Evaluating pelvic tilt using the pelvic antero‐posterior radiographs: A novel method

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic research Vol. 42; no. 10; pp. 2318 - 2326
• Main Authors: Chai, Yuan, Boudali, A. Mounir, Veltman, Ewout S., Farey, John E., Walter, William L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.10.2024
• Subjects: acetabular retroversion; Adult; Aged; antero‐posterior radiograph; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging; pelvic tilt; Pelvis - diagnostic imaging; Radiography - methods; spinopelvic alignment; surgical planning; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; spinopelvic alignment; surgical planning; acetabular retroversion; pelvic tilt; antero‐posterior radiograph
• DOI: 10.1002/jor.25907
• ISSN: 0736-0266; 1554-527X

Pelvic tilt (PT) is an important parameter for orthopedic surgeries involving hip and spine, typically determined from sagittal pelvic radiographs. However, various challenges can compromise the feasibility of measurement from sagittal imaging, including obscured landmarks, anatomical variations, hardware interference, and limited medical resources. Addressing these challenges and with the aim of reducing radiation exposure to patients, our study developed a novel method to estimate PT from antero‐posterior (AP) radiographs, using vertical distances from the pelvic outlet and obturator foramen. We correlated these measurements with PT, defined both anatomically (anterior pelvic plane, PTa) and mechanically (centers of femoral heads and sacral plate, PTm). The study explored creating linear, exponential, and multivariate regression models based on twelve 3D CT‐derived pelvic models (six men, six women), simulating AP radiograph projections with controlled PTs. We then validated these models against 105 pairs of patient stereoradiographs. Statistical analysis revealed that combined exponential‐linear models yielded the most accurate results, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.75 for PTa and 0.77 for PTm, and mean absolute errors of 3.7° ± 2.6° for PTa and 4.5° ± 3.4° for PTm, showing excellent measurement reliability (all ICCs > 0.9) without significant gender discrepancies. In conclusion, this study presents a validated, simple, and accessible method for estimating PT using AP radiograph parameters, supported by the Supporting Information S1: Excel Tool, showing great potential for clinical application in hip and spine procedures. Clinical Significance The proposed approach offers an alternative for estimating PT using AP radiographs, potentially reducing patient radiation exposure and improving surgical precision.