Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant treatment strategies for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Abstract Background This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-co...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of surgery Vol. 110; no. 10; pp. 1316 - 1330 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
US
Oxford University Press
06.09.2023
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
Background
This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT).
Methods
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022.
Results
In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance.
Conclusion
This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance.
This study has demonstrated that total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care. TNT treatment strategies also improve radiological and oncological responses to treatment, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BACKGROUNDThis study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). METHODSA systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022. RESULTSIn total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance. CONCLUSIONThis study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance. This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022. In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance. This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance. Abstract Background This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). Methods A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022. Results In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance. Conclusion This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance. This study has demonstrated that total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care. TNT treatment strategies also improve radiological and oncological responses to treatment, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance. |
Author | Creavin, Ben Ryan, Éanna J Martin, Seán T Ryan, Odhrán K Hanly, Ann O’Reilly, Mary Kennelly, Rory Donnelly, Mark Winter, Des C McDermott, Ray |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mark orcidid: 0000-0002-9824-3312 surname: Donnelly fullname: Donnelly, Mark email: mark.donnelly@ucdconnect.ie – sequence: 2 givenname: Odhrán K orcidid: 0000-0003-2750-4607 surname: Ryan fullname: Ryan, Odhrán K – sequence: 3 givenname: Éanna J orcidid: 0000-0003-2609-0836 surname: Ryan fullname: Ryan, Éanna J – sequence: 4 givenname: Ben orcidid: 0000-0001-8209-4810 surname: Creavin fullname: Creavin, Ben – sequence: 5 givenname: Mary surname: O’Reilly fullname: O’Reilly, Mary – sequence: 6 givenname: Ray surname: McDermott fullname: McDermott, Ray – sequence: 7 givenname: Rory surname: Kennelly fullname: Kennelly, Rory – sequence: 8 givenname: Ann surname: Hanly fullname: Hanly, Ann – sequence: 9 givenname: Seán T surname: Martin fullname: Martin, Seán T – sequence: 10 givenname: Des C surname: Winter fullname: Winter, Des C |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37330950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVUctO3TAQtSpQuTxW3SOvKjYBPxI76a5CFJCQuoF1NLEnNLdOfGs7oMt38YF1ygWpq5nRnId0ziHZm_yEhHzh7JyzRl5063jxMoHlWn8iKy5VVQiu6j2yYozpgkshD8hhjGvGuGSV-EwOpJaSNRVbkdd7n8DRCT3Y9fwEU6LpFwbYbOkThjhHGhNMFoL9HxMQ0oh5iylAwscBI-19WMh0hAke8d_X99R5A85tKdjMNGhpQLNYmuUK37JsevbhNx0xQZGZbhuHuBBD9vXj8JIpxg3TkGWy7wAuHpP9Pg882c0j8vDj6v7yprj7eX17-f2uMKIuUwG9qpitlZasZH2FUAqGHUjbyLoTgpfGGKhRYyNqpjQy3feNaXJ2ZWM7gfKInL3pboL_M2NM7ThEg85BzmKOraiFVqoUSmXo6Q46dyPadhOGEcK2fU86A76-Afy8-fhy1i4VtrnCdleh_AvrNJTR |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2478_fco_2023_0014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctro_2023_100721 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15174375 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijc_ijc_66_24 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000006161 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_023_04558_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_15192 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clcc_2024_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_05139_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15153945 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023 The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023 – notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. |
DBID | NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1093/bjs/znad177 |
DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1365-2168 |
EndPage | 1330 |
