Improved Efficiency in Clinical Workflow of Reporting Measured Oncology Lesions Via PACS-Integrated Lesion Tracking Tool

OBJECTIVE. Imaging provides evidence for the response to oncology treatment by the serial measurement of reference lesions. Unfortunately, the identification, comparison, measurement, and documentation of several reference lesions can be an inefficient process. We tested the hypothesis that optimize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 204; no. 3; pp. 576 - 583
Main Authors Sevenster, Merlijn, Travis, Adam R., Ganesh, Rajiv K., Liu, Peng, Kose, Ursula, Peters, Joost, Chang, Paul J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract OBJECTIVE. Imaging provides evidence for the response to oncology treatment by the serial measurement of reference lesions. Unfortunately, the identification, comparison, measurement, and documentation of several reference lesions can be an inefficient process. We tested the hypothesis that optimized workflow orchestration and tight integration of a lesion tracking tool into the PACS and speech recognition system can result in improvements in oncologic lesion measurement efficiency. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A lesion management tool tightly integrated into the PACS workflow was developed. We evaluated the effect of the use of the tool on measurement reporting time by means of a prospective time-motion study on 86 body CT examinations with 241 measureable oncologic lesions with four radiologists. RESULTS. Aggregated measurement reporting time per lesion was 11.64 seconds in standard workflow, 16.67 seconds if readers had to register measurements de novo, and 6.36 seconds for each subsequent follow-up study. Differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for each reader, except for one difference for one reader. CONCLUSION. Measurement reporting time can be reduced by using a PACS workflow-integrated lesion management tool, especially for patients with multiple follow-up examinations, reversing the onetime efficiency penalty at baseline registration.
AbstractList OBJECTIVE. Imaging provides evidence for the response to oncology treatment by the serial measurement of reference lesions. Unfortunately, the identification, comparison, measurement, and documentation of several reference lesions can be an inefficient process. We tested the hypothesis that optimized workflow orchestration and tight integration of a lesion tracking tool into the PACS and speech recognition system can result in improvements in oncologic lesion measurement efficiency. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A lesion management tool tightly integrated into the PACS workflow was developed. We evaluated the effect of the use of the tool on measurement reporting time by means of a prospective time-motion study on 86 body CT examinations with 241 measureable oncologic lesions with four radiologists. RESULTS. Aggregated measurement reporting time per lesion was 11.64 seconds in standard workflow, 16.67 seconds if readers had to register measurements de novo, and 6.36 seconds for each subsequent follow-up study. Differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for each reader, except for one difference for one reader. CONCLUSION. Measurement reporting time can be reduced by using a PACS workflow-integrated lesion management tool, especially for patients with multiple follow-up examinations, reversing the onetime efficiency penalty at baseline registration.
OBJECTIVE. Imaging provides evidence for the response to oncology treatment by the serial measurement of reference lesions. Unfortunately, the identification, comparison, measurement, and documentation of several reference lesions can be an inefficient process. We tested the hypothesis that optimized workflow orchestration and tight integration of a lesion tracking tool into the PACS and speech recognition system can result in improvements in oncologic lesion measurement efficiency. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A lesion management tool tightly integrated into the PACS workflow was developed. We evaluated the effect of the use of the tool on measurement reporting time by means of a prospective time-motion study on 86 body CT examinations with 241 measureable oncologic lesions with four radiologists. RESULTS. Aggregated measurement reporting time per lesion was 11.64 seconds in standard workflow, 16.67 seconds if readers had to register measurements de novo, and 6.36 seconds for each subsequent follow-up study. Differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for each reader, except for one difference for one reader. CONCLUSION. Measurement reporting time can be reduced by using a PACS workflow-integrated lesion management tool, especially for patients with multiple follow-up examinations, reversing the onetime efficiency penalty at baseline registration.OBJECTIVE. Imaging provides evidence for the response to oncology treatment by the serial measurement of reference lesions. Unfortunately, the identification, comparison, measurement, and documentation of several reference lesions can be an inefficient process. We tested the hypothesis that optimized workflow orchestration and tight integration of a lesion tracking tool into the PACS and speech recognition system can result in improvements in oncologic lesion measurement efficiency. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A lesion management tool tightly integrated into the PACS workflow was developed. We evaluated the effect of the use of the tool on measurement reporting time by means of a prospective time-motion study on 86 body CT examinations with 241 measureable oncologic lesions with four radiologists. RESULTS. Aggregated measurement reporting time per lesion was 11.64 seconds in standard workflow, 16.67 seconds if readers had to register measurements de novo, and 6.36 seconds for each subsequent follow-up study. Differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for each reader, except for one difference for one reader. CONCLUSION. Measurement reporting time can be reduced by using a PACS workflow-integrated lesion management tool, especially for patients with multiple follow-up examinations, reversing the onetime efficiency penalty at baseline registration.
