The Future of Religion and Secularity in Sociology’s History

• Published in: The American sociologist Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 591 - 609
• Main Author: Peker, Efe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York American Sociological Association 01.09.2021; Springer US; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: 19th century; Epistemology; Marginality; Modernization; Religion; Religious beliefs; Secularization; Social Sciences; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Religion; History; Sociology; Secularization
• DOI: 10.1007/s12108-021-09507-y
• ISSN: 0003-1232

Despite being foundational for the origins of modern sociology, religion as a topic of inquiry and the sociology of religion as a subdiscipline have long remained relatively marginalized in the sociological field. Losing sight of sociology’s profound initial engagement with religion, or a one-sided understanding of it as indifferent or unsympathetic towards the subject, may have contributed to this phenomenon. This article revisits early sociologists’ and the larger family of social philosophers’ involvement with religion to offer a more nuanced history. It argues that the religious question was crucial for the development of sociological thinking in three interrelated dimensions: epistemological, normative, and empirical. Epistemologically, social theorists questioned whether the scientific study of society was reconcilable with the premises of faith. Normatively, they were directly or indirectly involved with the question of whether religion should continue to exist and in what forms. Empirically, the main interest was how religion was changing via modernization, or whether it would survive it, which prompted methodological innovations and became the core of the secularization debate. Focusing on key social thinkers from the Enlightenment to the classics of the long nineteenth century, the article discusses the significance of the engagement with religion and secularity for the consolidation of sociology in these three dimensions, as well as its ongoing relevance for the discipline’s future.