A comparison of riparian vegetation sampling methods along a large, regulated river
Monitoring riparian vegetation cover and species richness is an important component of assessing change and understanding ecosystem processes. Vegetation sampling methods determined to be the best option in other ecosystems (e.g., desert grasslands and arctic tundra) may not be the best option in mu...
Saved in:
Published in | River research and applications Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 759 - 767 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bognor Regis
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.07.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Monitoring riparian vegetation cover and species richness is an important component of assessing change and understanding ecosystem processes. Vegetation sampling methods determined to be the best option in other ecosystems (e.g., desert grasslands and arctic tundra) may not be the best option in multilayered, species rich, heterogeneous riparian vegetation. This study examines the strengths and weaknesses of two common vegetation sampling methods, line‐point intercept and ocular quadrat estimates. Permutational analysis of variance analyses indicate that cover estimates among observers did not differ significantly for either line‐point intercept or ocular quadrat estimates. Line‐point intercept cover estimates resulted in lower coefficient of variation among observers than ocular quadrat estimates, but the ocular quadrat estimates recorded significantly more species. Line‐point estimates of cover were generally larger than ocular quadrat estimates. Ocular quadrat estimates are appropriate when assessment of richness is important, in areas with heterogeneous geomorphology and hydrology where fine‐scale measurements are most useful, and in areas where continuous sampling transects are impracticable. Line‐point intercept estimates are useful when minimum variation among observers is necessary, continuous transects are logical and practicable for the sampling area, woody cover does not present a logistical complication, and species richness is not a priority. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Monitoring riparian vegetation cover and species richness is an important component of assessing change and understanding ecosystem processes. Vegetation sampling methods determined to be the best option in other ecosystems (e.g., desert grasslands and arctic tundra) may not be the best option in multilayered, species rich, heterogeneous riparian vegetation. This study examines the strengths and weaknesses of two common vegetation sampling methods, line‐point intercept and ocular quadrat estimates. Permutational analysis of variance analyses indicate that cover estimates among observers did not differ significantly for either line‐point intercept or ocular quadrat estimates. Line‐point intercept cover estimates resulted in lower coefficient of variation among observers than ocular quadrat estimates, but the ocular quadrat estimates recorded significantly more species. Line‐point estimates of cover were generally larger than ocular quadrat estimates. Ocular quadrat estimates are appropriate when assessment of richness is important, in areas with heterogeneous geomorphology and hydrology where fine‐scale measurements are most useful, and in areas where continuous sampling transects are impracticable. Line‐point intercept estimates are useful when minimum variation among observers is necessary, continuous transects are logical and practicable for the sampling area, woody cover does not present a logistical complication, and species richness is not a priority. Abstract Monitoring riparian vegetation cover and species richness is an important component of assessing change and understanding ecosystem processes. Vegetation sampling methods determined to be the best option in other ecosystems (e.g., desert grasslands and arctic tundra) may not be the best option in multilayered, species rich, heterogeneous riparian vegetation. This study examines the strengths and weaknesses of two common vegetation sampling methods, line‐point intercept and ocular quadrat estimates. Permutational analysis of variance analyses indicate that cover estimates among observers did not differ significantly for either line‐point intercept or ocular quadrat estimates. Line‐point intercept cover estimates resulted in lower coefficient of variation among observers than ocular quadrat estimates, but the ocular quadrat estimates recorded significantly more species. Line‐point estimates of cover were generally larger than ocular quadrat estimates. Ocular quadrat estimates are appropriate when assessment of richness is important, in areas with heterogeneous geomorphology and hydrology where fine‐scale measurements are most useful, and in areas where continuous sampling transects are impracticable. Line‐point intercept estimates are useful when minimum variation among observers is necessary, continuous transects are logical and practicable for the sampling area, woody cover does not present a logistical complication, and species richness is not a priority. |
