Gallstones - surgery
Humans
Intraoperative Complications
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Title Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686181
Volume 22
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6lcOGCQLwp1R64WRsSP9Z2b1EVVFHRS1vRW7VPEZSXEueQ_j_-V7_1rmM3BQRcrMi7Xlk7X2a-Gc_OEPIxixWsolFMDEzMUi6HTNi8ZKV1rS0sOAl3B5y_nvPTq_TLdXbd6_3sZC1tKtlXt788V_I_UsU9yNWdkv0Hye4WxQ38hnxxhYRx_SsZXyzrnlYus2Kzds2QXYApEtBeoHXriahzCLXYMgVbFU1hF13tysVyoiJV98V1ZZxVtZht_ZlnaNPm5GUEG6YXs8ktCGlbgvYhi_WLGswNCzso7RIL1puV16y7UrHrPkjrquqEUF0PFh-bnplVG4k9c70DajX0HTZMt1HbkdRmyi5EgPI3Yabt96TxlJ2Jbd3EIBq7WXhy1I1sDNssWBimoI2znJWDEO0M6jqOO7Ds6t7MV7B9YBMGhSupiu1wiXxx3xGe7jxs8HJWAwRMtOBD30Hmz6N7JbqboQNykBdO2Z67kFFDB8okDcVd8Saf7r2HK0Udnt1za2p6c_mMPA0SpSMPsuekZ-YvyA8PMOoBRgPAaAswCoDRBmC0CzC6B7BjKmgHXrSFF63h9ZJcfR5fnpyy0JyDKTDEihW2MJLL2Go41CK2cD2FKHUppc7yXNkU3F4prUwhNSgq3HDJRcJza3khyszEr8ij-WJu3hCqUp6IjKcFlkpzroVUcLKl1YlVhZbJW_Lab83N0ldguWk27d1vR96TJy2kDslji7-8-QD-WMmjWj53dzp28A
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal+versus+general+anesthesia+for+day-case+laparoscopic+cholecystectomy%3A+a+prospective+randomized+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+laparoendoscopic+%26+advanced+surgical+techniques.+Part+A&rft.au=Bessa%2C+Samer+S&rft.au=Katri%2C+Khaled+M&rft.au=Abdel-Salam%2C+Wael+N&rft.au=El-Kayal%2C+El-Saed+A&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.eissn=1557-9034&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089%2Flap.2012.0110&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22686181&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22686181&rft.externalDocID=22686181