Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study

The purpose of this study was to compare standardized uptake values (SUVs) of normal tissues using MR attenuation-corrected versus CT attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET in a pediatric population. Thirty-five patients (21 boys; mean age, 13.3 years) referred for 47 PET/CT scans were recruited to und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 205; no. 5; pp. 1094 - 1101
Main Authors Lyons, Karen, Seghers, Victor, Sorensen, James I. L., Zhang, Wei, Paldino, Michael J., Krishnamurthy, Rajesh, Rohren, Eric M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-803X
1546-3141
1546-3141
DOI10.2214/AJR.15.14304

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare standardized uptake values (SUVs) of normal tissues using MR attenuation-corrected versus CT attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET in a pediatric population. Thirty-five patients (21 boys; mean age, 13.3 years) referred for 47 PET/CT scans were recruited to undergo PET/MRI. MR attenuation correction was performed using an automated three-segment model. ROIs were drawn over nine normal structures to estimate SUV(min), SUV(mean), and SUV(max). Pearson rank correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUVs obtained from MR and CT attenuation correction. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI studies, coefficients of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate intrapatient SUV(max) variation. Mean (± SD) time to imaging after FDG injection was 108 ± 17 minutes for PET/CT and 61 ± 6 minutes for PET/MRI. PET/MRI SUVs in all tissues were lower than those for PET/CT (mean difference, -28.9% ± 31.1%; p < 0.05). Very high or high correlation between PET/MRI and PET/CT SUV(max) was found in brain (r = 0.72), myocardium (r = 0.95), and bone marrow (r = 0.85) (p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was found in liver (r = 0.54), fat (r = 0.41), mean blood pool (r = 0.40), and psoas muscle (r = 0.38) (p < 0.01). Weak correlation was found in lung (r = 0.12) and iliacus muscle (r = 0.12). Compared with PET/CT, PET/MRI systematically undermeasured SUV. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI examinations, moderate or strong agreement was found in the SUV(max) of six of nine tissues, similar to the corresponding PET/CT examinations. Our study showed overall high correlation for SUV measurements obtained from MR attenuation correction compared with CT attenuation correction, although PET/MRI underestimated SUV compared with PET/CT. SUVs measured from PET/MRI indicated good intrapatient reliability.
AbstractList The purpose of this study was to compare standardized uptake values (SUVs) of normal tissues using MR attenuation-corrected versus CT attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET in a pediatric population. Thirty-five patients (21 boys; mean age, 13.3 years) referred for 47 PET/CT scans were recruited to undergo PET/MRI. MR attenuation correction was performed using an automated three-segment model. ROIs were drawn over nine normal structures to estimate SUV(min), SUV(mean), and SUV(max). Pearson rank correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUVs obtained from MR and CT attenuation correction. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI studies, coefficients of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate intrapatient SUV(max) variation. Mean (± SD) time to imaging after FDG injection was 108 ± 17 minutes for PET/CT and 61 ± 6 minutes for PET/MRI. PET/MRI SUVs in all tissues were lower than those for PET/CT (mean difference, -28.9% ± 31.1%; p < 0.05). Very high or high correlation between PET/MRI and PET/CT SUV(max) was found in brain (r = 0.72), myocardium (r = 0.95), and bone marrow (r = 0.85) (p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was found in liver (r = 0.54), fat (r = 0.41), mean blood pool (r = 0.40), and psoas muscle (r = 0.38) (p < 0.01). Weak correlation was found in lung (r = 0.12) and iliacus muscle (r = 0.12). Compared with PET/CT, PET/MRI systematically undermeasured SUV. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI examinations, moderate or strong agreement was found in the SUV(max) of six of nine tissues, similar to the corresponding PET/CT examinations. Our study showed overall high correlation for SUV measurements obtained from MR attenuation correction compared with CT attenuation correction, although PET/MRI underestimated SUV compared with PET/CT. SUVs measured from PET/MRI indicated good intrapatient reliability.
