Validation of earthquake analysis methodology of a suction-caisson foundation-structure through model testing
Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however seldom documented properly, often just treated as a foundation capacity issue applying a quasi-static acceleration and not considering the iner...
Saved in:
Published in | Marine structures Vol. 88; p. 103368 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.03.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however seldom documented properly, often just treated as a foundation capacity issue applying a quasi-static acceleration and not considering the inertial interaction between the structure and the soil. The more relevant tasks to document are the motions of the unit and the response of the externally connected flowlines and equipment/systems on the unit.
Based on a case study located in the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea, model centrifuge tests and numerical modelling were carried out to validate the global response of a 4-caisson supported manifold structure subject to seismic motions in soft clay. The centrifuge tests were carried out at 58 g at the centre for geotechnical modelling at UC Davis. To simulate the soil-structure interaction, a series of non-linear springs defined by kinematic hardening models were used in analyses with the ABAQUS software. This development includes the algorithms for determining the required model parameters. A very good agreement between recorded response from the centrifuge test and calculated response from the FE-analyses was achieved.
The development and validation of the soil model presented in this paper is an improvement in design methodology for caisson foundations subjected to earthquake loading. The non-linear soil springs are well suited to incorporate in more detailed structural analyses where an accurate representation of the foundation response is required. The paper also briefly describes how the subsequent earthquake design analyses were performed for the Shah Deniz manifold structures making use of the validated soil spring model and the added value it gave to the project.
•The response of a suction bucket foundation used in subsea structures or wind turbines investigated under the static and dynamic loads.•Foundation responses, p-y curves and practical methods to model the soi-nonlinearity are presented.•Non-linear hysteretic soil resistance models in FE analysis were constructed by use of several spring connectors with kinematic hardening material and validated by model tests.•The flexibility and corresponding dynamics of manifold structural elements, piping and other local equipment have no significant impact on global responses of such foundation-structure system. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however seldom documented properly, often just treated as a foundation capacity issue applying a quasi-static acceleration and not considering the inertial interaction between the structure and the soil. The more relevant tasks to document are the motions of the unit and the response of the externally connected flowlines and equipment/systems on the unit.
Based on a case study located in the Shah Deniz field in the Caspian Sea, model centrifuge tests and numerical modelling were carried out to validate the global response of a 4-caisson supported manifold structure subject to seismic motions in soft clay. The centrifuge tests were carried out at 58 g at the centre for geotechnical modelling at UC Davis. To simulate the soil-structure interaction, a series of non-linear springs defined by kinematic hardening models were used in analyses with the ABAQUS software. This development includes the algorithms for determining the required model parameters. A very good agreement between recorded response from the centrifuge test and calculated response from the FE-analyses was achieved.
The development and validation of the soil model presented in this paper is an improvement in design methodology for caisson foundations subjected to earthquake loading. The non-linear soil springs are well suited to incorporate in more detailed structural analyses where an accurate representation of the foundation response is required. The paper also briefly describes how the subsequent earthquake design analyses were performed for the Shah Deniz manifold structures making use of the validated soil spring model and the added value it gave to the project.
•The response of a suction bucket foundation used in subsea structures or wind turbines investigated under the static and dynamic loads.•Foundation responses, p-y curves and practical methods to model the soi-nonlinearity are presented.•Non-linear hysteretic soil resistance models in FE analysis were constructed by use of several spring connectors with kinematic hardening material and validated by model tests.•The flexibility and corresponding dynamics of manifold structural elements, piping and other local equipment have no significant impact on global responses of such foundation-structure system. |
ArticleNumber | 103368 |
Author | Feizi, Siamak Ghadak, Armin Arnesen, Knut Hassel, Jan Helge Aaslid, Andreas Kulleseid, Stephen Bergan-Haavik, Jens |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Siamak surname: Feizi fullname: Feizi, Siamak email: Siamak.feizi@ngi.no organization: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, NGI (Former DNV), Sognsvn 72, 0855, Oslo, Norway – sequence: 2 givenname: Knut surname: Arnesen fullname: Arnesen, Knut organization: DNV, Veritasveien 1, 1363, Hovik, Norway – sequence: 3 givenname: Andreas orcidid: 0000-0001-7926-2115 surname: Aaslid fullname: Aaslid, Andreas organization: DNV, Veritasveien 1, 1363, Hovik, Norway – sequence: 4 givenname: Jens surname: Bergan-Haavik fullname: Bergan-Haavik, Jens organization: DNV, Veritasveien 1, 1363, Hovik, Norway – sequence: 5 givenname: Jan Helge surname: Hassel fullname: Hassel, Jan Helge organization: TechnipFMC, Kirkegårdsveien 45, 3616, Kongsberg, Norway – sequence: 6 givenname: Stephen surname: Kulleseid fullname: Kulleseid, Stephen organization: TechnipFMC, Kirkegårdsveien 45, 3616, Kongsberg, Norway – sequence: 7 givenname: Armin surname: Ghadak fullname: Ghadak, Armin organization: British Petroleum (BP), London, UK |
BookMark | eNqFkMtOwzAQRS1UJNrCL6D8QIofSRxLLEAVL6kSG2BrOfakcUlisB2k_j1JCxs2rEYa3XM1cxZo1rseELokeEUwKa52q075EP2gVxRTNi4ZK8oTNCclZ2lGOJ6hORY5SUvGxBlahLDDmHBCyBx1b6q1RkXr-sTVCSgfm89BvUOietXugw1JB7FxxrVuu58iKgmDnvKpVjaEkavd0B8r0sMZcfCQxMa7YdsknTPQJhFCtP32HJ3Wqg1w8TOX6PX-7mX9mG6eH57Wt5tUU4FjajJKhMoKxQTUXHPDdJnrjAsKOc2pYRVUpgBDVVGJTGAQRmRZLrKc44qDYktUHHu1dyF4qOWHt6OlvSRYTtLkTv5Kk5M0eZQ2gtd_QG3j4bXolW3_x2-OOIzPfVnwMmgLvQZjPegojbP_VXwD_5qTQg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iintel_2023_100061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apor_2024_104186 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.005 10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.617 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89) 10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.75 10.1680/ijpmg.14.00016 10.1115/1.4011867 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000738 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 The Authors |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 The Authors |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Military & Naval Science |
EISSN | 1873-4170 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368 S0951833923000011 |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1~. 1~5 29M 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 6I. 6TJ 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JN AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACIWK ACNNM ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADTZH AEBSH AECPX AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFRAH AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHJVU AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BJAXD BKOJK BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W JJJVA KOM LY7 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SES SET SEW SPC SPCBC SST SSZ T5K UHS WUQ XPP ZMT ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFXIZ AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-d4219a46a39ef7c7d3c85c4792e5252d3bebd6ed2a6b9490e9d944594570b7ea3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0951-8339 |
IngestDate | Tue Jul 01 02:36:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:56 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:38:07 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Shah deniz Soil model calibration Model test Earthquake analysis Suction-caisson foundation |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY license. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c290t-d4219a46a39ef7c7d3c85c4792e5252d3bebd6ed2a6b9490e9d944594570b7ea3 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7926-2115 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833923000011 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_marstruc_2023_103368 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2023 2023-03-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2023 text: March 2023 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Marine structures |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Jeanjean, Znidarcic, Phillips, Ko, Pfister, Cinicioglu, Schroeder (bib12) 2006 Vucetic, Dobry (bib26) 1991; 117 (bib23) 2016 Foglia, Ibsen, Nicolai, Andersen (bib6) 2014 Gelagoti, Georgiou, Kourkoulis, Gazetas (bib13) 2019; vol. 170 Houlsby, Byrne (bib9) 2005; 158 Feizi, Arnesen, Moselmian (bib19) 2016 Zhu, Byrne, Houlsby (bib4) 2013; 139 (bib21) 2004 (bib18) 2012 Stapelfldt, Bienen, Grabe (bib24) 2018; vol. 1 Andersen (bib16) 2015 Athanasiu, Bye, Tistel, Ribe, Arnesen, Feizikhankandi, Sørlie (bib7) 2015 Jostad, Andersen, Khoa, Colliat (bib22) 2015 Byrne (bib1) 2000 Kelly, Houlsby, Byrne (bib3) 2006; 56 Tran (bib8) 2005 Zheng, Kutter, Hirt, Zhou, Wilson, Clukey (bib14) 2015 Stevens, Audibert (bib25) 1997 Johansson, Aas, Hansen (bib2) 2003 Andersen, Jeanjean, Luger, Jostad (bib10) 2005; 32 Chen, Randolph (bib11) 2005 Besseling (bib15) 1958 Zheng, Hirt, Kutter, Wilson, Zhou (bib17) 2014 Cox, O'Loughlin, Cassidy, Bhattacharya, Gaudin, Bienen (bib5) 2014; 14 Feizi, Arnesen, Andreas, Moselmian (bib20) 2017 (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib21) 2004 Foglia (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib6) 2014 Vucetic (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib26) 1991; 117 Andersen (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib16) 2015 Stevens (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib25) 1997 Zheng (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib17) 2014 Houlsby (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib9) 2005; 158 Athanasiu (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib7) 2015 Johansson (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib2) 2003 Zhu (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib4) 2013; 139 Jeanjean (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib12) 2006 Stapelfldt (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib24) 2018; vol. 1 Feizi (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib20) 2017 Kelly (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib3) 2006; 56 (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib23) 2016 Byrne (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib1) 2000 (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib18) 2012 Tran (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib8) 2005 Gelagoti (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib13) 2019; vol. 170 Feizi (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib19) 2016 Jostad (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib22) 2015 Andersen (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib10) 2005; 32 Besseling (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib15) 1958 Cox (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib5) 2014; 14 Chen (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib11) 2005 Zheng (10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib14) 2015 |
References_xml | – volume: vol. 170 start-page: 445 year: 2019 end-page: 465 ident: bib13 publication-title: Nonlinear lateral stiffness and bearing capacity of suction caissons for offshore wind-turbines” Ocean Engineering – volume: 32 start-page: 845 year: 2005 end-page: 863 ident: bib10 article-title: Centrifuge tests on installation of suction anchors in soft clay publication-title: Ocean Eng – year: 2014 ident: bib17 article-title: Soil structure interaction of caisson-supported subsea manifold and wellhead on soft clay: centrifuge data report for BLZ02/PHASE 3-#2.” technical report, 1.02 – start-page: 145 year: 2003 end-page: 153 ident: bib2 article-title: Field model tests for a novel suction anchor application, in ‘6 publication-title: International symposium on field measurements in geomechanics – year: 2000 ident: bib1 article-title: Investigations of suction caissons in dense sand. PhD thesis – volume: 139 start-page: 73 year: 2013 end-page: 83 ident: bib4 article-title: Long-term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand publication-title: J Geotech Geoenviron Eng – start-page: 529 year: 1958 end-page: 536 ident: bib15 article-title: A theory of elastic, plastic, and creep deformations of an initially isotropic material showing anisotropic strain-hardening, creep recovery, and secondary creep publication-title: J Appl Mech – volume: 56 start-page: 617 year: 2006 end-page: 626 ident: bib3 article-title: A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay publication-title: Geotechnique – year: 2016 ident: bib23 publication-title: PLAXIS program – volume: 14 start-page: 99 year: 2014 end-page: 115 ident: bib5 article-title: Centrifuge study on the cyclic performance of caissons in sand publication-title: Int. journal of Physical modelling in geotechnics – year: 2015 ident: bib7 article-title: Simplified earthquake analysis for wind turbines and subsea structures on closed caisson foundations, Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III – start-page: 269 year: 2015 end-page: 276 ident: bib22 article-title: Interpretation of centrifuge tests of suction anchors in reconstituted soft clay publication-title: Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III – volume: 158 start-page: 75 year: 2005 end-page: 82 ident: bib9 article-title: Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials publication-title: Proc Inst Civ Eng: Geotech Eng – year: 2017 ident: bib20 article-title: Earthquake analysis report for FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS, DNVGL report # 2015-0748 – year: 2005 ident: bib8 article-title: Installation of suction caissons in dense sand and the influence of silt and cemented layers, PhD thesis – start-page: 243 year: 2005 end-page: 249 ident: bib11 article-title: Centrifuge tests on axial capacity of suction caissons in clay publication-title: Proceedings, International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics – year: 2015 ident: bib14 article-title: Centrifuge modelling of seismic behaviour of caisson-supported subsea manifold on soft clay, proceeding of 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering – year: 1997 ident: bib25 article-title: Re-Examination of p-y curves formulation – year: 2016 ident: bib19 article-title: Calibration analysis report for FMC Kongsberg Subsea AS, DNVGL report # 2015-0847 – start-page: 667 year: 2014 end-page: 673 ident: bib6 article-title: Observations on bucket foundations under cyclic loading in dense saturated sand publication-title: ICPMG2014 – physical modelling in geotechnics: proceedings of the 8th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, perth, Australia – volume: 117 year: 1991 ident: bib26 article-title: Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response publication-title: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering – year: 2015 ident: bib16 article-title: Cyclic soil parameters for offshore foundation design, Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics – year: 2012 ident: bib18 article-title: Standard Version 6.11 – volume: vol. 1 year: 2018 ident: bib24 article-title: Centrifuge tests investigating the effect of suction caisson installation in dense sand on the state of the soil plug publication-title: Physical modelling in geotechnics – year: 2006 ident: bib12 article-title: Centrifuge testing on suction anchors: double-wall, over-consolidated clay, and layered soil profile, proceeding, annual offshore technology conference – year: 2004 ident: bib21 article-title: Petroleum and Natural Gaz Industries-specific requirements for offshore structures, Part2, Seismic design procedures and criteria – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib17 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib25 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib7 – volume: 32 start-page: 845 issue: 7 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib10 article-title: Centrifuge tests on installation of suction anchors in soft clay publication-title: Ocean Eng doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.005 – volume: vol. 1 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib24 article-title: Centrifuge tests investigating the effect of suction caisson installation in dense sand on the state of the soil plug – volume: 56 start-page: 617 issue: 9 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib3 article-title: A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay publication-title: Geotechnique doi: 10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.617 – start-page: 145 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib2 article-title: Field model tests for a novel suction anchor application, in ‘6 – start-page: 243 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib11 article-title: Centrifuge tests on axial capacity of suction caissons in clay publication-title: Proceedings, International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics – start-page: 667 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib6 article-title: Observations on bucket foundations under cyclic loading in dense saturated sand – volume: 117 issue: 1 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib26 article-title: Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response publication-title: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89) – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib12 – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib1 – start-page: 269 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib22 article-title: Interpretation of centrifuge tests of suction anchors in reconstituted soft clay – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib14 – volume: 158 start-page: 75 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib9 article-title: Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other materials publication-title: Proc Inst Civ Eng: Geotech Eng doi: 10.1680/geng.2005.158.2.75 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib19 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib23 – volume: 14 start-page: 99 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib5 article-title: Centrifuge study on the cyclic performance of caissons in sand publication-title: Int. journal of Physical modelling in geotechnics doi: 10.1680/ijpmg.14.00016 – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib8 – start-page: 529 year: 1958 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib15 article-title: A theory of elastic, plastic, and creep deformations of an initially isotropic material showing anisotropic strain-hardening, creep recovery, and secondary creep publication-title: J Appl Mech doi: 10.1115/1.4011867 – volume: vol. 170 start-page: 445 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib13 – year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib20 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib18 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib16 – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib21 – volume: 139 start-page: 73 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368_bib4 article-title: Long-term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand publication-title: J Geotech Geoenviron Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000738 |
SSID | ssj0017111 |
Score | 2.3394425 |
Snippet | Suction caissons are one of the most widely used foundation solutions for subsea structures and wind farms. Seismic response of subsea structures is however... |
SourceID | crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 103368 |
SubjectTerms | Earthquake analysis Model test Shah deniz Soil model calibration Suction-caisson foundation |
Title | Validation of earthquake analysis methodology of a suction-caisson foundation-structure through model testing |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103368 |
Volume | 88 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07b8IwELYQXbpUfQr6QB6qbgET2zEeESqirWBpqdgix3FaaAmUhqFLf3v9CqJSJYaOSXxRdL7cnU933wfAteBRlnWoDHCEzEgOogFHSAUYh0iHY8YSW8wZjqLBmNxP6KQCeuUsjGmr9L7f-XTrrf2dltdmazmdth5NctDB-oXYlqjtBDthxsqb35s2jzZrWw5eSydvVm9NCc-ac314NDCtTUMibubPsYFc_StAbQWd_iE48Nki7LoPOgIVlR-D2tAia6--4A0cCW0p0P-gJ2D-rNNqx5IEFxnUVly8fqzFm4LCg49ARxlti-lmiYCfDj82kELvgZbLNkRLgQOXXa8U9HQ-0BLnwMJAc-Qvp2Dcv33qDQJPqBDIkKMiSIn2T4JEAnOVMclSLPU2EcZDRUMapjhRSRqpNBRRwglHiqecEMoJZShhSuAzUM0XuaoBGEYs4zSUiSSGQJ0mFKcKMYVlG6X6VFkHtNRiLD3auCG9eI_LtrJZXGo_NtqPnfbroLWRWzq8jZ0SvNyk-JflxDoo7JA9_4fsBdg3V64f7RJU9XN1pROUImlYC2yAve7dw2D0A9eS56Q |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB5ROLQXVKCIhRZ8gN6y6_Ujxoceqha0PHYvBcQtOI7De6GwqOLSP8UfZPzICiQkDohrkrGsz5MZ25r5PoBVo_O6Xpc24zn1LTlUZppSl3HOKKZjpcpwmdMf5L19sX0oDyfgoemF8WWVKfbHmB6idXrSSWh2rk9PO3_85mCd44A8XFF3U2Xljrv_h-e22x9bv3GR1xjb3Nj71cuStEBmmaajrBL4pxqRG65drayquMUJC6WZk0yyipeurHJXMZOXWmjqdKWFkFpIRUvlDMdxP8CUwHDhZRPa_8d1JV3VDaK_Qb_eT-9JW_JZ-xJPq54Xtu1Vy33DO_ccry9lxCdZbvMzTKftKfkZEZiBCTechYV-oPK-uSffycCga5IUEebg8gD38VGWiVzVBKEZnfy9M-eOmMR2QqJGdbi9958YchsJazNrcNHRrh4rO2WRzfbuxpGkH0SCUg8ZeS6Q4fEX2H8XmOdhcng1dAtAWK5qLZktrfCK7bKUvHJUOW67tMJjbAtkg2JhE725V9m4KJo6trOiQb_w6BcR_RZ0xnbXkeDjVQvdLFLxzFULzEKv2C6-wXYFPvb2-rvF7tZgZwk--TexGO4rTOK37hvujkblcvBGAkfv7f6PL6EjSw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation+of+earthquake+analysis+methodology+of+a+suction-caisson+foundation-structure+through+model+testing&rft.jtitle=Marine+structures&rft.au=Feizi%2C+Siamak&rft.au=Arnesen%2C+Knut&rft.au=Aaslid%2C+Andreas&rft.au=Bergan-Haavik%2C+Jens&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0951-8339&rft.eissn=1873-4170&rft.volume=88&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.marstruc.2023.103368&rft.externalDocID=S0951833923000011 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0951-8339&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0951-8339&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0951-8339&client=summon |