Dispute on the reference standard for economics in Japan and its international backgrounds: is pluralism vs. standardization an appropriate scheme in economics education?
A dispute over economics education occurred in Japan in 2013 when the draft of the Reference Standard for Economics Education (RS Economics) of the Science Council of Japan (SCJ) was known to non-mainstream economists. This article reconsiders this dispute with its international background (OECD-AHE...
Saved in:
Published in | Evolutionary and institutional economics review Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 47 - 80 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Tokyo
Springer Japan
01.04.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | A dispute over economics education occurred in Japan in 2013 when the draft of the Reference Standard for Economics Education (RS Economics) of the Science Council of Japan (SCJ) was known to non-mainstream economists. This article reconsiders this dispute with its international background (OECD-AHELO, Bologna Process, QAA's Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics in the UK). OECD's AHELO project could not proceed from its Feasibility Study to Main Study. QAA's SBS Economics has made considerable concessions to the pluralistic opponents of mainstream economics. Confirming a paradigm shift in assessing the outcomes of higher education, the author critically examines the opposition scheme between Pluralism and Standardization around economics education. Further, he suggests the possibility of developing undergraduate-level economics education in the "universal stage" of higher education in the direction of resurgent general education (liberal arts study). |
---|---|
AbstractList | A dispute over economics education occurred in Japan in 2013 when the draft of the Reference Standard for Economics Education (RS Economics) of the Science Council of Japan (SCJ) was known to non-mainstream economists. This article reconsiders this dispute with its international background (OECD-AHELO, Bologna Process, QAA's Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics in the UK). OECD's AHELO project could not proceed from its Feasibility Study to Main Study. QAA's SBS Economics has made considerable concessions to the pluralistic opponents of mainstream economics. Confirming a paradigm shift in assessing the outcomes of higher education, the author critically examines the opposition scheme between Pluralism and Standardization around economics education. Further, he suggests the possibility of developing undergraduate-level economics education in the "universal stage" of higher education in the direction of resurgent general education (liberal arts study). |
Author | Yagi, Kiichiro |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kiichiro orcidid: 0000-0002-4262-0799 surname: Yagi fullname: Yagi, Kiichiro email: yagi@econ.setsunan.ac.jp organization: Kyoto University, Setsunan University |
BookMark | eNp9kctu2zAQRYnCAeo8fiArAl0rGYo0LXUTFGlehYFskjVBU6OErkwqHClI-kn9ytB2Ue-yGoBz7p0Z3kM2CTEgY6cCzgTA_JwUVEoVUMoCoNSyePvCpqWoqqKEWk_YVEhVF6rW4is7JFoBKDEDPWV_f3rqxwF5DHx4Rp6wxYTBIafBhsamhrcxcXQxxLV3xH3gv2xvA89d7ofNw4Ap2MHHYDu-tO73U4pjaOg798T7bky287Tmr3T239P_2fJ8Y9P3KfbJ27wDuWdc42bEfh42o9vCF8fsoLUd4cm_esQer68eLm-Lxf3N3eWPReHKGoZCKAHLJSi0WmjQohUOZT3Dytn5XDqnscJGoAUstRYO5FzPQKBWTS1c2zp5xL7tfPNiLyPSYFZxzBd2ZCSoGupSVjJT5Y5yKRLlbzP5iLVN70aA2WRidpmYnInZZmLeskjuRJTh8IRpb_2J6gNKlZXG |
Cites_doi | 10.1080/00346764.2018.1463447 10.1257/jel.20191585 10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30070-0 10.1080/03054985.2014.959912 10.1787/5kghtchweb3nn-en 10.1080/09538259.2018.1426682 10.12987/9780300252767 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQBIZ PQBZA |
DOI | 10.1007/s40844-023-00263-x |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Business (Alumni) |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics |
EISSN | 2188-2096 |
EndPage | 80 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1007_s40844_023_00263_x |
GeographicLocations | Japan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Japan |
GroupedDBID | -EM 0R~ 203 2WC 406 AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAZMS ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMQK ABQBU ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACKNC ACMLO ACOKC ACPIV ACREN ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETCA AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFQWF AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHSBF AIAKS AIGIU AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALFXC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR ASPBG AUKKA AVWKF AVXWI AXYYD BAPOH BGNMA CSCUP DNIVK DPUIP EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EOH ESBYG FERAY FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FYJPI GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD HRMNR IKXTQ IWAJR IXD J-C JBSCW JZLTJ KOV LLZTM M4Y NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9J OK1 PQBIZ PQBZA PT4 RLLFE ROL RSV SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE TKC TR2 TSG UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VFIZW Z81 ZMTXR AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT ABRTQ PKEHL |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-1410bb04ea616061f1ce395e8ca773cc6e8ed1ea0e2661c0376501e64d91cffc3 |
IEDL.DBID | AGYKE |
ISSN | 1349-4961 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 25 21:14:53 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:30:41 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:39:41 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | A11 A22 A12 B4 Generic skills B5 Economics education Above contents skill Standardization Pluralism in economics Subject-specific skills |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c290t-1410bb04ea616061f1ce395e8ca773cc6e8ed1ea0e2661c0376501e64d91cffc3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-4262-0799 |
PQID | 3049092383 |
PQPubID | 6628055 |
PageCount | 34 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_3049092383 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40844_023_00263_x springer_journals_10_1007_s40844_023_00263_x |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2024 text: 2024-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Tokyo |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Tokyo – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | Evolutionary and institutional economics review |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Evolut Inst Econ Rev |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Springer Japan Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Japan – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | CCE [Central Council for Education: Chuo Kyoiku Shingikai] (2008) Toshin: Gakushi Katei Kyouiku no Kochiku ni mukete (Response: Toward the Construction of the Bachelor Course Education). Tokyo: MEXT [Monbu Kagaku-sho]. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/b_menu/shingi/toushin/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2008/12/26/1217067_001.pdf QAA [Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education]A brief guide to quality assurance in UK higher education2003GloucesterQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education SkidelskyRWhat's wrong with Economics? A primer for the perplexed2020New HavenYale University Press10.12987/9780300252767 Hodgson G, Mäki U, McCloskey D, et al (1992) The plea for a pluralistic and rigorous economics. Am Econ Rev 82(2), advertisement. International Student Initiative for Pluralism in Economics (2014) “An international student call for pluralism in economics. https://www.isipe.net/open-letter. Accessed 16 May 2023 MearmanAGuizzoDBergerCIs UK economics teaching changing? Evaluating the new subject benchmark statementRev Soc Econ201876337739610.1080/00346764.2018.1463447 BowlesSCarlinWWhat students learn in economics 101: time for a changeJ Econ Lit202058117621410.1257/jel.20191585 OECD (2012b) Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO), Feasibility Study Report. Vol. 1. Design and Implementation. Feasibility Study Report, (Executive Summary) https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/ahelo-main-study.htm SCJ (2010b) Teigen: 21 Seiki no Kyoyo to Kyoyo Kyouiku (Recommendation: Humanities and Liberal Education in the 21st Century). April 5, 2010b. https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-21-tsoukai-4.pdf ACE [American Council of Education] and Universities of Canada (2015) Joint letter to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/files/files/ACE-UC%20AHELO%20Letter.pdf JohnstonJReevesATalbotSHas economics become an elite subject for elite universities?Oxf Rev Educ201440559060910.1080/03054985.2014.959912 MearmanAGuizzoDBergerCWhither political economy? Evaluating the CORE project as a response to calls for change in economics teachingRev Polit Econ201830224125910.1080/09538259.2018.1426682 QAA (2023) Subject Benchmark Statement: Economics. (5th ed.) [https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject -benchmark-statements/subjectbenchmark-statement-economics] Parr C (2014)“Manchester students take on economics curriculum in report. Times Higher Education online. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/manchester-students-take-on-economics-curriculum-in-report/2012879.article González J, Wagenaar R (eds) (2008) Tuning the Educational Structure in Europe. 2nd. Ed. Bilbao: Publicationes de la Iniversidad de Deusco. [https://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/Tuning_project/93/4/Tuning-Universities-contribution-to-Bologna-Process_575934.pdf] SCJ (2014) Daigaku Kyoiku no Bunya-betsu Shitsu-hosho no tameno Kyoiku-Katei Hensei-jo no Sansho Kijun: Keizai-gaku Bunya (Reference Standard for Designing Curriculum in the Subject Area Economics) https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-22-h140829.pdf RobbinsLAn essay on the nature and significance of economic science19352LondonMacmillan SCJ [Science Council of Japan: Gakujutsu Kaigi] (2010a) Kaito: Daigaku Kyoiku no Bunya-betsu Shitsu Hosho no Arikata ni tsuite (Report: Direction of Disciplinary Quality Assurance in University education). https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-21-k100-1.pdf OECD [Organization fie Economic Cooperation and Development] (2011) Tuning-AHELO Conceptual Framework of Expected and Desired Learning Outcomes in Economics. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 59. [EDU/EKP(2011)5] [https://doi.org/10.1787/5kghtchweb3nn-en] JUAA [University Standard Association of Japan: Daigaku Kijun Kyokai] (2004) Keizai-gaku Kyoiku ni Kansuru Kijun (Standards for Economics Education). University Standard Association of Japan Document No. 59, August 2004. https://juaa.or.jp/common/docs/publication/about/01/keizai.pdf FreemanAThe economists of tomorrow: the case for a pluralist subject benchmark for economicsInt Rev Econ Educ200982234010.1016/S1477-3880(15)30070-0 OECD (2012a) Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO), Feasibility Study Report. Vol. 1. Design and Implementation QAASubject benchmark statement: economics20072GloucesterQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Yagi K (2015) Keizai-gaku no Sansho Kijun wa Naze Soten ni natta no ka (Why did the Reference Standard of Economics Education become the focus of the debate?). In: Yagi K et al (eds) Keizai-gaku to Keizai Kyoiku no Mirai: Gakujyutsu-kaigi Dansho Kijun wo Koete (Future of Economics and Economics Education: Beyond SCJ’s Reference Standard in Economics). Sakurai Shoten, Tokyo, pp 13–54. Gurría A (2015) Reply to ACE and Universities Canada. https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/AHELO%20Letter.pdf 263_CR7 S Bowles (263_CR2) 2020; 58 263_CR9 A Mearman (263_CR10) 2018; 76 R Skidelsky (263_CR23) 2020 263_CR1 263_CR18 263_CR3 263_CR12 263_CR13 263_CR24 263_CR5 263_CR14 263_CR6 263_CR15 QAA (263_CR17) 2007 QAA [Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education] (263_CR16) 2003 263_CR20 263_CR21 A Mearman (263_CR11) 2018; 30 263_CR22 A Freeman (263_CR4) 2009; 8 J Johnston (263_CR8) 2014; 40 L Robbins (263_CR19) 1935 |
References_xml | – reference: FreemanAThe economists of tomorrow: the case for a pluralist subject benchmark for economicsInt Rev Econ Educ200982234010.1016/S1477-3880(15)30070-0 – reference: QAA [Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education]A brief guide to quality assurance in UK higher education2003GloucesterQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education – reference: BowlesSCarlinWWhat students learn in economics 101: time for a changeJ Econ Lit202058117621410.1257/jel.20191585 – reference: SCJ [Science Council of Japan: Gakujutsu Kaigi] (2010a) Kaito: Daigaku Kyoiku no Bunya-betsu Shitsu Hosho no Arikata ni tsuite (Report: Direction of Disciplinary Quality Assurance in University education). https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-21-k100-1.pdf – reference: MearmanAGuizzoDBergerCIs UK economics teaching changing? Evaluating the new subject benchmark statementRev Soc Econ201876337739610.1080/00346764.2018.1463447 – reference: Parr C (2014)“Manchester students take on economics curriculum in report. Times Higher Education online. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/manchester-students-take-on-economics-curriculum-in-report/2012879.article – reference: RobbinsLAn essay on the nature and significance of economic science19352LondonMacmillan – reference: CCE [Central Council for Education: Chuo Kyoiku Shingikai] (2008) Toshin: Gakushi Katei Kyouiku no Kochiku ni mukete (Response: Toward the Construction of the Bachelor Course Education). Tokyo: MEXT [Monbu Kagaku-sho]. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/b_menu/shingi/toushin/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2008/12/26/1217067_001.pdf – reference: OECD (2012a) Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO), Feasibility Study Report. Vol. 1. Design and Implementation – reference: QAA (2023) Subject Benchmark Statement: Economics. (5th ed.) [https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject -benchmark-statements/subjectbenchmark-statement-economics] – reference: Yagi K (2015) Keizai-gaku no Sansho Kijun wa Naze Soten ni natta no ka (Why did the Reference Standard of Economics Education become the focus of the debate?). In: Yagi K et al (eds) Keizai-gaku to Keizai Kyoiku no Mirai: Gakujyutsu-kaigi Dansho Kijun wo Koete (Future of Economics and Economics Education: Beyond SCJ’s Reference Standard in Economics). Sakurai Shoten, Tokyo, pp 13–54. – reference: SCJ (2014) Daigaku Kyoiku no Bunya-betsu Shitsu-hosho no tameno Kyoiku-Katei Hensei-jo no Sansho Kijun: Keizai-gaku Bunya (Reference Standard for Designing Curriculum in the Subject Area Economics) https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-22-h140829.pdf – reference: SCJ (2010b) Teigen: 21 Seiki no Kyoyo to Kyoyo Kyouiku (Recommendation: Humanities and Liberal Education in the 21st Century). April 5, 2010b. https://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-21-tsoukai-4.pdf – reference: ACE [American Council of Education] and Universities of Canada (2015) Joint letter to OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría. https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/files/files/ACE-UC%20AHELO%20Letter.pdf – reference: JUAA [University Standard Association of Japan: Daigaku Kijun Kyokai] (2004) Keizai-gaku Kyoiku ni Kansuru Kijun (Standards for Economics Education). University Standard Association of Japan Document No. 59, August 2004. https://juaa.or.jp/common/docs/publication/about/01/keizai.pdf – reference: QAASubject benchmark statement: economics20072GloucesterQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education – reference: MearmanAGuizzoDBergerCWhither political economy? Evaluating the CORE project as a response to calls for change in economics teachingRev Polit Econ201830224125910.1080/09538259.2018.1426682 – reference: SkidelskyRWhat's wrong with Economics? A primer for the perplexed2020New HavenYale University Press10.12987/9780300252767 – reference: González J, Wagenaar R (eds) (2008) Tuning the Educational Structure in Europe. 2nd. Ed. Bilbao: Publicationes de la Iniversidad de Deusco. [https://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/Tuning_project/93/4/Tuning-Universities-contribution-to-Bologna-Process_575934.pdf] – reference: Hodgson G, Mäki U, McCloskey D, et al (1992) The plea for a pluralistic and rigorous economics. Am Econ Rev 82(2), advertisement. International Student Initiative for Pluralism in Economics (2014) “An international student call for pluralism in economics. https://www.isipe.net/open-letter. Accessed 16 May 2023 – reference: OECD [Organization fie Economic Cooperation and Development] (2011) Tuning-AHELO Conceptual Framework of Expected and Desired Learning Outcomes in Economics. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 59. [EDU/EKP(2011)5] [https://doi.org/10.1787/5kghtchweb3nn-en] – reference: OECD (2012b) Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO), Feasibility Study Report. Vol. 1. Design and Implementation. Feasibility Study Report, (Executive Summary) https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/ahelo-main-study.htm – reference: JohnstonJReevesATalbotSHas economics become an elite subject for elite universities?Oxf Rev Educ201440559060910.1080/03054985.2014.959912 – reference: Gurría A (2015) Reply to ACE and Universities Canada. https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/AHELO%20Letter.pdf – volume: 76 start-page: 377 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 263_CR10 publication-title: Rev Soc Econ doi: 10.1080/00346764.2018.1463447 – ident: 263_CR24 – ident: 263_CR1 – ident: 263_CR21 – ident: 263_CR22 – volume: 58 start-page: 176 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 263_CR2 publication-title: J Econ Lit doi: 10.1257/jel.20191585 – ident: 263_CR18 – volume-title: An essay on the nature and significance of economic science year: 1935 ident: 263_CR19 – ident: 263_CR3 – volume: 8 start-page: 23 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 263_CR4 publication-title: Int Rev Econ Educ doi: 10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30070-0 – ident: 263_CR9 – ident: 263_CR13 – ident: 263_CR6 – volume: 40 start-page: 590 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 263_CR8 publication-title: Oxf Rev Educ doi: 10.1080/03054985.2014.959912 – ident: 263_CR14 – ident: 263_CR15 – volume-title: A brief guide to quality assurance in UK higher education year: 2003 ident: 263_CR16 – volume-title: Subject benchmark statement: economics year: 2007 ident: 263_CR17 – ident: 263_CR5 – ident: 263_CR7 – ident: 263_CR20 – ident: 263_CR12 doi: 10.1787/5kghtchweb3nn-en – volume: 30 start-page: 241 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 263_CR11 publication-title: Rev Polit Econ doi: 10.1080/09538259.2018.1426682 – volume-title: What's wrong with Economics? A primer for the perplexed year: 2020 ident: 263_CR23 doi: 10.12987/9780300252767 |
