Predicting Pressure Injury in Critical Care Patients: A Machine-Learning Model

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a serious problem among critical care patients. Some can be prevented by using measures such as specialty beds, which are not feasible for every patient because of costs. However, decisions about which patient would benefit most from a specialty bed are diffic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of critical care Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 461 - 468
Main Authors Alderden, Jenny, Pepper, Ginette Alyce, Wilson, Andrew, Whitney, Joanne D, Richardson, Stephanie, Butcher, Ryan, Jo, Yeonjung, Cummins, Mollie Rebecca
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.11.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a serious problem among critical care patients. Some can be prevented by using measures such as specialty beds, which are not feasible for every patient because of costs. However, decisions about which patient would benefit most from a specialty bed are difficult because results of existing tools to determine risk for pressure injury indicate that most critical care patients are at high risk. To develop a model for predicting development of pressure injuries among surgical critical care patients. Data from electronic health records were divided into training (67%) and testing (33%) data sets, and a model was developed by using a random forest algorithm via the R package "randomforest." Among a sample of 6376 patients, hospital-acquired pressure injuries of stage 1 or greater (outcome variable 1) developed in 516 patients (8.1%) and injuries of stage 2 or greater (outcome variable 2) developed in 257 (4.0%). Random forest models were developed to predict stage 1 and greater and stage 2 and greater injuries by using the testing set to evaluate classifier performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both models was 0.79. This machine-learning approach differs from other available models because it does not require clinicians to input information into a tool (eg, the Braden Scale). Rather, it uses information readily available in electronic health records. Next steps include testing in an independent sample and then calibration to optimize specificity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1062-3264
1937-710X
DOI:10.4037/ajcc2018525