Author Ganesh, Rajiv K.
Sevenster, Merlijn
Peters, Joost
Kose, Ursula
Chang, Paul J.
Liu, Peng
Travis, Adam R.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Merlijn
  surname: Sevenster
  fullname: Sevenster, Merlijn
  organization: Department of Clinical Informatics Solutions and Services, Philips Research North America, 345 Scarborough Rd, Briarcliff, NY 10510
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Adam R.
  surname: Travis
  fullname: Travis, Adam R.
  organization: Boston Consulting Group, Chicago, IL
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rajiv K.
  surname: Ganesh
  fullname: Ganesh, Rajiv K.
  organization: Department of Radiology, Loyola University, Maywood, IL
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Peng
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Peng
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ursula
  surname: Kose
  fullname: Kose, Ursula
  organization: Department of Clinical Informatics Benelux, Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Joost
  surname: Peters
  fullname: Peters, Joost
  organization: Healthcare Information Technology, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Paul J.
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Paul J.
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL., Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25714288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkc1PGzEQxa2KqgTaW8_Ixx7Y1OO1vd5jFPGRKoiKptDbynHsyMWxg70B8t_XEMoBcXrSzO-NNO8doL0Qg0HoK5AhpcC-j35cDYENgbbAP6ABcCaqGhjsoQGpBVSS1H_20UHOfwkhjWybT2if8gYYlXKAHierdYr3ZoFPrHXamaC32AU89i44rTy-ienW-viAo8VXZh1T78ISXxiVN6m4LoOOPi63eGqyiyHja6fwz9H4VzUJvVkm1Rdot8OzpPTtk3sWo_-MPlrls_nyoofo9-nJbHxeTS_PJuPRtNLlob6iINi8tQtGqSoTYXlDwCjJuODGUEYbaTmbS9UQUVtN5gCSCQ5AFrKtG1kfom-7u-XNu43JfbdyWRvvVTBxkzsQvG1EywQU9OgF3cxXZtGtk1uptO3-p1WA4x2gU8w5GfuKAOmeyuhKGV2R5zIKTt_g2vWqL1H0STn_vukfh1mLXQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_016_9938_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2017_08_005
crossref_primary_10_2196_medinform_5703
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_023_01568_6
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_16_16845
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00117_023_01114_x
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_18_20586
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_015_9846_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_018_0127_2
Cites_doi 10.1007/s10278-008-9128-x
10.2214/AJR.09.2850
10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.6639
10.1593/tlo.13796
10.1200/JCO.2003.01.144
10.1007/s00330-009-1685-y
10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
10.1016/j.jacr.2007.09.004
10.2214/AJR.09.4110
10.1148/radiol.2533090135
10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
10.1148/rg.313105195
10.1148/rg.266065168
10.2214/AJR.12.10136
10.2214/AJR.11.7522
10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.015
10.1148/radiol.2482080242
10.1118/1.3633898
10.2478/v10019-012-0009-z
10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750609
10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.004
10.1148/rg.324115080
10.1148/radiol.2522081895
10.1118/1.2789501
10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.008
10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/AJR.14.12915
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 583
ExternalDocumentID 25714288
10_2214_AJR_14_12915
Genre Evaluation Studies
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
3O-
53G
5GY
5RE
AAEJM
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABOCM
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AI.