ExternalDocumentID | 37330950 10.1093/bjs/znad177 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 23N 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WD 66C 6J9 6P2 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8F7 8UM 930 A01 A03 AABZA AACZT AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAONW AAPGJ AAPXW AAQQT AARHZ AASNB AAUAY AAVAP AAWDT AAYEP AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABNHQ ABOCM ABPQP ABPTD ABPVW ABQNK ABWST ABXVV ACBWZ ACCFJ ACFBH ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACMXC ACPOU ACSCC ACUTJ ACXQS ACYHN ACZBC ADBBV ADEOM ADIPN ADIYS ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADQBN ADVEK ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AFBPY AFFNX AFFZL AFGKR AFPWT AFXAL AFYAG AFYLJ AFZJQ AGMDO AGQXC AGUTN AHMBA AI. AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJAOE AJBDE AJEEA ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMBMR AMYDB APJGH AQDSO ASPBG ATGXG ATUGU AVNTJ AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BCRHZ BDRZF BEYMZ BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FLUFQ FOEOM FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X H13 HBH HF~ HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE IX1 J0M J5H JPC KBUDW KOP KQQ KSI KSN L7B LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N4W N9A NF~ NNB NOMLY O66 O9- OAUYM OCZFY OHH OIG OJZSN OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RGB RIG RIWAO RJQFR ROL ROX RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ TEORI TMA UB1 V2E V8K V9Y VH1 VVN W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI X7M XG1 XV2 YFH YOC YUY ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-af650d8673040f5ea420eba3d938b2214ccca8e7e928067e07ff9c916849db2e3 |
ISSN | 0007-1323 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 23:57:23 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:38:17 EDT 2024 Wed Aug 28 03:15:16 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Language | English |
License | This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights) The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c284t-af650d8673040f5ea420eba3d938b2214ccca8e7e928067e07ff9c916849db2e3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-9824-3312 0000-0001-8209-4810 0000-0003-2750-4607 0000-0003-2609-0836 |
PMID | 37330950 |
PQID | 2827664266 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2827664266 pubmed_primary_37330950 oup_primary_10_1093_bjs_znad177 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-09-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-09-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | US |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: US – name: England |
PublicationTitle | British journal of surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Surg |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
SSID | ssj0013052 |
Score | 2.5283618 |
Snippet | Abstract
Background
This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced... This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared... BACKGROUNDThis study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer,... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed oup |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1316 |
Title | Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant treatment strategies for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37330950 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2827664266 |
Volume | 110 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWcuGCingthWIkbig0cRIn6a0qXVWotFK1K-0tcmJbUNEEkQRp93dx4td1JnZepYfCJdpN4pHW8-14xv5mhpD3TAkWyEw7ATi3TsA85WTgJzu5m0iuEyGZxmzkL-f8dBV8Xofr2ezPiLXU1NnHfHtnXsn_aBXugV4xS_YfNNsLhRvwGfQLV9AwXO-n4xJTGQtVCnnVgEvc5iVikYAPSLZoqmGjYPJOzy2v6q5QRM82vO7pMOhGtivd983AFED7iBVF8FvbYLIwNHLsRC0cMapwAmugLK-_bWFQn33ZtgipJufItqbSqIBFNUrURg_bMHE2txOLLjdm6_ZCfjWn_V4xbNl2D_FBnIiiEMPx1zH8_F-2S73Ng7O7HsxvaV22Zrax1C09zzM9eXpTbimyFrPuyDJ7vsdHqzyE5u6dK4iprpVdwb9osS2E9GyXmUml7vOLdLE6O0uXJ-vlA_KQgZFDOuGnSzacYLkhs_mgIPIABB5YcbdSKf-KaFrPZrlLHtuQhB4ZfD0hM1U8Jb9bbNERbqjFFjXYoh22pu902KIDtihgCwfTAVu01NRii3bYogZb1GDrkFpk0QmycOCALNohixpkPSOrxcny-NSxHT6cHNyi2hEaAgQZc1hmAleHSgTMVZnwJcxnxpgX5GBgYhWpBAkAkXIjrZMcIpo4SGTGlP-c7BRloV4SmgCaVJh5XMYs0DxP3Eho7AXBucpB4py8hVlPf5gaLqnhXvgp6CW1epmTd51GUrCxeHAmYAabKmUxizhHX3ZOXhhV9YL8CJCUhO6re4zeI48GLL8mO_XPRr0Bn7bO9lvw3AAmubJp |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27938,27939 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total+neoadjuvant+therapy+versus+standard+neoadjuvant+treatment+strategies+for+the+management+of+locally+advanced+rectal+cancer%3A+network+meta-analysis+of+randomized+clinical+trials&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Donnelly%2C+Mark&rft.au=Ryan%2C+Odhr%C3%A1n+K&rft.au=Ryan%2C+%C3%89anna+J&rft.au=Creavin%2C+Ben&rft.date=2023-09-06&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1316&rft.epage=1330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbjs%2Fznad177&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |