Word embeddings for application in geosciences: development, evaluation, and examples of soil-related concepts

• Published in: Soil Vol. 5; no. 2; pp. 177 - 187
• Main Authors: Padarian, José, Fuentes, Ignacio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Göttingen Copernicus GmbH 17.07.2019; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Archives & records; Domain specific languages; Earth science; Embedding; Geology; Information processing; Language; Learning algorithms; Linguistics; Machine learning; Mineralogy; Natural language; Natural language processing; Petrology; Profiles; Scientific papers; Semantics; Soil; Soil analysis; Soil profiles; Soil properties; Soil sciences; Stratigraphy; Vectors
• ISSN: 2199-398X; 2199-3971; 2199-398X; 2199-3971
• DOI: 10.5194/soil-5-177-2019

A large amount of descriptive information is available in geosciences. This information is usually considered subjective and ill-favoured compared with its numerical counterpart. Considering the advances in natural language processing and machine learning, it is possible to utilise descriptive information and encode it as dense vectors. These word embeddings, which encode information about a word and its linguistic relationships with other words, lay on a multidimensional space where angles and distances have a linguistic interpretation. We used 280 764 full-text scientific articles related to geosciences to train a domain-specific language model capable of generating such embeddings. To evaluate the quality of the numerical representations, we performed three intrinsic evaluations: the capacity to generate analogies, term relatedness compared with the opinion of a human subject, and categorisation of different groups of words. As this is the first attempt to evaluate word embedding for tasks in the geosciences domain, we created a test suite specific for geosciences. We compared our results with general domain embeddings commonly used in other disciplines. As expected, our domain-specific embeddings (GeoVec) outperformed general domain embeddings in all tasks, with an overall performance improvement of 107.9 %. We also presented an example were we successfully emulated part of a taxonomic analysis of soil profiles that was originally applied to soil numerical data, which would not be possible without the use of embeddings. The resulting embedding and test suite will be made available for other researchers to use and expand upon.