AJJEV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
J5H
L7B
LSO
MJL
P2P
SJN
TR2
TRR
TWZ
UDS
VH1
W2D
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-2164b9fd422ac296f5701ea84565ee24278f54b8a7063fc0b118465110d893783
ISSN 0361-803X
1546-3141
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:54:26 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:33:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:22:21 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:37 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords quantitative imaging
structured reporting
time-motion analysis
measurement management
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c291t-2164b9fd422ac296f5701ea84565ee24278f54b8a7063fc0b118465110d893783
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 25714288
PQID 1659769461
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1659769461
pubmed_primary_25714288
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_14_12915
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_14_12915
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-03-00
2015-Mar
20150301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-03-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2015
References Levy MA (R26) 2008
R21
R20
R23
R22
R24
R27
R29
R28
Rubin DL (R25) 2008
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R30
R10
R12
R11
R14
R16
R15
R18
R17
R19
References_xml – ident: R11
  doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9128-x
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2850
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.6639
– ident: R9
  doi: 10.1593/tlo.13796
– ident: R27
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.144
– ident: R4
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1685-y
– ident: R2
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
– ident: R12
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.09.004
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4110
– ident: R17
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090135
– ident: R3
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.1148/rg.313105195
– ident: R20
  doi: 10.1148/rg.266065168
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10136
– ident: R28
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7522
– ident: R15
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.015
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482080242
– ident: R30
  doi: 10.1118/1.3633898
– ident: R29
  doi: 10.2478/v10019-012-0009-z
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750609
– ident: R21
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.004
– ident: R24
  doi: 10.1148/rg.324115080
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522081895
– ident: R18
  doi: 10.1118/1.2789501
– start-page: 399
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  ident: R26
  publication-title: AMIA Annu Symp Proc
– start-page: 626
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  ident: R25
  publication-title: AMIA Annu Symp Proc
– ident: R22
  doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.008
– ident: R23
  doi: 10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6
– ident: R8
SSID ssj0007897
Score 2.2145002
Snippet OBJECTIVE. Imaging provides evidence for the response to oncology treatment by the serial measurement of reference lesions. Unfortunately, the identification,...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 576
SubjectTerms Efficiency
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Radiology Information Systems
Software
Time and Motion Studies
Workflow
Title Improved Efficiency in Clinical Workflow of Reporting Measured Oncology Lesions Via PACS-Integrated Lesion Tracking Tool
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25714288
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1659769461
Volume 204
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FIiEuiHfDS4sEJ8vBdrz2-hhVRaU0gNIU5WbZ610pVbBRmgDil_HzmNmH7UatVLhY0a7Xlj1fdh6e-YaQN5KnMkwE9xkTgR9zFviZrMY-C7nMQhmmicAC5-mn5OgsPl6wxWDwp5e1tN2UI_H7yrqS_5EqjIFcsUr2HyTbXhQG4DfIF44gYTjeSMYmIgAm46EmgtBVlFjF56odMRKuVs1PwziCljYGBqYmLFh5n2thGJhO5IXOh_u6LLwvk4NT_4MjkajsHJKgC4yqe_OmWfUt2vaTT4-DYt2AKkP2V311pIICc6QXczhF2ijXEmSKhFvnXT7w2vEeTKrimzcbtRlCBezKOgg0K86XP7yP7czJcmtSja0WtkGMkHVZXG3xVgjKUrcGBrVk9-I4ARVheLHcZh2ZZsUWlePe1svSpKfFmWmPs6sgoiiMkajieAYqYgS2jqklvczDvaMf26xF8JdwfQ6rwWPK9epb5HYEDoouM190yUUp12192scyJRe4-l3_3peNoWs8HG3pzO-Te9ZFoRODtwdkIOuH5M7UJmE8Ir8c7GgHO7qsqYMddbCjjaIt7KiDHXWwoxZ2FGBHd2Bn56iDHUXYPSZn7w_nB0e-beDhC3i6jR-BL15mqoqjqICRRLE0CGXB0YuQMsIuL4rFJS9SMJSVCErwduMEXICgQjOaj5-Qvbqp5T6hHIy5ErcSmUWxiINSjVUZCAXehyhTxYbEc28yF5bdHpusrPKrpDYkb9uzvxtWl2vOe-2EksO2i9_SAOvN9iIPE_DEkyxOwiF5aqTVXgm0IPIY8mc3vMtzcrf7T7wge5v1Vr4EU3dTvtKo-gu_saa-
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved+Efficiency+in+Clinical+Workflow+of+Reporting+Measured+Oncology+Lesions+Via+PACS-Integrated+Lesion+Tracking+Tool&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Sevenster%2C+Merlijn&rft.au=Travis%2C+Adam+R.&rft.au=Ganesh%2C+Rajiv+K.&rft.au=Liu%2C+Peng&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=204&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=583&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.14.12915&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2214_AJR_14_12915
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon