National survey of Australian sonographer knowledge and behaviour surrounding the ALARA principles when conducting the 11–14‐week obstetric screening ultrasound
Objectives To identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester imaging; Identify relationships between demographic variables and knowledge or application of the Output Display Standard (ODS) value th...
Saved in:
Published in | Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 47 - 55 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.05.2016
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
To identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester imaging; Identify relationships between demographic variables and knowledge or application of the Output Display Standard (ODS) value thermal index (TI) and compare Australian sonographers to their international peers.
Methods
Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registered (ASAR)‐registered sonographers completed a voluntary questionnaire over September 2015 after institutional ethics approval (RDSE‐48‐15). Seventeen questions detailed their demographics (5); knowledge of ultrasound bioeffects terminology and ALARA principles (9); behaviour surrounding ALARA and first trimester imaging (2) and continuing bioeffects education (1). Exclusion criteria was non‐ASAR status. Descriptive (mode frequency) and inferential statistics (Fisher exact test) were used. Significance level was 95%.
Results
Ninety‐five valid surveys were collected. Ninety‐nine per cent knew the meaning of ALARA, 93.55% correctly defined ‘TI’ and 85.39% knew where to find the TI value via the ODS. Half never monitor the ODS. No correlation (P = 0.094) was found between experience and ODS monitoring. No statistical difference (P = 0.189) existed between obstetric and non‐obstetric sonographers who knew the meaning of TIB (87.18% vs. 76.92%) or those who correctly identified it as the setting for 11–14‐week examinations (30.77% vs. 30.77%). When using Doppler during obstetric examinations, no difference existed (P = 0.293), between obstetric and non‐obstetric sonographers’ knowledge of ASUM/WFUMB guidelines for maximum TI (47.37% vs. 46.15%).
Conclusions
Despite poor ODS usage, Australian sonographers outperform their international peers for ALARA literacy, and show better application of ALARA principles in the first trimester. No relationships were found between demographic variables and knowledge or conscious monitoring of ODS. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester imaging; Identify relationships between demographic variables and knowledge or application of the Output Display Standard (ODS) value thermal index (TI) and compare Australian sonographers to their international peers.
Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registered
ASAR)-registered sonographers completed a voluntary questionnaire over September 2015 after institutional ethics approval (RDSE-48-15). Seventeen questions detailed their demographics (5); knowledge of ultrasound bioeffects terminology and ALARA principles (9); behaviour surrounding ALARA and first trimester imaging (2) and continuing bioeffects education (1). Exclusion criteria was non-ASAR status. Descriptive (mode frequency) and inferential statistics (Fisher exact test) were used. Significance level was 95%.
Ninety-five valid surveys were collected. Ninety-nine per cent knew the meaning of ALARA, 93.55% correctly defined 'TI' and 85.39% knew where to find the TI value via the ODS. Half never monitor the ODS. No correlation (P = 0.094) was found between experience and ODS monitoring. No statistical difference (P = 0.189) existed between obstetric and non-obstetric sonographers who knew the meaning of TIB (87.18% vs. 76.92%) or those who correctly identified it as the setting for 11-14-week examinations (30.77% vs. 30.77%). When using Doppler during obstetric examinations, no difference existed (P = 0.293), between obstetric and non-obstetric sonographers' knowledge of ASUM/WFUMB guidelines for maximum TI (47.37% vs. 46.15%).
Despite poor ODS usage, Australian sonographers outperform their international peers for ALARA literacy, and show better application of ALARA principles in the first trimester. No relationships were found between demographic variables and knowledge or conscious monitoring of ODS. ObjectivesTo identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester imaging; Identify relationships between demographic variables and knowledge or application of the Output Display Standard (ODS) value thermal index (TI) and compare Australian sonographers to their international peers.MethodsAustralian Sonographer Accreditation Registered (ASAR)‐registered sonographers completed a voluntary questionnaire over September 2015 after institutional ethics approval (RDSE‐48‐15). Seventeen questions detailed their demographics (5); knowledge of ultrasound bioeffects terminology and ALARA principles (9); behaviour surrounding ALARA and first trimester imaging (2) and continuing bioeffects education (1). Exclusion criteria was non‐ASAR status. Descriptive (mode frequency) and inferential statistics (Fisher exact test) were used. Significance level was 95%.ResultsNinety‐five valid surveys were collected. Ninety‐nine per cent knew the meaning of ALARA, 93.55% correctly defined ‘TI’ and 85.39% knew where to find the TI value via the ODS. Half never monitor the ODS. No correlation (P = 0.094) was found between experience and ODS monitoring. No statistical difference (P = 0.189) existed between obstetric and non‐obstetric sonographers who knew the meaning of TIB (87.18% vs. 76.92%) or those who correctly identified it as the setting for 11–14‐week examinations (30.77% vs. 30.77%). When using Doppler during obstetric examinations, no difference existed (P = 0.293), between obstetric and non‐obstetric sonographers’ knowledge of ASUM/WFUMB guidelines for maximum TI (47.37% vs. 46.15%).ConclusionsDespite poor ODS usage, Australian sonographers outperform their international peers for ALARA literacy, and show better application of ALARA principles in the first trimester. No relationships were found between demographic variables and knowledge or conscious monitoring of ODS. Objectives To identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester imaging; Identify relationships between demographic variables and knowledge or application of the Output Display Standard (ODS) value thermal index (TI) and compare Australian sonographers to their international peers. Methods Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registered (ASAR)‐registered sonographers completed a voluntary questionnaire over September 2015 after institutional ethics approval (RDSE‐48‐15). Seventeen questions detailed their demographics (5); knowledge of ultrasound bioeffects terminology and ALARA principles (9); behaviour surrounding ALARA and first trimester imaging (2) and continuing bioeffects education (1). Exclusion criteria was non‐ASAR status. Descriptive (mode frequency) and inferential statistics (Fisher exact test) were used. Significance level was 95%. Results Ninety‐five valid surveys were collected. Ninety‐nine per cent knew the meaning of ALARA, 93.55% correctly defined ‘TI’ and 85.39% knew where to find the TI value via the ODS. Half never monitor the ODS. No correlation (P = 0.094) was found between experience and ODS monitoring. No statistical difference (P = 0.189) existed between obstetric and non‐obstetric sonographers who knew the meaning of TIB (87.18% vs. 76.92%) or those who correctly identified it as the setting for 11–14‐week examinations (30.77% vs. 30.77%). When using Doppler during obstetric examinations, no difference existed (P = 0.293), between obstetric and non‐obstetric sonographers’ knowledge of ASUM/WFUMB guidelines for maximum TI (47.37% vs. 46.15%). Conclusions Despite poor ODS usage, Australian sonographers outperform their international peers for ALARA literacy, and show better application of ALARA principles in the first trimester. No relationships were found between demographic variables and knowledge or conscious monitoring of ODS. |
Author | Ng, Curtise Kin Cheung Westerway, Susan Campbell Beirne, Geraldene Carruthers |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 School of Women's & Children's Health Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales Randwick New South Wales Australia 4 School of Dentistry and Health Sciences Faculty of Science Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga New South Wales Australia 2 School of Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University Sydney New South Wales Australia 1 Department of Medical Radiation Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 4 School of Dentistry and Health Sciences Faculty of Science Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga New South Wales Australia – name: 2 School of Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University Sydney New South Wales Australia – name: 1 Department of Medical Radiation Sciences Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia – name: 3 School of Women's & Children's Health Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales Randwick New South Wales Australia |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Geraldene Carruthers surname: Beirne fullname: Beirne, Geraldene Carruthers organization: University of New South Wales – sequence: 2 givenname: Susan Campbell surname: Westerway fullname: Westerway, Susan Campbell organization: Charles Sturt University – sequence: 3 givenname: Curtise Kin Cheung surname: Ng fullname: Ng, Curtise Kin Cheung organization: Curtin University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760443$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kc9u1DAQhy1URJfSCw-ALHFDSrETb-JckKKq_NMCEqJny7HHG2-z9mInu9pbH6FSX4En65PgsG0FF06Wxp8_z8zvOTpy3gFCLyk5o4Tkb-VqXJ_RnBD-BM3ynMwzQhk5QjPKizIrecmO0WmMK0IILQkpquoZOi5YVRLGihn69VUO1jvZ4ziGLeyxN7gZ4xBkb6XD0Tu_DHLTQcBXzu960EvA0mncQie31o9hehj86LR1Szx0gJtF873Bm2CdspseIt514LDyTo9qeIAovbu-pezu-mYHcIV9GwcYglU4qgDgJmzsUxdxMr9AT43sI5zenyfo8v3Fj_OP2eLbh0_nzSJTeV3wjBFZmpqXJjc0V6zSoKjRNaR6m-oKSNnmup63NeFsXjBTt4oro3NTKE1bXpygdwfvZmzXoBW4aQ8ijbKWYS-8tOLfG2c7sfRbwRmp52wSvL4XBP9zhDiIVdpQ2m4UBal4yRNGE_XmQKngYwxgHn-gREyhiilU8SfUBL_6u6dH9CHCBNADsLM97P-jEs3nyy8H6W-JibW0 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1088_1742_6596_1796_1_012061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hlpt_2019_05_011 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/uog.7663 10.7863/ultra.33.7.1209 10.1143/JJAP.37.2781 10.1002/uog.15172 10.1017/S0965539514000035 10.1002/uog.1864 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.01.030 10.1016/j.jus.2008.12.001 10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.21 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.04035.x 10.7863/jum.2009.28.2.139 10.7863/jum.2011.30.7.981 10.1002/uog.14691 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2010.tb00176.x 10.1159/000184541 10.7863/jum.2007.26.3.319 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine. Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine © 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine – notice: 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine. – notice: Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine © 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION K9. NAPCQ 5PM |
DOI | 10.1002/ajum.12008 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Beirne, et al |
EISSN | 2205-0140 1836-6864 |
EndPage | 55 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_ajum_12008 34760443 AJUM12008 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 1OC 33P AAESR AAHHS AANLZ AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCUV ABDBF ABJNI ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEQDE AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AHBTC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB AOIJS AZFZN AZVAB BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE C45 DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM EBS EJD FUBAC HGLYW HYE KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LITHE LOXES LUTES LYRES MEWTI MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM O66 O9- OK1 OVD P2W ROL RPM SUPJJ TEORI WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WVDHM WXSBR ZZTAW NPM AAYXX CITATION K9. NAPCQ 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-40a6f986f2f12c47dec1fd9e40abf98ce06b2d95b9084534f9bc8cfd2f3cd1b83 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1836-6864 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:26:20 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:56:02 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 03:04:44 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:19:40 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 01:02:40 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | ultrasound bioeffects mechanical index sonographer knowledge 12 week scan survey thermal index ultrasound safety |
Language | English |
License | 2016 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2938-40a6f986f2f12c47dec1fd9e40abf98ce06b2d95b9084534f9bc8cfd2f3cd1b83 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ajum.12008 |
PMID | 34760443 |
PQID | 3078680951 |
PQPubID | 6975058 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8409548 proquest_journals_3078680951 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajum_12008 pubmed_primary_34760443 wiley_primary_10_1002_ajum_12008_AJUM12008 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May 2016 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2016 text: May 2016 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Australia |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia – name: Chatswood – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Australas J Ultrasound Med |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
References | 2009; 25 2010; 36 2010; 13 2012 2011 2013; 24 2008 1992; 18 2011; 30 1973 2007; 10 2012; 78 2005; 22 2009; 28 2005; 25 2009; 12 2015; 46 2015; 45 1998; 37 1983 2015 2014 2005; 2 2011; 27 2014; 33 2007; 26 O'Brien (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0013|ajum12008-cit-0013) 1998; 37 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0019|ajum12008-cit-0019 Sande (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0035|ajum12008-cit-0035) 2013; 24 Bromley (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0033|ajum12008-cit-0033) 2014; 33 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0001|ajum12008-cit-0001 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0018|ajum12008-cit-0018 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0003|ajum12008-cit-0003 Jia (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0006|ajum12008-cit-0006) 2005; 22 Nelson (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0009|ajum12008-cit-0009) 2009; 28 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0011|ajum12008-cit-0011 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0014|ajum12008-cit-0014 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0021|ajum12008-cit-0021 Selman (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0017|ajum12008-cit-0017) 1983 Choi (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0032|ajum12008-cit-0032) 2005; 2 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0020|ajum12008-cit-0020 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0010|ajum12008-cit-0010 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0024|ajum12008-cit-0024 Marsal (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0028|ajum12008-cit-0028) 2005; 25 Sheiner (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0002|ajum12008-cit-0002) 2007; 26 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0023|ajum12008-cit-0023 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0022|ajum12008-cit-0022 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0036|ajum12008-cit-0036 Sheiner (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0034|ajum12008-cit-0034) 2009; 25 Aiken (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0005|ajum12008-cit-0005) 2012; 78 Akhtar (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0025|ajum12008-cit-0025) 2011; 30 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0012|ajum12008-cit-0012) 1992; 18 Kagan (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0008|ajum12008-cit-0008) 2015; 45 Bagley (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0026|ajum12008-cit-0026) 2011; 27 Houston (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0027|ajum12008-cit-0027) 2011; 30 Hassall (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0015|ajum12008-cit-0015) 2007; 10 Necas (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0029|ajum12008-cit-0029) 2010; 13 Piscaglia (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0030|ajum12008-cit-0030) 2009; 12 Gill (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0004|ajum12008-cit-0004) 2012 Kagan (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0007|ajum12008-cit-0007) 2010; 36 International Commission on Radiological Protection (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0016|ajum12008-cit-0016) 1973 Indrielle (10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0031|ajum12008-cit-0031) 2015; 46 |
References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 7 article-title: First‐trimester contingent screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by fetal nuchal translucency and ductus venosus flow and maternal blood cell‐free DNA testing publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – year: 2011 – volume: 30 start-page: 981 issue: 7 year: 2011 end-page: 5 article-title: Ultrasound biosafety during pregnancy: what do operators know in the developing world? National survey findings from Pakistan publication-title: J Ultrasound Med – volume: 25 start-page: 211 issue: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 4 article-title: The output display standard: has it missed its target? publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 12 start-page: 6 year: 2009 end-page: 11 article-title: Knowledge of the bioeffects of ultrasound among physicians performing clinical ultrasonography: results of a survey conducted by the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB) publication-title: J Ultrasound – volume: 33 start-page: 1209 issue: 7 year: 2014 end-page: 14 article-title: Do clinical practitioners seeking credentialing for nuchal translucency measurement demonstrate compliance with biosafety recommendations? Experience of the nuchal translucency quality review program publication-title: J Ultrasound Med – volume: 13 start-page: 28 issue: 4 year: 2010 end-page: 32 article-title: New Zealand sonographers do not outperform their European or American colleagues in the knowledge of ultrasound safety publication-title: Australas J Ultrasound Med – volume: 25 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 10 article-title: Acoustic output as measured by thermal and mechanical indices during fetal nuchal translucency ultrasound examinations publication-title: Fetal Diagn Ther – volume: 24 start-page: 260 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 76 article-title: Ultrasound safety, power and image quality: what do we know? publication-title: Fetal Matern Med Rev – volume: 27 start-page: 252 issue: 6 year: 2011 end-page: 61 article-title: Safety practices of sonographers and their knowledge of the bioeffects of sonography publication-title: J Diagn Med Ultrasound – volume: 78 start-page: 539 issue: 4 year: 2012 end-page: 41 article-title: Long‐term effects of in utero Doppler ultrasound scanning – a developmental programming perspective publication-title: Med Hypotheses – year: 2014 – year: 2012 – start-page: 3 year: 1973 – volume: 22 start-page: 415 issue: 5 year: 2005 end-page: 20 article-title: Immediate and long‐term effects of color doppler ultrasound on myocardial cell apoptosis of fetal rats publication-title: Echocardiography – year: 2008 – start-page: 311 year: 1983 – volume: 26 start-page: 319 year: 2007 end-page: 25 article-title: What do clinical users know regarding safety of ultrasound during pregnancy? publication-title: J Ultrasound Med – volume: 30 start-page: 21 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 7 article-title: Ultrasound is safe… right?: resident and maternal‐fetal medicine fellow knowledge regarding obstetric ultrasound safety publication-title: J Ultrasound Med – volume: 36 start-page: 542 issue: 5 year: 2010 end-page: 7 article-title: Two‐stage first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 by ultrasound assessment and biochemical testing publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 18 start-page: 731 issue: 9 year: 1992 end-page: 810 article-title: WFUMB Symposium on Safety and Standardisation in Medical Ultrasound. Issues and recommendations regarding thermal mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. Hornbaek, Denmark, 30 August‐1 September 1991 publication-title: Ultrasound Med Biol – volume: 10 start-page: 29 issue: 3 year: 2007 end-page: 34 article-title: Sonography – the emergence of a profession publication-title: ASUM Ultrasound Bulletin – volume: 46 start-page: 74 year: 2015 end-page: 5 article-title: OP08.05: can ultrasound cause harm? Survey of ultrasound users in the UK of the safety aspects of ultrasound: a pilot study in two hospitals publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 28 start-page: 139 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 50 article-title: Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sonologist publication-title: J Ultrasound Med – volume: 37 start-page: 2781 issue: Part 1, No. 5B year: 1998 end-page: 88 article-title: Assessing the risks for modern diagnostic ultrasound imaging publication-title: Jpn J Appl Phys – year: 2015 – volume: 2 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2005 end-page: 13 article-title: A catalog of biases in questionnaires publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis – volume: 36 start-page: 542 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0007|ajum12008-cit-0007 article-title: Two-stage first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by ultrasound assessment and biochemical testing publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.7663 contributor: fullname: Kagan – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0022|ajum12008-cit-0022 – start-page: 311 volume-title: Elements of Radiobiology year: 1983 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0017|ajum12008-cit-0017 contributor: fullname: Selman – volume: 33 start-page: 1209 issue: 7 year: 2014 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0033|ajum12008-cit-0033 article-title: Do clinical practitioners seeking credentialing for nuchal translucency measurement demonstrate compliance with biosafety recommendations? Experience of the nuchal translucency quality review program publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.7.1209 contributor: fullname: Bromley – volume: 2 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0032|ajum12008-cit-0032 article-title: A catalog of biases in questionnaires publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis contributor: fullname: Choi – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0036|ajum12008-cit-0036 – volume: 37 start-page: 2781 issue: Part 1, No. 5B year: 1998 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0013|ajum12008-cit-0013 article-title: Assessing the risks for modern diagnostic ultrasound imaging publication-title: Jpn J Appl Phys doi: 10.1143/JJAP.37.2781 contributor: fullname: O'Brien – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0018|ajum12008-cit-0018 – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0011|ajum12008-cit-0011 – volume: 18 start-page: 731 issue: 9 year: 1992 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0012|ajum12008-cit-0012 article-title: WFUMB Symposium on Safety and Standardisation in Medical Ultrasound. Issues and recommendations regarding thermal mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. Hornbaek, Denmark, 30 August-1 September 1991 publication-title: Ultrasound Med Biol contributor: fullname: World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology – volume-title: The Physics and Technology of Diagnostic Ultrasound - A Practitioner's Guide year: 2012 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0004|ajum12008-cit-0004 contributor: fullname: Gill – volume: 46 start-page: 74 year: 2015 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0031|ajum12008-cit-0031 article-title: OP08.05: can ultrasound cause harm? Survey of ultrasound users in the UK of the safety aspects of ultrasound: a pilot study in two hospitals publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.15172 contributor: fullname: Indrielle – volume: 24 start-page: 260 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0035|ajum12008-cit-0035 article-title: Ultrasound safety, power and image quality: what do we know? publication-title: Fetal Matern Med Rev doi: 10.1017/S0965539514000035 contributor: fullname: Sande – volume: 25 start-page: 211 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0028|ajum12008-cit-0028 article-title: The output display standard: has it missed its target? publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.1864 contributor: fullname: Marsal – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0003|ajum12008-cit-0003 – volume: 78 start-page: 539 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0005|ajum12008-cit-0005 article-title: Long-term effects of in utero Doppler ultrasound scanning - a developmental programming perspective publication-title: Med Hypotheses doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.01.030 contributor: fullname: Aiken – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0014|ajum12008-cit-0014 – volume: 12 start-page: 6 year: 2009 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0030|ajum12008-cit-0030 article-title: Knowledge of the bioeffects of ultrasound among physicians performing clinical ultrasonography: results of a survey conducted by the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB) publication-title: J Ultrasound doi: 10.1016/j.jus.2008.12.001 contributor: fullname: Piscaglia – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0021|ajum12008-cit-0021 – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0010|ajum12008-cit-0010 – volume: 30 start-page: 21 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0027|ajum12008-cit-0027 article-title: Ultrasound is safe… right?: resident and maternal-fetal medicine fellow knowledge regarding obstetric ultrasound safety publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.21 contributor: fullname: Houston – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0024|ajum12008-cit-0024 – volume: 22 start-page: 415 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0006|ajum12008-cit-0006 article-title: Immediate and long-term effects of color doppler ultrasound on myocardial cell apoptosis of fetal rats publication-title: Echocardiography doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.04035.x contributor: fullname: Jia – volume: 28 start-page: 139 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0009|ajum12008-cit-0009 article-title: Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sonologist publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.2.139 contributor: fullname: Nelson – volume: 30 start-page: 981 issue: 7 year: 2011 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0025|ajum12008-cit-0025 article-title: Ultrasound biosafety during pregnancy: what do operators know in the developing world? National survey findings from Pakistan publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.7.981 contributor: fullname: Akhtar – start-page: 3 volume-title: Recommendations of the ICRP year: 1973 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0016|ajum12008-cit-0016 contributor: fullname: International Commission on Radiological Protection – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0020|ajum12008-cit-0020 – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0023|ajum12008-cit-0023 – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0001|ajum12008-cit-0001 – ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0019|ajum12008-cit-0019 – volume: 45 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0008|ajum12008-cit-0008 article-title: First-trimester contingent screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by fetal nuchal translucency and ductus venosus flow and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.14691 contributor: fullname: Kagan – volume: 10 start-page: 29 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0015|ajum12008-cit-0015 article-title: Sonography - the emergence of a profession publication-title: ASUM Ultrasound Bulletin contributor: fullname: Hassall – volume: 13 start-page: 28 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0029|ajum12008-cit-0029 article-title: New Zealand sonographers do not outperform their European or American colleagues in the knowledge of ultrasound safety publication-title: Australas J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2010.tb00176.x contributor: fullname: Necas – volume: 27 start-page: 252 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0026|ajum12008-cit-0026 article-title: Safety practices of sonographers and their knowledge of the bioeffects of sonography publication-title: J Diagn Med Ultrasound contributor: fullname: Bagley – volume: 25 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0034|ajum12008-cit-0034 article-title: Acoustic output as measured by thermal and mechanical indices during fetal nuchal translucency ultrasound examinations publication-title: Fetal Diagn Ther doi: 10.1159/000184541 contributor: fullname: Sheiner – volume: 26 start-page: 319 year: 2007 ident: 10.1002/ajum.12008-BIB0002|ajum12008-cit-0002 article-title: What do clinical users know regarding safety of ultrasound during pregnancy? publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.3.319 contributor: fullname: Sheiner |
SSID | ssj0001600377 |
Score | 2.0008945 |
Snippet | Objectives
To identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester... To identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester imaging;... ObjectivesTo identify gaps in Australian sonographer's knowledge and application of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles during first trimester... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 47 |
SubjectTerms | 12 week scan Knowledge mechanical index Obstetrics Original Research sonographer knowledge survey thermal index Ultrasonic imaging ultrasound bioeffects ultrasound safety |
Title | National survey of Australian sonographer knowledge and behaviour surrounding the ALARA principles when conducting the 11–14‐week obstetric screening ultrasound |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fajum.12008 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760443 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3078680951 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8409548 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NatwwEB6SHEp6KP2vk7QI2lPBuytbluSjCQ0hdEspXcjNWLJE0ux6F2-ckFseIZBX6JPlSTqS7e0ugR56M7IsCb6R9I08-gbgk4mFcOiGQjlRbRlbnFJFEjJ3HY1ZpbVHevyNH0_YyWlyugVJfxfGB-1rdT6oprNBdX7mYysXMz3s48SG38eHzilBpj3chm000DUX3R-scKep4pOqyJiHXHK2kiWNhsWvZjag7qf_LjyJmeAjxuLNPekR0XwcL7nOY_1GdPQcnnUMkmTtSF_AlqlewtM1XcFX8LtTu56SZVNfmRsyt-TvoQZBit0KVZuarM7USFGVpLu039Tuw9plXML2CHJEkn3NfmRk0R_NL8n1makIOtNOL7avROnD7T1lD7d318ZckLlCE3IZAAiuTegvu2rNFEexdC2_hsnRl5-Hx2GXjiHUyAkkepoFt6nkNrI00kyURlNbpgbLFZZrM-IqKtNEpSPJkpjZVGmpbRnZWJdUyfgN7FTzyrwDYnCuKyWEUUnBqOWFKFJtGMUOaMFGMoCPPSD5olXdyFt95Sh3COYewQAOeqzybuYtc1yzJJeOOAbwtoVt1USPdwBiA9BVBae1vfkGTdBrbncmF8BnD_0_RpVnJ5Oxf9r77272YReJGW8DKw9g57JuzHskP5fqgzf2P-3ECZ0 |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,888,27936,27937,53804,53806 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dbtMwFD4aQ4JxgfgnMMASXCGljRPHcS6jiamMdkJolXYXxY6tDdq0Shcm7vYISLwCT7Yn4dhJSqtJXHAXOY5t6fOxv-McfwfgnY6SxKLrJ9KKaovIoEkVsc_sdTRmpFIO6ckxH03Z0Wl8ugNxfxfGBe0reT6oZvNBdX7mYiuXczXs48SGnycH1ilBpj28BbfRXgO24aS7oxVuVVVcWhURcZ8LztbCpOGw-NrMB9T-9t-DOxFLeMBYtL0r3aCaNyMmN5ms24oOH8D9jkOSrB3rQ9jR1SO4t6Es-Bh-d3rXM7Jq6u_6B1kY8vdYgyDJbqWqdU3Wp2qkqErSXdtvavthbXMuYXsEWSLJxtmXjCz7w_kVuTzTFUF32irG9pUovb76Rdn11c9Lrb-RhcRJZHMAEFyd0GO21ZoZjmJlW34C08MPJwcjv0vI4CtkBQJ9zYKbVHATGhoqlpRaUVOmGssllisdcBmWaSzTQLA4YiaVSihThiZSJZUiegq71aLSz4FotHYpk0TLuGDU8CIpUqUZxQ5owQLhwdsekHzZ6m7krcJymFsEc4egB_s9Vnlne6scVy3BhaWOHjxrYVs30ePtQbIF6LqCVdvefoOT0Klud5POg_cO-n-MKs-OphP39OK_u3kDd0cnk3E-_nj86SXsIU3jbZjlPuxe1I1-hVToQr52E_8PAxMM8w |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtQwEB5Bkar2gPgnUMASnJCyGyeO4xyjwqqUblUhVuotih1bLexmV9mmFbc-AhKvwJP1SRg7ybKrShy4RY5jW_r8881k_A3AOx0liUXXT6QV1RaRwSVVxD6z19GYkUo5pMfH_GDCDk_j07VUXy5oX8nzQTWdDarzMxdbuZipYR8nNjwZ71ujBJn2cFGa4V24h2s24GuGunOvcKus4lKriIj7XHC2EicNh8W3Zjag9tf_DmxHLOEBY9HmyXSLbt6Omlxns-44Gj2A-x2PJFk73odwR1ePYHdNXfAx_O40r6dk2dSX-geZG_LXtUGQaLdy1bomK88aKaqSdFf3m9p-WNu8S9geQaZIsqPsS0YWvYN-Sa7OdEXQpLaqsX0lSm-uf1F2c_3zSuvvZC5xItk8AAR3KLSabbVmiqNY2pafwGT08ev-gd8lZfAVMgOB9mbBTSq4CQ0NFUtKragpU43lEsuVDrgMyzSWaSBYHDGTSiWUKUMTqZJKET2FrWpe6edANK54KZNEy7hg1PAiKVKlGcUOaMEC4cHbHpB80Wpv5K3KcphbBHOHoAd7PVZ5t_6WOe5cggtLHz141sK2aqLH24NkA9BVBau4vfkGJ6JT3u4mngfvHfT_GFWeHU7G7unFf3fzBrZPPozyo0_Hn1_CDjI13kZa7sHWRd3oV8iGLuRrN-__AMPiDgY |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National+survey+of+Australian+sonographer+knowledge+and+behaviour+surrounding+the+ALARA+principles+when+conducting+the+11-14-week+obstetric+screening+ultrasound&rft.jtitle=Australasian+journal+of+ultrasound+in+medicine&rft.au=Beirne%2C+Geraldene+Carruthers&rft.au=Westerway%2C+Susan+Campbell&rft.au=Ng%2C+Curtise+Kin+Cheung&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.issn=1836-6864&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=47&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fajum.12008&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34760443&rft.externalDocID=34760443 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1836-6864&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1836-6864&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1836-6864&client=summon |