SSID | ssj0041506 |
Score | 2.2521787 |
Snippet | A dispute over economics education occurred in Japan in 2013 when the draft of the Reference Standard for Economics Education (RS Economics) of the Science... |
SourceID | proquest crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 47 |
SubjectTerms | Associations Colleges & universities Committees Core curriculum Councils Economic history Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Economics education Fisheries Higher education History of Economic Thought/Methodology Learned societies Political economy Political Economy/Economic Systems Quality control Quality standards Science Social Policy Society Standardization |
Title | Dispute on the reference standard for economics in Japan and its international backgrounds: is pluralism vs. standardization an appropriate scheme in economics education? |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40844-023-00263-x https://www.proquest.com/docview/3049092383 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwELaq3UO5UPpAbEurOfRGvbLX3jy4IEShiKqcWImeongykSLYgEgWof6k_sqOs_EuRe2BaxyPY8_E8409DyE-a5UWmlBL5zCXtqCpzEtjZeQSHbPJlZZd-bYf59HpzJ5dTi_7oLAmeLuHK8lup14Fu1mVWCtZx0hvOBjJyHHI-EPZgRgefvv5_TjswNZnzesMLesrqEW6D5b5N5W_FdIaZT65GO30zckrMQtfunQzuRovWjfGX0-SOD53KltiswegcLiUmNfiBdVvxMsQn9y8Fb-_Vo0v9AA3NTA6hFUhEgjHDsBAFyj0gKqGM1a5NXArVK1_8OiUEVyOVz52pC6afagauL32mT6qZg73zXhFsw8HBU_GpznnCTEKBra9aU5-iPV4FHxSDt6J2cnxxdGp7Cs6SJykqpXeqdQ5ZSmPNFtOutRIJp1SgnkcG8SIEmLRyRV53ICKd7-p0hTZItVYlmi2xaC-qWlHgCsoRlQxThTadJIkuSlRKzJYGJdEOBJ7ga3Z7TJxR7ZK0dytf8brn3Xrnz2MxG7gfNb_xE3mbyAVA-DEjMSXwMh18_-pvX_e6x_ExoSh0tIfaFcM2rsFfWSo07pPvWT_AdYw-b4 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwELYQHOilhT7UbSmdQ2-tV_bamwcXhAp0eZ5YiZ6ieDKRIiCgJlRVf1J_JeNsvEsRHLjG8Ti2J55vPC8hvmiVFppQS-cwl7agscxLY2XkEh2zypWWXfm2k9NoMrWH5-PzPiisCd7uwSTZndTzYDerEmslyxjpFQcjGTmuWNbBma9Xdn78PNoLJ7D1WfM6Rcv6CmqR7oNlHqfyv0BaoMwHhtFO3uy_EtPwpTM3k4vhbeuG-PdBEsfnTmVNvOwBKOzMOGZdLFH9WqyG-OTmjfi3WzW-0ANc18DoEOaFSCBcOwADXaDQA6oaDlnk1sCtULX-wb1bRnA5XvjYkbpotqBq4ObSZ_qomiv43QznNPtwUPBkfJpznhCjYGDdm67ID7EYj4JPyvZbMd3fO_s-kX1FB4mjVLXSO5U6pyzlkWbNSZcayaRjSjCPY4MYUULMOrkijxtQ8ek3VpoiW6QayxLNO7FcX9f0XoArKEZUMY4U2nSUJLkpUSsyWBiXRDgQX8O2ZjezxB3ZPEVzt_4Zr3_WrX_2ZyA2ws5n_U_cZN4CqRgAJ2YgvoWNXDQ_Te3D817_LFYnZyfH2fHB6dFH8WLEsGnmG7Qhlttft_SJYU_rNnsuvwO6Lfyt |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELbQVgIuUF7qQgtz4Abe2mtvHlyqqu1SWqg4UKmcongykaLSdEVShPhJ_ErGSbxbKjggrnEyju1J5ht75hshXmqVFppQS-cwl7agmcxLY2XkEh2zy5WWXfm2DyfR4ak9OpudXcvi76Ldw5Fkn9PgWZrqdntRlNvLxDerEmsl2xvpnQgjGUWuWc9tNxJru28_Hx-Ev7H1DHqd02V9NbVID4kzf5byu3FaIc4bh6Sd7ZnfF3l46z7k5Hxy1boJ_rhB6Pg_w1oX9wZgCru9Jj0Qt6h-KO6EvOXmkfi5XzW-AARc1sCoEZYFSiBsRwADYKDwBFQ1HLEproFboWr9hWu7j-ByPPc5JXXRvIGqgcUXzwBSNRfwrZksZQ5pouDFePpzHhyjY2CfnC7Id7Hqj0Ksys5jcTo_-LR3KIdKDxKnqWqlDzZ1TlnKI80elS41kklnlGAexwYxooRYpXJFHk-g4r_iTGmKbJFqLEs0T8SovqxpQ4ArKEZUMU4V2nSaJLkpUSsyWBiXRDgWr8ISZ4ue0CNbUjd385_x_Gfd_Gffx2IzaEE2fNxN5k8mFQPjxIzF67Coq-a_S3v6b7e_ELc_7s-z9-9Ojp-Ju1NGU33I0KYYtV-vaIvRUOueDwr_C2R5BaA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dispute+on+the+reference+standard+for+economics+in+Japan+and+its+international+backgrounds%3A+is+pluralism+vs.+standardization+an+appropriate+scheme+in+economics+education%3F&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary+and+institutional+economics+review&rft.au=Yagi%2C+Kiichiro&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=1349-4961&rft.eissn=2188-2096&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=80&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs40844-023-00263-x |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1349-4961&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1349-4961&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1349-4961&client=summon |