The purpose of this study was to compare standardized uptake values (SUVs) of normal tissues using MR attenuation-corrected versus CT attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET in a pediatric population.OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to compare standardized uptake values (SUVs) of normal tissues using MR attenuation-corrected versus CT attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET in a pediatric population.Thirty-five patients (21 boys; mean age, 13.3 years) referred for 47 PET/CT scans were recruited to undergo PET/MRI. MR attenuation correction was performed using an automated three-segment model. ROIs were drawn over nine normal structures to estimate SUV(min), SUV(mean), and SUV(max). Pearson rank correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUVs obtained from MR and CT attenuation correction. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI studies, coefficients of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate intrapatient SUV(max) variation.SUBJECTS AND METHODSThirty-five patients (21 boys; mean age, 13.3 years) referred for 47 PET/CT scans were recruited to undergo PET/MRI. MR attenuation correction was performed using an automated three-segment model. ROIs were drawn over nine normal structures to estimate SUV(min), SUV(mean), and SUV(max). Pearson rank correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUVs obtained from MR and CT attenuation correction. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI studies, coefficients of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate intrapatient SUV(max) variation.Mean (± SD) time to imaging after FDG injection was 108 ± 17 minutes for PET/CT and 61 ± 6 minutes for PET/MRI. PET/MRI SUVs in all tissues were lower than those for PET/CT (mean difference, -28.9% ± 31.1%; p < 0.05). Very high or high correlation between PET/MRI and PET/CT SUV(max) was found in brain (r = 0.72), myocardium (r = 0.95), and bone marrow (r = 0.85) (p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was found in liver (r = 0.54), fat (r = 0.41), mean blood pool (r = 0.40), and psoas muscle (r = 0.38) (p < 0.01). Weak correlation was found in lung (r = 0.12) and iliacus muscle (r = 0.12). Compared with PET/CT, PET/MRI systematically undermeasured SUV. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI examinations, moderate or strong agreement was found in the SUV(max) of six of nine tissues, similar to the corresponding PET/CT examinations.RESULTSMean (± SD) time to imaging after FDG injection was 108 ± 17 minutes for PET/CT and 61 ± 6 minutes for PET/MRI. PET/MRI SUVs in all tissues were lower than those for PET/CT (mean difference, -28.9% ± 31.1%; p < 0.05). Very high or high correlation between PET/MRI and PET/CT SUV(max) was found in brain (r = 0.72), myocardium (r = 0.95), and bone marrow (r = 0.85) (p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was found in liver (r = 0.54), fat (r = 0.41), mean blood pool (r = 0.40), and psoas muscle (r = 0.38) (p < 0.01). Weak correlation was found in lung (r = 0.12) and iliacus muscle (r = 0.12). Compared with PET/CT, PET/MRI systematically undermeasured SUV. In nine patients who underwent multiple PET/MRI examinations, moderate or strong agreement was found in the SUV(max) of six of nine tissues, similar to the corresponding PET/CT examinations.Our study showed overall high correlation for SUV measurements obtained from MR attenuation correction compared with CT attenuation correction, although PET/MRI underestimated SUV compared with PET/CT. SUVs measured from PET/MRI indicated good intrapatient reliability.CONCLUSIONOur study showed overall high correlation for SUV measurements obtained from MR attenuation correction compared with CT attenuation correction, although PET/MRI underestimated SUV compared with PET/CT. SUVs measured from PET/MRI indicated good intrapatient reliability.
Author Rohren, Eric M.
Lyons, Karen
Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
Zhang, Wei
Sorensen, James I. L.
Seghers, Victor
Paldino, Michael J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Karen
  surname: Lyons
  fullname: Lyons, Karen
  organization: Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Victor
  surname: Seghers
  fullname: Seghers, Victor
  organization: Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030
– sequence: 3
  givenname: James I. L.
  surname: Sorensen
  fullname: Sorensen, James I. L.
  organization: Department of Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Wei
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Wei
  organization: Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Michael J.
  surname: Paldino
  fullname: Paldino, Michael J.
  organization: Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Rajesh
  surname: Krishnamurthy
  fullname: Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
  organization: Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St, Ste 470, Houston, TX 77030
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Eric M.
  surname: Rohren
  fullname: Rohren, Eric M.
  organization: Department of Radiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26496558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkUtv1DAUhS1URKctO9bISxZk6ldsh90wKrSohVE7Rews176RDEkcHAdUfkR_c93XpmJ1fa3vHOncs4d2hjgAQm8oWTJGxeHqy_mS1ksqOBEv0ILWQlacCrqDFoRLWmnCf-yivWn6SQhRulGv0C6TopF1rRfoZh370aYwxQHHFl9kO3ibfPgHHl-O2f4C_N12M0w4DPhrTL3tCpRml-dUPj9C_gsw4M3R9nC9xUV8_zw7P7njLd5CysGma7wBH2xOweHjOI0h2-4DXuFNKgu4HP5AcZ399QF62dpugtePcx9dfjraro-r02-fT9ar08qxhuZKaK9F3ajaE60UF9JB7T1jrW0bYMILpqTkVJJWXHEuraON5oQLSrUCaBXfR-8efMcUf5d02fRhctB1doA4T4YqphpdM6EL-vYRna968GZMoS-JzNMNC8AeAFfSTAla40q-HOKQkw2docTcFWVKUYbW5r6oInr_TPTk-1_8FpEQkos
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_019_04578_z
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines4040024
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2022_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPH_0000000000001465
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_022_01748_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2023_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_017_5213_1
crossref_primary_10_37549_AR2528
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_016_0638_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_021_05076_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_576409
crossref_primary_10_3390_biom11111659
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nic_2022_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41824_022_00125_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_020_04650_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00256_022_04113_6
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_120_259747
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000000912
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_016_3601_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41824_019_0055_5
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_18_20531
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16081514
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10957_4
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2016152798
crossref_primary_10_1093_nop_npx008
crossref_primary_10_17946_JRST_2018_41_6_553
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_017_0207_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2016_12_005
crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A7464
Cites_doi 10.1148/radiol.14131732
10.1007/s11307-008-0177-9
10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/013
10.1007/s00259-001-0698-9
10.1002/pbc.21150
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.008
10.1007/s11307-013-0629-8
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827a49ba
10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
10.1007/s11307-012-0600-0
10.2967/jnumed.111.098608
10.2967/jnumed.112.113209
10.1007/s00259-010-1603-1
10.2967/jnumed.113.123547
10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
10.1007/s00259-004-1604-z
10.1007/s00259-008-1007-7
10.1097/00006231-199901000-00004
10.2967/jnumed.110.078949
10.1007/s10334-012-0334-7
10.2967/jnumed.114.141838
10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2012.08.002
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/AJR.15.14304
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 1101
ExternalDocumentID 26496558
10_2214_AJR_15_14304
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
53G
5GY
5RE
AAEJM
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABOCM
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AI.
AJJEV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
J5H
L7B
LSO
MJL
P2P
SJN
TR2
TRR
TWZ
UDS
VH1
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-48d845975d0877346ce5dd22faf9e24d427663160f4b336ac19830341187eef73
ISSN 0361-803X
1546-3141
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:17:43 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:20 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:51 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:22:23 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords PET/MRI
standardized uptake value (SUV) comparison
attenuation correction
MRI
pediatrics
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c291t-48d845975d0877346ce5dd22faf9e24d427663160f4b336ac19830341187eef73
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 26496558
PQID 1727985248
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1727985248
pubmed_primary_26496558
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_15_14304
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_15_14304
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-11-00
2015-Nov
20151101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-11-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2015
References R20
R23
R22
R25
R24
R1
R2
Paquet N (R26) 2004; 45
R3
R4
R5
Taylor R (R15) 1990; 1
R6
R7
R8
R9
Nakamoto Y (R21) 2002; 43
R10
R12
R11
R14
R16
R18
R17
R19
Surti S (R13) 2007; 48
References_xml – ident: R8
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131732
– ident: R18
  doi: 10.1007/s11307-008-0177-9
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/013
– ident: R22
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-001-0698-9
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.1002/pbc.21150
– ident: R20
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.008
– volume: 1
  start-page: 35
  year: 1990
  ident: R15
  publication-title: JDMS
– ident: R23
  doi: 10.1007/s11307-013-0629-8
– volume: 48
  start-page: 471
  year: 2007
  ident: R13
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827a49ba
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
– ident: R17
  doi: 10.1007/s11307-012-0600-0
– ident: R4
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.098608
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.113209
– ident: R11
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1603-1
– ident: R12
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123547
– ident: R9
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1137
  year: 2002
  ident: R21
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
– ident: R2
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1604-z
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-1007-7
– volume: 45
  start-page: 784
  year: 2004
  ident: R26
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
– ident: R3
  doi: 10.1097/00006231-199901000-00004
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078949
– ident: R24
  doi: 10.1007/s10334-012-0334-7
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.141838
– ident: R25
  doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2012.08.002
SSID ssj0007897
Score 2.3152404
Snippet The purpose of this study was to compare standardized uptake values (SUVs) of normal tissues using MR attenuation-corrected versus CT attenuation-corrected...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1094
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics
Hospitals, Pediatric
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Multimodal Imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiopharmaceuticals - pharmacokinetics
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Tertiary Healthcare
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Title Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26496558
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1727985248
Volume 205
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBAviPvKTUaCpyhd7dhOwtuoBtu0ommksLfIdhypYjTT1j6wH8HP4_dwbOdW6KTBS5SmdqL0fPW5-DvnIPQmETzW4FmEiaXQMJ2SUFEhQyK1VIYz5XOrpp_E_owdnvLTweBXj7W0WqqRvtqYV_I_UoVrIFebJfsPkm1vChfgHOQLR5AwHG8k40m_iaC1G11UYH4FRuTsfCm_meCLPFs5ypXdoPku3S70yu0aXAbva4rW8V5mq-RmPnHAfZieHNg5Msgs7doS69qWHm2nEZ_TfnxRNcmajpO4tkvcbgf16lNcVKDmbGVYV_vJlokCU6UXjzj6UXnTfi1N7bOxdBTfuX2ufYVk_0UFo-ookmP8Bgej4Gj0Vzz8q5n3AxyE15l-3ToYCYDS2LUNBpVVr9NMgPrwNbOahZyOeQ-xvLcsk7HvpFyreDB5yCb1QSlhtozF4cmIcNAh0Zh1arKhBvyhPVtOI3hTdn4Os3PCczf7FrpN49jRBz6edtSjOHFNf9oX8wkZdvZO_9nrptI1_o-zg7L76F7twOBdj8YHaGAWD9GdaU3ReIR-dqDEVYn7oMQelNiDEs8X2IMSd6DENSgx4HBnkmGY7E4BkHa8xA0gcQtI3ADyHd7FPThiB8fHaPZhL5vsh3XTj1DTlCxDlhQJAy-XF7ZUZcSENrwoKC1lmRrKCkZjMJKJGJdMRZGQmqQJmGEMHOXYmDKOnqCtRbUw2wiz0si40DbmALcURZKWhRRKiVSrkis1REHz--a6rohvG7Oc5ZtkOURv29HnvhLMNeNeN6LKYam2-29yYarVZW59hTThlCVD9NTLsL0T-CWp4Dx5dsOnPEd3u__KC7QFcjIvwTxeqlcOa78BeFG21w
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Standardized+Uptake+Values+in+Normal+Structures+Between+PET%2FCT+and+PET%2FMRI+in+a+Tertiary+Pediatric+Hospital%3A+A+Prospective+Study&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Lyons%2C+Karen&rft.au=Seghers%2C+Victor&rft.au=Sorensen%2C+James+I.+L.&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Wei&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1094&rft.epage=1101&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.15.14304&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2214_AJR_15_14304
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon