Validation of earthquake analysis methodology of a suction-caisson foundation-structure through model testing

Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however seldom documented properly, often just treated as a foundation capacity issue applying a quasi-static acceleration and not considering the iner...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMarine structures Vol. 88; p. 103368
Main Authors Feizi, Siamak, Arnesen, Knut, Aaslid, Andreas, Bergan-Haavik, Jens, Hassel, Jan Helge, Kulleseid, Stephen, Ghadak, Armin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however seldom documented properly, often just treated as a foundation capacity issue applying a quasi-static acceleration and not considering the inertial interaction between the structure and the soil. The more relevant tasks to document are the motions of the unit and the response of the externally connected flowlines and equipment/systems on the unit. Based on a case study located in the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea, model centrifuge tests and numerical modelling were carried out to validate the global response of a 4-caisson supported manifold structure subject to seismic motions in soft clay. The centrifuge tests were carried out at 58 g at the centre for geotechnical modelling at UC Davis. To simulate the soil-structure interaction, a series of non-linear springs defined by kinematic hardening models were used in analyses with the ABAQUS software. This development includes the algorithms for determining the required model parameters. A very good agreement between recorded response from the centrifuge test and calculated response from the FE-analyses was achieved. The development and validation of the soil model presented in this paper is an improvement in design methodology for caisson foundations subjected to earthquake loading. The non-linear soil springs are well suited to incorporate in more detailed structural analyses where an accurate representation of the foundation response is required. The paper also briefly describes how the subsequent earthquake design analyses were performed for the Shah Deniz manifold structures making use of the validated soil spring model and the added value it gave to the project. •The response of a suction bucket foundation used in subsea structures or wind turbines investigated under the static and dynamic loads.•Foundation responses, p-y curves and practical methods to model the soi-nonlinearity are presented.•Non-linear hysteretic soil resistance models in FE analysis were constructed by use of several spring connectors with kinematic hardening material and validated by model tests.•The flexibility and corresponding dynamics of manifold structural elements, piping and other local equipment have no significant impact on global responses of such foundation-structure system.
AbstractList Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however seldom documented properly, often just treated as a foundation capacity issue applying a quasi-static acceleration and not considering the inertial interaction between the structure and the soil. The more relevant tasks to document are the motions of the unit and the response of the externally connected flowlines and equipment/systems on the unit. Based on a case study located in the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea, model centrifuge tests and numerical modelling were carried out to validate the global response of a 4-caisson supported manifold structure subject to seismic motions in soft clay. The centrifuge tests were carried out at 58 g at the centre for geotechnical modelling at UC Davis. To simulate the soil-structure interaction, a series of non-linear springs defined by kinematic hardening models were used in analyses with the ABAQUS software. This development includes the algorithms for determining the required model parameters. A very good agreement between recorded response from the centrifuge test and calculated response from the FE-analyses was achieved. The development and validation of the soil model presented in this paper is an improvement in design methodology for caisson foundations subjected to earthquake loading. The non-linear soil springs are well suited to incorporate in more detailed structural analyses where an accurate representation of the foundation response is required. The paper also briefly describes how the subsequent earthquake design analyses were performed for the Shah Deniz manifold structures making use of the validated soil spring model and the added value it gave to the project. •The response of a suction bucket foundation used in subsea structures or wind turbines investigated under the static and dynamic loads.•Foundation responses, p-y curves and practical methods to model the soi-nonlinearity are presented.•Non-linear hysteretic soil resistance models in FE analysis were constructed by use of several spring connectors with kinematic hardening material and validated by model tests.•The flexibility and corresponding dynamics of manifold structural elements, piping and other local equipment have no significant impact on global responses of such foundation-structure system.
ArticleNumber 103368
Author Feizi, Siamak
Ghadak, Armin
Arnesen, Knut
Hassel, Jan Helge
Aaslid, Andreas
Kulleseid, Stephen
Bergan-Haavik, Jens
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Siamak
  surname: Feizi
  fullname: Feizi, Siamak
  email: Siamak.feizi@ngi.no
  organization: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, NGI (Former DNV), Sognsvn 72, 0855, Oslo, Norway
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Knut
  surname: Arnesen
  fullname: Arnesen, Knut
  organization: DNV, Veritasveien 1, 1363, Hovik, Norway
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Andreas
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7926-2115
  surname: Aaslid
  fullname: Aaslid, Andreas
  organization: DNV, Veritasveien 1, 1363, Hovik, Norway
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jens
  surname: Bergan-Haavik
  fullname: Bergan-Haavik, Jens
  organization: DNV, Veritasveien 1, 1363, Hovik, Norway
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jan Helge
  surname: Hassel
  fullname: Hassel, Jan Helge
  organization: TechnipFMC, Kirkegårdsveien 45, 3616, Kongsberg, Norway
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Stephen
  surname: Kulleseid
  fullname: Kulleseid, Stephen
  organization: TechnipFMC, Kirkegårdsveien 45, 3616, Kongsberg, Norway
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Armin
  surname: Ghadak
  fullname: Ghadak, Armin
  organization: British Petroleum (BP), London, UK
BookMark eNqFkMtOwzAQRS1UJNrCL6D8QIofSRxLLEAVL6kSG2BrOfakcUlisB2k_j1JCxs2rEYa3XM1cxZo1rseELokeEUwKa52q075EP2gVxRTNi4ZK8oTNCclZ2lGOJ6hORY5SUvGxBlahLDDmHBCyBx1b6q1RkXr-sTVCSgfm89BvUOietXugw1JB7FxxrVuu58iKgmDnvKpVjaEkavd0B8r0sMZcfCQxMa7YdsknTPQJhFCtP32HJ3Wqg1w8TOX6PX-7mX9mG6eH57Wt5tUU4FjajJKhMoKxQTUXHPDdJnrjAsKOc2pYRVUpgBDVVGJTGAQRmRZLrKc44qDYktUHHu1dyF4qOWHt6OlvSRYTtLkTv5Kk5M0eZQ2gtd_QG3j4bXolW3_x2-OOIzPfVnwMmgLvQZjPegojbP_VXwD_5qTQg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iintel_2023_100061
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apor_2024_104186
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.005
10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.617
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.75
10.1680/ijpmg.14.00016
10.1115/1.4011867
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000738
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 The Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 The Authors
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Military & Naval Science
EISSN 1873-4170
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368
S0951833923000011
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.~1
0R~
1B1
1~.
1~5
29M
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
6I.
6TJ
7-5
71M
8P~
9JN
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACNNM
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADTZH
AEBSH
AECPX
AEKER
AENEX
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHJVU
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BJAXD
BKOJK
BLXMC
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
JJJVA
KOM
LY7
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SES
SET
SEW
SPC
SPCBC
SST
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WUQ
XPP
ZMT
~G-
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
BNPGV
CITATION
SSH
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-d4219a46a39ef7c7d3c85c4792e5252d3bebd6ed2a6b9490e9d944594570b7ea3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0951-8339
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 02:36:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:56 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:38:07 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Shah deniz
Soil model calibration
Model test
Earthquake analysis
Suction-caisson foundation
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c290t-d4219a46a39ef7c7d3c85c4792e5252d3bebd6ed2a6b9490e9d944594570b7ea3
ORCID 0000-0001-7926-2115
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833923000011
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate March 2023
2023-03-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2023
  text: March 2023
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Marine structures
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Jeanjean, Znidarcic, Phillips, Ko, Pfister, Cinicioglu, Schroeder (bib12) 2006
Vucetic, Dobry (bib26) 1991; 117
(bib23) 2016
Foglia, Ibsen, Nicolai, Andersen (bib6) 2014
Gelagoti, Georgiou, Kourkoulis, Gazetas (bib13) 2019; vol. 170
Houlsby, Byrne (bib9) 2005; 158
Feizi, Arnesen, Moselmian (bib19) 2016
Zhu, Byrne, Houlsby (bib4) 2013; 139
(bib21) 2004
(bib18) 2012
Stapelfldt, Bienen, Grabe (bib24) 2018; vol. 1
Andersen (bib16) 2015
Athanasiu, Bye, Tistel, Ribe, Arnesen, Feizikhankandi, Sørlie (bib7) 2015
Jostad, Andersen, Khoa, Colliat (bib22) 2015
Byrne (bib1) 2000
Kelly, Houlsby, Byrne (bib3) 2006; 56
Tran (bib8) 2005
Zheng, Kutter, Hirt, Zhou, Wilson, Clukey (bib14) 2015
Stevens, Audibert (bib25) 1997
Johansson, Aas, Hansen (bib2) 2003
Andersen, Jeanjean, Luger, Jostad (bib10) 2005; 32
Chen, Randolph (bib11) 2005
Besseling (bib15) 1958
Zheng, Hirt, Kutter, Wilson, Zhou (bib17) 2014
Cox, O'Loughlin, Cassidy, Bhattacharya, Gaudin, Bienen (bib5) 2014; 14
Feizi, Arnesen, Andreas, Moselmian (bib20) 2017
(10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib21) 2004
Foglia (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib6) 2014
Vucetic (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib26) 1991; 117
Andersen (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib16) 2015
Stevens (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib25) 1997
Zheng (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib17) 2014
Houlsby (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib9) 2005; 158
Athanasiu (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib7) 2015
Johansson (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib2) 2003
Zhu (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib4) 2013; 139
Jeanjean (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib12) 2006
Stapelfldt (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib24) 2018; vol. 1
Feizi (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib20) 2017
Kelly (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib3) 2006; 56
(10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib23) 2016
Byrne (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib1) 2000
(10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib18) 2012
Tran (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib8) 2005
Gelagoti (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib13) 2019; vol. 170
Feizi (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib19) 2016
Jostad (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib22) 2015
Andersen (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib10) 2005; 32
Besseling (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib15) 1958
Cox (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib5) 2014; 14
Chen (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib11) 2005
Zheng (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib14) 2015
References_xml – volume: vol. 170
  start-page: 445
  year: 2019
  end-page: 465
  ident: bib13
  publication-title: Nonlinear lateral stiffness and bearing capacity of suction caissons for offshore wind-turbines” Ocean Engineering
– volume: 32
  start-page: 845
  year: 2005
  end-page: 863
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Centrifuge tests on installation of suction anchors in soft clay
  publication-title: Ocean Eng
– year: 2014
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Soil structure interaction of caisson-supported subsea manifold and wellhead on soft clay: centrifuge data report for BLZ02/PHASE 3-#2.” technical report, 1.02
– start-page: 145
  year: 2003
  end-page: 153
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Field model tests for a novel suction anchor application, in ‘6
  publication-title: International symposium on field measurements in geomechanics
– year: 2000
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Investigations of suction caissons in dense sand. PhD thesis
– volume: 139
  start-page: 73
  year: 2013
  end-page: 83
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Long-term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand
  publication-title: J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
– start-page: 529
  year: 1958
  end-page: 536
  ident: bib15
  article-title: A theory of elastic, plastic, and creep deformations of an initially isotropic material showing anisotropic strain-hardening, creep recovery, and secondary creep
  publication-title: J Appl Mech
– volume: 56
  start-page: 617
  year: 2006
  end-page: 626
  ident: bib3
  article-title: A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay
  publication-title: Geotechnique
– year: 2016
  ident: bib23
  publication-title: PLAXIS program
– volume: 14
  start-page: 99
  year: 2014
  end-page: 115
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Centrifuge study on the cyclic performance of caissons in sand
  publication-title: Int. journal of Physical modelling in geotechnics
– year: 2015
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Simplified earthquake analysis for wind turbines and subsea structures on closed caisson foundations, Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III
– start-page: 269
  year: 2015
  end-page: 276
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Interpretation of centrifuge tests of suction anchors in reconstituted soft clay
  publication-title: Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III
– volume: 158
  start-page: 75
  year: 2005
  end-page: 82
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials
  publication-title: Proc Inst Civ Eng: Geotech Eng
– year: 2017
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Earthquake analysis report for FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS, DNVGL report # 2015-0748
– year: 2005
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Installation of suction caissons in dense sand and the influence of silt and cemented layers, PhD thesis
– start-page: 243
  year: 2005
  end-page: 249
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Centrifuge tests on axial capacity of suction caissons in clay
  publication-title: Proceedings, International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics
– year: 2015
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Centrifuge modelling of seismic behaviour of caisson-supported subsea manifold on soft clay, proceeding of 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering
– year: 1997
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Re-Examination of p-y curves formulation
– year: 2016
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Calibration analysis report for FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS, DNVGL report # 2015-0847
– start-page: 667
  year: 2014
  end-page: 673
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Observations on bucket foundations under cyclic loading in dense saturated sand
  publication-title: ICPMG2014 – physical modelling in geotechnics: proceedings of the 8th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, perth, Australia
– volume: 117
  year: 1991
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response
  publication-title: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
– year: 2015
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Cyclic soil parameters for offshore foundation design, Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics
– year: 2012
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Standard Version 6.11
– volume: vol. 1
  year: 2018
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Centrifuge tests investigating the effect of suction caisson installation in dense sand on the state of the soil plug
  publication-title: Physical modelling in geotechnics
– year: 2006
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Centrifuge testing on suction anchors: double-wall, over-consolidated clay, and layered soil profile, proceeding, annual offshore technology conference
– year: 2004
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Petroleum and Natural Gaz Industries-specific requirements for offshore structures, Part2, Seismic design procedures and criteria
– year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib17
– year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib25
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib7
– volume: 32
  start-page: 845
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib10
  article-title: Centrifuge tests on installation of suction anchors in soft clay
  publication-title: Ocean Eng
  doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.005
– volume: vol. 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib24
  article-title: Centrifuge tests investigating the effect of suction caisson installation in dense sand on the state of the soil plug
– volume: 56
  start-page: 617
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib3
  article-title: A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay
  publication-title: Geotechnique
  doi: 10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.617
– start-page: 145
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib2
  article-title: Field model tests for a novel suction anchor application, in ‘6
– start-page: 243
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib11
  article-title: Centrifuge tests on axial capacity of suction caissons in clay
  publication-title: Proceedings, International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics
– start-page: 667
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib6
  article-title: Observations on bucket foundations under cyclic loading in dense saturated sand
– volume: 117
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib26
  article-title: Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response
  publication-title: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
– year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib12
– year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib1
– start-page: 269
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib22
  article-title: Interpretation of centrifuge tests of suction anchors in reconstituted soft clay
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib14
– volume: 158
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib9
  article-title: Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials
  publication-title: Proc Inst Civ Eng: Geotech Eng
  doi: 10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.75
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib19
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib23
– volume: 14
  start-page: 99
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib5
  article-title: Centrifuge study on the cyclic performance of caissons in sand
  publication-title: Int. journal of Physical modelling in geotechnics
  doi: 10.1680/ijpmg.14.00016
– year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib8
– start-page: 529
  year: 1958
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib15
  article-title: A theory of elastic, plastic, and creep deformations of an initially isotropic material showing anisotropic strain-hardening, creep recovery, and secondary creep
  publication-title: J Appl Mech
  doi: 10.1115/1.4011867
– volume: vol. 170
  start-page: 445
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib13
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib20
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib18
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib16
– year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib21
– volume: 139
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib4
  article-title: Long-term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand
  publication-title: J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000738
SSID ssj0017111
Score 2.3394425
Snippet Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 103368
SubjectTerms Earthquake analysis
Model test
Shah deniz
Soil model calibration
Suction-caisson foundation
Title Validation of earthquake analysis methodology of a suction-caisson foundation-structure through model testing
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368
Volume 88
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07b8IwELYQXbpUfQr6QB6qbgET2zEeESqirWBpqdgix3FaaAmUhqFLf3v9CqJSJYaOSXxRdL7cnU933wfAteBRlnWoDHCEzEgOogFHSAUYh0iHY8YSW8wZjqLBmNxP6KQCeuUsjGmr9L7f-XTrrf2dltdmazmdth5NctDB-oXYlqjtBDthxsqb35s2jzZrWw5eSydvVm9NCc-ac314NDCtTUMibubPsYFc_StAbQWd_iE48Nki7LoPOgIVlR-D2tAia6--4A0cCW0p0P-gJ2D-rNNqx5IEFxnUVly8fqzFm4LCg49ARxlti-lmiYCfDj82kELvgZbLNkRLgQOXXa8U9HQ-0BLnwMJAc-Qvp2Dcv33qDQJPqBDIkKMiSIn2T4JEAnOVMclSLPU2EcZDRUMapjhRSRqpNBRRwglHiqecEMoJZShhSuAzUM0XuaoBGEYs4zSUiSSGQJ0mFKcKMYVlG6X6VFkHtNRiLD3auCG9eI_LtrJZXGo_NtqPnfbroLWRWzq8jZ0SvNyk-JflxDoo7JA9_4fsBdg3V64f7RJU9XN1pROUImlYC2yAve7dw2D0A9eS56Q
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB5ROLQXVKCIhRZ8gN6y6_Ujxoceqha0PHYvBcQtOI7De6GwqOLSP8UfZPzICiQkDohrkrGsz5MZ25r5PoBVo_O6Xpc24zn1LTlUZppSl3HOKKZjpcpwmdMf5L19sX0oDyfgoemF8WWVKfbHmB6idXrSSWh2rk9PO3_85mCd44A8XFF3U2Xljrv_h-e22x9bv3GR1xjb3Nj71cuStEBmmaajrBL4pxqRG65drayquMUJC6WZk0yyipeurHJXMZOXWmjqdKWFkFpIRUvlDMdxP8CUwHDhZRPa_8d1JV3VDaK_Qb_eT-9JW_JZ-xJPq54Xtu1Vy33DO_ccry9lxCdZbvMzTKftKfkZEZiBCTechYV-oPK-uSffycCga5IUEebg8gD38VGWiVzVBKEZnfy9M-eOmMR2QqJGdbi9958YchsJazNrcNHRrh4rO2WRzfbuxpGkH0SCUg8ZeS6Q4fEX2H8XmOdhcng1dAtAWK5qLZktrfCK7bKUvHJUOW67tMJjbAtkg2JhE725V9m4KJo6trOiQb_w6BcR_RZ0xnbXkeDjVQvdLFLxzFULzEKv2C6-wXYFPvb2-rvF7tZgZwk--TexGO4rTOK37hvujkblcvBGAkfv7f6PL6EjSw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation+of+earthquake+analysis+methodology+of+a+suction-caisson+foundation-structure+through+model+testing&rft.jtitle=Marine+structures&rft.au=Feizi%2C+Siamak&rft.au=Arnesen%2C+Knut&rft.au=Aaslid%2C+Andreas&rft.au=Bergan-Haavik%2C+Jens&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0951-8339&rft.eissn=1873-4170&rft.volume=88&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.marstruc.2023.103368&rft.externalDocID=S0951833923000011
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0951-8339&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0951-8339&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0951-8339&client=summon