Author | Palmquist, Emily C. Ralston, Barbara E. Sterner, Sarah A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Emily C. orcidid: 0000-0003-1069-2154 surname: Palmquist fullname: Palmquist, Emily C. email: epalmquist@usgs.gov organization: U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Sarah A. orcidid: 0000-0001-7984-967X surname: Sterner fullname: Sterner, Sarah A. organization: U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center – sequence: 3 givenname: Barbara E. orcidid: 0000-0001-9991-8994 surname: Ralston fullname: Ralston, Barbara E. organization: U.S. Geological Survey |
BookMark | eNp1kE9LAzEQxYNUsK2CHyHgxYNbJ9nN_jmWYlUoCFXPYZpN1i27mzXZVvrtTa148zTzht_MG96EjDrbaUKuGcwYAL93DmdxksAZGTMRi4glaTb660VxQSbebwFYlhf5mLzOqbJtj672tqPWUFcfBXZ0rys94FCHsce2b-quoq0ePmzpKTY2KKQNukrfUaerXYODLsP2XrtLcm6w8frqt07J-_LhbfEUrV4enxfzVaR4EUOESR5-w1LEyQYx5ToxPIWy3BRQZpCp3BhhlALMlSgyzFIDLDW5UjmgQl3GU3Jzuts7-7nTfpBbu3NdsJSci4KLJAYRqNsTpZz13mkje1e36A6SgTxGJkNk8hhZQKMT-lU3-vAvJ9fr-Q__DYSub4k |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_168113 crossref_primary_10_5194_esurf_11_1223_2023 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/esp.3397 10.3398/064.077.0309 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00314.x 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02223.x 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-367 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00182.x 10.3133/pp1677 10.1650/7242 10.1023/A:1014259902449 10.3133/tm2A14 10.1002/1099-1646(200011/12)16:6<543::AID-RRR590>3.0.CO;2-N 10.3133/ofr20071266 10.1890/04-0668 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.011 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01328.x 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.026 10.3398/064.077.0104 10.2307/3237188 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0170.x 10.1890/09-2296.1 10.3354/meps096093 10.2307/3236309 10.1007/s11273-012-9280-4 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-138 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.009 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020598.x 10.1139/as-2015-0020 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02234.x 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.04.032 10.1002/ece3.2975 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA – notice: 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7QH 7SN 7SS 7ST 7UA C1K F1W H95 H96 L.G SOI |
DOI | 10.1002/rra.3440 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Aqualine Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Environment Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aqualine Environment Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Entomology Abstracts CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 1535-1467 |
EndPage | 767 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_rra_3440 RRA3440 |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: U.S. Department of the Interior |
GroupedDBID | ..I .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1L6 1OB 1OC 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AHBTC AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD F00 F01 F04 FEDTE G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K ROL RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ TWZ UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WRC WUPDE WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XV2 Y6R ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAYXX CITATION 7QH 7SN 7SS 7ST 7UA C1K F1W H95 H96 L.G SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-a48467ad534baa62e4f260ddb90d707c8ff5fcc0a8c597a76f016f8cc80acaed3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1535-1459 |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 10 15:40:41 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 03:10:43 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 01:14:42 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2930-a48467ad534baa62e4f260ddb90d707c8ff5fcc0a8c597a76f016f8cc80acaed3 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9991-8994 0000-0001-7984-967X 0000-0003-1069-2154 |
PQID | 2259254305 |
PQPubID | 1046366 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2259254305 crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_3440 wiley_primary_10_1002_rra_3440_RRA3440 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2019 2019-07-00 20190701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2019 text: July 2019 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Bognor Regis |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Bognor Regis |
PublicationTitle | River research and applications |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2017; 7 2002; 75 2013; 21 2015; 96 2011; 75 2008 2003; 14 2005; 63 1997; 28 2005; 86 2007 2005 2004 2003 2002 2004; 106 1996; 10 2007; 13 2003; 11 2011; 126 2016; 2 2000; 16 2001 2017; 77 2004; 15 1993; 96 2019 2009; 9 2018 2011; 21 1999; 10 2017 2015 2014 2005; 50 2014; 39 1996; 7 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 Grams P. E. (e_1_2_8_12_1) 2015; 96 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 Anderson M. J. (e_1_2_8_3_1) 2008 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 Stevens L. E. (e_1_2_8_38_1) 2002 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 Herrick J. E. (e_1_2_8_15_1) 2005 Elzinga C. L. (e_1_2_8_9_1) 2001 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 |
References_xml | – start-page: 241 year: 2002 end-page: 266 – volume: 14 start-page: 899 issue: 6 year: 2003 end-page: 906 article-title: Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 75 start-page: 1228 issue: 11 year: 2011 end-page: 1231 article-title: A comparison of methods to assess long‐term changes in Sonoran Desert vegetation publication-title: Journal of Arid Environments – volume: 7 start-page: 593 issue: 4 year: 1996 end-page: 598 article-title: Do rivers function as corridors for plant dispersal? publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 77 start-page: 22 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 30 article-title: Functional traits and ecological affinities of riparian plants along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon publication-title: Western North American Naturalist – year: 2005 – volume: 11 start-page: 504 issue: 4 year: 2003 end-page: 515 article-title: Sampling techniques influence understory plant trajectories after restoration—An example from ponderosa pine restoration publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 75 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 2002 end-page: 78 article-title: Evaluation of metric precision for a riparian forest survey publication-title: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment – volume: 15 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2004 end-page: 40 article-title: Reproducibility of vegetation cover estimates in south‐central Alaska forests publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – year: 2001 – year: 2007 – year: 2003 – volume: 21 start-page: 452 issue: 2 year: 2011 end-page: 464 article-title: Assessing the performance of sampling designs for measuring the abundance of understory plants publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 106 start-page: 106 issue: 1 year: 2004 end-page: 115 article-title: Diets of insectivorous birds along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona publication-title: The Condor – year: 2018 – volume: 86 start-page: 56 issue: 1 year: 2005 end-page: 62 article-title: Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species publication-title: Ecology – volume: 39 start-page: 4 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 25 article-title: Plants as river system engineers publication-title: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms – year: 2014 – volume: 28 start-page: 621 year: 1997 end-page: 658 article-title: The ecology of interfaces—Riparian zones publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – volume: 11 start-page: 325 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 333 article-title: A comparison of remote sensing and ground‐based methods for monitoring wetland restoration success publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 63 start-page: 785 issue: 4 year: 2005 end-page: 813 article-title: Riparian plant species richness along lateral and longitudinal gradients of water stress and flood disturbance, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA publication-title: Journal of Arid Environments – volume: 21 start-page: 71 issue: 21 year: 2013 end-page: 85 article-title: Comparing survey methods for monitoring vegetation change through time in a restored peatland publication-title: Wetlands Ecology and Management – volume: 10 start-page: 598 issue: 2 year: 1996 end-page: 607 article-title: Invasibility of species‐rich communities in riparian zones publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 96 start-page: 12 issue: 11 year: 2015 end-page: 16 article-title: Building sandbars in the Grand Canyon publication-title: Eos – volume: 7 start-page: 3732 year: 2017 end-page: 3744 article-title: Variation in species‐level plant functional traits over wetland indicator status categories publication-title: Ecology and Evolution – year: 2008 – volume: 13 start-page: 126 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 139 article-title: Riparian vegetation—Degredation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects publication-title: Diversity and Distributions – year: 2004 – volume: 9 start-page: 1001 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 1008 article-title: Comparison of three vegetation monitoring methods—Their relative utility for ecological assessment and monitoring publication-title: Ecological Indicators – volume: 10 start-page: 537 issue: 4 year: 1999 end-page: 548 article-title: Plant communities and landscape diversity along a Canadian Arctic river publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – year: 2017 – volume: 96 start-page: 93 issue: 1 year: 1993 end-page: 100 article-title: Visual versus random‐point percent cover estimations: ‘Objective’ is not always better publication-title: Marine Ecology Progress Series – volume: 77 start-page: 369 issue: 3 year: 2017 end-page: 384 article-title: Taxonomic and compositional differences of ground‐dwelling arthropods in riparian habitats in Glen Canyon, Arizona, USA publication-title: Western North American Naturalist – year: 2019 – volume: 2 start-page: 127 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 141 article-title: What is the most efficient and effective method for long‐term monitoring of alpine tundra vegetation? publication-title: Arctic Science – volume: 16 start-page: 543 issue: 6 year: 2000 end-page: 564 article-title: Riparian vegetation and channel change in response to river regulation—A comparative study of regulated and unregulated streams in the Green River Basin, USA publication-title: Regulated Rivers: Research & Management – year: 2015 – volume: 50 start-page: 201 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: 220 article-title: Tangled webs—Reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones publication-title: Freshwater Biology – volume: 126 start-page: 333 issue: 3–4 year: 2011 end-page: 349 article-title: The role of feedback mechanisms in historic channel changes of the lower Rio Grande in the Big Bend region publication-title: Geomorphology – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1002/esp.3397 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.3398/064.077.0309 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00314.x – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02223.x – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-367 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00182.x – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.3133/pp1677 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1650/7242 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1014259902449 – start-page: 241 volume-title: Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 contributor: fullname: Stevens L. E. – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.3133/tm2A14 – volume-title: PERMANOVA+ for primer—Guide to software and statistical methods year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 contributor: fullname: Anderson M. J. – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1002/1099-1646(200011/12)16:6<543::AID-RRR590>3.0.CO;2-N – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.3133/ofr20071266 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1890/04-0668 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.011 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01328.x – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.026 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.3398/064.077.0104 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.2307/3237188 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0170.x – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1890/09-2296.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.3354/meps096093 – volume: 96 start-page: 12 issue: 11 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 article-title: Building sandbars in the Grand Canyon publication-title: Eos contributor: fullname: Grams P. E. – volume-title: Monitoring manual for grassland, shrubland and savanna ecosystems—Volumes I and II year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 contributor: fullname: Herrick J. E. – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.2307/3236309 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1007/s11273-012-9280-4 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-138 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.009 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020598.x – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1139/as-2015-0020 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02234.x – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.04.032 – volume-title: Monitoring plant and animal populations, a handbook for field biologists year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 contributor: fullname: Elzinga C. L. – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1002/ece3.2975 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 |
SSID | ssj0017898 |
Score | 2.2966309 |
Snippet | Monitoring riparian vegetation cover and species richness is an important component of assessing change and understanding ecosystem processes. Vegetation... Abstract Monitoring riparian vegetation cover and species richness is an important component of assessing change and understanding ecosystem processes.... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 759 |
SubjectTerms | Coefficient of variation data variability Deserts Ecosystem assessment Ecosystems Environmental changes Environmental monitoring Estimates Geomorphology Grasslands Hydrology line‐point intercept long‐term monitoring Observers ocular quadrat estimates Plant cover Polar environments Riparian vegetation Rivers Sampling Sampling methods Small mammals Species richness Tundra Variance analysis Vegetation Vegetation cover vegetation sampling methods |
Title | A comparison of riparian vegetation sampling methods along a large, regulated river |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Frra.3440 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2259254305 |
Volume | 35 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fS8MwEA6yJ33wtzidEkF8slvWpm36OMQxBH2YDgY-lEua7MHRybr54F_vpWm3KQjiUwn0IM3l7r4rd98Rcm17PX2QyouSABMUKbgnVSQ8oUHGBgOKAtso_PgUDUb8YRyOq6pK2wvj-CFWP9ysZZT-2ho4yKKzJg2dz6EdcG7TdcujZ_HQcMUc1Y1FOQYX7Tn0ujxMat5Z5ndqwe-RaA0vN0FqGWX6e-S13p8rLnlrLxeyrT5_UDf-7wP2yW4FPmnP3ZYDsqXzQ7KzQUl4RJ57VK1GE9KZoehUcAE5_dCTqjSRFmDr0PMJdfOnCwrTGa6ATm1d-S2duwH3OkNpNJVjMurfv9wNvGrwgqcw-jMPuEUlkIUBlwCRr7nBtCfLZMKymMVKGBMapRgIhfkIxJFB4GiEUoIB6jYLTkgjn-X6lFCTiFibCEGCyXjkS4hB2n5tDibkAeNNclUrIX13_BqpY1L2Uzyg1B5Qk7Rq7aSVhRUp-qHENvKzsEluymP-VT4dDnv2efbXF8_JNuKixFXltkhjMV_qC8QeC3lZ3rIv11LXAg |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,1382,27955,27956,46327,46751 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEB5ED-rBt1ifK4gnU2OySTZ4Kmqp2vZQW_AghNlN1oOSSlo9-OudzaOtgiCewkIWkt39Zr5ZZr4BODG1ng5KZfmhSwGKFNySyheWSFAGmhyKQlMo3On6rQG_e_Qe5-CyqoUp9CEmF24GGbm9NgA3F9LnU9XQLMO6yznF6wuEds-g8ro30Y66CETeCJcQ7VkX3Asr5VnbOa9mfvdFU4I5S1NzP9NchafqC4v0kpf6-1jW1ecP8cZ__sIarJT8kzWKA7MOc0m6AcszqoSb8NBgatKdkA01I7tCA0zZR_JcZieyEZpU9PSZFS2oRwxfhzRC9mpSy89YVvS4T2KaTWjZgkHzpn_VssreC5YiAmBbyA0xwdhzuUT0nYRrinziWIZ2HNiBElp7WikbhaKQBANfE3fUQilhI21v7G7DfDpMkx1gOhRBon3iCTrmviMxQGlKtjlqj7s2r8FxtQvRWyGxERViyk5ECxSZBarBfrU9UQmyUUSmKDS1_LZXg9N8nX-dH_V6DfPc_euLR7DY6nfaUfu2e78HS0STwiJJdx_mx9l7ckBUZCwP8yP3BVWe2yI |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEF6kgujBt1ituoJ4MnWbbJLNsVhLfRWpFgoewuwm24MlLX148Nc7m0dbBUE8hYUMbHZ2Zr4JM98QcmF6PW2QyvICBxMUKbgllScsEYP0NQYUBaZR-Knttbr8vuf28qpK0wuT8UPMf7gZy0j9tTHwUaSvF6Sh4zFUHc4xXV_lnmObxKvRmVNH1XyRzsFFg3atGneDgniW2deF5PdQtMCXyyg1DTPNLfJWbDCrLnmvzqayqj5_cDf-7wu2yWaOPmk9uy47ZCVOdsnGEifhHnmpUzWfTUiHmqJXwQUk9CPu57WJdAKmED3p02wA9YTCYIgroANTWH5Fx9mE-zhCabSVfdJt3r7etKx88oKlMPwzC7iBJRC5DpcAnh1zjXlPFMmART7zldDa1UoxEAoTEvA9jchRC6UEA1Ru5ByQUjJM4kNCdSD8WHuIEnTEPVuCD9I0bHPQLncYL5PzQgnhKCPYCDMqZTvEAwrNAZVJpdBOmJvYJERHFJhOfuaWyWV6zL_Kh51O3TyP_vriGVl7bjTDx7v2wzFZR4wUZBW6FVKajmfxCeKQqTxNL9wX7aLZ0Q |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+riparian+vegetation+sampling+methods+along+a+large%2C+regulated+river&rft.jtitle=River+research+and+applications&rft.au=Palmquist%2C+Emily+C.&rft.au=Sterner%2C+Sarah+A.&rft.au=Ralston%2C+Barbara+E.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=767&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Frra.3440&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_rra_3440 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1535-1459&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1535-1459&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1535-1459&client=summon |